Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Keith Olbermann Takes On Rupert Murdoch’s Growing International Scandals
The Rupert Murdoch owned News of the World phone hacking corruption scandal has gone international.
On a day when David Cameron distanced himself from Rebekah Brooks, former editor of News of the World, the news just keeps getting worse for Rupert Murdoch and his son, James. The snowball of scandals is now international.
In an attempt to stem the disaster and possibly save their BSkyB deal, the Murdochs chose to close News of the World, leaving employees and reporters out of work and 2.7 million readers without their paper. Those reporters have stories to tell and since they are now out of work, they have little reason to protect their former employer. As the hacking scandal heats up, people will be racing to tell their side of the story. This doesn’t bode well for the Murdochs.
Friday, the Guardian reported that Murdoch’s son, James Murdoch, CEO of the US owned News Corp “could face corporate legal battles on both sides of the Atlantic that involve criminal charges, fines and forfeiture of assets…” James has already admitted misrepresenting facts relating to the phone hacking incidents to Parliament.
As deputy chief operating officer of News Corp – the US-listed company that is the ultimate owner of News International (NI), which in turn owns the News of the World, the Times, the Sunday Times and the Sun – the younger Murdoch has admitted he misled parliament over phone hacking, although he has stated he did not have the complete picture at the time. There have also been reports that employees routinely made payments to police officers, believed to total more than £100,000, in return for information.
The payments could leave News Corp – and possibly James Murdoch himself – facing the possibility of prosecution in the US under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) – legislation designed to stamp out bad corporate behaviour that carries severe penalties for anyone found guilty of breaching it – and in the UK under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 which outlaws the interception of communications….
While the UK phone-hacking scandal has been met with outrage in the US, the hacking itself is unlikely to prompt Washington officials into action. But because NI is a subsidiary of the US company, any payments to UK police officers could trigger a justice department inquiry under the FCPA.
The 1977 Act generally prohibits American companies and citizens from corruptly paying – or offering to pay – foreign officials to obtain or retain business. The Butler University law professor Mike Koehler, an FCPA expert, said: “I would be very surprised if the US authorities don’t become involved in this [NI] conduct.”
To add to their troubles, Bob Brown, senator and leader of Australia’s Green party, has called on the government to investigate Rupert Murdoch’s media holdings in Australia. The BBC reported Friday that “Mr Brown said the potential for similar activity in Australia should be probed.” Speaking to Reuters News agency, he added, “We have the most Murdoch media ownership of any country in the world with eight of the 12 metropolitan dailies owned by the Murdoch empire. I think that it’s just prudent to take a raincheck at this stage, because the events unfolding in London are so serious, and it would be irresponsible for us not to look at the potential for similar operations to have occurred in Australia.”
The Australian government has put a hold on Murdoch’s Sky News bidding to run a previous ABC contract for a government-funded international TV service. The UK has also put a hold on Murdoch’s takeover of BSkyB after Ofcom raised concerns as to whether News Corp is a fit-and-proper owner for BSkyB. The 14 billion dollar take over is the biggest deal in Murdoch’s career and today, BSkyB’s stock fell 8%.
Keith Olbermann, barely able to contain his smile over the mere notion that justice might be served finally in regards to Murdoch, interviewed Murdoch biographer Michael Wolff on Current TV Friday night:
Raw Story’s David Edwards broke down Keith Olbermann’s interview with Murdoch biographer Michael Wolff on Current TV:
“This is a company that’s all about — it’s about power,” Wolff explained. “You hurt me, you diss me, we smack you down.” He added, “These people will do anything.”
“Is James Murdoch really at legal risk?” Olbermann asked.
“I think it’s an exaggeration, somewhat,” Wolff replied, but he quickly noted, “Anything could happen now. … The unimaginable is now occurring.”
“This is the snowball effect,” Wolff said, explaining that when it comes to Rupert Murdoch, “these politicians … in the UK have had to put up with this guy for a long time. He’s never been pleasant about it. He’s always extracted blood. So finally there’s an opportunity. ‘We can get rid of this guy.’”
