Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Instead of Impeaching Obama, Let’s Expel Unhinged House Republicans
By: RmuseNov. 16th, 2012more from Rmuse
In the world of thoroughbred dogs, there is an unspoken practice of putting down animals that resist intervention training to prevent the propagation of unwanted behavior due to hereditary flaws. Normally, before destroying an animal, they undergo intensive behavior modification and extensive training to modify conduct that is atypical of breed standards that may prove dangerous if a family pet becomes aggressive towards strangers. There are human beings who fall into the same category as what breeders refer to as “bad animals,” and America is home to an organized group of bad animals in Congress known as Republicans. It is a sad reality that despite two overwhelming election victories, Republicans are still disavowing that Barack Obama was legally elected as President, and instead of modifying their behavior and getting down to doing their job as legislators, they have chosen to spend time attacking the President to delegitimize his presidency.
In the aftermath of the President’s resounding victory over Willard Romney in last week’s election, Republicans are making excuses for why they lost, pretending they were victorious, or attacking the President over the tragic Benghazi attack that claimed four Americans’ lives. Perhaps Republicans are following the will of their supporters who, in a recent Pew poll, said Republicans should stand up to the President and not work with him to solve the nation’s problems, but it is more likely they are picking up where they left off and plan to obstruct the President out of spite. In fact, Republican leaders in Congress announced their intention of using Willard Romney’s tax plan as a model to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff within a day of the election, and it signaled their inability to acknowledge the election was a repudiation of Republican fiscal policies.
For Romney’s part, he spent the past week offering lame excuses for losing the election, and in a conference call with donors impugned minorities, women, and students in a repeat of the infamous 47% speech to high-value donors, and reminded voters why they rejected his candidacy last week. Several Republicans gave lip-service to women and minorities by claiming the GOP had to revamp its message to attract Latinos and women voters, but Romney’s message, and lack of pushback from Republicans, coupled with their congressional leaders adhering to his tax plan, portends more of the same bad behavior from the GOP. However, what defines Republicans’ innate behavioral flaw is their assault on the President for the Benghazi attack to invalidate his re-election.
Republicans are so focused on preventing the President from serving a second term, they are accusing him of lying to create a reason for impeachment and to cover up their failure to fund security for diplomats that certainly played a role in the deadly Benghazi attack. They are also diverting attention from David Petraeus’ failure to keep the diplomats safe. The Petraeus affair embarrassed Republicans who envisioned a political career for the incompetent general, so they are attempting to distract the public and focus on the President and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice. There is more to the Petraeus scandal than Republicans are wont to concede, and it involves at least one high-ranking Republican in Congress; more on that later.
In a highly charged exchange in the House Foreign Affairs hearing on “Benghazi and Beyond” yesterday, Republicans leveled charges at President Obama that reveal their intention to damage his presidency heading into its second term. Several Republicans accused the President of ”intentionally misinforming, read that LIED, to the American people in the aftermath of this tragedy,” and are besmirching U.N. Ambassador, Susan Rice, who they feel is in line to succeed Secretary of State Hilary Clinton by blaming her for being the “person who is the actual vehicle used to misinform the American people during this crisis.” In fact, Alzheimer sufferer Senator John McCain and Lindsey Graham went on the offensive and promised to block Ms. Rice appointment (if it comes) because of her comments when she first informed the nation about Benghazi even though she was merely acting as the government’s spokesperson and reporting what the CIA told her in its briefing. Republicans are making comparisons to Ms. Rice and President Obama’s reports on the Benghazi attack to Watergate to drum up support for impeachment proceedings against the President as a remedy for losing the election, and that is precisely what this is about.
