Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann Give Birth to Hooters Democracy
I wanted to stay above this mud wrestling fight, but dragged down into it I am, right along with the rest of a rather bewildered America. How did we get here? Well, Michele Bachmann, a Republican presidential candidate, brought up the suggestive image of her mud wrestling her would-be competitor.
Michele Bachmann responded to a question totally unrelated to mud wrestling, unless Sarah Palin is now automatically equivocated with such, with the following ode to Republican red light specials:
“They want to see two girls come together and have a mud wrestling fight,” the Minnesota congresswoman said. “And I’m not going to give it to ‘em.”
What you just heard was the sound of Republican politics this year. That was Michele’s return fire for Bristol’s attacks on her and a not too subtle way of asserting her sexuality as on par with Palin’s. Because, you know, the presidency is all about the sexy.
Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin are bringing out the worst in the American public, once again, and dragging women back further into the Hooters’ cave than I could have imagined when Palin first graced us with her beauty pageant demands that we not be sexist by calling out her diminished intellectual capacity. We had to give her special rules at the debate and then pretend she was viable VP material, even though she never responded to the questions asked. Ironically, she was largely successful in doing this because of the overly sexualized way she presented herself, taking refuge in her white knighting GOP daddies whose war on working Americans and general awareness she was all too happy to parrot.
To say that many women were enraged by this double standard, backstabbing insult is to put it mildly. We are, after all, most of us members of the working class and some of us have been ducking the overly presumptuous grabs of male authority figures our entire working lives, and here was Sarah Palin telling us to not only like it, but use it. Cock-tease your way to the top, ladies! It’s the new American way.
Of course, many women don’t have the privilege of being protected by the boss because they haven’t sold their soul to him. And only a certain kind of woman knows how to tease her way to the top, avoiding unpleasant incidents of assault along her journey. But in the end, the fact is that many of us do not want to engage in this. Unlike some people, we value our freedom and dignity and relationships of mutual respect. It brings to mind the slobbering, middle-aged married men at run down strip clubs, about whom I have often wondered, who here is really getting taken for a ride? You can see the analogy: Club owner is to the GOP what stripper is to Republican Barbie President, as the GOP voter is to never-gonna-get-it man paying to be conned into wanting something he can never have. But that is another matter, for another day.
Bristol Palin had earlier accused Michele Bachmann of copying her mother’s “style”. This petty, mean girl snide sent from the cowardly missile of another wanna be’s daughter tugs at our outrage, begging us to join it in the gutter. It’s obvious that whatever “style” Sarah Palin had during the 2008 campaign was the result of stylists who have been doing that style for years now. It’s nothing new (does Sarah really think her hair is original? She knows she stole that from her idol Ivana Trump and earlier, Anita Bryant gave that back-combed puff a place in political history). And actually, Bachmann does it better.
Palin doesn’t own “Dressed for Work Barbie.” In fact, it’s pretty obvious that she has the stylistic sensibilities of a social climber who came into money but sadly, has no grace. Recall, if you will, any number of vulgar exhibitions by Ms Palin, from sitting on stage in a thigh gracing skirt at an official Memorial Day event that invited TMZ type shots of the forbidden land all too visible to those who sat beneath her to the black water bra underneath a white t-shirt, topped off by a garish Jesus themed baseball hat at the upper crust Belmont Stakes. Jesus apparently sold his trademark to the Republicans in the name of capitalism. Sarah Palin, worshiper of consumerism, has never seen a brash logo she didn’t covet. Bachmann, for all of her many intellectual failings, can at least dress herself.
Prior to Palin’s $250,000 Wasilla Hillbilly looting Neiman Marcus from coast to coast make-over, Sarah Palin had no style save pushing her sex appeal. She has always been self-regarded “proud Valley Trash”. I can’t see Michele Bachmann running around in a “Proud to be Valley Trash” t-shirt. Nor can I picture Bachmann donning a belt on low riders with a huge cross on it pointing down, down, down to the nether regions of sin. As a result of said belt, Joe McGinniss labeled Sarah Palin the “rhinestone Christian“.
Palin, notorious in high school for her rabid competitiveness with girls more popular than she, is obviously taking pot shots via her daughter because she can’t handle the fact that Bachmann is also attractive and sexy. For Palin, that’s what our Presidential race is all about; it’s a beauty contest and she’s damn determined to get her grubby paws on that elusive crown this time, even if she has to use her daughter to fight her battles in order to get it.
