Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
John Boehner Whips Up a Batch of Desperate Lies After Getting Busted on the Sequester
Police officers often apprehend car thieves in stolen cars, or shoplifters wearing stolen merchandise, and instantly face a barrage of lies and excuses that are so unbelievably bizarre it is almost enough to make one embarrassed for the criminal frantic to avoid arrest. Yesterday, Speaker of the House John Boehner penned an op/ed in the Wall Street Journal that was tantamount to a criminal attempting to lie his way out of trouble after being caught red-handed, and if the subject were not so serious, one might pity Boehner’s peculiar attempt at logic and desperate pack of lies in his screed, but sequestration cuts are serious; Boehner is not. What Americans can take away from Boehner, and Republicans as a group, is that they are aware their rigid obstructionism and hostage-taking are bearing fruit in plain view of the public and their feeble attempt to cast blame on the President portrays them as lost and desperate.
The theme of Boehner’s fantasy-filled essay was “it’s all Obama’s fault,” and that Republicans are well-aware of the sequester’s devastating effects “that threatens U.S. national security, thousands of jobs and more,” but still the GOP are determined to allow the $1.2 trillion sequester go into effect unless President Obama agrees to an equal amount of entitlement spending cuts. Many Republicans are scoffing at the paltry $85 billion in domestic cuts, but Boehner opined the amount is indeed “deep” and devastating, but unlike Boehner and Republicans, President Obama wants to avoid them making Republicans look unreasonable and deliberately imposing unnecessary damage to national security and the economy.
Boehner, wrote that it was unfortunate the President “has put forth no detailed plan that can pass Congress,” but the President has proposed a plan that asks both sides to compromise, as have Senate and House Democrats, as well as the Congressional Progressive Caucus, but Republicans have offered nothing. Boehner claimed “House Republicans have twice passed plans to replace the sequester with common-sense cuts and reforms that protect national security” and through his spokesman said, “We support replacing the indiscriminate cuts in the sequester with smarter cuts and reforms (of an equal amount). That’s what we did with the sequester replacement bills written by Chairman Ryan that we passed last year.”
Last year was 112th Congress, and any eighth-grader knows bills, replacement or otherwise, passed in one house of Congress in the last session are moot in the current session, but when your only point of argument is fallacy, there’s little reason attend reality, and if Republicans do support replacement cuts: where is their proposal? The GOP is hopelessly clueless and desperate to avoid the blame they know the American people will saddle them with, and in lieu of even giving the appearance of a plan, or care about America, their last-ditch effort is blaming the President. However, even some Republicans understand the gravity of the sequester and that it does not fall under the purview of the President and one spoke up. Justin Amash (R-MI), is no friend of the Obama Administration, but he sees the folly of blaming the President for the sequester. He said, “it’s a mistake on the part of Republicans to try to pin the sequester on Obama, it’s totally disingenuous. The debt ceiling deal in 2011 was agreed to by Republicans and Democrats, you can’t vote for something and, with a straight face, go blame the other guy for its existence in law.” Amash has only been in Congress since 2011, so maybe he missed the memo that part and parcel of being a Republican is “blaming the other guy” for everything; especially Republican economic malfeasance.
The serious nature of the debt ceiling situation in 2011 will go down as a watershed moment for Republican malfeasance because for the first time in American history, every member of the Republican caucus held the debt ceiling hostage and gave President Obama the price for ransoming the credit and good faith of the United States. If the President failed to give Republicans more than $2 trillion in debt reduction, Republicans would crash the economy on purpose leading Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to boast, “I think some of our members may have thought the default issue was a hostage you might take a chance at shooting, most of us didn’t think that. What we did learn is this — it’s a hostage that’s worth ransoming,” and said “he could imagine doing this again.” In fact, he promised that “it set the template for the future. The President will not get the debt ceiling increased without spending cuts in 2013, so we’ll be doing it all over.” Republicans balked at a balanced approach to deficit reduction en masse in the debt limit crisis and during super-committee negotiations that set the course for the sequester to go into effect in eight days.
Republicans own the sequestration cuts and despite Boehner’s accusation it falls on President Obama, they cannot convince anyone it is not their intransigence that will damage national security and the economy. Perhaps Boehner took the time to pen his screed because a 2011 presentation he gave regarding the Republican’s use of the sequester as a strategy surfaced that has his name, literally, all over it. Boehner’s desperation was most evident in blaming the President’s demand for a balance of revenue and cuts to avoid the sequester, and it proves Republicans still cannot accept November’s election results. He said, “The president has repeatedly called for tax revenue, but the American people don’t support trading spending cuts for higher taxes,” and it leads one to wonder if Republicans are even in the same universe as the rest of America. Besides the results of the election, the people have overwhelmingly supported a balanced approach to deficit reduction and especially new revenue Republicans reject out of hand.
