Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Mitt Romney Pops Up In Virginia and Proves America Dodged a Crazy Bullet in 2012
Over the weekend, Mr. Romney proved that we dodged a crazy bullet when he was roundly defeated in the 2012 presidential campaign. Southern Virginia University put up a video of Mr. Romney speaking at a commencement this past weekend, during which he referenced Psalm 127. This Psalm is embraced by the Quiverfull movement, “Children are a heritage of the Lord, and the fruit of the womb is His reward. Happy is the man who has his quiver full of them.”
Mr. Romney urged graduates to have a “quiver full” of kids if they can.
Romney addresses graduates, faculty, staff, students and friends of Southern Virginia University at the 2013 commencement exercises on Saturday, April 27. Watch here:
Southern Virginia University is a “wholesome Latter-day Saint environment”, so Mr. Romney’s speech there gives us a peek into the beliefs that he refused to discuss during the campaign.
Romney claimed that didn’t need to know what he believed, because that’s “personal”, even if it was going to impact your freedoms. Yes, his religious beliefs are personal, but when his stated policy goals as would-be President aligned with an extremist religious agenda, his beliefs became relevant. Mr. Romney referenced Quiverfull beliefs several times in his speech.
I did an interview with PoliticusUSA contributor Vyckie Garrison, a walkaway from the Quiverfull movement, in June of 2011, in which she explained the Quiverfull movement and the relevance of the Psalm Mr. Romney quoted.
The Quiverfull movement believes women are born to breed:
I like to define Quiverfull as a very powerful head trip. It’s an all-encompassing vision of a big, happy family which infects the mind and affects every aspect of a Believer’s life. The term “Quiverfull” comes from a reference in Psalm 127 which likens children to “arrows” in the hands of a mighty man, “blessed is the man who has his quiver full of them.”
Quiverfull Believers eschew all forms of birth control in favor of “trusting the Lord” with their family planning. The Quiverfull ideal embraces a “biblical” model (read, fundamentalist) of the traditional family which insists that the husband is the head of the household and the wife is the submissive “helpmeet.”
In practice, the Quiverfull ideals often result in larger-than-average families (think, Jim Bob & Michelle Duggar of TLCs “19 & Counting” fame) in which the woman stays at home having babies, homeschooling, homesteading, dressing “modestly,” and most importantly, serving and submitting to her “lord,” i.e., her patriarchal husband.
Those aren’t exactly mainstream beliefs.
Vyckie, who owns the blog “No Longer Quivering“, went on to explain that “‘pro-life’ groups such as National Right to Life, Concerned Women for America, etc., were much too wishy-washy for me”, and how “we packed all our friends and associates into our living room to hear Flip speak about what it really means to storm the gates of Hell (Planned Parenthood) and take back America for God.”
Mitt Romney pledged to defund Planned Parenthood and then ran that back during one of his many etch-a-sketch moments.
Mr. Romney did not support the the Lilly Ledbetter Act, and his reasons for not supporting it are much clearer now than they were during the campaign. One of his female advisers told us during the campaign that equal pay for women was the “agenda” of the “left”. That’s how Romney saw the need for women to be paid equally for the work they do – as an agenda of the radical left.
Remember, “binders full of women” came out as Romney was avoiding answering whether or not he supported equal pay for women. During the campaign, Lilly Ledbetter issued a statement after Romney’s binder full of women stumble, “If Romney was truly concerned about women in this economy, he’d take a stand against paycheck discrimination. Instead, he has remained silent and refused to speak out for equal pay for women and their families. Simply put, Romney doesn’t get it.”
Romney assured women that he “got it”, even though his words suggested otherwise, by announcing that he just “asks Ann”. From her, then, apparently came the notion that stay at home moms of the upper crust are doing a “job”, while poor women lack dignity if they stay at home.
Romney thinks that parents who stay home lack “”dignity” — mothers on welfare need to go to work, because staying at home to care for children is not work. Just this January at a town hall in Manchester, New Hampshire, he said, “Even if you have a child two years of age, you need to go to work…I want the individuals to have the dignity of work.”
Dignity apparently involves working for less than a man, but only if you are not rich. If you are rich, then working for “free” is fine, because your leader/husband and the Lord will reward you later.
Mitt Romney’s binders full of women and embrace of the Republican Party’s anti-women platform helped out him to female voters.
By quoting a Psalm embraced by the extremely patriarchal Quiverfull movement, Mitt Romney revealed the source of his beliefs about women. Jim Bob Duggar for president? Thanks, but no thanks.
h/t Mother Jones
Thursday on Andrea Mitchell Reports, Romney senior adviser Delegate Barbara Comstock (and transvaginal u ...