Both Bachmann and Palin are GOP puppets; religious extremists dressed up, puffed up and pushed out, sold to the highest bidder to put a pretty face on ugly ideas. Both women seem nice enough from afar, both are ostensibly good mothers from afar, both are absolutely hypocritical on almost every issue they purport to stand for and too ignorant to know it. Both are wildly over-confident, in the way that can only come from a small mind that cannot conceive of larger issues beyond the self-aggrandizing, unregulated id that drives them.
Both women bring out the worst in our culture. Both appeal to the lurking sexism, hooking it with a wink and bringing all women down into the mud with them if we dare call them out on it. Yes, if we dare say a word, we are then labeled ugly haters or “fat”. It’s as if we are back in Junior High, only I never knew anyone so shameless and tawdry as either of these two women in Junior High. It offends me to even address their vulgar cries for attention via their sexuality.
Americans are so titillated by the idea of Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin mud wrestling that they might give them the honor of running for the highest office of the land, even though Bachmann barely grazes by Palin in the knowledge department and they are neck and neck in McCarthyesque Bircher tactics of division, buttressed by their “faith”. Why doesn’t the GOP spare us, and just run down to Hooters and grab an 18 year old “evangelical” girl who believes her only worth is her body and her willingness to submit to their putrefied patriarchal beliefs and run her for President. It would be no different.
And while the leading men in the GOP are not known for their intellectual prowess, it is just slightly less disturbing when they diminish women, because after all, we expect this from them. And furthermore, they lack the sanctimonious smugness of the Ultimate Sexy Mommy whispering about mud wrestling while verbally castrating the men on the other side of the aisle and calling other women “feminazis” for speaking their minds. From their behavior, you’d think these two were Alpha Dogs in drag and, of course, the notion of an alpha dog is contradictory to the notion of an egalitarian society (aka: feminism). Gosh, yes, nothing says feminism like propping up the patriarchal power structure with a frozen grin and dominatrix boots, stomping on the have-nots on the climb to the top.
It’s come to this: Palin and Bachmann are fighting over Best Mommy Award, previously a tie, but Bachmann just one-upped Palin’s fifth child with a moving story of a miscarriage she suffered. A few weeks ago, Bachmann was careful to get in pre-emptive digs about how her children were all out of high school now, and doing well. You’d have to follow Palin’s personal life to get the full meaning of this knock out punch, but rest assured that you will hear more about it than you ever wanted to if this war continues. Suffice it to say, Bachmann’s children are apparently all out of high school, none of them pregnant or shipped off to various pseudo foster homes for management. It shouldn’t matter, but it does, because these are the politics of puppets playing to the evangelical fundie crowd. So now it’s the war of the Mommies.
Michele Bachmann has a law degree from Oral Roberts. Did they teach mud wrestling there? Michele is never going to beat Sarah Palin unless she breaks out the push up bra that Sarah Palin infamously claimed got her everything she wanted at city council meetings. Maybe in the name of liberty the ladies will give us skin to win. Oh, freedom! Yes, people, get on down in the mud. Lower….lower…..and lower yet.
We are never going to get a female Presidential candidate who represents women unless we stop seeing all women as cheap sexual objects first and only. I do not want to be represented by a woman who relies solely on appeasing the patriarchy by submitting to it as sex kitten tiara holder while smirking at the rest of us over her alleged win. The problem for women like me is we don’t even want to be in that game, let alone respond to it.
Some of us would like to be free. We would like to get ahead without selling out. We would like to be taken seriously. We would like to have authority over our bodies. We would like to have the right to make our own medical decisions. We would like to do be represented by someone who wasn’t slinging the sexist mud that she so desperately needs because it is all she has.
It used to be that stripping and selling our bodies were the options of the financially less privileged, but now we tell our young girls that selling themselves as objects is the height of power. Of course, there is nothing wrong with stripping, but spiritually stripping for the Presidency because you have nothing else to offer is another matter, and it is this problem that these two women embody.
Mud wrestling for the nomination is the culmination of this, the dumbing down of America. We’re so completely devoid of character and integrity that this is what we have come to. If either of these women even gets the nomination, this country deserves what it gets. And the puritans who push these Trojan horses with filthy, cheap sexism meant to appeal to their sexually repressed base will have won the ultimate battle.