Wolff concluded by saying that we can expect “new revelations every day” as “more shoes drop.”
The UK has already put a hold on Murdoch’s BSkyB takeover, Australia is now probing the Aussie Murdoch empire and the US could file charges. And this story is just getting started.
Watch the people running away the fastest and those whom Rupert & Co do not dump (Brooks), because those clues will tell you the real story of just how deep the criminal corruption scandal goes. The Murdoch empire is under great strain and it’s only going to get worse if Murdoch continues to deal with things as he has been. The Murdoch boat is taking on water and he may not be able to contain the damage.
Rupert Murdoch Bleeding Cash To Save Plummeting News Corp Stock MPs have invited the beleaguered News ...
Things are unraveling at warp speed for Rupert Murdoch. After discovering that illegally hacked phon ...
You know things are bad when a man who dominates world media is publicly claiming that he is a victim. T ...
For the first time in almost 20 years, summonses were issued by a parliamentary select committee. The ...
Rupert Murdoch (Fox News) Hrafnkell Haraldsson- Naughty. Rupert Murdoch redefined naughty with his a ...
Rocky in Texas said...
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 1:20 am
Man…
I Love Karma !!
Peter Hockley
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 10:34 pm
No man, Hubris!
Moongal6
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 2:50 am
This story is sure having trouble getting ‘legs’ on our side of the pond.
Let’s hope America is paying attention.
Angel
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 12:34 pm
Fear not; like a tsunami, the waves from the London earthquake will make their way to our shores in time. The work put in by the Guardian and others who would not let this story die give me faith that hard-hitting, public-interest-serving, investigative journalism is not dead.
Sally
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 7:08 am
Couldn’t happen to a sleazier family (can this take down Breitbart and FauxNoise too…hopefully before they can damage our elections?)
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 7:42 am
It can’t be! You’re just saying this to make us feel good!
Scorpie
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 8:18 am
Can the granting(can’t think of another word this early in the a.m.) of US citizenship be revoked? Who was it that ‘fast-tracked’ Murdochs’ citizenship request?
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 9:12 am
Denaturalization can occur only if it is shown that the initial naturalization was obtained fraudulently- say, if it was based on false data, or the oath of citizenship was taken with real allegiance reserved for a foreign sovereign (e.g., to aid in espionage or sabotage).
la Zingaro
Jul. 10th, 2011 at 9:12 am
He could sure spend some time in his naturalized country’s prison. Yeha!
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 8:21 am
This is exactly whats wrong with our lot here. A complete lack of competition and the Murdoch trying to own all the major players there will never be a dissenting voice.
I hope England quashes his bid to own their media as well. Empires like this cannot be allowed to determine the voices of the people. I hope Olbermann makes a clean expose with this
bee
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 12:26 pm
britain not england :)
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 12:35 pm
Have we had this argument before?
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 12:42 pm
They’re not coterminous, since Scotland has a separate body of law, but in this case, I suspect you’re right.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 1:04 pm
The brits I talk to daily have no problem with England
They dont much care for Britannica rules the waves though
bee
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 3:43 pm
it’s very easy to say britain – it’s the british parliament for example, and the country is called the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland….. if you called the welsh or the scots “english” they would not be happy :)
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 5:41 pm
when I refer to the English, I only refer to the British. Not the Scottish, nor the Irish or the Welsh. Of course if you are English the Welsh dont exist anyways
bee
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 6:02 pm
shiva – you seem very confused
the english, the welsh, the scots and the northern irish are all britons. you can’t refer to the english and mean all britons…
it’s like me calling people “californians” when i mean every american…..
i don’t know what brits you regularly talk to but no scots or welsh will accept being called english…
i appreciate it might not appear to be a major issue but it irks…..:)
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 6:43 pm
And I wouldnt call any scot or welsh brits or english. Thats where you are confused. Brits live in England. Britons have been the English since the division of the welsh and scots. The brits do not consider the Welsh or scots as Brits or as english. Not the ones I know
bee
Jul. 10th, 2011 at 5:11 am
I’m sorry this is nuts….are you referring to Ancient Britons or the current inhabitants of the British Isles or citizens of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or what?????????
