Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Romney’s Greedy Drive to Divide Does Not a President Make
It is perplexing to determine what forms a politician’s ethics when they claim that their life is shaped by strong adherence to Christianity, and yet they use dishonesty to advance their agenda. It is not unusual for a candidate to stretch the truth during a tightly-contested campaign, but the level of deceit and outright lies coming out of the Romney campaign are unprecedented in modern politics. Pundits assert Romney’s blatant lies are a sign his campaign is in desperation mode, but it is hardly believable because for nine months he avoided the truth regardless if his support was flagging or not, and his fallacies are meant to serve one purpose; divide the American people. There are myriad reasons why Romney is unqualified to serve as president, but chief among them is his willingness to pit American against American on the basis of race and socio-economic status that fuel his entire campaign.
Observing President Obama and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie work together to provide relief aid to storm victims was a reminder that Americans are at their best when they work together for a common goal. President Obama has championed that sentiment throughout his term in office, and despite fierce opposition from Republicans; he has never lost sight of his promise to Americans that as President, he would work to unify the country. Conversely, Romney has signaled to voters that he will work primarily to advance the interests of big business, and to garner support for his agenda he has alienated 98% of the population including minorities, women, gays, the middle class, and especially the poor.
The sad truth is that Romney has worked tirelessly to pit low-information voters against any group that does not fit the conservative ideal of white evangelical Christians, and his primary tool of choice is abject lies. One wonders how Willard would be able to lead the nation after spending the entire campaign sowing suspicion and hatred among the population, but apparently, it is not his primary concern. Although he changes his stance on issues depending on his audience, the underlying theme of his campaign is casting aspersion on different groups of Americans to further his chances of winning the election. Americans got a taste of how Romney feels about Americans who do not pay income taxes when he was secretly taped pitting wealthy donors against seniors, the poor, and Veterans who don’t pay income tax, but his divisive tactics extend far beyond pitting rich against the poor.
When Willard addressed the NAACP, he insinuated African Americans were lazy and only wanted handouts from the government, and he bragged to a conservative audience that he told “those people” if they wanted “more free stuff, vote for the other guy.” It was not the last time Romney attempted to drive a wedge between the races, and he has continued implying African Americans are getting “free stuff” by asserting President Obama eliminated the work requirement so lazy African Americans receive free stuff for nothing. Romney’s campaign has attempted to portray the President of the United States as a foreigner since the Republican primaries, and Romney never condemned one of his advisors for using race as the reason Colin Powell endorsed President Obama for the presidency. Romney does not discriminate when it comes to driving a wedge between groups of Americans and implying the President is a foreigner is solely to turn the population against President Obama.
Romney also attempted to drive a wedge between his conservative base and public sector employees in education, law enforcement, and firefighters by accusing them and their unions of being primary drivers of government spending. His pitch to supporters is that their tax dollars are supporting unions and depriving children of an education, but his real agenda is eliminating unions from donating to political campaigns. He reserves that right for corporations he claims have an inherent right to buy elections and advance a libertarian agenda.
To drive a wedge between extremist Christians and women, Romney borrowed the religious liberty meme to restrict women’s rights under the guise of allowing religious maniacs to ban contraception, abortion, and Planned Parenthood. He also promotes enmity between extremist Christians and gays as a religious liberty issue by supporting the discriminatory National Organization of Marriage instead of promoting tolerance and equality between Americans. There are many other instances of Romney’s use of divisive rhetoric to keep the population at odds with itself, and it is impossible to comprehend his true motive because every time he promotes religious, economic, or racial animosity between different groups of Americans, he alienates a different segment of the population that will not support his candidacy.
Romney’s biggest lie to divide America is his contention that government is the people’s enemy, and there was no bigger example of his failed argument than recovery efforts in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. President Obama directed the federal government to be ready to provide valuable assistance to victims of the storm well in advance of the event, and it belied Romney’s assertion that states are better equipped to handle the monumental task of cleanup, financial aid, and recovery efforts. Even Republican governor Chris Christie, no friend of “big government,” was intelligent enough to know that it took the massive federal assistance under President Obama’s direction to provide swift and comprehensive aid in a disaster of epic proportions. Governor Christie also heaped praise on the President and the federal government for their rapid and sustained response and assistance.
There is no reasonable explanation for Romney spending the entire presidential campaign driving wedges between Americans except that he lacks basic comprehension that America is a collection of United States, and not disparate groups of individuals jockeying for superiority and advantage over “the other.” Romney claims to be the consummate American, but he has no more idea what it means to be part of a whole than he understands the plight of middle class America. In fact, Romney is the antithesis of American because his lies cannot conceal his allegiance to the wealthy’s drive to control this country, and if he were an American, he would understand this country either prospers and succeeds together, or fails miserably as a divided nation of religious plutocrats and peasants.
