Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Missouri Votes to Allow Christians to Discriminate Against Non-Believers
The Founding Fathers were explicit in the First Amendment’s separation and no-establishment clause that prohibits religion from dictating the course of any part of the government. Republicans are allegedly extraordinarily fierce defenders of the Constitution except where it conflicts with their ideology, and as Americans have witnessed for the past year-and-a-half, GOP ideology is firmly rooted in obeisance to fundamentalist Christianity. On Tuesday, voters in Missouri took a major step towards granting Christians the right to dominate public meetings, discriminate against non-Christians, and dictate school curriculum as defined by evangelical Christian fanatics. Now that residents of the “show me state” have established Christianity as the state religion.
Voters overwhelmingly approved the “right to pray” Amendment (Amendment 2), a measure that ensures public meetings, school functions, and educators are beholden to adhere to the whims and mythos of fundamentalist Christianity. The amendment was sponsored by Republican state Rep. Mike McGhee, a Baptist, to allegedly protect the state’s Christians, about 80 percent of the population, who complain they are under siege in the public square. The Christian’s, buoyed by support from the state’s four Catholic bishops, define “under siege” as not being allowed impose their version of Christianity on the rest of the population. In fact, McGhee worked in concert with his preacher, Rev. Terry Hodges of First Baptist Church, who said if the amendment passes, it will “level the playing field” because Christians “enjoyed home-field advantage for the country’s first 150 years, but that’s changed, and now there’s a hostility toward Christians.”
McGhee said the amendment will protect Christianity in the state and he cited an incident he claims proves Christianity is under attack when a teacher told a kindergarten student singing “Jesus Loves Me” to change the verse to “mommy loves me.” A similar incident in California underscores the pressure evangelical fanatics are putting on educators to fall in line and promote Christianity. A mathematics teacher was chastised for not acquiescing to a student’s demand to play religious music in the classroom, and despite citing the Constitution’s separation clause, a religious group demanded the teacher’s head on a platter for persecuting Christians in the classroom. The matter is still unsettled and the teacher is under investigation for “restricting Christian’s right to their religious freedom to praise Jesus during classroom time.” It is an alarming trend from Christians who claim their religious liberty is being restricted because the Constitution prohibits them from imposing their religion on the rest of the population.
The hostility towards Christians is fantasized by the president of Missouri Family Network who said, “religious liberty is pretty important and a high priority, the public feels the Supreme Court took this away from them over 50 years ago by ruling against mandatory school prayer.” Opponents of the amendment say it will “become the vehicle for a sectarian agenda, typically Christian and typically Protestant, in violation of the no-establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.” The amendment also jeopardizes education by including a clause that allows parents and students to dictate curriculum and instruction to fit their religious inclinations.
One section of the amendment says “no student shall be compelled to perform or participate in academic assignments or educational presentations that violate his or her religious beliefs.” The programs and policy director for the National Center for Science Education, Josh Rosenau, said allowing students to opt out of assignments would be problematic. Rosenau said, “What if a student says that long division is against his religion? Would he be accommodated by his math teacher?” However, that frivolous example does not address Christian parents and students who will impact how topics such as the age of the earth, climate change, and evolution are taught in schools if they are allowed to continue at all. According to Christian extremists, the Earth is 6,000 years old, climate is controlled by god, the universe is a six-day project of an imaginary sky-being, and science is the work of the Devil. Proponents of the amendment said it will protect students who want to read the bible during class time or drop and pray for rain, money, or whatever school-age children pray for. With the overwhelming majority of Missouri residents subscribing to Christianity, education will be transformed into bible classes and students will finish school with the academic acumen of Dark Ages hunter-gatherers; only more superstitious.
