Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Murdoch’s Watergate Reaches America with Allegations of 9/11 Victims’ Hack
Things are unraveling at warp speed for Rupert Murdoch.
After discovering that illegally hacked phones were more widespread than first thought and that in addition, police had been paid off, Downing Street sources confirmed that Government lawyers were planning to block Murdoch’s 14 billion dollar bid for BSkyB over the phone hacking scandal. This action is a separate move from Ofcom’s investigation into Murdoch’s fitness to operate BSkyB, which is worth more than all of Murdoch’s papers combined. Ouch.
A startling development that could harm Murdoch in America is the allegation that victims of the 9/11 attacks in New York “could also be among those targeted by phone hackers from the News of the World. The Daily Mirror cites an unnamed source claiming that a former police officer, working as a private investigator, was asked by News of the World journalists to retrieve the private phone records of those killed in the attack.”
The officer/PI turned down World of the News, and it’s unclear at this juncture whether or not News of the World was successful in getting someone to hack the 9/11 victims’ phones.
The Sydney Morning Herald reports:
A New York police officer has claimed besieged British tabloid the News of the World attempted to hack into the voicemails of victims of the 9/11 terror attacks, as Rupert Murdoch arrived in London for emergency talks aimed at diffusing the international crisis surrounding his media empire.
Rival red-top newspaper the Mirror reported the officer was contacted by News of the World journalists who said they would pay him to retrieve the private phone records of the dead.
Now working as a private investigator, the ex-officer claimed reporters wanted the victims’ phone numbers and details of the calls they had made and received in the days leading up to the atrocity.
The voicemails would likely include harrowing messages from desperate loved ones trying to make contact with their relatives caught up in the 2001 terror strikes on the World Trade Center, in which thousands perished.
Hacking into victims of a horrific tragedy to listen to their loved ones’ pleas is beyond morally reprehensible; it’s monstrous and unimaginable. It’s unfortunate that the callousness of Murdoch’s News of the World modus operandi will no doubt reopen tender wounds for the victims’ families and loved ones.
As if that weren’t bad enough, the cover-up of the phone hacking is turning out to be the undoing of Murdoch’s bid for BSkyB in Britain. The Independent writes, “Rupert Murdoch’s takeover of BSkyB appeared to be dead in the water last night after proof emerged that executives at his British newspaper empire mounted a cover-up of the full scale of alleged criminal wrongdoing at the News of the World.”
The Independent breaks down the collapse of the hacking cover-up:
The collapse of the cover-up came as:
* Rupert Murdoch flew into London and was seen entering News International’s Wapping HQ carrying a copy of the last ever News of the World.
* Labour leader Ed Miliband confirmed his party’s opposition to the BSkyB bid and won backing from senior Lib Dems.
* One of Scotland Yard’s most senior officers, John Yates, admitted that his decision to fend off demands for a re-opening of the criminal investigation into the NOTW had been “pretty crap”.
* The parents of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler, whose phone was targeted by the paper, prepared to travel to Downing Street to demand action over the growing scandal.
* The News of the World published its final edition after 168 years with the headline “Thank You & Goodbye”, and and an apology for having “lost its way”.
* An audacious bid was being made by to resurrect the Sunday paper.
The Government’s U-turn over its backing for the BSkyB deal is a humiliation for the Prime Minister, who last week said he was powerless to stop it.
Since April, when he was first shown a Scotland Yard report from 2007, James Murdoch has known the phone hacking victims number over 4,000.
As always, it’s the cover-up that’s getting the criminal. In this case, unidentified executives at News International misled Parliamentary inquiries in 2007 and 2009, saying that the hacking was one rogue journalist instead of the obviously widespread practice it was. Nine journalists and three police officers are facing jail over corruption charges so far.
If Murdoch loses BSkyB, his empire faces serious challenges. Australia is calling for an investigation into all of Murdoch’s media and in the US, Murdoch may face challenges holding on to Fox’s FCC license.
In Britain, Government lawyers are drawing up plans to block Murdoch’s takeover of BSkyB in addition to the Ofcom investigation. In America, if it’s proven that 9/11 victims’ phones were hacked, News Corp’s stock could suffer a damaging blow. While Murdoch will no doubt survive, the reputation of his brand is permanently damaged at this point, and we are only in stage one of the corruption revelations. If further witnesses come forward with allegations regarding hacking 9/11 victims’ phones, the flood gates will be wide open.
Our condolences go to the victims’ families and loved ones for what may unfortunately turn into yet another painful reminder of their loss.
Rupert Murdoch Bleeding Cash To Save Plummeting News Corp Stock MPs have invited the beleaguered News ...
