Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Boycott Stress Causes Rush Limbaugh To Launch Half Baked War on Vegetarians
What to do when your culture war is running short of issues? If you’re Rush Limbaugh, you dig deep down into your bag of resentments (largely stemming from protruding projections) until you find the simmering issue of self-loathing that you’ve never been able to get control over and you throw that at your opponent.
For Rush Limbaugh, this naturally takes us to food. He’s already run through the all women are sluts because he wants to see women post online videos of themselves having sex and the gays are responsible for ruining his many marriages, so yeah, now it’s food. According to Rush Limbaugh, conservatives don’t try to impose their moral beliefs on others, while liberals want to control what everyone else eats, just like they want to kill his radio show.
Buckle up courtesy of Media Matters:
Rush said,”When I think of organic food, I think of vegetarians. I think of militant vegetarians. Now, a liberal vegetarian is not content to just eat his vegetables. You have to, too. A conservative vegetarian will eat his vegetables and leave you alone. A liberal vegetarian will eat his and then demand that you only eat vegetables, too. And this is one of the big differences between liberals and conservatives across the board — whatever it is, whatever the left-right issue is.”
Completely missing the irony, Rush attacks liberals for being jerks over their moral beliefs, “There’s a line of research showing that when people can pat themselves on the back for their moral behavior, they can become self-righteous,’ says author Kendall Eskine, assistant professor of the department of psychological sciences at Loyola University in New Orleans.”
You don’t say? Self-righteous, eh? Like calling women sluts for using birth control?
Rush then explains that conservatives don’t care if liberals go to church or not. He does this as if he is unaware that conservatives are legislating their morality all over this country. “If a conservative doesn’t believe in God, he doesn’t go to church. Period. He doesn’t tell you that you that you have to stop believing in God. Conservative doesn’t chide you for going to church. A conservative doesn’t call a member of Congress and make church illegal.”
Rush’s argument is that a conservative organic food nut doesn’t care what YOU eat. Rush offers no proof of this, but if we broaden out the issue, it’s hard to find any indication that he is accurate.
After all, conservatives care who marries whom, they care what birth control we use, they care what faith we choose, they want to force us to look at an unnecessary trans vaginal ultrasound — they care about pretty much all of the very personal decisions in our lives. They want us to do it their way, and they’re so militant about it that they force laws mandating exactly what the rest of us can and can not do, and often cite the Bible as their justification.
When Michelle Obama started her healthy food initiative, the conservatives freaked out. Sarah Palin even devoted time in her reality TV show to airing her Obama resentment, declaring that she wouldn’t be told what to eat. It seems that even when studies prove that certain foods/chemicals are bad for us, conservatives see this intellectual exercise as fodder for ever-growing resentment, like angry children rebelling against their parents. “You don’t get to tell me what I can eat!”
Organic food became a cause precisely because people wanted an option to the chemical poisons that a defunded FDA allows in our food. The fact that the meat and agri-industry in America has become a foray into additives, fillers, and on bad days, life threatening bacteria hot houses is of no concern to Rush Limbaugh. Meat is just another reason to hate his parents (the liberals).
Kill or be killed! That’s the conservative mantra.
Where are the militant liberals passing food laws mandating that conservatives can’t eat meat? Nowhere. Meanwhile, conservatives are busy running every aspect of our personal lives except food. Food is the one area conservatives really seem to embrace “liberty.” They want the freedom for agri-business to poison Americans and by gosh, they are going to fight for it.
Conservatives have long fought to defund the FDA, hating on it as they hate Social Security. Reagan himself declared the FDA was “needlessly killing Americans.” Newt Gingrich, who led a successful move to privatize some of the agency, said the FDA was the number one job-killer in America (and here you thought that title belonged to Republicans). Bush staffed the FDA with business leaders whose goals were to unregulate the various sectors they oversaw.
The Reagan led defunding of the FDA blossomed under Bush, until conservatives were able to point to the ineffectiveness of the agency they had starved as proof that government doesn’t work. Think defunded and dis-empowered FEMA during Katrina.
Jonathan Cohn wrote for the New Republic:
Prior to the 1980s, agencies like the FDA had authority to finalize regulations on their own. Reagan changed that, forcing agencies to submit all regulations to the Office of Management and Budget, which cast a more skeptical eye on anything that would require the government or business to spend more money. The regulatory process slowed down and, in many cases, the people in charge of it became more skittish…
Like Reagan, Bush was skeptical of government interference in the market. And, like Reagan, he appointed officials sympathetic to businesses that wanted to avoid the cost of complying with new federal rules.
The real truth is that government agencies like the FDA are needed in order to protect the common good of the people from the greed of business. Since the agency has been set up for failure by conservatives, said failure can hardly be used as justification that it doesn’t work.
The Obama administration was able to push their Food Safety Act before Christmas of 2010 with some bi-partisan support. The pre-Tea Party House and the Senate passed the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act and the President signed it into law on January 4, right before the Tea Party took office. Of course, this law is only as good as the funding for it, and who does the funding? That’s right. Your Tea Party controlled House.