It is painfully obvious that Romney’s ethics are driven by greed and division and whether it is the result of a lifetime of privilege and religious indoctrination that lying is a virtue, or his drive to control all the wealth in America, but whatever his dysfunction, it is not American. President Obama says often that America is at its greatest when the entire nation succeeds, and he backs up his words with deeds in fighting for every American, rich or poor, black or white, or men or women and it is the mark of a real American leader. The only thing Romney accomplished over the past ten months was creating suspicion and hatred between Americans and it designates him as an enemy of the people and unqualified to lead. It has been 147 years since the Civil War nearly tore America apart because a group of men incited Americans to oppose other Americans, and while most of the nation moved forward and accomplished great feats as a United States of America, Willard Romney has spent an entire campaign attempting to divide the American people, and just like the Confederacy’s leaders, he uses lies, suspicion, and misinformation making him bad for unity, bad for community, and bad for America.
At some point in every person's life, they have known someone who seems hopelessly bewildered, unaware, ...
Most Americans would like to believe their representatives in government are looking out for their inter ...
Using anxiety to influence public opinion and actions of others towards some specific end by repetitious ...
Few would argue that no remark or comment from a campaign is off-the-cuff or unintended, and meant to do ...
Wow. This is just so easy. The day after President Obama made history by becoming the first sitting ...
Reynardine
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 9:04 pm
He has displayed a most singular *character*, hasn’t he? I daresay he regards the Presidency as the requisite platinum setting for himself, the diamond.
DMB
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 9:28 pm
Obama is a socialist/anti-american, who is tied to islamics. His idea of helping the country is keeping minorities lazy and dependent on the government to meet their needs. Thus using them to try and get reelected. Wake up america.
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 9:39 pm
Another one I am leaving here so we can all see the effects of sean hannity on the population. Read this one and you will know just how uneducated you have to be to buy into this stuff. This is what living in the south does to people
Reynardine
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 9:59 pm
See here, Shiva, I’ve lived in Florida most of my life, and *I* don’t write like that.
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 10:16 pm
Bah Florida isnt in the south. Its lake front property
Manny
Nov. 4th, 2012 at 2:18 am
FYI, Florida is one of the most southern states. look at a map. Florida isn’t on a lake, to the right of Florida on the map you will see an ocean and to the left, the gulf, not a lake
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 4th, 2012 at 9:08 am
er….I think it was something less than sarcasm, not to be taken seriously
majii
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 10:40 pm
Ignorance, frustration, and desperation are not admirable traits—you reek of all three.
Gerald Westerberg
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 11:18 pm
It’s easy to make such statements. Where is your proof? Give us examples, cite references, quote experts. Build your case, bud, or shit up and troll elsewhere.
Racist and disrespectful as you wish be, but show one ounce of brain matter sometime and quit parroting bullshitmyou here at the pool hall.
Read a book. Learn something. Think for yourself.
mGal
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 9:46 pm
I’ve never seen so many blatant lies in a campaign and Romney is supposedly a man of faith. Your purpose as a Christian is to bring lost souls to Christ by your shining example. I think lying may dim your light.
Debra V Hurd
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 10:01 pm
In response to Obama is a Socialist,anti-American, etc….provide evidence, documentation to your “facts” or do you use drop-outs Limbaugh, Hannity as your “documentation”? Making wild ass statements like that shows your ignorance, racism and bigotry to the poor…bet you are dependent on the system. Guilty dogs are the most critical.
clever
Nov. 3rd, 2012 at 10:36 pm
Great Article… Several reasons for the splitting. First, splitting is one of the major behavior patterns of being character/personality disordered, possibly sociopath. Persistent lying is also a significant qualifying behavior. Romney is WASP by heritage and by religion which supports his racism, male dominance, and ideas of Anglo Saxon supremacy. The only elected official that I know of that was so obviously disorderd with great oratory and leadership skills prior to election was Hitler. It was also a time of great economic and civil unrest and fear. We all need to revisit our values and stop the GOP movement that has allowed him to come this far.
Anne
Nov. 4th, 2012 at 1:08 am
A striking example of Willard’s divisiveness is that he has said if he won the presidency, he would not forget the fact that Gov. Chris Christie has sincerely and effusively praised President Obama for his assistance in dealing with Hurricane Sandy’s aftermath. I take that to mean that he will exact some kind of revenge politically. I mean, what kind of human being who calls himself God-fearing has a problem with a governor who sought help for the suffering citizens of his state from the president, the only person capable of making the resources for help available? It not only shows Willard’s cluelessness about the government he wants to lead but also a striking lack of humanity at a time of crisis. He is by far the worst presidential candidate I have ever seen in my lifetime, and that includes the late Richard Nixon.
DobieTracker
Nov. 4th, 2012 at 5:37 am
Mitt is a malignant narcissist just like Palin.
MNs ONLY care what is best for them.
Either you are 110% for them or you are an enemy.
If you are an enemy they will destroy you because they think that is what you are ready to do to them.
They cannot grasp the fact that being for someone else—for any reason—is NOT being against you.
TO A NARCISSIST LIKE ROMNEY OR PALIN, YES ! THEY ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THOSE LITTLE PEOPLE WHO ARE WHINING ABOUT A LITTLE WIND DAMAGE WHEN “THEY” ARE TRYING TO WIN THE PRESIDENCY.
It is hard for a normal minded person to grasp this kind of totally illogical, totally inhuman, totally evil way of thinking, but that is exactly and literally how the narcissistic mind works.
