Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
The NRA’s Response to Sandy Hook Massacre is to Sell More Guns
NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre held a presser regarding the NRA’s position on gun control in response to the massacre of children and adults at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown. His solution sounded more like a marketing strategy for the manufacturers on the board of the NRA than a sane policy position.
LaPierre thinks congress should immediately provide armed police in our schools, because there’s no tragedy that can’t be used to generate more taxpayer funded profits for his corporate masters. He floated this absurdity, “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”
Yes, LaPierre’s solution is that there are “good guys” and “bad guys” and the way we protect our children is for the already under-funded public schools so demonized by his Party to pay for an armed police officer in schools and for a national database of the “mentally ill”, while avoiding a national database of gun owners.
Who will pay for these police officers and the weapons they’ll be needing? Oh, that’s right. The taxpayers. I was waiting for LaPierre to admit his reverse-socialized profit scheme, and just come out and say that the NRA’s board members should get the government contract to supply arms to our schools. Oh, wait. The statement included an offer to help train those officers:
Every school in America needs to immediately identify, dedicate and deploy the resources necessary to put these security forces in place right now. And the National Rifle Association, as America’s preeminent trainer of law enforcement and security personnel for the past 50 years, is ready, willing and uniquely qualified to help.
Our training programs are the most advanced in the world. That expertise must be brought to bear to protect our schools and our children now. We did it for the nation’s defense industries and military installations during World War II, and we’ll do it for our schools today.
The NRA is going to bring all of its knowledge, dedication and resources to develop a model National School Shield Emergency Response Program for every school that wants it. From armed security to building design and access control to information technology to student and teacher training, this multi-faceted program will be developed by the very best experts in their fields.
So, yes, it appears as if the NRA is calling for more of your tax money to fund their profits via their “National School Shield Emergency Response Program.” The solution is to give the NRA board members (two of which are gun manufacturers) a government contract, because they are such great citizens and worthy of our money, whereas teachers aren’t.
It’s not like they don’t make enough money in our bloated defense budget. No. They must profit off of our schools, where we are told we can’t afford to pay our teachers.
Code Pink was there to protest the NRA, and naturally LaPierre refused to answer any questions because the NRA doesn’t do dialogue. They can’t afford to permit dialogue. In order to shut down any attempt at discussion on gun control, he took aim at those who “politicized” the tragic events in Connecticut. By this he means that anyone who seeks to mitigate the problem of massacre by assault weapon is guilty of “politicizing”, whereas his call for more profits and less responsibility is just good citizenship.
Logic tells us that after 9/11 we immediately jumped into solution and prevention mode, because that is what people who are not brain dead or brainwashed do after a horrible tragedy. We know we can’t solve all of the problems, but we seek to mitigate their occurence as best as we can. We seek to do our best to provide a safer country for our children.
LaPierre’s argument of “good guys” and “bad guys” and blaming the media, video games and movies for the NRA’s relentless pursuit of profit at the expense of Americans’ safety will appeal to the simple-minded fearful bunch — aka, the Fox News conservatives. But it will fail to move anyone with two brain cells to rub together because it’s as transparent as it is pathetic.
When looking for “bad guys”, do we only blame the mentally ill for taking advantage of a readily available weapon of mass destruction, or at some point after repeated incidents, do we also blame the manufacturers pushing to make those weapons available to anyone, no matter what, with no accountability and no responsibility?
Wayne LaPierre wants Big Government for the mentally ill, and no government for the corporations he represents. Big shocker. Any regulation of his corporate masters is evil, but the massacre of innocent Americans is to be blamed on video games and promptly ignored after harvesting for profit.
Notice how no matter what, the NRA never takes any responsibility for America’s obscene levels of gun violence. It’s always someone else’s fault and the solution is never to look at the unfathomable destruction an assault weapon is capable of, but rather to use the taxpayers’ money to create a need for MORE weapons.
