Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Morning Joe Calls New NRA Ad Taking Aim at Obama’s Kids ‘Sick’
By: Sarah JonesJan. 16th, 2013more from Sarah Jones
“What’s wrong with these people, Mika? What’s wrong with these people?” Joe asks Mika on MSNBC’s Morning Joe after showing the NRA’s new ad aimed at Obama’s kids. “You have children that had no say in the decision on whether their father is going to step forward to be President of the United States, to run for President, one of the most bone crushing, sacrificing things any husband or wife can do to their family, and the second they make that decision, their children, their family have targets on their backs and the NRA is putting something out like- what’s wrong with these people?”
Watch the segment here:
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Mika: They are out of step, out of the mainstream, totally out of sync with what’s going on in our society. After seeing that, I think some of the people who run this thing are sick. I really do. I think they are sick in the head. I’m serious, I’m embarrassed right now. I’m embarrassed for our country. We have a section of our country, the NRA, who should have a voice… They just took it – they just brought it down to the lowest, most debase level.
Joe: … They are now a fringe organization. With millions of mainstream Americans, guns- guys and women who love to hunt –
Mika: They should be embarrassed to be a part of the NRA at this point.
Joe: They have a right to protect their families. What the NRA once was it no longer is. This extremism is so frightening. It’s over, over, over the line.
Joe Scarborough also pointed out that the NRA released a new game for kids on the anniversary of the Newtown massacre.
The NRA went too far when they brought the President’s kids into this. It should be pointed out that enough of the people making threats against the President and his family are extremist right wingers, so for the NRA to blame the President for needing protection from a result of their own fear-mongering about him is so distasteful as to ring of Sarah Palin’s Blood Libel moment.
The NRA has been telling fearful nut jobs that Obama was coming for their guns for four years. They’ve lied about this President and smeared him with unconscionable accusations. Those lies seeped into the minds of the unstable and as a result we’ve all had to deal with their insanity. Perhaps the NRA should pony up to cover half of the President’s Secret Service detail, since they are responsible for some of the rise in death threats against him and his family.
Now they put a target on his kids. I can’t imagine how horrified and furious President Obama was when he saw this ad, but I know if I were Michelle I’d have a thing or two to say to the NRA. As a parent, I would call this kind of ad emotional terrorism — a threat not to proceed with gun legislation. I would feel that my children had been overtly threatened.
White House spokesman Jay Carney responded to the ad saying, “Most Americans agree that a president’s children should not be used as pawns in a political fight. But to go so far as to make the safety of the president’s children the subject of an attack ad is repugnant and cowardly.”
If the NRA does this over a discussion on reducing the gun violence in our country, what next?
This is the President who wept over Newtown, who relates first as a father to these horrible tragedies. The President and First Lady have been nothing but civilized in response to the awful things extremist Republicans have said about them, but that line was crossed when the NRA put their children as the main focus of a fear-mongering ad showing killing machines while discussing their daughters. It doesn’t take a genius to get the message.
It’s revealing that conservatives were absolutely hysterical when the media wrote about Bristol Palin’s unwed pregnancy, but they are silent when the President’s children are targeted like this. It’s indecent, repugnant, vile and all too telling about what the extremists on the right have become. The President said today in his presser on gun violence that protecting our children should not be divisive. Those words should shame the NRA, but it seems as if the folks leading the NRA are incapable of being shamed.
When Republican Joe Scarborough calls you out as out of touch with the mainstream, you are done. Great job, NRA. Americans finally know why they can’t get the sensible gun legislation they deserve for a civilized society.
At 12:15 President Obama will be speaking to the nation about the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the ...
The most surprising reaction to President Obama's State of the Union Speech came from MSNBC's Chris Matthews ...
With the news that Rep. Michele Bachmann's main Democratic challenger Elwyn Tinklenberg would not be taking ...
The MSNBC ad campaign Move Forward is moving forward into its post-Olbermann phase with Spike Lee ads fo ...
On MSNBC's The Ed Show tonight Donny Deutsch was supposed to be on to talk about the future sales of Michael ...