About those binders full of women that Romney asked for and staffed up with - it's not true. Romney neve ...
While continuing to try to play the victim at a speech in Connecticut, Ann Romney did her part for the G ...
Ladies, Ann Romney has some news for you! You thought you were looking for hope and change (also known a ...
On Fox News Sunday today, Mitt Romney blamed minorities for costing him the election, and poor people wh ...
kernel85
May. 2nd, 2013 at 3:01 pm
The mere reminder that he wasn’t elected makes me quiver with relief.
Donald M Jaquess
May. 4th, 2013 at 2:12 pm
Mitt Romney is a wort on the ass of humanity.
ARWKoppen
May. 2nd, 2013 at 3:07 pm
I don’t like it, because Europe is OK nowadays; so be carefull not to repeat the following in USA:
www.verhoevenmarc.be/PDF/...
KatzKids
May. 3rd, 2013 at 6:19 am
If you want to share that information, may I suggest you use this link instead? Your link is captioned in German, this is the same but captioned in English.
alamoministries.com/conte...
Off topic here though.
Paws
May. 2nd, 2013 at 3:09 pm
He’s mentally ill. There is just something wrong with this man that goes beyond religion. I don’t know what it is, but something is not right with him.
djchefron(Moderator)
May. 2nd, 2013 at 3:40 pm
The planet Kolub takes offense with your charge that bishop Rmoney is mentally ill.
Sugapea
May. 2nd, 2013 at 9:50 pm
Paws, Something must be mentally ill with Mitty…he congratulated ‘The Class of 2012′??? Did you hear the crowd laughing?
Sally
May. 2nd, 2013 at 3:21 pm
So between the Quivers and the secret militias, the secessionists and the people stocking up for war against the US government, we had a LOT of nutjobs who are very loud right now. I pray Dems can regain the House and get something accomplished for the people..all of us! before 2016.
djchefron(Moderator)
May. 2nd, 2013 at 3:21 pm
In other words you white men better knock the white wimmen up because them brown people are having babies like rabbits.It ain’t rocket science.
Elizabeth 44
May. 2nd, 2013 at 9:48 pm
Specifically, Muslims. It is important that we outbreed the Muslims. I kid you not.
Kimbutgar
May. 2nd, 2013 at 3:26 pm
If he is such a supporter of the quiverful movement why did he and Ann only have 4 children? It appears some birth control was involved or they had a celibate marriage after their 4th son was born.
Shiva
May. 2nd, 2013 at 4:21 pm
mitt Romney is a Mormon, not a member of the quiverfull movement. However in order to get votes he had to throw himself in with a fundamentalist and evangelical Christians and get their blessing. Therefore he had to ascribe to some of their beliefs which he obviously still does
Brian Pollard
May. 2nd, 2013 at 10:03 pm
Maybe one of them has ‘broken plumbing!’ Or possibly than Mrs. Romney will be in too much pain to have another child, given her MS.
inezt
May. 4th, 2013 at 11:24 pm
Only perfect children for the Romney legacy. Didn’t he offer money to his son if the fetus, his daughter in law was carrying was “not perfect.” Guess the quiver shiver must be on the bull’s eye. Anything off center is anono!He has the audacity to criticize a poor woman for being a stay at home MOM, but his wife with her wealth is considered a saint. What a hypocrit!
ChiChi
May. 2nd, 2013 at 3:53 pm
More children=More finance for the church.
Shiva
May. 2nd, 2013 at 4:11 pm
And those catholics do loves their babies
Daniel Berry, NYC
May. 2nd, 2013 at 6:47 pm
Roman catholics – in the West at least – have walked away from having large families. They’ve used birth control in numbers that mirrored the greater society almost from the beginning of the availability of “the pill.”
Shiva
May. 2nd, 2013 at 7:44 pm
I agree. However you still almost never see a Latino family with less then three kids and usually 4-6. At least in my area of Tennessee
The church really needs to visit its doctrines
elizabeth
May. 3rd, 2013 at 4:08 pm
Catholic church can’t change its doctrines. Basic teaching of the Church. Doctrine is unchangeable. It isn’t a religion of man that changes on every whim of human nature. Some catholics also lie, download music illegally, and don’t go to church every Sunday. Doesn’t mean the Church should change the rules.