Republicans have disavowed that Barack Obama is the President of the United States since he defeated John McCain in 2008, and they have never altered their aberrant behavior one iota. Whether they sat passively and allowed their surrogates to question the President’s rightful birthplace, or impugned him as un-American, the sentiment is the same; he cannot be the President. Never before in American history has one party so traitorously sought to damage the nation’s economy for three-and-a-half years just to prevent President Obama from winning a second term and they show no signs of relenting in their attempt to delegitimize his presidency. In August, Iowa Representative Steve King proposed introducing a bill, which if it became law, would repeal everything President Obama has signed into law in the ultimate action to eradicate the President’s achievements from the historical record. Republicans have sat on their hands for the President’s entire first term and either outright obstructed or voted no on bills that helped all Americans, caused the nation’s first credit downgrade, and nearly caused a credit default that would have destroyed the full faith and credit of the United States, and they show no signs of letting up before the President’s next term even begins.
It is one thing to work through ideological differences on how to govern the country, but these Republicans are behaving in a manner more in line with enemies of the state than an opposing party, and the country has suffered enough. Their actions are reminiscent of a serial abuser who beats his wife because his football team lost a game and Republicans deserve nothing less than imprisonment for their malfeasance. The election is over and President Obama won, again, but it looks like the GOP will continue punishing the American people for re-electing him for four more years, and along the way they will make every attempt to remove him from office as the ultimate censure of a legal election.
Republicans have had four years to change their behavior, and the election was the ultimate behavior modification to rid them of their bad habit of obstructing progress, but like bad animals they have not changed their bad conduct. The people have spoken, twice, and instead of following the simplest directions possible, to do their jobs, they persist in attempting to change the outcome of an election; first by sabotage, and now by seeking ,to invalidate the election with phony reasons for impeachment. There are already over a hundred reasons in the public record to begin proceedings, and if Democrats were empowered, they could expel every Republican in Congress.
Republicans are calling for Obama's impeachment over Benghazi, even though those calling for impeachment ...
Benghazi gate is not going as Republicans planned, and in fact, the failure to gain traction on their narr ...
President Obama is warning John McCain that if he keeps jabbering on and threatening to block any nomina ...
Fox News has taken their conspiracy claims for impeachment to new crazy places by claiming that Obama bl ...
David Petraeus isn't speaking publicly, but he is setting the record straight. Petraeus debunked the rig ...
George Greene
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 5:46 pm
It is NOT constitutionally POSSIBLE to “impeach” any House member. The closest you could come would be expelling, which takes a 2/3 vote.
The closing phrase, “There are already over a hundred reasons in the public record to begin impeachment proceedings, and if Democrats were empowered, they could impeach every Republican in Congress.”, is a JOKE. There IS NO SUCH THING AS “impeachment proceeings” against ANY member of the House!
Keith Hollingsworth
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 11:12 pm
George,
In the last paragraph, the last sentence reads as such ( There are already over a hundred reasons in the public record to begin proceedings, and if Democrats were empowered, they could expel every Republican in Congress.) It does not say over 100 reasons to begin impeachment proceedings.The previous sentence mentions the Republicans attempt to invalidate Obama’s Presidency by using phony reasons for impeachment, which does leave the meaning of the last sentence confusing if not looked at thoroughly, but not wrong. .Just saying.
Johnee
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 5:58 pm
Here we go again. I wish I could say I was surprised.
Another Democrat was elected to a second term (one that they absolutely hate with a fervor that borders on insanity),and the Repugs start concocting desperate conspiracy theories and witch hunts to look for a reason to impeach the president…thereby wasting the public’s tax dollars and Obama’s precious time.
Gee where in the flying F*** have we seen this before? Hmmmm, let me think.
They are so damn predictable. Do they REEEAALLY think the American people aren’t going to smell this for what it is? Cretins.
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 6:11 pm
Try to remain calm please
46A9MA
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 6:16 pm
What the Republicans have been doing is similar to what the police in crime movies call “obstruction of justice”, which is punishable by law.
Richard
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 6:48 pm
Impeach, remove from office. Those of us with some sense knew what they meant. Very much needed is accountability,for Congress’s in-action.
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 6:49 pm
I think every elected official in this country should be subject to recall. No protections
Kevin Shinn
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 8:14 pm
They are… but only to their constituents.
Abraham Lincoln
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 7:18 pm
I was the Republican that set Black men free. I sure wish those who like
to slam the Republican party would remember this.How short peoples memories are. You should
go watch this thing called a movie. They say
it is about me.
