Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
The Meningitis that Mitt Romney’s Deregulation Built
Mitt Romney and other Republicans love to talk about the profits that deregulation builds. As they wag their fingers at us when we express concerns about the ramification of deregulation on people, animals and the environment, Republicans will dismiss the very real and deadly consequences that come with their ideology.
This is a story about the Meningitis that Willard’s deregulation built.
One such example is the Meningitis outbreak that so far, has cost 25 people their lives. An additional 344 people in 18 states are suffering from Meningitis, resulting from Mitt Romney’s failure to regulate while serving as Governor of Massachusetts.
From the Examiner:
Records have revealed that a Massachusetts regulatory agency found that the New England Compounding Company had continually failed to meet accepted standards in 2004. Romney failed to act, was it because the New England Compounding Company were contributors to Mr. Romney, and he did not want to bite a feeding hand?
Nothing says responsible government like ignoring life risking negligence, when the company in question is a political donor.
This meningitis outbreak is the result of contaminated drugs, and according to some experts it will get worse.
We were concerned that there might be other medications that might be contaminated coming from that pharmacy,” said Schaffner, who is past-president of National Foundation for Infectious Disease. “The FDA has given us a heads up that that looks to be the case. We’ll have to notify many more patients across the country that they may have been exposed to a fungal infection.
Realistically speaking, this goes beyond a reluctance to bite the proverbial hand feeding his campaign. It’s an example of the extent to which Mitt Romney puts ideology first and sound policy second.
There are some disease outbreaks that cannot be prevented by regulation. No one is suggesting that regulation can create a disease free world. However, this meningitis outbreak could have been prevented. That is what is so infuriating and disgusting about the extent to which deregulation takes precedence over anything else in Mitt Romney’s world.
As we already know, ideology is what makes it possible for Mitt Romney to threaten profit based emergency relief. It’s the same ideology that makes it conceivable to cut funds to agencies that save lives, while preserving government’s “role” as an ATM machine to the 1%.
Moreover, despite the appearance of many alter egos during this election season, Willard’s ideological position hasn’t changed at all since he was Governor of Massachusetts. You bad victims thinking that government should step between a corporation and its freedom to spread deadly diseases like Meningitis.
Phillip Johnston explained to Salon: “The philosophy of the Romney administration was to have lax regulations across the board.”
Simple ideologically based solutions to complex problems may appeal to the party base. This story is a concrete example of the devastating effects of staunchly ideological based policy. It’s part of an undeniable pattern of the devastating effects of what we’re calling “conservative” ideology these days.
Our taxes would go up, while corporations and the rich would pay lower taxes, when they pay taxes at all. Disaster relief would depend on if it was profitable to provide. As a poor substitute for Medicare, seniors would be handed a voucher and sent to fend for themselves with the profit focused Insurance companies.
A common element to all of these policies is the reality that lives will be lost when different policies could have prevented the loss of those lives.
America is, without question, a place where dreams can come true with the hard work and sacrifice that all of us value. Without question, people should be free to pursue their dreams and profits, provided they don’t leave the sacrifice to someone else as was the case with The New England Compounding Company.
This is not to say that regulation should be ideologically based. While opposed to regulating corporations on matters of public safety and preventing public health disasters, a Romney Administration does believe it is essential for government to interfere with women’s health and with personal family choices.
While it is so very important to protect corporate welfare, Romney would block grant Medicare, leaving millions of poor Americans without access to the healthcare that could treat the disease that Romney’s deregulation built.
And as we are seeing, we would have many more serious problems under a Romney administration that could be prevented.
In the context of health issues, and tragedies like Superstorm Sandy, your vote could literally save a life.
Image from Pandith News
In the criminal justice system, an accomplice in a crime is just as culpable for a homicide as the perso ...
As Sandy bears down with a potentially life-threatening storm, we flash back to the 2011 primaries when ...
Mitt Romney went on Fox News and managed to make his situation worse by refusing to release his tax retu ...
It has to say a lot about a candidate when the people who supported you for Governor, are campaigning ag ...
It's so nice to know what Mitt Romney really thinks of our troops, the elderly, the working poor and stude ...
Sally
Oct. 30th, 2012 at 10:48 pm
“Romney failed to act” is a great slogan for his entire life, isn’t it? He saw the goalposts (a fortune) and he failed to act to save jobs here, create wealth here, save lives here. Instead, he used his power and influence for the good of Mitt. Period. I’m beginning to think this guy is Bush, Cheney, and Palin all wrapped up in one disgustingly expensive suit. he makes me sick.
