Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Liberals Who Celebrate GOP Distancing From Romney Are Biting Into the Poison Apple
The media is out with great excitement as Republicans lined up to repudiate Mitt Romney’s offensive “gift” comments. The Washington Post wrote, “Ten days after failing to sail into the White House, Mitt Romney is already being tossed overboard by his party.” The Sunday shows were stuffed with Republicans lining up to be seen on TV distancing themselves from the Romney stink. Yes, it seems everyone is happy with the Republicans for finally seeing the light.
And therein lies the mistake.
Republicans like Newt Gingrich and the gang of repentant Romney apologizers do not see any light except that they can no longer afford to be seen as defending the rich and hating everyone else.
Now they are scapegoating the man who carried that mantle for them in a failed presidential campaign. For this, they are reaping praise for having principles and waking up.
One does not have principles if they defend such comments during a campaign, because they wanted to help their party maintain power. Had they come out immediately after the 47% comments and specifically condemned them and the thinking behind them, that would be different.
But here we have Newt Gingrich, who accused President Obama of being the “food stamp President” playing the Good Guy on the Sunday shows. Suddenly he doesn’t think Obama won because of “gifts” to “those people”.
Here’s a taste from today’s This Week:
Gingrich expresses his moral outrage over Romney’s comments that Obama won because of “gifts’.
GINGRICH: I just think it’s nuts. I mean — I mean, first of all, it’s insulting. This would be like Wal-Mart having a bad week and going, “The customers have really been unruly.” I mean, the job of a political leader in part is to understand the people. If we can’t offer a better future that is believable to more people, we’re not going to win.
Of course, George Will got in on this, telling Mitt to quit hating.
WILL: Quit despising the American people, particularly because a lot of what they’re despising them for are Republican policies.
Give me a break. George Will wrote a column in October saying that the only reason Americans aren’t firing Obama is because he’s black. Redemption? Not so fast. Accountability first, please.
Wake me up when Republicans have the courage to condemn these comments when it matters, and when – more importantly – they do so by not perpetuating the stereotypes beneath the comments and stop campaigning on blatant racism and class warfare.
I am also not buying until the Republicans change their policies to match the rhetoric.
Currently, Republicans are still refusing to lower taxes for the 98% unless they can give “gifts” to the top 2%. Why is that, if they really don’t believe that there are “takers” versus “makers”? If they really don’t believe this crap and think it’s so insulting, why have they been perpetuating it for so long?
The problem is that Republicans do not find “takers” versus “makers” insulting, just as they are not insulted by their use of racial stereotypes to win the resentful white vote. That is the only vote they have, aside from the 2% vote, so naturally they need to keep it. It would be political suicide for them to abandon the resentment vote, even if it only works on a state level now.
Liberals celebrating Republicans who are distancing themselves from Mitt Romney are biting into a poisoned apple. Mitt Romney was, as I wrote early in the general election, going to be a problem for the GOP because he represents everything that they have become. He is the entitled plutocrat who hates the rest of America and thinks they are lazy. He celebrates greed and cruelty. He is an empty puppet devoid of values except those he needs to spout to get votes.
Now that the puppet did exactly to the party what we could all see coming, that is, out them to the public, Republicans want to distance themselves.
Of course they do. This is not an act of authenticity or self-examination or regret. This is an act of a party who just got word that they can no longer win national elections on blatant racism and class warfare. They are rebranding the same policies under yet another “new” Republicanism. The Birchers, the Tea Party, the Southern Strategy all share the same problems and you don’t see the Republicans changing those inherent problems. Rather, they are doing what they always do. Rebrand.
Shiny new sticker, nice words, maybe an immigration reform policy that does not include electric fences and self-deportation — but it is the same party of the elites, of the plutocrats, manipulating the easily fooled into supporting policies that do not benefit them.
Liberals are gloating that Mitt Romney is being demolished. So what? Mitt Romney was never the problem. The way he expressed his disdain is being demolished, but the policies behind the disdain and the strategies that use that disdain as a get out the vote tactic are being let off the hook.
Once again, the symbol gets destroyed as the policies live on. This is the party that ran Sarah Palin as VP in 2008 because she put a pretty face on their ugly policies and Southern Strategies. This is the party that ran the rape triplets. This is the Tea Party, Koch-backed, Norquist pledge-signing party.
The money and therefor the agenda behind the Republican Party has not changed. What do they stand for? Certainly not small government or fiscal conservatism. No, they stand for corporate welfare and the now destroyed trickle down lie.
We can thank Mitt Romney for outing the trickle down lie, and George W Bush for outing the small government lie. What have elected Republicans done over the past four years? They have spent our money trying to get women locked up in prison for having a miscarriage, spent millions on witch hunts to destroy Obama and on voter suppression aimed at minorities, and have stood tall for tax cuts for the rich, subsidies to big oil, more war for private contractor profits and deregulation.