Bachmann and Palin are the final solution to the notion that stripping for frat boys in Girls Gone Wild is the ultimate show of female empowerment. It’s obscenely ironic that it is the conservatives pushing women to give it away for free in the name of family values. And by “it”, I don’t mean their virginity – I mean their souls.
The fact that we now have the so-called conservatives using sex to sell hate and war on the middle class speaks volumes about our culture. America may indeed be an adolescent boy, who finds Ayn Rand the height of pseudo intellectual rebellion and Sarah Palin the epitome of their political Oedipus fantasy, revealing their deeply repressed desire to have a sexy mommy spank them while she feeds them home baked bread and pops out the winning number of babies necessary to be considered “pro-life”.
The modern day Republican Party is winnowing down its membership to those easily duped by shiny objects, happy to sing praises for the oxymoronic “conservative feminism” manifested by mud wrestling beauty queens who think the founding fathers fought to end slavery. This is the Republican version of American exceptionalism.
Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann are dark deeds inflicted upon a desperate nation. They have given birth to Hooters democracy this week. Michele Bachmann’s dismissal of Sarah Palin was a salacious dog whistle of Republican red light politics and Palin’s cowardly jabs dished out from her untouchable daughter about Bachmann’s style shows us that the focus will be all about exteriors and fan club adoration better suited to teenage girls screaming at a Twilight premiere. Only in the worst of times do dangerous con artists make such hay selling hatred in the name of Jesus and American nationalism.
Some people laugh at them, while others treat them as objects of erotic scorn. Meanwhile, Rome burns.
Image: Lynnrocket’s Blast-off
In an interview with World Net Daily, Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann claimed that Democrats are sabotaging ...
According to the latest PPP poll Michele Bachmann is on a roll, but all that could change if Sarah Palin ...
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) was recently in Spartanburg, SC giving a speech to the local Tea Party, whe ...
When you put Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann at the same rally it is only matter of time before the gar ...
As Sarah Palin gets set to head to Iowa this weekend, and new CNN poll released today found that only 10 ...
Janet Carter
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 7:52 pm
Your BEST piece ever, Sarah. Every intelligent woman in the world must read ! Thanks so much for this !
Sarah Jones
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 7:59 pm
So glad you liked it, Janet. Hearing from women like you really inspires me to keep writing, and it helps to know I am not the only person who feels this way.
Windy
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 10:36 pm
I agree this is one of your best! All of what you wrote is why we don’t like both of these republican women candidates. Bachman and Palin are such an insult to all women,Americans, and Hillary.
moles
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 8:03 pm
Quite excellent, and also utterly depressing in that it sums up the collective attitude of the GOP moguls who shape the political standards and ideas of their party. God help us. They might as well king hit us with a club and drag us by the hair back to their caves.
Boscoe
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 10:48 pm
Wow. I’m not a woman (though Boscoe *would* be a kinda cool name for a grrl), but I totally agree. There is absolute poetry in this piece…
“Both Bachmann and Palin are GOP puppets; religious extremists dressed up, puffed up and pushed out, sold to the highest bidder to put a pretty face on ugly ideas.”
That line gives me chills, it’s so laser concise!
And as someone who has, on occasion, found themselves at a strip club (not recently ;P), I can assure you it was immediately obvious to me exactly who was being exploited. I swear I felt my wallet heat up.
Those women know what they’ve got and exactly how to use it to get our money. It’s a damnned artform and anyone who doesn’t see that is blinded by their hormones or their jealousy. ;)
I guess the difference with politics is that it has to appear believably “accidental” enough for the conservatively-minded boys to suspend their disbelief. A specific blend of wholesomeness wrapped around a peekaboo-ishly poorly concealed core of abject whorishness.
Which, I guess, is why when *actual* pr0n stars run for office it doesn’t work as well. We need to convince ourselves that nobody else noticed the hawtness (it must be just for me!) -and also be able to convincingly appear to our wives and girlfriends that we’re just platonically interested in her “domestic policies”…
Also, I think I may have just coined “peekaboo-ishly”.
lucy
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 8:15 pm
Playing the sex card is deadly for women. It makes us complicit in a very degrading dance. Thanks for the great post. I think Bachman and Palin simply do not get it. I was shocked when the GOP thought women would go for Palin because they perceived Democratic women were upset Clinton lost to Obama. It made me realize how far out of touch the GOP had become. It still amazes me to see Bachman and Palin touted as women that other women relate to. Where are these women? What do they do? I would love to know!