Nothing else has worked, so Rush is going to make meat a part of the culture war. Sure, there are more meat-eaters than non-meat eaters, so this seems like a safe ‘big tent’ bet. But if we reframed this discussion to ask how many Americans want to be poisoned by an unregulated meat industry, I’m betting that big tent would shrink.
You want salmonella and e-coli? Keep voting Republican. When they talk about starving the beast, this is what they mean. Less federal oversight and regulation, and that translates directly to poisoned food.
Rush’s tirade against organic food is really all about him and his resentment over his advertisers abandoning him, as he wrapped up with this telling tidbit, “If a conservative doesn’t like a radio show, he changes the channel. Liberals, if they don’t like a radio show, demand that the show be shut down. And if the show isn’t voluntarily shut down, then they try other avenues to get the show shut down.”
Rush went from blaming liberals for allegedly legislating what conservatives can eat (no meat!) to proof that liberals want everyone to think like they do because Rush’s show is being boycotted. That’s a whole lotta Rush resentment for a Monday.
Today on his radio show Rush Limbaugh said that Michael Jackson, “flourished under Reagan, languished under ...
On a recent radio show Rush Limbaugh made the claim that the Left is out to ban Chinese food. He tried t ...
Rush Limbaugh responded to the Tea Party protests on his radio show today, by declaring that the tea baggers ...
Yesterday Rush Limbaugh went on the attack against hungry children on his radio show. Limbaugh criticize ...
Rush Limbaugh, a.k.a. radio's morning after pill for your intelligence, used an attack on Danica Patric ...
Reynardine
May. 21st, 2012 at 4:00 pm
Aw, Hell, if everybody eats vegetables, Rush is in danger wherever he goes.
A Walkaway
May. 21st, 2012 at 4:24 pm
I hate to say it (because I don’t like being attacked by militant vegans and I despise Limbaugh), but he does have a somewhat valid point there.
It’s not fun to be harassed by militant vegetarians/vegans when you sit down to eat a decent meal (or even a sandwich). They can be as bad – as aggressive and insulting as any dominionist and almost as hard-headed (and as hooked on pseudoscience).
I also don’t consider them liberal… that’s where Rush is REALLY wrong. The essence of liberalism is the freedom of the individual to do as they please, unless it directly affects another. (“Your freedom ends where my nose begins” as the saying goes.)
Let’s just say this – all of the “science” I’ve read about supporting vegetarianism and veganism turned out to be coming from sources dedicated to spreading the philosophy and were debunked, and they’re contradicted by real, peer-reviewed science on many levels.
Reynardine
May. 21st, 2012 at 4:47 pm
I never had it happen, but if it did, I’d tell them about the same thing I said about Rush: if everybody becomes ravenous for vegetables, they’d better hide.
Carrie
May. 21st, 2012 at 4:54 pm
Do you see the difference? The vegetarians aren’t passing laws to stop you from eating. You just bought into rushs game. What a group of people say isn’t the same as passing laws to force you to their belief lime Rachel Maddow says its in the policy!
A Walkaway
May. 21st, 2012 at 6:10 pm
Actually, the ones I had encounters with WERE advocating such laws – they wanted the eating of meat banned and a few tried to get our campus to go meatless (so not going to happen), plus they were trying to stomp out any meat-eating in their presence (that also was a big fail). I’ve seen attempts to pass laws like that (in the past) based on global warming (cow flatulence adding to the problem so they claim, so part of the solution is to ban eating meat), and based on ersatz health studies.
A Walkaway
May. 21st, 2012 at 6:12 pm
I realize I wasn’t clear… the people (and articles) were advocating for said laws, as far as I know none have made it to the bill stage.
ern
May. 21st, 2012 at 7:35 pm
I have been a vegetarian for twenty years and I am not pushy. There are pushy vegetarians but you’d be surprised at how many are civil libertarians.
I am actually very much pro hunting, by the way.
Reynardine
May. 21st, 2012 at 9:34 pm
Hunting done in an ethical way is actually a lot more humane than commercial slaughter, and in many cases the meat is more wholesome, though it should be dressed with gloves and thoroughly cooked (especially javelina pork)
ern
May. 22nd, 2012 at 2:46 pm
I totally agree with your comments about hunting. Part of my concern is that people are very much removed from the process of procuring food in general. Hunting is about as involved in the process as one can get and I see that as a good thing.
A Walkaway
May. 21st, 2012 at 11:31 pm
I have a live-and-let-live policy, and recognize the difference between militant vegetarians/vegans and those who aren’t.
As I like to put it: “Whatever floats your boat!”. Just don’t ask it of me – or try to make life any harder because I don’t go along.
(I agree that vegetarians and vegans should be able to get food that fits their dietary preferences, and that is a real problem in some restaurants. It gets taken too far when they try to get the restaurants to go completely vegetarian/vegan.)
ern
May. 22nd, 2012 at 2:49 pm
I think I agree with you. I have a live and let live policy for the most part also.