We dodged a bullet with Palin.
Now with Romney we are facing a guided missle.
WE MUST ALL GO VOTE NO MATTER WHAT AS ROMNEY’S “TRUE BELIEVERS” ARE EXTREMELY MOTIVATED.
DO NOT ASSUME OBAMA WILL WIN DUE TO POLLS.
POLLS ARE ONLY CORRECT IF THE PEOPLE POLLED ACTUALLY GO TO THE VOTING BOOTH AND VOTE ! ! ! !
D.Hunnel
Nov. 4th, 2012 at 3:27 am
Recently while watching a video clip of “Press Pass” on MSNBC (I believe) an economist pegged the situation quite accurately when she said “Mitt Romney is not a very good politician. He is not a particularly good businessman, either. What he IS is a VERY good ‘Focused Marketing’ salesman.”
Extrapolating from her insight: He apparently gets some feel for “what does THIS group NEED to hear me SAYING in order to ‘buy in to’ my underlying goals” and changes his speech to meet that need — which, by definition, means a “message” which changes with each different group he addresses (exactly as this article describes). He’s not BEING “devisive” so much as REFLECTING each group’s internal biases and divisiveness out into the broader reality (although I can’t rule out that he is AWARE of this and does USE it).
In HIS version of “a perfect world”, his minders would have been able to schedule him into a sequence of speaking engagements with a consistent group-”NEED-to-hear”, such that the summation of his recorded statements maintained a coherent story-line. Tough luck for HIM (and EXCELLENT luck for the REST of us) that they didn’t/couldn’t manage to DO that.
Because now we know. He’s a puppeteer’s dream; control who he’s talking to and what he’s SUPPOSED to get “buy in” on, and he will “reflect” a very predictable message, changeable on demand. The biggest “presidential duties” problem with that is this little thing called “foreign policy”, where HE has to be able to set the tone, not allowing who he is facing to set HIS tone. Haven’t seen ANY proof he CAN do that, (cough) sorry…
DobieTracker
Nov. 4th, 2012 at 5:12 am
please dont get complacent and not bother to vote !
polls are only in obama’s favor if if if if if
you actually go out and vote !
do not assume anything.
obama can only win if you actually go to the voting booth and vote>
remember, romney’s extreme right wing is very motivated and you can bet they will be at the polls and voting for romney—they are not assuming anything either ! ! ! ! !
DobieTracker
Nov. 4th, 2012 at 5:30 am
Those of us familiar ( overly so unfortunately) and who live in Alaska as I do, remember her and the Alaska Independence Party to which Todd belonged for 7 yrs and YES ! so did Sarah.
In any event, she made a video to be played at one of their conventions—you may be able to find it on youtube. At the convention the head of the AIP thanked her for the support and states ( I am paraphrasing here) the way to infiltrate is to get your foot in the door of a party (Palin chose GOP) and take it over.
That is exactly what Sarah Palin did. There likely would not have been a Tea party without her.
I galls me to say she succeeded at anything, but the GOP is ruined and taken over by those as extreme and even more than Palin herself.
After Hitler we did not think it could happen again.
After Palin in 2008 we thought we dodged a bullet.
Now with Romney in 2012 we see that ONCE AGAIN WE ARE COMING AS CLOSE IF NOT CLOSER TO DISASTER THAN PALIN TOOK US WITH MC CAIN.
IF McCain and Palin had won, she would have found a way to take him out–NO WAY was she going to get that close and let some old fart stand in her way.
Going Rogue was her way of campaigning for the PRESIDENCY, NOT VICE PRESIDENCY.
In her twisted narcissistic mind she felt she would be welcomed if she could get rid of McCain.
ROMNEY IS JUST AS BAD AS PALIN ONLY HE HAS MORE POLITICAL SAVY AND MORE MONEY BEHIND HIM.
Palin would not support him ONLY because she was angry at him for being in the position she thought she was going to be in.
Gary Vaughn
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 5:24 am
DNB spews his crap as he tells you stoopid libruls how Obama is a islamist, as the “baccer ambeer” leaks down the corners of his mouth tho his chin, occasionally spitting it through the 3 teeth he has between the three toes he was born with. HE IS AFTE ALL UH-MURKAN AND WANTS TO KEEPP UH-MURKAH, UH-MURKAH.
Eriskay Cavan
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 1:11 pm
Great article! I don’t get how he and the other religious fanatics can call themselves Christians, while constantly lying their asses off. They can call themselves anything they like, but they are not followers of Christ. If Jesus Christ came back today, he’d be one of the 47% They would hold him up as an example of not looking for work, but is okay with
Our President has done a remarkable job considering Republicans in the house and Senate have worked against him these past four years They didn’t even give a thought to the people of this nation. They were and still are determined to give the tax breaks to the wealthiest. They are like little kids who need their asses kicked!
What amazes me more that there are voters who will actually vote for Romney. Are they stupid, or downright racist? Because they are not smart.
sandppppr
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:07 pm
Robme has truly shown at this time he truly does not have a solid philosophy. He truly does not want the Presidency to govern, but just to carry the title, the same way he is addressed as ‘Governor.’