According to the Constitution, religious protections are already guaranteed under the Bill of Rights, and if a person wants to pray in public, they have that right. However, they do not have the right to force other citizens, or students, to suffer their superstitious appeals or praises to an imaginary being. Some opponents of the amendment fear “all manner of unintended and costly consequences including endless taxpayer-funded lawsuits” will drain much-needed public funds, but Missouri’s four Catholic bishops said the amendment was about “democratic clarity” which is code for the Christian majority dictating the course of education, public meetings, and public proselytizing. In a rare moment of religious reason, an Episcopal Bishop worried that prayer in public schools will “become the vehicle for a sectarian agenda, typically Christian and Protestant, in violation of the no-establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.”
Missouri’s Amendment 2 is a Dominionist ploy to insert Christianity into education and public discourse regardless the Constitution’s prohibition on establishing a state religion. The so-called “democratic clarity” is little more than religious imposition by Christian majority to transform America into a sectarian Christian nation and is part of a long-term effort to establish a theocracy. The movement has infiltrated all levels of public and private entities, and the educational system is their best opportunity to program an entire generation of “onward Christian soldiers” to finally establish the Christian nation they fantasize America becoming. The Missouri Family Network’s assertion that the Supreme Court “took religious liberty away” from Christians by banning mandatory school prayer informs their sense of entitlement to force students to submit to Christianity, and now Christian parents and students have legal cover to force schools to alter their curriculum to meet bible standards.
America is creeping toward a theocratic government the Founders evaded with the First Amendment, and Dominionists scored a major victory with passage of Amendment 2. It is unfortunate that taxpayers will lose millions-of-dollars fighting this religious intrusion in the courts, and all the while, superstitious children will dictate to teachers what they are allowed to teach. Like the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade, the ban on mandatory school prayer is enduring a long-term assault by Christian fanatics who will not accept that the bible is not the law of the land, and that Christians do not control every aspect of society and government. If Missouri was an aberration, one could chalk it up to regional religious lunacy, but all across America, Christians are infiltrating school boards, city councils, state legislatures, and Congress to impose their version of religious liberty on the entire population.
Dominionism is as dangerous a threat to the existence of a free America as the corporatists seeking to take control of the government. There is nothing as perilous as religious zealots with power and motivation to seize control of all aspects of society, and if Americans are not vigilant, this country will go the way of Afghanistan when the Taliban took advantage of an opening and began a reign of terror that continues unabated. The 2010 midterm elections should be a lesson to all Americans that when enough fundamentalists gain a little power and influence, no group is safe from extremism and religious imposition. This week in Missouri, fundamentalists were handed a lot of power by voters who thought they were protecting their religious liberty, but tragically, they just dealt a devastating blow to the Constitution in a moment of religious insanity they will remember as how theocracy came to America.
Apparently it's ultra-super important for Christian kids to be able to pray at school but not so much for Mu ...
All across the United States this month young people celebrated the end of their high school careers and ...
The uproar over a mosque being built near ground zero in New York is the latest assault on the Constitut ...
I was traveling when I heard about what had happened in Connecticut. I read about it on my cell phone. I hav ...
Going door to door, risking that each knock will be met with rejection, right wing evangelical Christian ...
serg
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 10:06 am
yeah i bet this it will and by level they mean F%^K you magic sky man said so
skippydoodle
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 10:27 am
This whole amendment was well planned and IMO a fraud. Firstly, it was a constitutional amendment on a primary ballot where there were some contentious Republican primaries and the Dems weren’t fighting each other as much, therefore guaranteeing a much larger Republican turnout.
There was little public discussion about the Amendment before the election. I can’t vouch for the rest of the state but I only encountered mention of the Amendment twice before the election. Once in a small article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. And about 2 weeks before the election our local public radio station had a great discussion with the bill’s sponsor, and pro and con religious leaders. But how many Republicans listen to NPR? I would guess that conservative talk radio around here talked about the issue, but probably didn’t have any real discussions about what it would mean.
What really happened was that voters showed up to vote and were presented with ballot language that basically read: Are you for or against the right for someone to pray in public? To a regular person without any background knowledge it looked like an affirmation of our current US Constitutional rights. I’m sure even nontheists saw that ballot language as harmless. Welcome to yet another way to cause problems for our overwhelmed educators and years of millions spent on defending that ridiculous scam.