Nasty Liberal
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 4:22 am
To answer your question Lucy, they’re down at Suzy’s Lounge working the pole.
Georgia Eliot
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 3:29 pm
The sex workers I know are not Palin / Bachman supporters nor are they dumb.
C Cone
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 8:25 pm
Thank God for a woman who can analyze the current female Republican presidential candidates with such insight and clarity and has the education and intellect to express it so well.
Thank you Sarah
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 8:26 pm
Put the two together and Bachmann would win a pretty contest any day. When she had her chin Bristol would take both of them.
But the ugliness of both of them is bad for the party. Bachmann is deep in her false religion and Palin is deep in her own pockets.
Neither being a republican in truth
Ingarose
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 8:27 pm
This an absolutely wonderful, wonderful article.
Palin selling herself as a sex object has been extremely upsetting. (For me it started with her ‘wink’ at the VP debates.) What is even worse now is that she uses her daughter, Bristol,to do her dirty work. Actually I digress, it is Sarah using Bristol and Bristol using her mother to make money and become important. Just wondering how much longer we have to wait for Willow and Piper to come on the scene.
Yet, there are quite a few, both men and women who say that the Democrats and liberals hate strong conservative women.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 8:51 pm
That wink was so embarrassing. Jesus, so obvious and sickening
dowl
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 3:12 am
There is an actual Biblical admonition about winking relating to the character of the winker. Amazing for these ever-so-christian aging beauty queens (not Esthers).
rjwalker
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 8:52 pm
>>Yet, there are quite a few, both men and women who say that the Democrats and liberals hate strong conservative women.
What does the concept of “strong conservative women” have to do with Palin and Bachmann?
When I was canvassing in 2008, I was told by a number of Republican women that they were ticked that McCain thought Palin was the best woman in the GOP. Bachmann is her intellectual equal – which isn’t compliment
KarenJ
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:19 am
I can’t honestly think of more than two “strong conservative Republican women” who even come close to sane, commensense, intelligent representatives for their constituents.
I’m thinking of Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins.
Are there more? Not Virginia Foxx, not Marsha Blackburn, not Cynthia Lummis…and so on.
Nasty Liberal
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 4:35 am
Former Senator Elizabeth Dole (R-NC) is a mostly reasonable individual I respect, but even she swims with the tide, so to speak. At least in her case it’s said she got burned in her 2008 reelection bid by her pandering to the god pack.
Tidux
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 11:28 am
Snowe and Collins are good people – I travel to Maine pretty regularly and I’ve never heard people griping about them the way they do about Bachmann or Palin, or even Kelly Ayotte.
JoC
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 9:01 pm
Well written! Yep, I noticed the very first time I saw Palin wink, back in 2008, when I almost fell off my chair with disbelief at the sexist stuff she was pulling. The overriding thing that comes to mind, every time I see her do something like that, is….could I ever see a strong woman like Hillary Clinton do that? On the conservative side, Kay Bailey Hutchinson (though I do not agree with her policies)? These two are shameful and an embarrassment to all politicians everywhere, but especially the women who strive to work so hard, and most of all, they have made the US a laughingstock on the world scene.
RockyMissouri
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 9:44 pm
Kay Bailey H. is a Rick Perry doppelgänger – a sleazy old broad… She could have been gracious…but, noooooo…
Linda1961
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 8:40 pm
Very well-written piece Sarah. Both Palin and Bachmann are setting women way back; whereas Hilary Clinton had moved us forward.
Moongal6
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:57 am
As much respect as I have for Hillary, I have twice as much for Madeleine Albright.
rjwalker
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 8:53 pm
Fascinating article – but tell us what you really think! <G?
Reynardine
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 8:57 pm
What strong, conservative women? The only one who fit that, sorta, was Condaleeza Rice, and she doesn’t count with conservatives because she’s…well,… you know. The ones who do count with conservatives are strong like Limburger. You ever notice how, once they pass their prime, most of these alleged conservative hotties look like old alkies? Except Michele Bachman looks like a cross between rabies and tetanus and Sarah Palin looks increasingly like a high-end inflatable rubber doll. My guess is that there is something in “conservatism” that is highly inimical to yin energies. So I say: Women of the world, unite behind liberalism! You’ll save the planet, and it’s better for you than Retinol and Q-10!