Boehner is the worst Speaker of the House since Newt Gingrich, and his inability to work with the President, or control his caucus, cannot possibly come at a more inopportune time. He can attempt to lay blame on the President and Democrats, but they have proposed several options to avoid sequester cuts while Republicans are pointing fingers instead of even attempting to stop certain damage to national security and the economy their sequester will bring. Yesterday the Department of Defense notified Congress it will be furloughing its civilian workforce of 800,000 employees if sequestration goes into effect on March 1, and House Democrats called for Congress to return from their vacation to get to work to prevent the damage the across-the-board sequester brings in eight days. Boehner’s answer is to blame the President and bemoan the “deep and devastating” cuts to national security and the economy, and write a 900-word op/ed full of mendacity that defies reality and demonstrates Republicans are desperate and guilty.
In an exclusive interview with Jake Tapper on CNN, Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) replied to a question a ...
Speaker of the House John Boehner put out a statement that blaming Obama for the fight delays that he ca ...
Despite the fact that a PowerPoint presentation from 2011 surfaced today with his name on it, John Boehn ...
On the same day that John Boehner told the Senate to get off its ass, he refused to allow the House to v ...
Harry Reid fired back at John Boehner's attempt to blame the Senate for the sequester by saying, "The sp ...
bluerose
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 10:48 am
dont bully him, hes gonna cry….lol, get lost Boner.
Petersst
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 11:19 am
This article has little or no facts, but lots of opinion. More of the same from the far left. When are they going to get real in addressing the real issue the US has now? Spending much more than we can possibly get in tax revenue by pulling money out of the economy and wasting it in inefficient ogovernment programs.
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 11:30 am
So, the government DOES create jobs!
The government has been trying to interject money in to the economy. The far right is doing everything hey can to stop it.
Speaking of facts, what are the inefficient programs?
LAC
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 12:26 pm
I think he needs time to digest the latest Faux news talking points first. You know how hard them facts is. :)
terry
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 6:10 pm
Shiva, The government cannot create a job. Name one. It can only take money from the paychecks of the wage earner and transfer it to someone of their choice. This is not job creation, its government control and that’s what Obama and his minions are all about. To “create” a job with “revenue” that you don’t have is simply taking the job from our children’s generation and selfishly using it for your own desires. Selfishness is a characteristic of most liberals. Taking from those who earn it and give it to selfish in exchange for votes..
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 6:21 pm
The Erie canal,Transcontinental railroad,Hoover dam,Tennessee Vally Authority,The Interstate Highway System,Aerospace industry,The Internet,WPA projects and on and on.Hey Silly rabbit read history and STFU till you do
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 11:30 am
Reading is fundamental.The President has already cut 1.7 trillion dollars .Spending is at a slower level since the 50;s
Obama spending binge never happened
Rex Nutting
Commentary: Government outlays rising at slowest pace since 1950s
articles.marketwatch.com/...
Please show me although corporate profits are up
Corporate Profits Soar as Executives Attack Obama Policy
www.bloomberg.com/news/20...
Where is the investment in the economy not named the Caymans?
Bmalpone
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 5:48 pm
What planet are you on, The slowest spending since the 50′s. Get your head out of the sand and wake up. Never have we spent so much. And never have we spent so much and got poor returns. And yes Republicans will block wastefulness and misguided spending, regulations,and laws. And i thank them for that.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 6:38 pm
I didnt say it.The Wall Street Journal said it.The same paper that has the same owner as Fox.Rupert Murdoch.I guess they are part of the liberal media to.LOL.
Reading IS fundamental
Jamal Igle
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 12:35 pm
We don’t have a spending problem, which is lie #1, we have a Revenue problem. The Congress could raise taxes and import tariffs, increasing the revenue going into the Treasury, but choose not to. The Congress is responsible for this. The president can present a budget, but it’s not in his control. the Congress writes the budget and sets the spending limit. They (The Congress ) created this, not the President.
Bmalpone
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 5:54 pm
We have a spending problem…. We had the greatest increase in revenue after bush cut taxes, FACT.look it up. Look at all the cities and states that try to fix their spending problems with higher taxes. They all are failing, Chicago, Detroit, Camden, Bridgeport, Youngstown,LA, CA,NJ,CT,NY, all democratic wasteland. Not only has the revenue dried up all the thinkers and producers have left. Than who do you tax.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 6:33 pm
No.You make a claim you provide the evidence.
M
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 1:02 am
I agree with you 100%. This is filled with opinions no facts. Liberals are all over the place.