While it’s obvious Republicans never liked Romney personally, that didn’t stop them from glorifying him as a “maker” (job creator, trickle down God, entitlement class ruler) and standing by his welfare to work lies. Mitt Romney represents the empty corporate greed of the GOP. He was the perfect poster boy for the modern day Republican Party and they don’t get to run away from the political poison so quickly.
After all, they built that.
Mitt Romney tried to walk away from his 47% comments last night by calling them "wrong". Not so fast, sa ...
Mitt Romney finally took the stage in Boston to let Republicans know that the delusion is dead. The ange ...
Rush Limbaugh claimed Mitt Romney got booed at the NAACP convention because all black people want is mor ...
On Meet The Press today, Colin Powell made mention of several recent racist attacks by Republicans on ...
Apparently, Mitt Romney hasn't hit rock bottom yet. Romney has gone from being one of only two men vying to ...
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 6:01 pm
The GOP hasnt changed one bit, they only want to change how they are perceived. The ones running and slamming Romney the liar are just making the path to the outhouse for the rest of the GOP to follow
Dont look at the man behind the curtain. He will lie in 2016 the same as he did in 2012
Paws
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 6:16 pm
A leopard doesn’t change his spots. I do not buy this about-face from the GOP for one second. They know if they don’t moderate their message, then voters will completely clean house in 2014 and they can forget the presidency in 2016. They know this so they are trying to get people to think they’ve changed. They haven’t.
They’ve already stabbed us in the back and they’ll twist the knife as soon as they have convinced enough people that they’ve changed.
dragonpuff
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 6:32 pm
They are not fooling anyone. If Mitt had won he would have been a deity to them. All they want is to seem less crazy so the electorate might take them seriously in four years.
Judy M
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 6:34 pm
And, why would any “credible” news show think that Newt Gringich has anything worthwhile to say or to contribute to the national conversation?
Paws
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 9:14 pm
I ask myself that same question. He has NO place in our politics today. He tries to pass himself off as some elder statesman when he is anything but. He’s as sleazy as they come.
Gordon Hilgers
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 6:35 pm
So the “wiley coyote” Republican Party, after having an anvil dropped on its proverbial head, is scheming to change tactics without changing ideologies?
Don’t they realize that their godforsaken “free market economics” has failed big-time? Are they so smitten with the likes of Ludwig von Mises and Frederick Hayek that they can’t see the essential interdependence government shares with business?
Begone, Newtie Patootie! George Will wears Victoria Secret!
Johnee
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 6:36 pm
Yeah it’s complete bullshit. All the high profile people that SUPPORTED all the same policies and ideology that Romney did, are all of a sudden (like rats) trying to jump a sinking ship and say: “Hey don’t look at us. It was this guy (Romney) over here”. When all of us know that guys like Gingrich would have been basking in the glow, and crowing about the triumph of “conservative” principles if Romney would have won.
As you say, this lip service ain’t gonna count for squat until we see some big changes, and some action behind it.
I don’t feel sorry for Romney one bit though. Nope. Got what he deserved. Backstabbing snakes the lot of them.
A Walkaway
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 7:03 pm
That’s how this all has been sold locally… that the Republicans “got the message”. That Romney opened his mouth without thinking first, or that he got his words wrong.
No, they didn’t get the message (they ignored it). They threw Romney under the bus because he failed. They only care about winning and turning money over to the 1% (which includes them).
The rest of us… their plan for us is wage slavery.
They certainly don’t want people thinking for themselves.
Anne
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 9:15 pm
They are only about changing their image by trying to sound more “reasonable,” but not about changing their regressive policies. An example is Governor Bobby Jindhal of Louisiana who has said his party needs to stop being the stupid party and refrain from saying dumb things. Unfortunately, his refusal of ObamaCare for his state falls under the category of DOING something dumb, and it shows he’s about form over content. Governor Rick Snyder of Michigan is another example, because he ran as a “tough nerd” and a moderate, only to show what a wolf in sheep’s clothing he truly is once he was elected. They throw people like Romney, Palin, and GW Bush under the bus once they have outlived their usefulness either by losing badly or by falling out of favor with the American populace in spite of having won. While they reject these folks, they continue to embrace the backward policies that made these folks and others such losers. At the end of the day, they are still doubling down on what cost them this election.
1voice1vote
Nov. 18th, 2012 at 11:47 pm
“GOP Distancing From Romney” “they don’t get to run away from the political poison so quickly”
The 2012 staunchly anti-science Republicans are going to be awfully hard-pressed to find a surgeon that can separate conjoined twins who share a single set of vital organs (read the GOP cannot distance themselves from their own platform.) The stench of Romney is yesterday’s news, but the GOP’s roster of “political poison” is as vast as the wealth that parades them out as viable Republican legislators – Ryan, Bachmann, King… We have much work ahead.