I suspect the same people who pushed this through are small government types who would cut food stamps and medicaid in a second but have no concern over the expense of this crap.
jeff_000
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 10:30 am
I’m from Missouri… Once you get 50 miles N, S, or W of St Louis it is all basically rural… I am from KC area, and they still consider themselves a big cowtown and BBQ capital of the world… They still have all the stock yards and everything…
BUT, Missouri is the “Show Me” state, and the people there use it all the time… I still use it all the time… I am from Missouri, The “Show Me” state, actions speak louder than words… I tell people that all the time… So all you have to do, is use it against them… As I said, rural mentality and most non-belieers are usually fairly intelligent so it is pretty easy to shut em down… I did it all the time and still do no matter where I at…
All you have to tell them is, according to the Bible we are all God children, everything is the way God wants it or it would be different… If I am one of Gods children I must be the way he wants me to be or I would be different… It works everytime, and usually I get a roundablut apology, because basically to put up (“Show Me”), they have to shut up…
vhope
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 7:50 pm
First off, the stockyards in Kansas City have been closed for some time. Secondly, I live in Kansas City now. BEFORE this Amendment passed, I lost a job because I did not want to pray with my coworkers, my supervisor, and the owner. Since they were the only witnesses, I had no recourse. We non-Christians in Missouri are not treated like you might think. Oh yeah, and God created the Muslims that lost their Mosque in Joplin due to arson over the weekend. There is no reasoning with the uber-Right-winged Haters in this state.
Uncajoe
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 10:33 am
So, how long before they go ballistic over a Muslim performing Salah at a city council meeting?
Robert Chapman
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 1:15 pm
How long before they go ballistic over a moslem prayer?
They can’t they have just legislated his right to do it.
Uncajoe
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 9:24 pm
Now they have to deal with science too, specifically the law of unintended consequences.
Banned Atheist
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 10:49 am
I did a cartoon on the ‘Right to an A’ Amendment… I’ll leave the toon to express my opinion of where this absurd law will lead (aside from the lawsuits that are on their way).
eggheaded.bannedatheists....
A Walkaway
Aug. 10th, 2012 at 12:33 pm
I’m not sure where they are, but there are some cartoons put together by professors that are a real hoot (about “Right to an A” thinking). They went around the school about two, maybe 2 1/2 years ago.
At least one was wishful thinking expressed through a computer-generated video cartoon, on what they’d like to say to the students who get “F”s and think they deserved “A”s.
I’ve experienced that myself… had students rant at me about answers they gave, when they didn’t follow the rules and used the internet for answers (STILL incorrect answers to be found) instead of legitimate sources, which we tell them in the syllabus. I’ve also heard “Is that going to be on the test? If it’s not on the test, I don’t want to hear about it!” when discussing aspects of the subject. My mentor and others have related stories of students who demanded “A”s when they did -at best- C or D work. In some cases, the students threatened legal or political repercussions if they didn’t get their undeserved “A”.
Your cartoon was a hoot… from someone who has seen very similar behavior! (Usually the behavior was from one of the big “Party Animals” on the campus.)
Detroiter
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 10:54 am
Add “cheapskates” and “freeloaders’ to the terms that apply to these pseudo-religionists. When Catholics, Lutherans, Jews and others wanted to express their faith in the education setting, they dug deep and built their own schools. (And, by the way, stong academic schools that teach evolution and other facts and do a fine job preparing their students for college). These yahoos want the taxpayers to provide their religious schools for free.
A Walkaway
Aug. 10th, 2012 at 12:38 pm
Keep the fundamentalists out… don’t even let them begin teaching there, otherwise you’re liable to find those schools teaching creationism and using Barton for history.