They can’t admit their mr. o lied to all of us during last years campaign, when he said that this sequester was needed. I hope the GOP do not succumb to his tactics of lies, lies and more lies. Let it happen. M
notable damntexan
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 11:29 am
You are a fool just helping the criminals in DC stir division. Both parties are the same. DC is a two head serpent that does whatever it takes to charm its prey.
only fools would think otherwise.
LAC
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 12:24 pm
My God, you must make Christmas so special for the people around you.
Just A Dumb Fireman
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 2:49 pm
We think, on the basis of your having typed “two head” instead of “two-headed”, that you are either careless or illiterate. In either case, you lead us to believe that your opinions are not well-researched, and therefore not worth considering seriously.
Texan in Virginia
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 5:00 pm
I’m sad but not surprised to see you’re a Texan. with the pitiful Republican politicians you guys keep voting into office, you have to do whatever it takes to make yourself believe what you’re saying.
Sea Lion
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 12:12 pm
washingtonexaminer.com/ar...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 12:27 pm
img41.imageshack.us/img41...
T'mershi Duween
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 12:21 pm
It’s Kleptocracy vs Plutocracy out there these days. I love reading comments like the ones here, they so ably demonstrate how the rubed citizenry seeks to deal with the contortions in moral reasoning necessary to justify their chosen side.
Joel McKiney
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 12:37 pm
This phenomenon of troll responses has become so ubiquitous that I have to assume that this is a paid job (and probably poorly paid, judging from the educational levels of the posts), and not the real positions of real readers. I am curious about such “stock trolls.” Is there a database of troll usernames?
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 12:45 pm
I don’t know but when articles with key words are in it they will be out in force saying the same thing like a telemarketer .
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 12:47 pm
LOL no, but there used to be one for Yahoo message board trolls!
Nancye
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 1:12 pm
It’s very easy to fix the economical, get rid of Republicans. Then put new trade laws in effect. Tax the wealthy, lower tax rate on middle class, add to the infrastructural as in railway, cheaper gas prices, more efficient cars, clean up wall street, keep down lending fees, stay out of wars, give farmers money to grow more organic food and meat, stop chemical abuse and threatening the American food and causes more disease. Free health care for all, lower ins rates on everything. Use bartering system like in the old days. stop immigration. Feed and cloth the poor at home first. Stop sending all this aid over seas, better and free education. Better jobs, better pay and better benefits. Stop over paying , Congress, anybody else over paid. Needs to be more equal among people. The rich get richer and the poor gets poorer. Rebuild our own country and let others build their own, we should not be responsibility for stupidity over seas. After all when going gets rough, who is really their for us?
NO ONE !
Just A Dumb Fireman
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 2:53 pm
Will you marry me?
terry
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 6:22 pm
All this is caused by Republicans? Check it out. Try real hard to objectively look into a couple facts. Don’t use this web sight. It is as hateful, intolerant and bias as they come.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 6:56 pm
TWO-STEP APPROACH TO
HOLD PRESIDENT OBAMA ACCOUNTABLE
www.thedailybeast.com/con...
I got 98% of what I wanted
This next one is for you.Remember ,Reading Is Fundamental
The Confused Person’s Guide to Sequester Politics
www.slate.com/articles/ne...
George
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 1:46 pm
Everyone is missing the point of Boehner’s article in the Wall Street Journal. The point is he’s ready to deal. The President needs to come to Congress with a deal. Obviously, this will include cuts to federal spending. So, what’s going to be cut? How much? The President needs to govern, not just demagogue the opposition. No one cares that the President is responsible for the Seqestration. It’s time for him to get a deal done.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 1:53 pm
Silly rabbit. 1.7 trillion has already been cut.The question you should be asking is why the oil companies need 85 billion in tax cuts when they made 100′s of billions in profits.Why should corporate jets get a tax break.Why are farm subsidies going to agribusiness?Why are people like Michelle Bachmann get a farm subsidy when she grows nothing on her farm?
George
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 2:45 pm
I agree with everything djchefron says. Let’s end the tax breaks to big oil, let’s remove the tax breaks for corporate jets, let’s reduce farm subsidies. Djchefron has good ideas, but we’re just the little people and don’t have the qualifications to suggest specifics, especially in the entitlement programs that need immediate attention. Again, the question is, when will the President come to Congress and make a deal? When will he step up with ideas such as these and take responsibility for governing? It’s up to our elected leaders. To his credit, Boehner is ready to do a deal. How about the President?
Just A Dumb Fireman
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 2:54 pm
One doesn’t do deals with bullies and people who have evil intent.
Next disingenuous question?
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 3:21 pm
Boehner cant make a deal because his caucus wont let him make a deal.Haven’t you been paying attention.The teabaggers killed Boehners own bill during the fiscal cliff debacle.A bill BTW WAS A TEABAGGERS WET DREAM.