Sandra
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 12:14 pm
That’s a shocking, disgusting ad that has no place in the public square. For the NRA to target innocent kids with this scurrilous ad to promote their agenda is beneath contempt and basic decency and humanity. All law abiding and honourable Americans should object to it most vociferously. What a disgrace.
8^/
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 12:29 pm
they are TRUELY sick people, who dont give a crap about “WE THE ***TRUE***PEOPLE” at all!
djchefron
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 12:39 pm
Why are we shocked?They are john birchers,conservatives republicans.To advance their agenda they will do anything.Lie us into war,check.Out a CIA covert agent,check.Blow up the economy,check.Deny the right to vote,check.On and on they have proven they have no honor.
Make no mistake,when they declared a culture war against everything that doesn’t fit their world view they meant that sh*t.
This is the opening shot on this front more is to come.The question is are we willing o fight?
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 12:40 pm
I would say that morning Joe really slammed any Republican that goes along with these people. He also said that he can’t wait to see the Republicans who would be asked about this ad today and would have to somehow find a way to support it. if the media does its job today we will find out where the Republicans stand. Today they will find out that the NRA considers their children as nothing less than collateral.
The NRA should now be designated as a hate group. This has nothing to do with people in their guns unless you’re one of the people who count owning guns is more important than life. This does not represent anyone who is a normal citizen who has guns but understands their place and is a member of the NRA. if this brings people in to support the NRA than those people are thoroughly in need of mental health. Obama care should be instituted today and set of waiting to 2014 and get these people the help they need
Reynardine
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 11:08 pm
I actually suggested this at the SPLC Hatewatch blog (should post tomorrow), providing them with the same link I gave here earlier
m.nydailynews.com/news/na...
which relates how a psychologist, Dr. Rosen, who sheltered several children who escaped from the Sandy Hook massacre, has received death threats from *massacre deniers*. It would be bad if this were a joke. It’s worse that it’s not.
Interestingly, several NRA big shots live a stone’s throw from Newtown.
46A9MA
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 12:40 pm
Dragging two young girls into their bullshit, inciting hatred against them, the NRA has hit a new low.
Grasshopper
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 12:57 pm
While I completely agree with Scarborough on this one, I will always doubt his sincerity until he switches parties, and then, maybe. Can’t have it both ways. Joe, say it ain’t so.
djchefron
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 1:34 pm
First Joe needs to come clean on that intern that was found stiff in his office.
Reynardine
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 7:53 pm
It’s the party that switched parties. I suspect he’s still waiting for the old Republican party to com back.
Reynardine
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 7:55 pm
*come* back. My (1/4 acre) kingdom for an edit button!
Grasshopper
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 8:56 pm
I liked your first version better, anyway.
TStMauro
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 1:04 pm
De-fund the NRA–members cancel your memberships. You don’t want to be associated with organization.
1voice1vote
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 1:50 pm
“Most Americans agree that a president’s children should not be used as pawns in a political fight, but to go so far as to make the safety of the president’s children the subject of an attack ad is repugnant and cowardly.” Press Secretary Jay Carney
repugnant, cowardly, vile, disgusting, repulsive, abhorrent, despicable, wicked, sick, appalling, deplorable, shameful, twisted…
EVIL.
rdale
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 1:53 pm
It’s not like the NRA, or the GOP, has just recently become unhinged; that’s been going on for decades. For Joe Scarborough and the rest of the talkers to suddenly clutch their pearls in dismay about the racism, hate, intolerance, and violence that has been part and parcel of the GOP since the last half of the 20th century is pretty disingenuous.
Rivka Benoit
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 1:59 pm
After having lived through 9/11 these sickos have actually brought the children of a President into their hate-filled facist rhetoric? This is a hate organization.
TigerLily
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 2:16 pm
AND NO ONE STOPS THEM…the RW quiet as crickets. The RW constituency again..you would think would say something to their vile leaders. But no. THEY MUST LOVE THIS HATE.
Sarah Curington
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 2:28 pm
The NRA is an organization that has only one purpose: to proliferate the usage of weapons. They are in bed with gun manufacturers who of course do not have any reason to wish for a peaceful, safe and sane society in the U.S. or elsewhere. Using the President’s children as pawns will become a rallying cry for those base enough to belong to such an organization.