Boscoe
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 10:51 pm
I find your statement to be an affront to old alkies and high end inflatable rubber dolls.
moles
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 8:05 pm
:-) :-)!
Linda1961
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 9:02 pm
Used to be, a woman couldn’t have a family and be successful in politics. Women in politics were rare, but that started changing in the second half of the 20th century. More women got involved in politics, many with families. No one cared whether the women were married, or if they had children. If Palin and Bachmann have are successful only married women with a pack of children will be able to run for public office.
Elaine
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 9:12 pm
Thank you so much for this. I was just saying almost the same thing to my husband, those two bring nothing but shame and embarasement to women every where. I am so very sick of both of them. Also, they’re both a pair of phonies. I’d love to see women take a larger place in governing, but not the likes of these two.
Elaine in Canada
wicket99
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 9:22 pm
Brilliant article. Thank you.
rod
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 9:26 pm
All I care to say about Palin and Bachmann is what silly idiot Bitches they both are.
Jolene
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 9:37 pm
I’m going to reread Margaret Atwood’s prophetic (?) novel, “The Handmaid’s Tale”, not that I really need any reminding of what kind of repressive, right-wing, fundie nightmare world Palin/Bachmann would drag us into if only they could. They would drag women’s rights back to the Victorian Age and probably the world into apocalypse if this country is demented enough to elect one of them President. At least Bachmann can string sentences together, tho that’s all one can say in her favor.
CJR
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:20 pm
Yes – I was just thinking about that book as I was reading this excellent article. A brilliant book by a brilliant (CANADIAN -yay!) author. The very disturbing thing in this book, and in the US Republican party of today, is those women who act as the “enforcers” of women’s oppression. I can see Bachman and Palin as characters in this book.
BTW has anyone investigated Bachman’s past career as a tax attorney? It’s really hard to believe that she was actually employed as such. Also, did Oral Roberts University actually have an accreditated law school? Again, hard to believe.
RockyMissouri
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 9:51 pm
Thank you, Sarah! An incredibly witty, and well-written article…. Don’t stop..!
Pam
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 9:56 pm
Really all my working career I have ended up doing the real work while I have watched women who ate prettier slimmer and sexier than me get the promotions.
Leah Burton
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 10:42 pm
You have taken yourself to a new level with this post, my friend! And you are correct…sadly. I hear it from both the men AND the women who call into radio programs in defense of Palin that she “resonates” with them – and what I am really hearing from them is they are all enamored with her physical appearance. The men are drooling and the women are wishing they looked like her. And THIS is how we pick politicians in this country?
Again…sadly…yes. This may be the most obvious, but we have seen this on both sides of the aisle. Appearance and emotion are the dominant factors in the decision-making process when Americans decide who to vote for.
These women are a dangerous distraction because neither one will win the nomination…but look at the base-animal interest by both men regarding Bachmann and Palin. I have already been asked more times than I can count whether these two will go head to head in a cat fight. You are spot on! America is waiting for this like the premier of a new Fall Season reality show!
Leah Burton
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 10:45 pm
(last paragraph I meant …”both men and women regarding…”)
Angel
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 10:54 pm
The finest story I’ve read on Politicus to date. Absolutely devastating indictment of the state of women in the GOP. As the father of an incandescently brilliant 18-year-old daughter, I am simply appalled as what is passing for women in the political arena.
Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe run rings around these two clowns, displaying intellect and grace in sharp contrast to these two. Unbelievable.
Reynardine
Jul. 1st, 2011 at 11:09 pm
You omitted any opinion as to whether I had offended rabies and tetanus.
Green Genius
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:39 am
I have a question, why is Bristol Palin untouchable??? She is no woman of virtue!
wiscogal
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:51 am
So where would Bristol even come up with this idea? Ya think Sarah’s been bitching & complaining-like a 12 year old girl- that “that Michelle Bachmann chick is copying me!” I can just hear the screech. What a juvenile mean girl she is!
dlbvet
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:54 am
WOW! Holy cow. Holy tamales. Holy guacamole. That was fantastic!!!!
I’m going to print it out and put it on my desk to refer to over and over.