Maybe if I a Republican had not been elected
folks would still be slaves and there still be
a Confederate States of America. Would the
United States and Confederate States been
able to defeat someone you all refer to as
Hitler.
Johnee
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 9:51 pm
WTF? Yeah, and Teddy was one of my favorite presidents too….so what? What on earth does that have to do with anything?
We are talking about the modern – hi-jacked by lunatics and extremists – Republican party.
Comparing the republican party of 150 years ago to today is absurd. The party name is irrelevant. If positions were reversed and the Dems behaved like a bunch of out of touch and backward nut jobs, I would disown them.
Seriously, you are displaying the lack of reason and critical thinking skills, that is making your party the subject of ridicule across the civilized world.
crystalwolfakacaligrl
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 12:31 am
Oh yawn! Someone went to the movies today and learned some History…!
I bet it would surprise the hell out of him to hear that PBO has been compare to Lincoln?
And so the R’s freed the slaves, why is John MCCain ashamed of his AA part of his family?
KatzKids
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 7:08 am
In Abe’s time, it was the Republicans who were the liberals, who stood on the side of the people, and the side of the Union. The Democrats were the party of the traitors, the secessionists, the ones who attempted to tear our country apart.
Over time those Democrats & Republicans switched party names, but kept their attitudes. Today’s Republicans would have hated Lincoln, exactly as their States Rights descendants, using a different name, hated him & assassinated him. Their hatred was as insane and intense as today’s Republicans are against our President. They were and are rabid dogs.
william howard taft
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 7:46 am
You do understand that the republican party was the progressive party until i came around, dont you?
Mike
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 7:54 am
Hey Abraham – since you are now amongst the living here, should we remind you that at the time of your administration, the Republican party was more aligned with the left than it ever has been in modern times, and the democrats of your period were more aligned to the right – a complete paradox of where we are today.
Great job on Habeus Corpus by the way – that was a real killer.
Anne
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 10:51 am
It does no good to focus on the Republican Party of Lincoln when the same party has changed radically 147 years after his assassination. It has become the party of, by, and for the wealthy. In addition, it has become the party of voter suppression of voters who tend to vote for Democrats–many of whom are the descendants of those (like me) whose slavery Lincoln outlawed. It is also now the party that convinces a significant number of white working class and poor Americans to continue voting against their own best interests. So, spare us lecture on what the party stood for in the past. It’s not useful in addressing the problems of 2012.
mjh
Nov. 23rd, 2012 at 12:59 am
“I was the Republican that set Black men free.” — Abraham Lincoln
Abe, it was the the Thirteenth Amendment to the US Constitution (passed 3 years after you helped make Booth famous) that set Black men free: it was law of the land, applied everywhere, and made slavery illegal; your proclamation did none of those three . . .
.
John
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 8:42 pm
Thank you President Lincoln, may I add the democratic party found it hard to let go.
smarterboy09
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 9:07 pm
OMG they are brain dead!! Have they not learned anything at all? This is what happens when your entire party only knows how to do one thing; spin lies and attack the President. Now, after the election is over and the republicans should re-group and move on to something real, they keep falling back into this craziness because THAT’S ALL THEY KNOW HOW DO DO!
I hope somebody starts one of those digital clocks to tabulate how much of the taxpayer money they spend on this crap, if they’re stupid enough to pursue it. Let the American people see exactly how much they’re willing to throw away on their crazy ideological masturbation. And remember, these are the people who said FEMA is too expensive right after a 100 year storm devastated the Atlantic seaboard!
Sugapea
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 9:34 pm
Wow…Thank you, RMUSE.
POLITICUSUSA is the ‘Go-To Political Site’ on the web. Always timely, interesting and spot-on analysis of ‘The Art & Science of Administration of Government’, as the dictionary says.
I sincerely hope that ‘Pub Voters’ are reading here. Because there’s a world-of-difference between our two political parties. Republicans, I hope, are seeing that extreme difference in goals & values for America the Democratic voter’s across this country value most.