I also don’t think that the fictional strawman liberal vegetarian that rush speaks about is really based in very much reality.
Are there pushy vegetarians? Sure. Just like there are pushy insurance sales people, pushy Christians, and just about pushy anybody.
A Walkaway
May. 23rd, 2012 at 10:13 am
I wish you could have been at my school a few short years ago, you’d realize that they aren’t straw men and they can be very nasty and aggressive (not just pushy).
There have been two letters the the editor in the local paper in the last week or so, advocating hard for a vegan/vegetarian “lifestyle” and based on pseudoscience. I nearly replied to them, but didn’t for a good reason.
Jeff R
May. 22nd, 2012 at 2:36 am
Curious… just how often has that happened to you? I’m a meat eater with lots of vegan friends and daughter’s who’s a vegetarian and it’s never happened to me. Do you antagonize them or something?
A Walkaway
May. 23rd, 2012 at 10:31 am
Well, sitting in a public area meant for things like eating lunch and quietly eating a sandwich was sufficiently antagonizing for one, who I think got in trouble for her agitating (possibly got in trouble for verbally attacking and harassing me because I was eating a sandwich). One other encounter was similar, just quietly eating a meat-based meal in a restaurant. In the first encounter, I knew the person but didn’t talk much with her before her explosion over my eating meat. The second was bolt out of the blue and I still don’t know who she was and don’t really care.
I tend to be less gregarious these days… partially because I’m busy when I go to school (and I’m cautious in the “general public”), but also partially because of all of the problems we’ve had with the other side… the “Good Christians”. So I don’t have the encounters quite as much as I used to. Plus I admit it is possible the students who were such a headache may have moved on… there was a bunch of them agitating (not just for veganism, but most of them were also militant anarchists by their own admission).
You’ll also hear of the same sort of crap if someone is obese and not on an obviously starvation diet… we’ve only had a few snide remarks from that angle, and the people didn’t seem to realize we were eating a healthy, well balanced diet (and now we’re loosing weight because they finally have us on medications that work – thyroid problems and neurological damage can lead to severe obesity).
Barry Roope
May. 22nd, 2012 at 10:38 am
Where are you eating at? I’ve never met a Militant Vegetarian, do they wear uniforms, seems like they would be a pretty weak enemy, not eating meat, If they harass you while you eat, maybe push them out of your way?
Carrie
May. 21st, 2012 at 5:03 pm
I saw that his audience dropped a ton since the boycott but he claims it’s because more people were listening after he attacked Sandra fluke. Conservatives ruin every government program they touch.
Shiva (Moderator)
May. 21st, 2012 at 6:00 pm
Liberals only demand shows that are not conducive to good vibrations get shut down Rush.
Rush reminds me of the people who insist they will not quit smoking even if it kills them.
majii
May. 21st, 2012 at 7:00 pm
Millions believe that Rush is an “expert” who knows everything there is to know about any subject. The reality is that he knows very little/nothing about what comes out of his piehole. He has an overinflated opinion of himself. I’m pleased to discover that some people have stopped listening to this misogynistic liar.
Sally
May. 21st, 2012 at 7:28 pm
Like Beck, Rush’s self-important tirades are becoming less and less newsworthy. We read about Beck maybe once a month; it will be great when Rush’s popularity reaches that level too. I applaud the people who backed the boycott and the advertisers who responded. Free speech does not allow someone to manipulate facts for their own financial gain, which is what Fox and Rush and Beck do daily.
Zaynab
May. 21st, 2012 at 10:31 pm
I’m not sure if it was conservatives or liberals who wanted to tax sodas and fast food, but whoever it was it’s wrong and shouldn’t be done. Leave people to eat what they please. I’ve never had problems with vegetarians, and when I was one, I didn’t force my lifestyle on anyone, heck I never told anybody unless they asked. We should all be like that. That is one thing I will suggest everyone do, leave people alone about the way they choose to live their lives, if it’s not hurting anyone or anything, it’s not my problem.
That said, when Rush said that eating organic food makes people jerks, I kept thinking, “Waitasec. You don’t eat organic food, and YOU’RE a jerk…so what’s your excuse?”
Reynardine
May. 22nd, 2012 at 9:13 am
The food I grow is fairly organic; the food I buy, because of cost, isn’t. I’m not a purposive locavore, but we ate a lot better when most farms were family enterprises and came in a lot closer to cities. We should, through zoning, grants, and de-development of deindustrialized areas, get as close to that as we can again. Public landscaping with fruits and vegetables with municipal Harvest Days would be wholesome, delightful, and community-building treats.
A Walkaway
May. 23rd, 2012 at 10:35 am
That’s very much what I observed when I was helping teach a fieldschool in Sicily – their structure encouraged local farming and production of foods.
The interesting thing was that combined with finally being on the right sort of medication, the local foods made a big difference. I lost nearly sixty pounds during the fieldschool, was never hungry, and felt good. I wish that America could adopt many of the aspects of the European model… it’s so much more efficient and healthy!
(A lot easier on the poor too!)