This organization will always have the bloody cry “from my cold dead hands” and use mass murders to their advantage. I’m sure that Wayne La Fear has his own gang of armed guards to protect him and his. It’s clear the NRA will always be the manufacturer of fear and violence.
Lidia maravilla
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 2:33 pm
NRA you are cowards that your only concern is your profit and not the well being of people. We the people should be able to sue you anytime a person is killed with your guns. We the people have the power without guns to take the NRA down. Lets push for laws that make the NRA accountable and hit them were it hurts-their pockets.
Reynardine
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 2:36 pm
Check out who is running the NRA. Among others, it includes Grover Norquist and Oliver North. Is the Polaroid developing?
mjh
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 3:00 pm
Hey, NRA gun-nuts!
You want the same level of protection for your kids at school that the POTUS gets for his?
No problem!
All you have to do is request it from the same organization that protects the President’s children: the US Secret Service.
Failing that — after USSS gets done laughing at you — you can always hire private security.
Of course, somebody has to PAY for that private security — and, since you gun-nuts don’t like the very idea of funding public education, guess who’s pocket it’ll come out of . . .
.
Kimbutgar
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 3:21 pm
I think Lapierre should be given a picture of those innocent children who were massacred to remind him of what he has done. I blame him for 100% for this insane gun culture in this country. He really should be sued by the parents of the children and families of the teachers for inciting willful violence upon their families and our society.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 3:24 pm
I really don’t think that would matter to him. I really don’t think he could care about your children or even his if guns are at risk
Reynardine
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 3:42 pm
There are already massacre-deniers who are targeting citizens of Newtown with death threats. They have been particularly menacing towards Dr. Rosen, a psychologist who sheltered several young children who fled the butchery, calling him, among other things, a player in a Zionist conspiracy to take their *guns* away.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 3:53 pm
This is going to drag the conservatives write down and the mud. If news of that which you describe hits the media, the conservatives will still have to find a way to back the NRA and the gun nuts.
I think we can start singing chestnuts roasting on an open fire now
Reynardine
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 5:07 pm
Link: m.nydailynews.com/news/na...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 5:44 pm
That is stunning. They dont believe the guy killed the kids.
Brigita Petrutis
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 4:09 pm
It is my contention that the RWNJs in the media, hate-filled preachers and irresponsible, publicity-seeking politicians have created the ripe environment for the very type of disillusioned sociopath to act out and commit mass murder. (NRA: “How do we sell more guns?” “Generate more fear. If we’re lucky, some crazy kid will snap and start shooting”.) Now we are the point where they can capitalize on their set-up. More hate, more fear, stir the racism against the President. This is frighteningly, swiftly, coming to a head.
Reynardine
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 5:27 pm
I suspect it’s more sinister than that. Check out this link:
m.motherjones.com/politic...
It’s not a far stretch to suspect this cadre is both inciting and arming a putsch.
Brian Loudermilch
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 6:08 pm
When Mental Health Exams become Mandatory BEFORE
you can Buy a Gun, Can WE Demand that NRA Members
are at the Front of the Line ?
The NRA Hates the Idea of Mental Health Exams and
for a Really GOOD Reason.
The VAST Majority of their Members would Probably FAIL.
That Advertisement is the Most DISGUSTING thing
I have seen in YEARS.
Reynardine
Jan. 16th, 2013 at 11:13 pm
Well, I agree, it was, for a few hours. But now, try this:
m.nydailynews.com/news/na...
Nash Montana
Jan. 17th, 2013 at 4:37 am
The truth hurts. Doesn’t it.
Peter Barnett
Jan. 17th, 2013 at 11:01 am
So it’s ok for Obama to use kids as political pawns (having them stand behind him as he signed the executive orders), but his kids aren’t allowed in the debate? It isn’t fair. We aren’t targeting the kids, we are targeting him. The truth is that Obama isn’t being fair or rational. Why aren’t my kids allowed to go to a school protected with armed security, but his are? This isn’t “sick” or disgusting. It’s simply true. The ad does not attack the kids, it simply uses them as an example, much like Obama did when he signed those executive orders.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 17th, 2013 at 11:56 am
If you dont know the answers to your questions here, think about your political maturity