Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Like Magic, Dem Gov. Jerry Brown Fixes California Budget with Tax Hike
Democratic Governor Jerry Brown fixed California’s deficit via Prop 30, also known as raising taxes even if only temporarily. California no longer has a deficit.
Governor Brown said voters made the budget possible by passing Proposition 30, “California today is poised to achieve something that has eluded us for more than a decade – a budget that lives within its means, now and for many years to come.”
This shoots a hole in conservative talking points that we can’t tax our way out of a deficit, therefore we shouldn’t raise taxes at all. In fact, Brown already made budget cuts in prior years, but it wasn’t enough to avoid a deficit. He needed to temporarily raise taxes in order to avoid a deficit.
The Governor’s office pointed out that the budget still manages to make an investment in education and healthcare reform, “Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. today proposed a balanced state budget that boosts investment in education, implements health care reform and keeps California on a long-term path to fiscal stability. This budget builds on the work of the last two years to eliminate the ongoing deficit.”
Prop 30 is a temporary tax approved by voters. It increased personal income tax on annual earnings more than $250,000 for seven years and increased sales tax and use tax by .25 cent for four years to fund schools and public safety.
The question at this point is why does it take a Democrat to get a fiscal house in order? Clinton did it, Obama’s doing it, Brown is doing it – meanwhile, Governor Jindal (R-LA) is pushing to get rid of all income and corporate taxes. He wants to rely on raising the sales tax to cover the losses. Libertarians often push for this solution, referred to as a flat tax, because on the surface it appears fair.
In reality, the regressive flat tax hits poor people the hardest. Examples of this were the CBO’s scoring of Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 program (different than Jindal’s proposal but based on the same idea), which it determined according to Robert Reichwould “lower the after-tax incomes of poor households (incomes below $30,000) by 16 to 20 percent, while increasing the incomes of wealthier households (incomes above $200,000) by 5 to 22 percent, on average.”
Furthermore, under Jindal’s free gift to corporations masquerading as a “fair” solution, corporations will just buy less from in state suppliers in order to avoid paying any taxes at all, thus hurting Louisiana businesses. The tax burden will shift to those who make daily, life-sustaining purchases. The rich will go out of state to buy their big ticket items. Most importantly, rich people’s consumption is a much smaller amount of their income than it is for poor people. You can see how a flat tax disproportionately hurts the poor.
This is not to suggest that all are happy with Governor Brown’s budget, which did not address budget cuts made years ago into state programs. In fact, the budget would not be deficit free without those cuts and the taxes. It’s called balanced fiscal prudence.
Republicans say people vote for Democrats because they want free stuff, and yet it is Republicans who refuse to do the hard work of governing, such as telling obvious sources of revenue and users of government services like corporations that they must pay into the system they use. Yes, that would be hard work for Republicans; also known as biting the hand that feeds them. We will never get those corporations to take responsibility for their use of American taxpayer funded infrastructure. They’re always looking for handouts — subsidies, ways to avoid paying their bills (aka; taxes), etc.
We probably could tax our way out of a deficit along with real balanced cuts (not to earned benefits, of course, but to oil subsidies and other government hogs), if only we closed the loopholes and deductions that allow corporations to get away with paying nothing. What Republicans probably mean when they make the claim that we can’t tax our way out of a deficit and therefore shouldn’t bother taxing their precious corporations is they don’t want to imagine a world in which we tax our way out of a deficit. They’d rather keep going on borrowing and spending while claiming, “Deficits don’t matter” until they’re voted out of power.
Where’s the praise for the California voters (aka; “liberal nuts”) who stepped up to the plate to help fund their state via taxes?
California Democratic Governor Jerry Brown is not impressed with Texas Republican Governor Rick Perry. ...
Republican Governor Bobby Jindal announced Tuesday that he was cutting Medicaid services for Louisiana's ...
Gov. Bobby Jindal tried to put the Republican agenda in place in Louisiana, and the end result is an app ...
President Obama took steps today to make sure that Republicans have already lost the sequester battle. H ...
The need to close corporate loopholes became even more apparent after a new study revealed today that ...
novenator
Jan. 10th, 2013 at 6:16 pm
Fiscal Conservatives in the Republican Party are guilty of the vast majority of the national debt, and they have done it on purpose under an insane economic theory known as Starve The Beast.
Conservatives: the most fiscally irresponsible politicians in the history of America.
robyn ryan
Jan. 10th, 2013 at 6:59 pm
Bobby “The Exorcist” Jindal is doing his best to bring slavery back to Louisiana.
Eight years after Katrina, we STILL don’t have a Charity hospital. Instead, LSU wiped out an historic neighborhood for a ‘medical magnet’ campus which was never 80% funded and consisted of ground level parking for acres and acres. So people languish in emergency rooms (which want payment up front if they can get it) or go home and die.
The schools in already isolated small towns of Louisiana were denied an internet subsidy because Jindal wanted it piratized.
He’s piratizing schools, and using Federal monies to ‘update’ buildings. The ‘updated’ school down the street has destroyed the historic district for blocks (law suit pending), cost millions of Federal dollars, and will only be used as a school for 3 years, when busing kids in from 12 miles away gets too expensive.