They’re like a cancer… but harder to cure and sometimes as difficult to detect.
dave price
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 10:54 am
The amendment’s official ballot title:
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to ensure:
• That the right of Missouri citizens to express their religious beliefs shall not be infringed;
• That school children have the right to pray and acknowledge God voluntarily in their schools; and
• That all public schools shall display the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution
sorry? but that actually does protect a citizens right where when the Government, ( Teacher ), tryed to stop the child from singing ” Jesus loves me” was the attack to personal freedom.
Rmuse
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 1:02 pm
Wrong! Allowing a student to promote Jesus is unconstitutional. Imagine a Muslim, Buddhist, Heathen, Pagan, or Scientologist child demanding every other student listen to their worship. Christians would go ballistic. NO religion in schools is the rule of law. Go to a parochial school and praise the lord at will, but not in public school. This may come as a shock, but not everyone is a Christian, and by dog, it’s a good thing.
Rosie
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 3:30 pm
**** You said it simply & correctly!! when will people wake up!!
Elizabeth
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 3:30 pm
Sorry, you are wrong. The SCOTUS has ruled that the students’ right to religious freedom does not stop “at the schoolyard gate”. The student retains their right to pray, talk about Jesus etc. The Kindergartener has the right to sing Jesus Loves Me at an appropriate time (not interrupting class). A child has the right to read a religious text during “free reading time”. The teacher, as an agent of the state, does not have the right to read the Bible during free reading time, have religious posters, or promote religion in any way. Parents demanding changes in the curriculum is probably unconstitutional because the curriculum is for everyone.
Bob Roberts
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 7:27 pm
Our Constitution is VERY clear…
Public schools can NOT teach religion as “truth”…elementary, middle and high schools rarely offer theology classes, but discussion and “teaching” about religions is acceptable if done from an academic point of view…many colleges offer theology courses ,ect.
A student in a public school has the right to pray, sing, chant, talk about, ect…its unconstitutional to ban free thought/will…period.
Private ran schools can pretty much do whatever they want as far as teaching the “truth” because they are ran and funded by private individuals…again, they have that right.
Our constitution is not so complicated as to not clearly see what is right and wrong here…
Wake up people…wake up before it too late.
Tim From LA
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 3:24 pm
dave price Reply
August 9th, 2012 at 10:54 am
The amendment’s official ballot title:
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to ensure:
• That the right of Missouri citizens to express their religious beliefs shall not be infringed;
• That school children have the right to pray and acknowledge God voluntarily in their schools; and
• That all public schools shall display the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution
sorry? but that actually does protect a citizens right where when the Government, ( Teacher ), tryed to stop the child from singing ” Jesus loves me” was the attack to personal freedom.
Must be a right winger…he can’t spell tried…but I digress.
What are you talking about? When is it illegal to pray in school? A child could pray ANY TIME they wish so long as the prayer is NOT disruptive. I’ve seen children pray before they eat their meals. I’ve seen children pray before they go to class. Why is there legislation passed to repeat what the Constitution allows? I mean, you talk about how bit government is so evil, but this is MORE GOVERNMENTAL legislation that’s costing taxpayer money!
Man, Christians are getting more and more nuttier every year! Religion in general is a detriment to our freedom. TAX THE CHURCHES!
ignia
Aug. 11th, 2012 at 12:44 pm
Indeed. This is why it passed.
The “Ballot Title” was misleading…. and I believe the bill was written and sponsored by a gentleman who’s poor, abused children had to write a paper defending gay marriage.
You know, like I was given the assignment to write a paper when I was in school to defend the South’s to Secession. Also in Missouri. And my partner was given a paper to defend the con side of that argument, too.
As it was explained to us (we were in late middle-school to early high school, 8th or 9th grade, iirc) that we had to be able to research and defend a viewpoint, even if we didn’t necessarily agree with that viewpoint. One of those “Critical Thinking” skills, I suppose.
Well, Representative Pantywad got his wish. Now his kids can tell the teachers “Screw you!”