1voice1vote
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 6:17 pm
See, one gag-me-treat falls by the wayside… leaves room for: “Hey GOP, take the Palin cure
She’s hot, she’s blue collar, she’s electable.” (LA Times)
hahahahahahahahahaha!
KatzKids
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 11:15 am
I don’t know anyone who buys the new crap fest the GOPTP is trying to convince voters about now. Even while they attempt to sound “reasonable,” they are so clueless, they expose the fact that they STILL don’t get it.
They’ll never get it, and their efforts will fall on deaf ears, except for their idiot base who will be enraged by their attempts to seem to moderate their radical agendas. Romney was their perfect candidate – a lying, arrogant, entitled, member of the 1% they worship, & a religious extremist. Few buy his rejection by the party who loves to eat their own.
I have to admit that each GOPTP member who slams him tickles the heck out of me. No better target exists for their in-party mud slinging. Picturing his rage at the attacks makes life fun, especially since our President is with us for another 4 years. Life is good, but the fight continues.
Johnee
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 11:50 am
Yup. The fight will always continue. But for the moment, let’s enjoy life and grab a ringside seat and watch the show.
Lori
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 12:12 pm
No extreme views here…
From The Maddow Blog (today):
Fifteen months later, another high-profile, far-right politician was asked the identical question, and once again the answer was pretty interesting. In this case, it was GQ’s Michael Hainey who asked Sen. Marco Rubio (R), “How old do you think the Earth is?” Here’s how the senator responded:
“I’m not a scientist, man. I can tell you what recorded history says, I can tell you what the Bible says, but I think that’s a dispute amongst theologians and I think it has nothing to do with the gross domestic product or economic growth of the United States. I think the age of the universe has zero to do with how our economy is going to grow. I’m not a scientist. I don’t think I’m qualified to answer a question like that.
“At the end of the day, I think there are multiple theories out there on how the universe was created and I think this is a country where people should have the opportunity to teach them all. I think parents should be able to teach their kids what their faith says, what science says. Whether the Earth was created in 7 days, or 7 actual eras, I’m not sure we’ll ever be able to answer that. It’s one of the great mysteries.”
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 12:21 pm
I can tell you that wont include the Hindu story of creation which takes the earth back much much further
They will only accept the 7 days/eras theory. Dont introduce nothing different
Johnee
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 12:55 pm
Lori that’s a lot of double talk from the senator there.
“I think there are multiple theories out there on how the universe was created and I think this is a country where people should have the opportunity to teach them all”.
This is code for: “Creationism should be taught in science class”. Plus, as Shiva said, only one religious account of creation would be taught.
Plus the good senator throws in a straw man for good measure: “I think parents should be able to teach their kids what their faith says, what science says”. Uh, senator no one is arguing that a parent shouldn’t have the right to do this.
The kicker for me was “I’m not a scientist man”. OK senator then why do you feel that you are qualified to tell SCIENCE teachers what to teach kids in a SCIENCE class?
Lori
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 12:14 pm
Whoops–add this:
To be sure, I don’t seriously expect Rubio to immediately cite the commonly accepted scientific figure — the planet is 4.54 billion years old — from memory. Sure, Rubio is a member of the Senate Science Committee, and is on the subcommittee that deals specifically with science and space, but let’s give him the benefit of the doubt and assume the age of the Earth is one of those details that doesn’t come up often.
Johnee
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 1:15 pm
Lol!
Oh, and how about we teach the “theory” that aliens visited the earth thousands of years ago and not only built the pyramids and Stonehenge but performed genetic experiments on ape like hominids that led to our creation as modern humans.
How about that “theory” senator? A lot of people believe it, so we should teach it right? We should have equal time for all “theories” out there; isn’t that what you believe?
montag
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 12:30 pm
Once again the Conservative Movement dumps on all those who failed the Infallible Conservative Ideology. The Conservative Ideology can never fail.
mfware
Nov. 19th, 2012 at 1:37 pm
Sarah Jones is absolutely correct. The Republican Party–both party professionals and rank-and-file–hated Romney. The nominated him anyway. They did so because they felt that he was their best chance of getting their policies reinstated. Romney’s unforgivable sin is that he lost. Now, the Republicans have named Piyush “Bobby” Jindal to lead the Republican Governors Association. He was Tea Party before Tea Party was cool. I have yet to meet a single Republican who actually likes Jindal. Yet, no other Republican is allowed to oppose him as he dismantles institution after institution that defines Louisiana as a state. As for his commitment to principle and intelligent discourse, Jindal is a failed Ph.D. student in biology who promoted, passed, and signed into law a bill that promotes the teaching of creationism in Louisiana public schools.