Shiva
May. 3rd, 2013 at 4:23 pm
I agree they cannot change doctrine. The ridiculous things like priests can’t marry, oppression of people by threatening them with hell are just too good to be true. To change doctrine would have to admit that their entire history is a lie
I wouldn’t expect them to change their doctrine on everyday living. But it’s probably time they stepped into the 21st century because there numbers are not going up all that quickly. They may be big with Latinos and Romans, but Americans no different. The birth control issue tells that story.
Reynardine
May. 4th, 2013 at 11:08 pm
They not only can change doctrine, they’ve done it, many times. Priests could marry until the eleventh century. Popes weren’t infallible until the nineteenth century. Masses were in Latin and Jews were Christ-killers until the mid-Twentieth Century. If the Catholic Church still exists in the next century, you may bet there will have been doctrinal changes, just as there were regarding the findings of Copernicus and Galileo.
SinghX
May. 2nd, 2013 at 4:17 pm
I wasted 15 minutes listening to him address to the graduating class…broiler plate commencement hokum with a few added touches his minions wrote for him to make it sound personal. So cute…
He repeatedly kept defining “life” as, children, family and occupation, and, in that order. He obviously doesn’t want these 20-somethings deciding on their own future, but, follow what he pontificates as “god’s will”; the”gift of marriage”. Everyone is supposed to obey the bishop or leave the cult., er ah I mean, the church. I’m sure the 20-somethings will go right out and do what Mittens says.
What a bunch of oppressed maroons…
Shiva
May. 2nd, 2013 at 4:18 pm
Unfortunately mitt Romney could not stay on one subject long enough to have a consistent position on it. If the people really knew what his religion was he would’ve been laughed right out of contention. There was nothing funnier than watching evangelicals support him because his religion was all of a sudden “okay”.
It’s a blessing and not a blessing that the quiverfull movement is so small. Because the GOP supports it in the person of Paul Ryan and many other GOP representatives. But they never really show what’s going on. You would think that the women of the GOP would have a clue by what the men are doing to their rights but they don’t.(Some do of course).
Romney would’ve taken women back several lifetimes if he was able to. If he would’ve had a Republican Congress women would be jumping off tall buildings
Tonya
May. 2nd, 2013 at 4:23 pm
They have five sons and she had health issues, ms. That is why they stopped having kids.
Shiva
May. 2nd, 2013 at 4:37 pm
True, I forgot all about the MS
Kate
May. 2nd, 2013 at 8:10 pm
Ann Romney’s youngest child was 16 when she was diagnosed with MS. The diagnosis had nothing to do with when they stopped having children. They were obviously happy with five children and used some form of birth control to make sure there weren’t anymore since she was still of child bearing age for at least another ten years or more. Romneys’ are hypocrites. With them, it’s always do as I say, not as I do.
Reynardine
May. 2nd, 2013 at 4:25 pm
Well, Itt Romney is everything we ever thought he was.
I’d point out that the purpose of the original ADC program was so that mothers could stay home and bring up their children. Evidently, this was regarded as too beneficial for the children of the poor: they might do too well and get uppity. In that class, both mothers and children must be shunted into menial labor as soon as possible to prevent this. Wealthy children have their Momneys, of course, who must, however, be reminded of the fate that awaits them if their masters are ever displeased with their services.
JPT
May. 2nd, 2013 at 5:11 pm
Mitt Romney seems incapable of projecting any genuine connectedness with other human beings. He had no compunction for lying repeatedly during the campaign.
I will never believe that he couldn’t recall holding down and cutting that kid’s hair in high school.
Reynardine
May. 2nd, 2013 at 7:16 pm
He probably can’t remember it because he’s bullied so many other people.
patsy soto
May. 2nd, 2013 at 5:27 pm
the republican party needs NUMBERS.. and in order for that to happen, their women must be submissive and compliant, and be willing to become breeding farms. The republican party does not like strong women- women who can lead, women who can take charge, women who can speak their mind… they want stepford wives, plastic women who will agree to everything their men say… I thank God I am not a republican woman…….
Kathleen
May. 2nd, 2013 at 6:37 pm
Does this sound like a God that loves all the little children….
God killed the Israelites children who didn’t sprinkle blood on doorposts.
God threatened to have wild animals carry the Israelite children away.
God killed all the Egyptian babies.
God told the people to beat their children with rods or stone them to death.
God threatened that people would have to feast on their children’s flesh.
God threatened to punish children for their parents sins.
God killed two of Aaron’s sons.
God doesn’t give a damn about children, Mitt. So unless Ann beat, boiled or stoned your boys, she wasn’t following the word of God. That is unless the Mormon God came out with a book of his own.
Shiva
May. 2nd, 2013 at 7:42 pm
Fortunately archaeology tells us this was all about Ramsses killing his own child. The Jews borrowed it and turned it into the passover.