Oh, Missouri… going the way of Louisiana.
Susan
Aug. 14th, 2012 at 4:03 pm
That doesn’t protect everyone else’s right not to be subjected to that one person’s religion, especially in a public (read: “secular”) school. Thanks for showing exactly what is wrong with the religious bigots in this country.
Dan
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 11:17 am
This is all hunky dory right now, but what happens when one of these Arab dominated communities decides they want their religious freedom in school. What happens when white Christian children are forced to observe Muslim traditions? I’d say that’s going to go over like a lead balloon! I’m a Christian and I want NO PARTS of a teacher principal guidance counselor etc ” educating” my kids on Christianity. I choose the church. I choose the minister. Catholic Bishops and Evangelical Christians teaming up? Catholics believe that they have the ONLY true church and that EVERYONE else is going to hell! These people are the epitome of hypocrites!
Denise
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 11:18 am
There is no way this will stand up in court. Federal law, including the Constitution, trumps state law. On the other hand, being a “non-believer”, this scares the hell out of me. At least it would if I believed in hell.
jeff_000
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 11:37 am
I Grew up in the 60′s and 70′s… I had a friend that was a Johova’s Witness… He had to stand in the hallway everyday during the pledge of allegiance as it went against his religiion to say it…
My kids are 23 and 26, they learned it in school but didn’t do it every day like I did growing up…
That is why they did away with all that stuff in school to begin with… Too many different denominations to keep up with…
Brad
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 11:47 am
Imagine. Believing in a god of love that will put you in a burning pit of hellfire if you dont bow down.
Remind anyone of the gods of Rome or Greece? (hint: copy cat god)
of course hell came along when Dante told us what it was.
This wont fly. Even some religious leaders are againstit
A Walkaway
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 12:25 pm
I’ve been expecting this sort of thing… don’t be surprised if Florida follows suit (we’ve had similar things put before us as amendments).
If anything, this should bring to the front that everything all ties together… the push towards theocracy, the political move towards the 1%, etc.. This all has been part of the plans of the “Religious Right” for decades and it’s coming to fruition.
Robert Chapman
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 1:12 pm
As a result of their stealth campaigns to get “christians” on school boards in California during the nineties, a number of California school districts adopted right to pray regulations.
The result was New Age religions and Buddhism almost driving Christianity from the schools of California.
If Christians think there is public hostility toward them, they would be far better off with the old rules that silence that hostility.
The ‘christians’ have opened the floodgates for bitter sectarian struggles in the schools.
This will bleed over into a general disdain for Missouri and an unwillingness to relocate there or to invest in Missouri locations.
A Walkaway
Aug. 10th, 2012 at 12:45 pm
I am going to watch and see if there is any repercussions from higher education.
How will we tell that a student didn’t sit out evolution in the biology class (without evolution, Biology is a farce). How do we know they didn’t learn about their government, or about set theory in math?
This raises so many problems it’s not funny, and while we’re dealing with a de facto expression of that thinking right now (I’ve mentioned dealing with creationist students in other posts), this will make any student from Missouri suspect.
Matt
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 2:04 pm
The insertion of personal religious views into a public school’s curiculum is doomed to become very problematic. If one wants their children to pray in school and be taught that the Bible is an accurate historical text then they should send them to a private school associated with their particular religion. Even the various Christian sects can’t agree on biblical interpretations and are often at odds over who’s version is really the “word of God”. And, of course, Jews, Muslims, Pagans, Wicans, Satanists and Scientologists etc. would all be allowed to force their religious views into each classroom. I am quite sure that Fundamentalist Christians will soon demand that only “their Christianity” is allowed. And what about students who don’t believe this religious nonsense, should they be forced to endure constant superstitious bombardment? The conflict between scientific facts and biblical mythology will cause constant interuptions and will prove detrimental to the educational proccess. Public schools, in order to serve all of their students equally, must be secular and their curiculum must be based in proven historical and scientific facts. Allowing superstitions to influence public education cannot be tolerated. Unfortunately the students in Missouri public schools are those who will pay the price for this illconceived legislation which will prove to be an example of what not to do.