Miles W. Rich
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 5:19 pm
What do you mean you are beginning to think he is Bush, Cheney, and Palin rolled up into one? He is the worst possible choice for President I can think of that a major party has nominated in my life time. A pathological liar, he believes he can say anything and get away with it because he realizes that the majority of the voting public is uneducated and ignorant when it comes to public and international affairs.
majii
Oct. 30th, 2012 at 11:21 pm
I don’t think Romney’s decision to ignore warnings that this pharmacy was breaking the law was ideological. I think it was personal. Everything Romney does seems to be done for personal reasons. I remember when the information came to light that showed he’d employed undocumented immigrants to do his yard work, his first response included the words, “I’m running for POTUS, for god’s sake!” He didn’t appear overly concerned that he was breaking the law, he didn’t approach the immigrants and offer to help them begin the naturalization process, all he remembered was his own ambition. It’s who he is–a selfish, immature, lying, cheating, hypocritical, immoral pus on the face on the planet.
Reynardine
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 12:02 am
Another pile of Mitt. Sounds famiLIAR.
Churchlady
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 12:47 am
People may sneer and say if you wanted it regulated, there have been many years since Mitt left to do so. Well, cleaning up that kind of mess is far less easy than people think. The paper trail of companies and industries and individuals given a pass on basic standards is snarled and difficult to unwind. It’s easier to find the thread when you’re working backwards – knowing a particular fail and tracing its origin – than to figure out what got left undone and follow it all out.
During the Spanish American War of the late 1890s, we killed more soldiers from contaminated food than from the war itself. The threads were so snarled it finally resulted in broad based universal controls. The problem is that it swept the good companies into the pot with the really bad ones – there was not a good way to judge, to discern, to determine who was who. The large meat packers – with money to burn – wrote some of the rules. Why? They could comply but small packers could not. So it became a better system for public health and a terrible one for small, decent purveyors of meat.
It is not easy regulating an industry fairly. Small business needs to see who its friends really are. Recently, at least in CA, the advocates for small business are making those distinctions. They’ve not gone so far as to understand that pro-tax people are on their side (it’s the out of state giants that are being targeted for unfair tax breaks) or even people on some form of social program – the folks who shop at local small businesses. But it’s a start. We have to break the mythology and build new coalitions. Everyone who gets hurt is a natural ally of others being hurt. Not all businesses are the same.
And Mitt is on the side of the giants. He’s never on the side of the small firms, the employees, or the community. That’s something to ponder as you try to decide for whom to vote next week.
robyn ryan
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 2:46 pm
Bingo! Big businesses try to cut the little guy out by stupid regs they can’t meet and exempt themselves from the real needed rules.
It’s the state and local elected running dogs that enforce their dictates.
Elizabeth
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 5:49 pm
Big agribusiness tried to do this to the small farmers not long ago. The new regs. would have put the little guy out of business. It was after the eggs of one agribusiness sickened thousands of people. Lots and lots of us wrote letters, signed petitions and did succeed in stopping the proposed regulation. My CSA farmer knows if he sickens us, he’s out of business. That big chicken farm got a few thousand dollars fine.
FormerGOP
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 12:51 am
I knew the meningitis was linked to deregulation posed by Romney Administration. I wonder why Fox News didn’t pick up on this?
Kenneth Morgan
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 1:10 am
Great POS for us. Habitual liar and murderer. The repubs couldn’t find some one who extols their values. He’s the man sent to destroy mankind.
Dorothy White
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 1:21 pm
I’m so glad the press is finally getting right on top of Tea Party lies as they happen. The truth has been the biggest casualty of the Tea Party takeover of the GOP. The biggest lie Mitt tells is that he is for small government. His spending will be bigger than President Obamas- it will focus on the military instead of social programs. If we elect Mitt, a war with Iran will soon follow. Defense contractors will rake it in,while ordinary Americans will bury their dead and tend to the wounded with little help from Uncle Sam. Food stamps and assistance with health care will be gone. The next big storm will devastate while Mitt will whine about the deficit- all the while pocketing as much government money he can get his hands on .
Onblur
Nov. 2nd, 2012 at 10:19 pm
Wow. You people are seriously brainwashed.
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 2nd, 2012 at 10:40 pm
Is that it? Do you have a refutation to what is now common knowledge? Is that all you have?