We’ve found the “bad guys”, and they’re not going to be stopped by armed police in our schools, if indeed that is our vision for American children.
Image: cropped version of Getty Images photo
Wayne LaPierre went so far off the crazy cliff today that even Fox News had to call out his conspiracy l ...
Breitbart.com has the conservatives super confused again. This time it's writer John Nolte, seeking to ju ...
I just finished watching the National Rifle Association (NRA) "Press Event". The "watch Wayne read" NRA ...
NRA Elementary School Armed Guards When human beings have a conscience and nominal ethics, they feel gu ...
Since the day it happened there has been a common thread in the endless discussions about Sandy Hook. Over a ...
djchefron
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 1:22 pm
Its funny that he said put police officers in every school.Well that’s going to be hard to do since their board of directors support slashing public workers from the payroll. Breaking unions is part of the far right agenda.Sometimes I wonder do they put 1+1 together and come up with a negative 3. SMDH
mjh
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 5:31 pm
Its funny that he said put police officers in every school.Well that’s going to be hard to do since their board of directors support slashing public workers from the payroll.
They’ll hire private security — like Blackwater/Xe . . .
.
djchefron
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 5:48 pm
But,but,but the deficit,WHAT ABOUT THE DEFICT?waaaaaaaaaa.No money to feed children but if it has anything to do with militarizing our society the sky’s the limit.That’s what jesus would do.Got to love the free market
luciboo
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 1:33 pm
I can’t believe this is what we have become as a country. It breaks my heart to have listened to this hateful rhetoric.
Can we save ourselves?
Or fo we succumb to this
Reynardine
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 2:08 pm
If they don’t stop it, they’ll go blind… Too late.
Dale Thomas
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 2:39 pm
They will pay for the police by slashing teachers’ salaries, throwing kids off of food stamps and making kindergarteners work in place of janitors.
Makes perfect sense, doesn’t it.
If they’re really smart, they will fire the school psychologist in order to pay for the police officer.
Why doesn’t the MSM discuss the composition of the NRA board of directors????????
mjh
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 5:29 pm
Why doesn’t the MSM discuss the composition of the NRA board of directors????????
‘Cause the MSM’s board of directors has largely the same composition . . .
.
Dancertiffy
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 2:40 pm
Today it should be obvious that the NRA is out of touch with the reality of the carnage being inflicted on our communities. Their vision of our schools being protected by armed guards, lots and lots and lots of armed guards, is just plain sick and stupid.
The arrogant jerks over there at the NRA need to be rounded up, charged as accessories to murder and then prosecuted and jailed.
Hooray for Code Pink
mathazar
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 3:25 pm
This is reminiscent of Palin’s first interview with Katie Couric.
Train wreck.
djchefron
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 3:02 pm
You just cant make this up
While the NRA Was on TV Talking About the Need for More Guns Some Guy Was Walking Up and Down a Road in Pennsylvania Shooting People
gawker.com/5970497/while-...
Tiffany Lathrop
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 3:24 pm
The NRA acknowledges that we are a culture of violence yet they work relentlessly to insure maximum firepower for everyone in this culture of violence, and they do it for profit. This is, without a doubt, at the very least, despicable and irresponsible behavior, and at worst should be seen as criminal behavior worthy of arrest, prosecution for accessories to murder, and incarceration.
Oh, as the NRA was holding its news conference today there was another mass shooting occuring in Pa.
Frank
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 3:52 pm
Gun owners should pay gun tax to cover all cost including funerals.
sally gruber
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 4:18 pm
I have a friend who lives in an affluent community in Pennsylvania; it’s just she and her husband and they DO have a security system….they also own six guns, three of them rifles. I asked her “why so many guns?”; she said to protect ourselves….. This is so typical of the arrogance of right wing gun owners – who the hell needs six guns in an upscale development! It’s not like it’s North Philly ! In my opinion, it should be one house, one gun and NO rifles…..SG
Reynardine
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 7:13 pm
Actually, if you live in the countryside and have chickens or rabbits, you could need a varmint gun, generally a light rifle or shotgun, and there are people who hunt for the pot and need something better. I have a varmint gun (brandished at a couple of foxes and a mink but never fired) and no handgun.