When George Dubya and Condi Rice both ignored the infamous dire warnings: “Bin Ladin Determined To Strike with Airplanes in U.S”. *Only* one week before 9/11/01! Democrats did not demand Dubya’s nor Condi’s HEAD, No, disrupting our nation at such a tumultuous period would be totally Un-American…and would weaken our President, while we needed a strong, brave American Front. Nor did Dems cry ***Impeachment***! When we all learned George W. Bush’s own Brother’s Company was in charge of Security covering the Twin Towers!
Yet, look at what Republicans are putting our Tax Money, GOP-Energy, Intention and Focus on.
I truly can’t understand where Pubs are coming from. Shaking-Head….
Is Impeaching our President the new constructive Republican Plan for America?
Mike
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 7:56 am
Actually – there was a cry by Dem House members for impeachment of W, and Nancy P said publicly, “Impeachment is not on the table”
Grandmarge
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 12:04 pm
And rightly so. Spending time and money on impeachment is pointless and damaging to the office of the Presidency. We can all agree that Dubya was an unprincipled moron. There’s no need to impeach or expel anyone. Let the voters choose; I am loath to overturn the will of the people. That is an engine of change that is very difficult to control. I think that we saw in the last election that voters will eventually vote for those who actually do something vs those who just impede forward progress. Unfortunately, it takes time.
mjh
Nov. 23rd, 2012 at 1:26 am
“Spending time and money on impeachment is pointless and damaging to the office of the Presidency.”
Unfortunately — that didn’t stop the GOP.
It isn’t “damaging to the office of the presidency” — it was purposely placed in the Constitution as a legal redress and authorized form of removal of someone who commits a “high crime and/or misdemeanor” while in office.
“We can all agree that Dubya was an unprincipled moron. There’s no need to impeach or expel anyone.”
I figure it this way: if Clinton could get impeached for getting a hummer, surely Dumbya SHOULD have been impeached for such things as
- starting two preemptive wars based on fake intel
- wiretapping US citizens without warrants
- extraordinary rendition
- outing a covert CIA agent for political retribution
You know — things that actually ARE illegal . . .
.
.
julia patterson-massey
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 10:01 pm
how about recalling the republicans that are causing all the un-american disruptions that are making our country look stupid. americans that have worked and served our country are in jeopardy. the republican party once again is responsible for this ridiculous circus that is going on. seceding threats, racism, and blocking sensible solutions. keep lincoln out of the discussion he was right. gop you are wrong.
you are not helping this country at all….
Keith Hollingsworth
Nov. 16th, 2012 at 11:16 pm
The article is not written wrong. He only says there are 100 reasons to begin expulsion proceedings on every Republican in Congress.
crystalwolfakacaligrl
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 12:27 am
RMuse, heh, great article! Got the “paranoid one’s” panties in a twist!
So much so, they can’t be bothered to read!
Good job.
8)
Thomas
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 1:09 am
yes, when you read this article as it is worded the author is quite correct. There are over 100 things on the record to begin impeachment proceedings against the Republicans if the Democrats were so empowered. But since the Democrats are not so empowered, there can be no impeachments. Funny thing about reading, you have to actually keep an open mind and follow the words and not assume what they are saying. And even though there is no “Constitutional Authority” to impeach House and Senate members, there is the authority to charge people with Treason, and being convicted of such would automatically remove that person from their seat in Washington.
galactusx
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 1:24 am
You miss the point. These hateful idiots have done everything to stop this President from helping the American people..that in itself is treasonous and criminal. If they cannot be impeached then we need to put out a public record of their votings and other crimes and let the public vote them out. A scarlet letter if you will to shame them until they get removed. No Repubs in power ever again!
Hamish MacKenzie
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 3:13 am
How about let’s not impeach anyone (particular since congress can’t be impeached) and get on to the affairs of the day. Quit with the partisan bull. It’s getting as bad on the left of the political spectrum than on the right.
fedded-up
Nov. 20th, 2012 at 2:07 pm
That was one of the dumbest comments I’ve read in a while.