You can pontificate all you want about the President showing leadership but that dog don’t hunt.You cheered the teabaggers hollering “WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK”So now you have to live with your choices.Sucks to be a republican right now.
You invited what you thought was the popular girl to the dance and then she turns into a real biotch and now you don’t know what to do.
aspromised
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 6:29 pm
No, “entitlement programs” do not require immediate attention. Unless…maybe you’re referring to all those CORPORATE entitlements and loopholes? Typical GOP thinking to go after average-Joe citizens first.
terry
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 6:32 pm
Why do the Democrats not want to cut all loopholes and go to a percentage for everyone? Me thinks its because they want to keep their own money, but fool you into thinking only Republicans are rich. Oh, why aren’t you talking about the cowardly Senate passing a budget for the last 4 years? Bush’s fault right?
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 6:40 pm
Because a flat tax would be regressive for the middle class dummy
terry
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 6:22 pm
Well said George!
Cheryl
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 1:53 pm
Beohner is such a cry baby. He is the worst speaker ever. The Rep and Teabaggers always blame Obama when the get egg on their face. They never want to accept blame for anything, case in point Iraq.
Just A Dumb Fireman
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 2:55 pm
Böhner is a disgrace, a failure, and a lying, ineffectual, shameless whore to his corporate puppeteers. I’m glad I’m not a relative of his; I’d have to share in the embarrassment of the family.
Lynda
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 3:03 pm
The fact that Bonehead Boehner is a liar is news because????
j
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 3:47 pm
Let’s see – what was the vote on the sequester – it seems to me it was dems -0 repubs -218.
Guess Obama forced them to vote for it.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 3:56 pm
Damn!!!I did not know that.Make their ass own this crap
H.R. 6684 (112th): Spending Reduction Act of 2012 (On Passage of the Bill)
www.govtrack.us/congress/...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 5:07 pm
Watching Hardball right now and Michael Steele just said that some DEMOCRATS VOTED FOR SEQUESTRATION.LIE LIE LIE.We proved that is not true and tweety didn’t do his job and correct him
SMFH Eon your job media,producers DO YOUR EFFING JOB
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 5:14 pm
Correction I was wrong the vote that I quoted was an amended vote on the original deal.The original deal breaks down like this
The House passed the Budget Control Act[1] on August 1, 2011 by a vote of 269–161. 174 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted for it, while 66 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted against it.[14]
I apoligise for the error
Sherlock
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 6:10 pm
Gee whiz wilickers— the ” Tan Man” lied. The GOP lied. Wake me when you have some news.
Sammy
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 3:30 pm
I don’t understand why newspapers like the Wall Street Journal, the New york Times and other media allow themselves to used to sdpread lies? Especially when they know that they are printing lies.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 3:55 pm
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!” – Upton Sinclair.
This right here just answered your question
majii
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 10:54 pm
I can’t think of a better example of proof of ownership than a PowerPoint presentation that discusses details of the sequester with the title “Two Step Approach to Hold President Obama Accountable.” This PowerPoint presentation was produced and presented by our Speaker, John Boehner, and it doesn’t surprise me that he’s now running away from it as fast as he can. It’s what cowards do, they throw rocks, braking windows in houses, and when the homeowners come to investigate, they run and hide. The sequester deal never included Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, or Pell grants, yet,these are the programs that republicans now want to cut the most.
thepoliticalcarnival.net/...
It seems like someone wants to renege on the deal that was made in 2011 and is angry that the president won’t allow him to. What many Americans don’t know is that during the fiscal cliff negotiations, republicans sent aides to the WH to ask the president whether he’d be willing to offer them the same deal he offered to them in 2011. He refused, and I’ve never been more proud of President Obama than I was when I discovered that he refused to do it. I think he thought what I was thinking when I read about this–they should have accepted his offer in 2011, then we could have avoided the sequester and all of its’ nasty fallout. Proactive is not a word I associate with our Speaker, but I definitely think the word reactive fits him to a “T.”
teachtofish
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 1:50 pm
Wait a minute….who’s lying about the sequester??? :www.washingtonpost.com/op...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 1:59 pm
Wait a minute! What was the reason for the sequester?Oh yeah, republicans threatening the countries financial stability by reneging on the debt in 2011.BTW Their mission was partly successful seeing the United States credit rating was downgraded
The sequester, explained
www.washingtonpost.com/bl...
teachtofish
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 1:54 pm
According to Bob Woodward of the Washington Post, who has researched the history of the sequester specifically as to who actually proposed it, it is the Obama Administration that introduced it:www.washingtonpost.com/op...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 2:03 pm
img856.imageshack.us/img8...