Reynardine
May. 3rd, 2013 at 1:43 am
Well, no, it was actually Ramses III, the heir of Ramses II, who *was killed* by his own son, with the complicity of his mother, other harem ladies, and their sons, because Ramses III was living too long for the convenience of the intending heirs. The patricidal son was.executed by strangulation and, though embalmed and buried beside his father, was wrapped in a goatskin to show what a beast he was.
Sandra Mort
May. 2nd, 2013 at 7:56 pm
Ugh. I’ll be the first one to say I’m glad we dodged the Romney bullet, but I DID take offense at this:
“the woman stays at home having babies, homeschooling, homesteading, dressing “modestly,” and most importantly, serving and submitting to her “lord,” i.e., her patriarchal husband.”
I don’t submit to ANYBODY but I don’t see any problem with dressing conservatively or raising my children myself instead of sending them off to be raised by strangers. Homesteading is as much about saving money and healthful eating as anything else — that isn’t only for fundamentalists! And when schools have 30+ kids in a class where nobody’s needs are really being met and you have the luxury of being able to take care of your own kids, what’s wrong with homeschooling?
Shiva
May. 2nd, 2013 at 8:01 pm
The subject is not homeschooling. These kids are home schooled for one reason. They only learn religion and cherry picked history
Kate
May. 2nd, 2013 at 8:18 pm
The problem with the idea is not the idea itself but the fact that it’s only applicable to the wealthy, in most cases. Mitt would certainly have vetoed any legislation that would have raised benefits or increased minimum wages, allowing others to get ahead. He’s all for keeping the little guy in his place while continuing to cut taxes for the wealthy corporate owners. He loves welfare subsidies from the gov’t for corporations, too, having taken advantage of them many times himself and using them to bail out companies he bankrupted, leaving their pension plans high and dry. He has no concern for anyone but those like himself. He would also be the first one to tell you that you need to be submissive to your husband and obey him.
I’m in favor of homeschooling when it’s not being done for reasons the other poster state, in order to cherry pick history and religion, revising history to meet their religious beliefs. Those children will come out unprepared for reality.
Reynardine
May. 2nd, 2013 at 9:01 pm
Sandra, clearly you are literate enough to teach a child good English. If you are adept enough to teach physics, chemistry, algebra, geometry, and a foreign language, I congratulate you. But if that is your picture, I suspect you have misunderstood” modestly”. It does not mean “conservatively”,”decently”, or “in good taste”. It means in a manner that would pass muster with the Taliban: long skirts, long sleeves, high necklines, hair which must never be cut and must be put up, regardless of traction alopecia, and head covered so it doesn’t show in public. You can’t even do the work necessary to keeping up a farmstead like that.
PSzymeczek
May. 3rd, 2013 at 12:46 pm
And regardless of severe traction-induced migraine or tension headaches.
Gloria Lynn
May. 3rd, 2013 at 8:09 am
It’s not the act of homeschooling that’s bothersome to most, Sandra; it’s WHO is doing the homeschooling.
The parents who teach their children that God wrote the Constitution and tell their children that science is evil are not educating their children, they are indoctrinating them.
There’s also nothing wrong with dressing modestly, if one wants to dress modestly. I have always dressed modestly, not because of religion or being forced into it, but because I am more comfortable wearing pants and non-sheer shirts.
Men should not dictate to women what they are allowed to wear or not allowed to wear; that’s not a marriage, that’s a master/slave relationship.
I had 3 children, almost lost my life during the last pregnancy so made sure, via surgery that I would not get pregnant ever again. Being married at the time, abstinence would not have been an option and birth control pills failed me twice though I faithfully took them at 5 AM every single day.
Pogonip
May. 2nd, 2013 at 7:56 pm
This level of reproduction made sense when less than one fourth of all babies born lived past the age of two. That’s not how it is today, and it’s not just a question of whether or not the parents can support the children they bring into the world. Every additional person adds to the weight against natural resources, including air and water. Each one necessitates 70 or so years of impact on resources and on other humans. Overcrowding leads to conflict. Shortages of necessities leads to conflict. It is arrogant and foolish to burden not just the parents, but the entire civilization with this excess.
Lisa crone
May. 2nd, 2013 at 7:59 pm
The Mormons and Mittens here are brain-washed, psycho elitist. There is always an ulterior motive with these people. They want control over others… Mainly so that the “the white man” can continue to rule as he has for many millions of years. Hello! We are not all the same and will not adhere to your rules and kookie religious crap! Marriage? Some of us are gay and are fighting for our right to marry who we love.