This was simply a brilliant analysis of the absolute mockeries of Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann. That being a mockery of the caliber of a person needed to become the leader of the greatest nation.
THIS should be read by every female voter (and every male as well, gosh that would be everyone) in the United States. Truly outstanding. Thank you so much for your time in writing this!!!!
AKPetMom
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:59 am
Palin and Bachmann are like Paris and Nicole in “The Simple Life”; goin’ around lookin’ cute and doin’ stuff, but being annoyingly stupid and lacking substance. They are the political version of Paris and Nicole. They should run together on “The Simple Life” ticket.
Fabulous article, by the way, spot on and a fantastic summary of what lies beneath all of this political madness. Americans should not have to “dumb ourselves down” to elect the first female President. The first female POTUS should win the office playing on the same field with the same rules as the boys do, plain and simple. Just as Bristol said she joined a boys football team to prove to her brother she could do it. Maybe her mother could learn a few things from her daughter, if she hadn’t already turned her into simpering carbon copy of herself.
Moongal6
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 1:04 am
Brilliant, Sarah just brilliant.
You left nothing unsaid.
FauxPalin
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 1:05 am
Aside, it looks like Sarah Palin’s jury time is over.
www.alaskadispatch.com/ar...
poetica subatomica
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 1:22 am
Brava! Well said.
KatzKids
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 2:33 am
Brilliant! Fantastic! You totally nailed it Sarah! Thank you for all women and reasonable men who don’t do all their thinking with their “small brains.”
Nasty Liberal
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 4:14 am
Red light politics terrifically sums up our arrival at this pass.
Reynardine
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:17 pm
It’s not only a riveting title for a book on the subject; I can visualize the cover/jacket design now.
BeeEss
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 5:26 am
Sarah J – you have put into words what I have been feeling for a long time, and I am sure many other women as well. I wish this post could get the airplay that those two nutjobs get every time they utter their asinine nonsense. I can only hope this clown show is a passing fancy with the media and they will come to their senses before it’s too late.
ericmiami
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 7:09 am
Brilliant, thoughtful, and spot on. Thanks, Sarah.
Snoozepossum
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 9:11 am
Dead on, and thanx muchly for it! This is the crux of why it annoys the hell out of me when some stupid bimbo gets self-righteous with me and plays the “you’re against empowered women!” card because I think both of them should be launched out over shark infested waters via trebuchet.
The other thing their supporters need to consider but won’t:
“And only a certain kind of woman knows how to tease her way to the top, avoiding unpleasant incidents of assault along her journey.”
A professional cock-tease works by keeping everyone on a string – until she doesn’t need them any more because she’s strung someone that she can get more out of, and by keeping the competition for her attention going in the ranks to keep anyone from looking too closely at what she’s doing. The stripper analogy is very accurate. Anyone who thinks they actually matter beyond being a tradeable commodity is delusional, and so is anyone who thinks either of them will give a gnat’s fart about the general public if they manage to move up the political office ladder.
C.
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 9:43 am
Excellent Sarah! And totally spot on.
Eric
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 10:26 am
Ditto, Sarah!!! Spot on, intellectual and honest… A clarion call to those who’ve been lulled to sleep by the sleight of hand and trickery of right-wing female-mongering. I’ve watched the Bachmann-Palin sideshow in disbelief; there are such critical issues that demand our attention and beg for true leadership. Why are we distracted by such nothingness?! The fact that their verbal sparring has taken center stage and so captivated our national attention is a reflection of our own hollowness. Alas… Hopefully, we’ll see through the haze before Rome is completely burned to the ground.
kenjaminicus
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 10:06 am
Please stop taking entire groups of people and lumping them into one category.
This is a Republican, who can think for himself with the head on my shoulders. I am not being winnowed down by my party. I do my own winnowing.
I love my liberal brothers and sisters. Even though I do not agree with the entire article it made me think. This country would be a lot better off if we listened to and at least considered other views on things.
Reynardine
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 10:38 am
Dear Kenj: I remember real Republicans. Some were even in recent history, like Chuck Hagel and Charlie Christ. They have been driven out of either politics, their party, or both by the Partysnatchers, whose twin pillars are Friedmanism and Dominionism. You are right that they don’t deserve the name of a once-honorable party, but they have nonetheless taken it and sullied it. There are two ways to redeem your party: organize and take it back, or organize and form a party of REAL republicans. A RINO is actually quite a powerful beast when it gets pissed off. CHARGE!