His tame legislature was shocked when a mosque applied for a charter. They thought they only funded Xtian schools.
He dreams of national politics, but public scrutiny would be his worst nightmare.
be funk note
Jan. 11th, 2013 at 11:24 am
I think the word you’re looking for is “privatize” not piratize.
rcarr57
Jan. 10th, 2013 at 7:52 pm
It always takes a Democrat to balance a budget and create a surplus. RepubliCONS don’t believe in math, science or reality.
Robyn is right about Bobby Jindal. He is the worst Louisiana could ever have allowed to be Governor, God forbid twice. Sadly, the red states are backward and poor as also the greater majority of the citizens.
If Jindal doesn’t run for President in 2016, he will be open to VP. If that fails, he will trade places with Senator Vitter. Both have done nothing but further Louisiana’s decline, yet, the ignorant will run out to vote them into each others seats because they are Republicans.
Blue Soul trapped in a Red State
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 10th, 2013 at 7:56 pm
My understanding Jindal might drop the corporate and personal income tax in his state. Look out Federal budget
theadvocate.com/home/4597...
Just think, you got more money in your pocket but no roads to go to work on
majii
Jan. 11th, 2013 at 12:02 am
Or, God forbid, the bridge collapses as a company truck is transporting its product to the airport for distribution to other states/regions. Morans here in GA voted against borrowing money to fix/upgrade our infrastructure last November. The same ones who voted against SPLOST are the ones complaining about how “looooong” it takes them to get from Point A to B because the number of people heading in the same direction on the way to, and from, work exceeds the capacity of the one highway they all have to use. I choose the time I leave Middle GA to head north because I know that, at certain times of the day, I’m going to run into bumper to bumper traffic less than 50 miles from my home and more than 60 miles from Atlanta!
majii
Jan. 11th, 2013 at 12:06 am
Only deadbeats want something for nothing, and there are a whole lot of them in the GOP.
Inez
Jan. 11th, 2013 at 11:00 pm
jindal doesnt. know what makes america the best! it’s the middle class hard workers, not the ceos. those corporations couldn’t function without the bottom line worker………no taxes for corporations(?) where is getting operation money? i don’t think his state is overwhelmed with millionaires. cut off any federal funds as long as he’s in office.
RMuse
Jan. 10th, 2013 at 8:04 pm
Yes, we Liberals and Progressives in California suffered through an adulterer who “acted” like he was governor and racked up a massive debt. Arnold was following the Reagan agenda of lower taxes and cuts to education, healthcare, and infrastructure maintenance. We also rejected Meg Whitman who promised NO corporate tax, massive education cuts, and a union busting scam a la the GOP/ALEC/Koch process of punishing the people and deifying corporations and the wealthy.
People can demean Californians all they want, the people value government services and do not mind paying for them. Maybe the rest of the nation will follow suit. One can only hope.
Dennis Reilly
Jan. 10th, 2013 at 9:03 pm
Just imagine: A government that taxes its people to provide services for them! Stupid Repugnicans.
Sugapea
Jan. 10th, 2013 at 9:56 pm
brown/clinton 2016? clinton/brown 2016?
denise
Jan. 10th, 2013 at 10:16 pm
wow! brown RAISED taxes and california’s financial woes were fixed!! well knock me over with a feather!
Lee Schelin
Jan. 11th, 2013 at 4:09 pm
Jerry had the foresight and experience to understand what we in CA needed, and we backed him up with our “Yes” vote on his tax bill. Now we can move on to solve other problems in our state. Hooray for Jerry.
Gordon Hilgers
Jan. 12th, 2013 at 7:17 pm
What makes me laugh is that all these self-described “economic experts” in the Tea Party don’t get the common sense idea that, when you’re running at a deficit, you raise revenue.
Most of them want no taxes at all. And then they turn around and deem themselves “patriots”. Haha!
slk
Jan. 13th, 2013 at 2:10 am
When you actually cut how much we are just handing out to people who don’t work and have generation after generation of living off the system — bilking welfare, food stamps, etc, then I will believe you should increase taxes on those who are working. Let’s see how many businesses stay in CA now that he has raised taxes once again. Businesses are RUNNING from CA. That means more people out of work and living of the gov’t and more taxes for the few that work. Apparently some of you think that’s the way a smart gov’t works. While others of us think that EVERYONE should pay their ‘fair share’ — even those who have been on welfare generation after generation. Welfare — limit how many children it will pay for. Those that work don’t get a raise when they have more kids — why should those on welfare? Limit the number of years someone can be on Welfare, FS, WIC, etc, etc, etc. Stop feeding kids every meal at school. My parents had nothing — no extra $$, but figured out how to give us 3 meals a day. I can guarantee you, they wouldn’t have had a cell phone, video game, brand name clothes, etc, to make sure we had breakfast and lunch — today’s parents should be doing the SAME THING! Even though they don’t feed their kids, I bet they all have cell phones with text, data, etc, etc. But apparently all of you who WANT to pay more taxes, like paying for people being irresponsible and making poor choices.
Bob
Jan. 13th, 2013 at 6:35 pm
Gordon is right that when we run a deficit, we need to raise more revenue. What’s the most prudent way to do that; raise taxes or put more people to work to pay taxes?