Rudy Gonzales
May. 2nd, 2013 at 8:42 pm
Quiverfull movement reeks of womanizing and sexual-ization of woman by this TEA-Republican and possibly all the rest. Women are relegated to chattel and ownership by this magnitude of man. He is a bunt short of a foul ball. These people are sensually practiced at the least.
Pam G. Fraser
May. 2nd, 2013 at 9:27 pm
Mitt is an abomination. A quiver full reminds me of jello quivering about which seems fitting since he has no firm moral ground on which to stand.
She is disgusting. When I think of the money they have stashed in the Cayman’s, the taxes they have avoided paying, it makes my blood boil.
These two are perfect examples of all that is wrong in our country. Utter slime.
Lee Anne Walker
May. 2nd, 2013 at 10:38 pm
As a Utah-raised-Mormon who loves the people but hates the politics:
I cannot believe he joked about people afraid of raising kids who get dogs! That he should ever mention the care of a dog again is beyond oblivious.
There were 3 Mormons with Utah ties running for President in 2012–Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman, and Ross “Rocky” Anderson. Pretty broad spectrum. Plus Roseanne Barr, raised in Salt Lake who inevitably received some crap here for being Jewish.
Richard Wirthlin, Ronald Reagan’s campaign manager who put together a winning combination of deregulate, privatize, and hate message dog whistles that brought us 30 years of Republican domination and the flat-lining of the middle class-was from Utah. Karl Rove of Bush-shaping fame was from Utah.
You cannot blame all Romney’s flaws on Mormonism.
Or can you?
Shiva
May. 2nd, 2013 at 10:49 pm
I b;ame it partially that he is just way beyond being in touch with humans. He has no idea how people live
carrie
May. 3rd, 2013 at 12:55 am
His religion is his business until he makes it our business which he did with his backwards beliefs about women. I for one want to know if someone believes these things. Huntsman doesn’t give off the crazy vibe. Romney is jut another Republican religious extremist. It doesn’t matter what religion, they all hate women’s freedom.
majii
May. 3rd, 2013 at 1:15 am
Even members of churches that push couples to have lots of kids should use their own judgment when it comes to deciding how many kids they’ll bring into the world. I was reading on the New Times site earlier this week about a woman in AZ who killed her six day old baby because she felt that she already had enough children. She and her husband are members of the Laestadian Lutheran Church, which doesn’t believe in using any form of birth control. The husband admits that his wife is bi-polar, has schizophrenia and depression:
“During the interview, Nina admitted she smothered Maya because she thought she had too many kids already and she was jealous of the attention [her husband] was giving baby Maya,” a probable-cause statement says. “The father . . . was put in the interview room with Nina and she admitted to him that she pinched Maya’s nose, twisted, suffocated, and smothered baby Maya.”
blogs.phoenixnewtimes…
PSzymeczek
May. 3rd, 2013 at 12:50 pm
That case reminded me of the Andrea Yates case in Texas. That one also involved a hyper-religious husband who kept forcing his wife to bear children beyond her mental health and doctors’ advice.
Laser the Liquidator
May. 3rd, 2013 at 9:53 am
Fret not dear PoliticusUSA readers. I’m about (and thanks to PoliticusUSA.com’s Rmuse btw) – to expose “Romney the Racketeer” for who he really is.
Where bat[c]hit craziness and his ebol nature will be truly exposed to his quivering core.
Stay Tuned – it’s going to be entertaining – Much!
David Gennaro
May. 3rd, 2013 at 3:39 pm
as great as this speech is …….it’s only in the left speaker ….. what kind of god is that ?… a god that only listenens to the left speaker ?…..
Mario
May. 4th, 2013 at 10:36 pm
If the right wing lunatics aren’t able to go after the government, which has them outnumbered anyway, then chances are they’ll go after everyone else they hate. That has me worried. How many citizens that are progressive, liberal, democrat, a member of the green party, GLBTQ, feminist, etc will end up being target practice for these insane fanatics? To people like Romney and his supporters you don’t even qualify as a human being if you’re different from them.
inezt
May. 4th, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Reality to Mitt, means evading taxes, buying companies then closing them down. He doesn’t want equal pay for women, yet criticizes stay at home Moms if they ARE NOT wealthy. He doesnt believein welfare, “it’s entitlements”. Yet, he has no problem avoiding taxes, though legally! I’d call that entitlement. He also believes that lying is OK if it benefits the LIAR! Imagine HIM in the White House? God does move in mysterious ways, as he did in the Presidential election.