The Rupert Murdoch owned News of the World phone hacking corruption scandal has gone international. ...
For the first time in almost 20 years, summonses were issued by a parliamentary select committee. The ...
Murdoch rode into town so sure of the BSkyB takeover that he threatened to abandon it if the bid was ref ...
The Culture of Lawlessness in Rupert Murdoch’s Newsrooms The next time you find yourself screaming at ...
Moongal6
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 3:03 am
Schadenfreude, anyone?
Take a moment or two to completely enjoy it. There’s more to come.
Sally
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 5:40 am
So I’m sure we can expect Sarah to quit working for this guy, and to issue a severe rebuke about someone who is so abhorrent…..waiting Sarah….still waiting.
Nasty Liberal
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 7:36 am
Not to defend Quitler, but… see Reynardine, below.
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 7:11 am
Thinking about this man’s character, his power, and the way so many seem to fear him, I have no doubt he is keeping immense blackmail files on all sorts of figures of note, and if his back is really to the wall, he’s likely to start releasing them. Expect interesting times.
Nasty Liberal
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 7:34 am
Oh yes.. the J Edgar Hoover of the private sector, as it were.
LBJ famously said about keeping Hoover in his job I’d rather have him inside the tent pissing out.”
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 7:47 am
In 1968, I never thought I’d say this, but… blessed St. Lyndon.
Cassandra Vert
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 11:15 am
Could be, or it could be that they know that Murdoch’s media machine doesn’t need truth to ruin someone who falls from his favor.
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 12:03 pm
It must need at least a grain of truth, or it’d just make up seven-foot grasshoppers.
dt
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 7:59 am
Although it has not yet been confirmed whether victims of 9/11 and their families had their privacy violated in this disgusting and illegal manner by reporters on Rupert Murdock’s payroll, it *has* been confirmed by the police investigation here in UK that victims of the 7/7 terrorist attack in the London *did* have their phones hacked (along with the families of murdered school children and the families of soldiers killed in Iraq) — so it wouldn’t at all surprise me if the 9/11 allegation also proves to be true.
I don’t quite understand why this story isn’t getting more coverage in the US. Over here in England, it is BIG — threatening not only to bring Murdoch down, but possibly Cameron’s government as well.
One of the weirdest moments: Murdoch was asked, upon his arrival in London, what his priority is right now — and he pointed to Rebekah Brooks (the widely reviled chief executive of News International and former editor of News of the World) and said: “That one.”
Not “To push the BSkyB deal through,” or “To clear the name of my company” or “To apologize to the parents of Milly Dowler”…but “That one,” Rebekah Brooks.
Isn’t that a very odd thing to say? What does that woman have on him??????
The hero in all this is Nick Davies, the extremely courageous Guardian reporter who has doggedly pursued this story for years now. He is the David to Murdoch’s Goliath, and he deserves a knighthood.
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 8:22 am
Indeed, Mr. Davies does. As to why more people haven’t spoken agains him in the United States, you sound literate, so I refer you to “The Case of Charles Augustus Milverton”, by Arthur Conan Doyle.
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 8:25 am
Read, “against”; it’s Hell typing on one of these slide-out thumb boards on just one cup of coffee.
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 9:07 am
One begins to suspect Rebekah Brook is either: (1) his mistress; (2)his natural daughter; (3) his niece; (4) the mother of a kiddy he diddled; (5) some combination of any or all of the above.
bee
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 9:09 am
or possibly Mick Hucknall…..
Bev Montenaro
Jul. 12th, 2011 at 4:00 am
Yes ! A thousand times yes. It’s been eluding me, due to being distracted by the “pre-raphaelite” red-herring, just who she reminds me of. Thank you.
Steve
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 9:14 am
I wonder what he gets her to dress up as?
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/...
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 10:24 am
I recommend the link you provided.
Meanwhile, Rebekah is a redhead and Rupert owns Fox, so I can feature he had her wear fox ears and tail and nothing else, while he dressed up as The Jolly Huntsman.
Sarah Jones
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 12:18 pm
It’s not news here because of Fox and the corporate owned media. This is what happens when you deregulate media ownership. WE HAVE NO NEWS HERE.
It is not a big story here because all of the media outlets and the politicians protect him. When the President tried to out Fox as not “real news”, the entire media machine smacked him down so hard and surrounded Fox like mother hens. We have NO news here because of that beast. RUN while you can, knight Nick Davies and RUN for national IQ and for literacy rates in your country – RUN. Fox News has destroyed this country and many families and friendships. It’s a cult, with unspeakable political influence and I doubt we are going to get rid of it here until finally the market tires of it, but how can the market tire of it when Fox keeps them ignorant, scared, and angry at everyone else?