S. J. Reisner
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 2:13 pm
I am SO looking forward to the first High School student in full rebellion to bring a copy of the Satanic Bible to study hall and to take a moment to thank his/her dark lord for helping him/her to get an A on that math quiz. These people don’t realize how much this can work against their plan of dominion, too. If all students have a right to practice their religion in school, that means all religions. Hail [Insert Deity Name of Choice Here]. LOL!
george kahle
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 2:23 pm
Jackson Co. Missouri, is the site of the Holy Seat when Jesus returns from Kolob to judge the living and the dead!!!! Read the Book of Mormon. When Bishop Romney becomes president he will be endowed by his “Almost Christian Church” as a “Prophet” to lead all the world to Mormonism. they do it by taking no prisoners, they “control” everything!!!!!
Cristawillow
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 2:29 pm
when i went to school (a few years ago) every morning we had a “moment of reflection” 2 min every morning to quietly do as you will, you could pray (silently or very quietly) or pick your nose for all they cared. as an atheist i was fine with this, it allowed my classmates a chance to do their thing (if they wished) without making me uncomfortable by in essence forcing me to join in prayer.
i would never dream of infringing on someones beliefs, however i demand the same respect.
the thing that bothers me tho is them insisting on teaching creationism, i don’t mind talking about the concept in the abstract, but to teach it as fact when we have no evidence (aside from a book) of this, however DO have evidence AGAINST it, is just silly.
if you are that devote than put your child in a religious based school, if you cant afford it talk to your pastor/priest most churches and schools have funding to help with tuition
lily
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 2:57 pm
Have you ever heard of separation of church and state??? You’re giving church power when they have no right to it. What business does a religious sect have in politics? Absolutely nothing. They preach faith, religion and hope…so why is this being allowed???
Alan
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 3:06 pm
So this is ” show me state”
marilyn
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 3:09 pm
I am a Christian and this scares the hell out of me. The USA is already far down the list on education. Where will this put us. No more scientists, mathemiticians etc. Texas is no longer teaching cursive. This will be the end of critical thinking in Missouri. As it is slowly disappearing in many schools. Does this law cover college levels also?. If so heaven help us
Custer'sWorstNightmare
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 5:25 pm
Marilyn,I wish Cursive was the worst thing we had to worry about with these Dominionists getting their grubby hands on Education.In Louisiana,they are using Abekka &Bob Jones Books to teach Kids with OUR Tax dollars so many heinous things,such as Fire Breathing Dragons really exist,That the”New Math”ISN’T what God wanted,so they are NOT teaching Set Theory at ALL&are Denouncing it as”Evil”.(For those who don’t know,that means Algebra,because it came from Muslims),That The Trail of Tears was a GOOD thing for the Indians,because it brought them to Christ.Don’t forget that The KKK is a Good thing as well,since it tackled Drinking,Smoking&Wife Beaters.And of Course,that Africa needs Religion,that the reason they are all so poor,starving and illiterate is because they refuse to believe in Jesus&The Bible.There’s more,MUCH more,but I can’t type it without becoming literally Physically Ill.I actually found Abekka Textbooks in our Local Library here when they had a sale&bought them to keep anyone from dementing their childs Mind with this stuff.I was raised in this craziness&ran like hell as a Tenn.It almost cost me my Life&is STILL endangering My Childrens as well as mine,due to my Family trying to get not only Custody of My Grand-daughter,but completely adopt her&cut us completely out.Why?Because my daughter is Bi-Sexual&we don’t believe in their Dominionist Bullcrap.They are also part of The American Family Council,which Bryan Fisher just Announced on Twitter thay want to form an “Underground Railroad”to kidnap Kids of same sex Couples as well as Gay Single Parents.They already did it to mine twice&I had to get them back without Law Enforcement(I however was heavily Armed..be amazed at how Pansy Ass they get with a Gun to their Head.That’s what it took to get my kids back),because the Cops where they live also go to their Church&were on their side.I’ve never even been to jail,or gotten in any trouble.I merely refused to join their Cult,so they stole My Kids.This is all WAY beyond scary folks.To see more about what they are using OUR Tax Dollars to teach,check out this Article in Mother Jones.I for one Love My Country&will fight like Hell for it,but if we get squashed,I’m keeping a Bag packed by The Door,My Passport Current&My Gun Loaded.Sadly folks,we really ARE
A Walkaway
Aug. 10th, 2012 at 12:51 pm
Thanks for speaking up.