P.S. Signed one of my books to Charlie Crist: We miss you! Come back to public service!
Nasty Liberal
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 1:07 pm
Affirm. The notion of voting straight ticket appalls me. Doing it November past actually turned my stomach.
Mrs. Tarquin Biscuitbarrel
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 10:17 am
Sarah, you talk about “home baked bread” like it’s a bad thing… [Pouts]
No, seriously, this article pinpointed absolutely EVERYTHING that makes me so uncomfortable about the Bachmann/Palin Overdrive. Passionate, incisive, and a joy to read even when one’s own pilot light is turned up full blast by the TRUTH.
Bravo, my friend!
Nebraska Native
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 10:28 am
Sarah Jones, this is your best piece ever! Thank you for speaking so eloquently for the women (and men) who are growing tired of banging their heads on their desks. I have printed this out, it’s a keeper. Thank you thank you!
elizabeth
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 10:59 am
“Some of us would like to be free. We would like to get ahead without selling out. We would like to be taken seriously. We would like to have authority over our bodies. We would like to have the right to make our own medical decisions. We would like to do be represented by someone who wasn’t slinging the sexist mud that she so desperately needs because it is all she has.”
Best… article…. ever…
Thank You for articulating so well what has been causing me acid-indigestion ever since these women were given ANY credibility at all.
bsanchin
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 11:45 am
As a randy heterosexual male, let me just go on record as saying that there is nothing wrong with Hooters girls, stripper, etc. I enjoy the beauty of the female form. I just don’t let it affect my voting habits. I also don’t let it affect my choice in doctors, lawyers, business associates etc. Everything has its time and place. Lust is a fine and wonderful thing that makes life more enjoyable. But it shouldn’t be mixed with politics anymore than religion should be. I know how to separate and compartmentalize. There are women who should be appreciated for their beauty and women who should be appreciated for their intelligence and accomplishments. It’s just sad that there are so many men, and some women, who can’t seem to recognize the difference.
kenjaminicus
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:10 pm
Excellent. What I said only better.
Amyloo
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:22 pm
Stunning piece of writing and thinking. Thank you.
Steve from Yellowstone
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:53 pm
It’s good that you’re only approving the asskissing comments and nothing dissenting. Typical left.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 12:59 pm
Really? go to Conservatives for palin and offer the same garbage that gets deleted here. You will be banned. of course palin is typical left
Your post was simply nonsense, I did you the favor of not being embarrassed.
Beverley
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 1:13 pm
As a retired professional female who nearly stroked out when Palin WINKED at the audience during her VP “debate”, I want to thank you for this EXCELLENT article! Sarah Palin took women back 50 years and Michele Bachmann is trying to pour cement on the escape hatch from that era. While Bachmann disgusts me with her unbelievable ignorance and narcissism, Sarah Palin wrote the book when it comes to “working your way up the corporate ladder”. Yeah . . . working on your back with your push-up bras!! I like Joe McGinnis’ new name for Palin – the Rhinestone Christian. The woman is classless, ignorant, and a total media whore that has no business anywhere NEAR politics. Thanks for exposing both of them for what they truly are.
Laura Novak
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 1:19 pm
It is a disgrace and an embarrassment. What would Mamie Eisenhower say? What of Pat Nixon? Old school, to be sure, but graceful and lady like. Yes, we’ve come a long way baby, and rightly so. But when did being a strong woman have to equate with talk of mud and personal muck.
Excellent writing, Sarah. Thank you.
AZChick
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 1:30 pm
Great article and spot on! Take heart ladies; the Democratic Party has tons of fabulous women who do not stoop to these levels- Jennifer Grandholm was a beauty queen and aspiring Hollywood star who later graduated from Berkley Phi Beta Kappa and honors from Harvard Law School. In my humble opinion, the former governor of MI is a true Jessica Lange type beauty who outshines Bachmann/Palin both physically and intellectually. For the supermoms out there you have Nancy Pelosi, a devout Catholic and mother of five who actually raised 5 well adjusted children and then entered politics after the youngest one was out of the house. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is an attractive, intelligent career woman and mom who embodies “having it all” as progressive Jewish women have been doing for generations with the loving support of their husbands (they were the backbone of the NYC public school system for a century). I think it boils down to Red State/Blue State mentalities; I graduated from Barnard were it was expected that I be a trailblazer whereas women at BYU are still today majoring in “Marriage, Home and Family”. At least Mormon women know that their is in the home; they don’t shake their booty in a cheesy man pleasing way to gain power.