Cathy
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 12:47 pm
My thoughts exactly!
Moongal6
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 1:36 pm
Again Sarah, well done.
DannyEastVillage
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 8:18 am
“Hacking into victims of a horrific tragedy to listen to their loved ones’ pleas is beyond morally reprehensible; it’s monstrous and unimaginable”?
Not for conservativces.
DannyEastVillage
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 8:23 am
Tbe great thing–and only saving grace–about the arrogance Murdoch represents and lives is that such arrogance always over-reaches. If only we had a press in this country that was not in the pocket of the over-reachers.
DannyEastVillage
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 8:28 am
If Private Citizen Rupert Murdoch is doing this, folks, what is your government doing?
More Patriot Act, anyone?
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 8:30 am
I wonder if some of the rival tabloids would do it. They were having a great time with their seven-foot grasshoppers and Bat Boys until Rupert started pushing them around. And who really sent the anthrax powder to the tabloid in Broward County and to NBC, anyway? Who’d really GAIN?
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 10:33 am
Given that the (as I understand it) second largest shareholder at Fox is a Saudi sheikh with possible terrorist ties, Murdoch’s hacking of victims’ phones, were it to be proven, would take on a whole new spectrum, wouldn’t it? Especially if emergency responders were involved as either victims or agents of hacking, too? Just asking.
Moongal6
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 1:34 pm
Sure sounds plausible too me. If this plays out the righteous way it should,
I will be so happy to see that horrible smirk on his face….gone.
Sarah Jones
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 3:10 pm
I am writing a new one on Murdoch (things are so bad I am actually trying not to cry as I write this), and I had originally ended with “Maybe this will wipe that smirk off of his face” — :-) But in light of the implications of what he’s done, I have no sense of humor left.
Basheert
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 12:02 pm
Murdoch is simply unbelievable. He is an angry bully – with tons of bucks to toss around. He has money and power but he lacks humanity. He is simply dirt.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 12:06 pm
So, it looks like Beck slid out at exactly the right time! There is no reason for Murdock to own every paper in the world. Especially when he cant run them honestly
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 12:52 pm
Re: the Charles Augustus Milverton theory: The BBC reports that several years before Gordon Brown became Prime Minister, he was “blagged” at Murdoch’s request. That is a Britiform term for the practice of impersonating someone in order to get his medical records, his financial transactions, etc, from anyone who ought to keep them in confidence. I would guess that Murdoch “blags” or otherwise gets files on anyone he anticipates might reach a position of power or influence, and that he therefore has ready dossiers on almost all of them. This surely includes, in this country, not only all politicians who haven’t lived impeccable lives, but all who can influence MSM reporting and carrier availability as well.
Ted
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 1:20 pm
All of you self-righteous know that you’d listen to those voice mails if Rupert had published them. Most of you have probably already done a Google search for them. Who are you really angry with again?
majii
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 11:39 pm
Do you know me? I haven’t run one Google search nor do I have any interest in listening to these voicemails. Be careful before using words like “all” and “most” unless you can prove your claims. Seems to me that YOU are the angry one. NO one else posting comments to this post seems angry, except you.
Could the reason be that you’re a Fox viewer and one of Murdoch’s devoted sycophants who has only now discovered how despicable he is?
Reynardine
Jul. 12th, 2011 at 12:38 am
Aaaaw, Majii, let the poor little feller alone. I mean, besides being a pipsqueak, he’s a cretin… or maybe it’s the other way around.
Sarah Jones
Jul. 12th, 2011 at 1:00 am
An angel must have just gotten her wings:-) Bells.
rodney Morgan
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 2:49 pm
My Grandmother and Mother use to tell me when I was a young kid years ago, that the media was controlled by the Devil and It looks like they were absolutely correct.
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 3:16 pm
The CNN mobile site currently carries the blagging of Gordon Brown as its lead story. The Sun evidently blagged the medical records of his seriously ill son by impersonating Mr. Brown to the boy’s doctors, while the Sunday Times blagged his financial and real estate records from his brokers. Evidently, someone in the Evil Empire also tried to bribe guards to give out the ground line ## of the Royals, so they can be tapped.
CNN has not yet reported on the 911 victims here, but, dammit, the moon is yellow and the night is young.
Reynardine
Jul. 11th, 2011 at 3:19 pm
Omitted to say, the blags occurred just before and during the time Brown was first Chancellor of the Exchequer and then Prime Minister. Stay tuned!