Bob
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 4:42 pm
Are you kidding me?
Wanting to protect yourself in an upsale community is arrogant?
But, it’s okay to protect yourself in North Philly?
Isn’t this a little racist?
Benny Belloes
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 5:03 pm
Every gun in this country needs to have its serial and its owner kept in a national data base. Every new gun manufactured or imported into this country needs to have its serial number registered and when it is sold that number registered to the buyer. Then every time the gun is sold the serial number is transferred to the new owner.It works when automobiles are built it will work in the same manner for guns. Any other gun law change id not worth the time it takes to implement.
djchefron
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 6:23 pm
I know I shouldn’t mock but WTF!!!Just fed up with this cluster-fuck
East Windsor gun store raided after man caught stealing rifle
www.wfsb.com/story/203964...?
autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=8090780
The same store that sold the weapons in the Newtown Massacre.
Responsible gun owners my arse
Anne
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 6:56 pm
They are showing just how tone-deaf and out of touch they truly are. It’s bad enough that they have opposed common sense measures that could have saved countless lives, but now they are advocating a non-solution that would create the backdrop for situation that could easily spiral out of control if what they suggest is actually implemented.
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 7:06 pm
First of all Ned, no one is talkign about taking all guns away. Just assault type rifles.
Next Ned, most murders are committed by people who know the person they shot or are relatives. You can drop the criminals thing now.
Last, we dont want kids brought up in a gun culture. We want to progress past the childish behavior of people who think guns are the living end. Wy not stop the bad guy with the guin before he gets to the school? Ever think of that?
Nper
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 7:37 pm
But you think its fine for the president to be protected by a gun? The tern assault weapon is a joke! You keep living in your dream world withthe rest of the people that are so out of touch. The people who came up with this term based it on a gun that looks “scary”. The weapons they want to ban are used by hunters every day because of there reliability and ability to withstand the elements! These are not automatic weapons as the media portrays them to be these are semi auto one shot for o e trigger pull. Maybe if people like you would take time to educate your on guns instead of being afraid of them you may be surprised what you can learn! And one more thing, you can deny that if that principal or on of those teachers were armed that day maybe one of them could have prevented even one of those children from being killed it would have been well worth it! And something must be wrong with my “assault rifle” because it has yet to jump out of my safe and kill someone yet! Why dont you people address the bigger issue of the mental heath situation in this counrty! And one last thought, tabacco is the leading killer in this country and drunk drivers have killed more children in this country that any gun crime so why arent you talkin about banning alchol and cigarettes; because this shooting is just a reason for the anti gunners to push their gun ban agenda! And what happened to my comment i posted earlier? You dont want the rest of the people on here tO read it and maybe get a little turn off by you agenda?
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 7:58 pm
Sorry ned. We all know what an assault rifle is and its not used for deer hunting. We know they are not automatics.
I didnt delete your last post, but I can tell you that you are clueless on whats going on
Guns have their place. If the president is protected by guns thats fine. You need to get used to stopping people before they get to the schools. If they didnt have a weapon they could do mass killign with they wouldnt go there
majii
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 10:46 pm
If any president needs to be protected by assault-weapon carrying Secret Service personnel, it’s this one. Threats to his life have been estimated at being a 400% increase over those of President Bush. Not until the election of Barack Obama had I ever seen anyone show up at a political event sporting an AR-15 and carrying other guns, and never had I seen anyone at a political event with a sign that said,”We showed up unarmed this time, President Obama,”–a clear threat on the president’s life, simply because he’s not a republican. The president is unarmed, and I doubt that all attending these political events that were carrying weapons were trying to make a fashion statement. As a retired teacher, I don’t like the idea of our kids thinking that guns are the only answer to remaining safe because this isn’t true. During a major part of our history, Americans were safe without the presence of 200,000,000 guns. Academic research shows that there is a strong correlation between gun ownership and gun violence, and that more guns does not mean less violence.
www.kellogg.northwestern....