TimpFeee
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 6:54 am
Man that makes no sense dude.
www.Anon-Day.tk
mjh
Nov. 23rd, 2012 at 1:38 am
Neither does you posting an ad . . .
.
timothy a kannon
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 3:39 pm
If the Republicans know nothing else it’s self interest and it would be in the best interest of them to be a part of the solution here rather then part of the problem.2014 is just around the corner and as they well know, if one political party is all u…See More
Inez
Nov. 17th, 2012 at 9:16 pm
Just recently I satnext to a Mrs Bush lok alike, as she was looking through a magazine with Mrs. O on the cover. She turned a page and said loudly,”what a disgrace to have that man and his wife in the White House.” Unable to stifle my feelings, I said, “I voted for him and if those one-track minded,Republican woudl pass some of’the bills in their hopper we wouldn,t be in the shape we’re in!” She huffed, assuming, I guess . to be one of her ilk! I really have to wonder who the (the OLD REPS) think are problem.
Big Tenor
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 3:14 am
As much as I hate to say it, and no i don’t want to start a flame war. Don’t be shocked if someone tries to take a shot at the President. Or a “terrorist” act comes to America to try and create distraction.
Old boy Rumsfeld cant account for 2.3 trillion at the pentagon and the very next day kaboom air planes are hitting buildings. People are shadier than ever before in this country. Do I love my President? yes I do. Am I paranoid? you bet!
Any Time the KKK and the Panthers come out of their holes you know things are not looking good.
Just my personal example of how crazy people are: My across the street neighbor buy’s a gun a month and is a big time Romney guy. He knows I’m for Obama. He said flat out to me that he never wants to speak to me again:) Days before I was fixing all his kids bikes and everything was normal. He yelled at the top of his lungs at my next door neighbor for voting Obama and said he was going to call INS to do what ever he could to get my neighbor deported:) he’s and his family are from lebanon and been here since the 70′s
To top it off this nut job is a Vietnam Vet. Am I worried right now YOU BET I am.
mjh
Nov. 23rd, 2012 at 2:20 am
“As much as I hate to say it, and no i don’t want to start a flame war. Don’t be shocked if someone tries to take a shot at the President.”
Much as I hate to say it, I wouldn’t be.
Rightwing billionaires like the Kochs spent a lot of money bankrolling this campaign for the GOP — and when they spend money, they want a return on that investment.
If they feel they didn’t get it one way, they might just resort to having secret meetings to plot how to get it another way — like the men in the 1973 movie Executive Action:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8...
.
D. W. Skinner
Nov. 22nd, 2012 at 11:12 am
The republicans now know how to do nothing BUT fail. Everything they choose to do..will fail… everything they choose to believe …will fail.. every plan they make… will fail… every hope they have…will fail…
James Threadgill
Nov. 24th, 2012 at 8:39 pm
The solution is to bring all the faith and ferocity we brought to the Presidential Election to the mid-terms and turn the bastards out. There are no half measures; we must take our government back from Bible thumpers, plutocrats, and racists.
regressivewatch.org
Aaron Michael Carver, Jr.
Nov. 24th, 2012 at 10:03 pm
Is there such thing as unbiased journalism anymore? Can politics be discussed without referring to opposite minded thinkers as trained and brainwashed dogs? I myself am a conservative minded Libertarian and I’m disgusted with this article outright. The main questions and concerns rising behind the Obama Administration’s unwillingness to act on the Benghazi incident is a matter of public interest, not JUST Republican. The legitimacy over the Elections this time around has been a matter of concern as well due to current systems in place that make voter fraud easily done. The Benghazi incident has failed to receive proper attention and investigation due to the elections taking up media spotlight and public eye. The investigation being sponsored by both Republican and Non-Republican members of the congress would have happened regardless of who was president. If the Obama Administration was involved in plausible criminal activity, then it’s within the American’s people’s interest to voice concern. Calling that concern out as an attack in retaliation against Obama winning the election is not justified. It doesn’t matter if Obama or Romney was president, this investigation was going to come up regardless of who won. Trying to play it off as anything less than what it is is dodgy and questionable, and with how this article is written, it’s unreasonable as well.