Dominionism’s practice of stealing children is a little-known reality, and there are a lot of people who have been through what you described.
I’ve personally known three who had it happen to them, and heard of many more through stories like yours. Your testimony just adds to the support that this is a real problem that is growing.
If you’re not “Good Christian”, you’re not even supposed to have the right to raise your own children.
Custer'sWorstNightmare
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 5:30 pm
Sorry guys,My Page just went COMPLETELY Apey&I didn’t get to Proof Read&Edit.Mea Culpa.What I was going to say was it really IS That bad here in America,not just Missouri.People HAVE to wake up&Fight back NOW..Also,here’s the Link to The Article in Mother Jones:www.motherjones.com/blue-....
Here is another one that explains exactly what these Dominionists believe:godsownparty.com/blog/wha... you don’t crap yourself in fright after reading these,you don’t have a Pulse.TERRIFYING!
MarkB
Aug. 9th, 2012 at 7:55 pm
WOW, another destination crossed off the list; Missouri no longer exists for me. Should I have to travel THROUGH it, I’ll keep my passport handy….
Reminds me of my parochial school upbringing — EVERY MORNING, reciting the pledge of allegiance, followed by sitting down in unison, and singing “God Bless Our Native Land”.
I feel SO MUCH BETTER having shed the onerous burden of Lutheranism….
Sara L. Holliday
Aug. 10th, 2012 at 12:39 am
Oh great the burning times are coming again. I for one will not bow to this agenda I am a proud pagan and will stand with all of my brothers and sisters
Bernadette
Aug. 13th, 2012 at 11:04 pm
I’ll be standing next to you, Sara! )0(
mjh
Aug. 10th, 2012 at 12:44 am
OK, let’s review:
Discrimination based on religion . . .
Suppression of voting rights {removal of eligible voters from the rolls, ID requirement to vote} . . .
Are we still in the United States?
.
SueinCA
Aug. 11th, 2012 at 10:43 pm
Anyone doubt the Dominionists are on the move now? When will people wake the hell up?
OZARKWOOD
Aug. 13th, 2012 at 6:52 pm
I was born and raised in Missouri. Still live here. Both my mother and father (both long deceased) were liscensed, practicing , fundamentalist Free Will Baptist ministers. They were most certainly, the most Christian people you would ever hope to know. They were also proud United States citizens. This amendment and the fanatical attitude of certain right-wing frightened Christians today most likely has them spinning in their graves! They PRIZED the seperation of church and state! They understood it’s meaning very well. They always knew that it would keep the State from EVER intruding into the private religeous beliefs of American people. How ironic that today’s religious Right feel that it’s PERFECTLY okay to reverse that contract now and have Christianity intrude upon the State side of things! The needless fear of these people shows that they have either completely lost their faith….or they have succumed to the lust of POWER!
scott
Aug. 13th, 2012 at 8:18 pm
I think the christians (lower case intended) deserve the hostility.
nunya
Aug. 14th, 2012 at 2:34 am
f**k this shit! f**k these christians and their attempts to FORCE their religion on ANYONE! this should be a red flag to the government. there is no separation to church and state here. i don’t give a f**k about your religion as long as you don’t try to shove it down my throat the moment you do its harassment and i will stop you from attempting to do so.