Angel
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 8:09 pm
Speaking of beautiful, capable women, I’m totally in the tank for Sen. Amy Klobuchar. Brainy is beautiful.
LB
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 2:58 pm
Wow! Excellent, excellent piece of writing and a fabulous example of superior critical thinking, Sarah! You nailed it!
Georgia Eliot
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 3:37 pm
thank you, Sarah, you make me proud.
dug
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 3:41 pm
I’ve never read you before Sara, but now I’m interested. That was beauty. You just nailed it. wow
gsb
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 3:58 pm
thank you sarah. there are two women i read as often as i can. You and Leah Burton.
There is one subject i’d like to know more about. That being Bachanns 23 foster children. Did she as she tells us, raise them till they were able to leave her home and make it in the world? Or ( as i suspect) Just take in 23 children for short periods of time?Now raising them and taking care of them are different. In one case, she can really get credit, the other is a case of exaggerateing. To be simple, a lie. kind of like the lie she tells of not taking Gov. money. the farm has for years been subsidized as has her husbands clinic. Clinic is a nicer way of saying indoctrination.
Yesterday, i had a conversation with a Tea party person. didn’t know that until she said she was going to vote for Bachmann, becaus ehe was an evangilical christian who raised 23 childern plus her own,who stood for christian values. I told her she better check out the Dominionists. she didn’t know what they were. So it seems, there is a job to finish,information getting out to people who do not know or maybe even care. eyes and minds like these need to be informed.
CO
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 4:38 pm
Kudos. Thanks for writing this.
These two imbeciles have not only lowered the bar they dug a hole and augered it in.
“Hooters Democracy”…spot on.
Goes along with ‘Candies’ foundation/godaddy.
newmeximan
Jul. 2nd, 2011 at 5:52 pm
I can’t wait for your first book. You’re style is brilliant and clear. I can’t add to any of the other comments.
sideroller
Jul. 3rd, 2011 at 12:27 am
Your analysis is correct. However, most Republican voters do not understand history, science or logic when electing stupid leaders who then rip us all. They are happy to get a title “republican” and work to destroy the democracy and creating demon-crazy. So both these ladies(!?) will be a good term to trash this country. Democrats are not going in troves to vote out these highly testosterone charged women. No wonder no middle east wants our democracy.
Bob
Jul. 3rd, 2011 at 12:28 am
Ahhh, women, right!?! What are you going to do? Your brilliantly reasoned exposition of Bachmann’s single sentence has convinced me that women have no place in politics.
Tim B
Jul. 3rd, 2011 at 1:08 am
You think all women should be out of politics, but you make an exception for the men in drag. And you think your opinion is worth something? LOL.
Carol
Jul. 3rd, 2011 at 1:34 am
Hi Sarah
Wow, why aren’t you running for 2012???? An excellent piece. This is my take from across the other side of the Globe, Australia precisely who takes a great interest in US politics because 1/3 of my family reside there and American politics fascinate me.
Unfortunately the Republican Party in the past 30 years has never nominated or voted for a person with any substantial intellect and the dumb down American public from the middle continually elect these light weights over and over with minimal intelligence and male.
I’ll have Bachmann over Palin any day at least she sounds alot more intelligent than Palin. I have taken to calling Palin running around the US currently as a Political Prostitute. Anything for a buck, prostitute I respect more because at least they are honest about their profession.
I have concluded a long time ago that Americans who bother to vote only like their Presidents to be Protestant White Males!!! Ouch, am I wrong here?
omomma
Jul. 3rd, 2011 at 3:23 am
This is a very fine article. The presence of these two in politics has guaranteed a full-on clown show for at least the next 7 or 8 months. No serious candidate will be able to grab any media space from the boobfest [not a reference to their female parts]. I can hardly wait ’til Obama takes the oath in January, 2013.
Kevin
Jul. 4th, 2011 at 3:03 am
I love when the Pain advocates come out to play in the comment threads, proving the point that their pols who they support, are akin to crack whores on steroids, pretending they can actually do a job — in actuality, they can’t work at Burger King without it going morally and financially bankrupt.