I am a British Citizen – my passport says that, I was born in Scotland and consider myself to be Scottish. However I am also British but not English..
When you say “I hope England quashes his bid to own their media as well…..” by your defintition you are excluding the Scots and Welsh from this. It is a British issue ie one involving the whole of Great Britain.
Also by your definition I should be referring to Native Americans as “Americans” and everyone else by some other epithet….
molly malone
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 8:42 am
@ Scorpie.
I read somewhere that Newt Gingrich was the one who fast-tracked Murdoch’s U.S. citizenship. If that’s true we owe Newt a tar and feathering.
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 9:19 am
If Rupert Murdoch was naturalized by anyone with the intent of enabling him to subvert the democratic process… well, that’s legally interesting, too, isn’t it?
Scorpie
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 11:10 pm
A commenter on another blog posted this link www.realchange.org/gingri...
Interesting read and a lot of info on Newt.
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 11:29 pm
Clearly, Newt sold a citizenship to Murdoch that enabled the latter to establish his Evil Empire here. Meanwhile, all those reminders that Newt has a penis are damned hard to take.
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 9:24 am
One of the most powerful blows that could be struck for democracy, a free press, and the American commonweal at this point would be the dimemberment of the Murdoch empire. Now is not the time for the Obama administration or Eric Holder to play nicey- nice.
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 10:13 am
In fact, disabling the Evil Empire is the greatest blow against stochastic terrorism, the spiral of silence, and the subversion of journalism anyone could make. My electronic means are limited, but if someone will go to www.signon.org and draft a petition to Eric Holder to apply the full rigor of the law to this corruperate octopus and then furnish us the link, we can all sign and pass that link along. I understand that NewsCorp is already in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and doubtless that’s not even scratching the surface.
Matthew Steeples
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 12:49 pm
Interesting take. Murdoch’s turning into a Citizen Kane like figure. Check out my view at dasteepsspeaks.blogspot.c...
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 3:00 pm
I wish it did. I was brought up on a set of 1943 Brittanicas, and a finer compendium was never published (these were authentic old British editions, though published in Chicago because of the War. I still have them.)
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 3:03 pm
Misposted, as usual. Should have gone to Shiva’s comment on Brittanica rules the waves.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 5:28 pm
if you don’t get a computer I’m going to ban you for six months
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 11:01 pm
I have two. They’re just not on line.
David Ashton
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 10:47 pm
Rupert Murdoch is entirely responsible for this situation. He has always directed the editorial approach for all his media (being very much a hands-on owner), and he created the environment where such a thing would happen.
He is responsible for the Fox network’s right wing propaganda and it’s distortion of the truth or outright lying.
That is the only way he is responsible. He is not someone who should own any media let alone most of it. I wish we could sue him for false advertising (“Fair and Balanced”), and for misleading viewers. If there is any explosion of violence or violent action by right-wing groups he will in part be to blame.
I hope and pray that the British PM does not shy away from following it through to the end and shielding Murdoch from the consequences.
Reynardine
Jul. 9th, 2011 at 11:05 pm
The Guardian suggests the Murdochs are destroying millions of e-mails even as we speak.
Peter
Jul. 10th, 2011 at 1:34 am
Rupert Murdoch controls over 70% of media here in Australia.
He has for years held power over Australian politicians and his journalists consider that they should run the Government’s agenda.
Our Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, does not play the Murdoch media game as they would like it, nor does Bob Brown, the leader of the Greens Party. As a result, Murdoch media blatantly deningrates everything the Government does and has vowed, in “The Australian” newspaper to destroy the Greens Party.
Mr Murdoch is a conservative. Many leaks against the Labor Government have arisen over the pat 3 years since they were elected. It is reported that former Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd thinks his phone was hacked. Bob Brown is right – there needs to be a comprehensive enquiry into Murdoch media in Australia.
No one person should control 70% of a country’s media.
Reynardine
Jul. 10th, 2011 at 7:16 am
If that is proven, would Australian law support an espionage charge against this guy?