Wayne LaPierre said that violent crime in jurisdictions that recognize the ‘right to carry’ is lower than in areas that prevent it.
PolitiFact rated this claim as FALSE.
www.politifact.com/truth-...
Mayor Bloomberg,”Georgia and other states with weak gun laws have more crime.
PolitiFact rated this claim as mostly true.
www.politifact.com/georgi...
There are beliefs and there are facts. Beliefs never trump facts.
John Taylor
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 8:29 pm
Why is this only about schools? If we want people (including children) to be safe, then wouldn’t we want armed guards at Walmart, the local movie theaters, malls, churches, and everywhere? If guns keep us safe, just where is there no need for trained armed guards? Don’t we need armed guards on every street corner to protect us from villinous pedestrians? I’ve heard a lot of stupid stuff coming from the NRA, but this takes the cake.
All the NRA did was to toss out a distraction. There was no mention of assault type weapons or hi-cap mags as being any part of the problem. If the NRA thought they had a winner with this hare-brained proposal, they’re living in some alternate universe.
labman57
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 9:38 pm
The NRA seems to be advocating a return to the days of the Old West, when most adult males were expected to defend themselves by carrying a sidearm, and anyone who opted to not “pack heat” — or hire gunmen to provide protection for their interests — was regarded as either a naive idealist or a coward.
KatzKids
Dec. 23rd, 2012 at 1:09 pm
Exactly, but even in the Wild West days, most towns had a rule that no guns could be carried within the city limits. They were also excluded in most bars.
Today’s gun maniacs have passed laws to allow guns in bars, churches, colleges, & most all public areas. Many of the southern states don’t even have to get a concealed weapon permit to carry. Anyone who wants to pack can do so, regardless of criminal records, mental illnesses, or any other regulation. There are even some independent Baptist churches who are giving ccw training to lure more suckers to attend.
Jarhead
Dec. 23rd, 2012 at 2:57 am
1. I have to agree that the only way this tragedy could have been lessened would have been with an armed immediate response from somebody at the scene while it was active. No matter how good your “security” precautions are…without the ability to either make yourself invulnerable or meet the threat with equal or greater force your done!
2. Yes AR style weapons are used for hunting…also used for sport shooting competions.
3. Why did he shoot up the school? Probably because he knew it would make him famous…Pushes all the “buttons”… Young victims, Community Heros (Teachers) vics… No chance of interference with his plans till its to late.
4. I don’t know what makes a person capable of these kinds of crimes, but it is caused by our enviroment. In the late 70′s early 80′s when i was 7-12 grades we used to have hunting rifles in open trucks and Buck knives on our belts. Nobody ever got shot or stabbed. People were raised with different morals back then. You had a problem with somebody, you put up your fists. There is no way you can deny that he media, games, TV and alot of other things have desensitized todays youth to violence and advocated guns as a “evil” device.
5. You can pass all the laws you wish, but there will still be these kinds of tragedys. The world has always had “Bad Guys” and they will continue to kill the innocent…if guns are not easy, then bombs, knives, cars, busses, gas, you name it.
6. Yes, the NRA is looking out for gun owners, but they are not evil. I hate that I no longer feel safe when I travel to larger citys, but my legal concealed firearm give me a little security. I practice with it weekly in case i ever need to…God forbid…defend myself or someone near me from threat of deadly force.
7. Guns are just a tool, they don’t kill people…people kill people!
8. I raised my kids to respect guns. They can shoot, but i guarantee they are not capable of this kind of violence…why…because i know my kids!…