Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
NRA’s LaPierre suggests a solution for 1% of gun deaths
By: Dennis SDec. 21st, 2012more from Dennis S
I just finished watching the National Rifle Association (NRA) “Press Event”. The “watch Wayne read” NRA dog and pony show was in response to what was arguably the most horrific single mass murder in modern history.
Here, in pretty much chronological order is a thumbnail of what Executive Vice-President, Wayne LaPierre had to say. He was introduced to a room full of media by NRA President David Keene, an old guy who seems to have no say in the organization. It’s all LaPierre.
LaPierre starting talking about 20 minutes after the announced starting time. The media was informed that any Q & A would have to wait until Monday at the earliest. Here’s an often-paraphrased, compressed version of what was said. The NRA joined the nation in the horror, outrage, grief and earnest prayer for the fatalities in Newtown. LaPierre said that “Some have tried to exploit the tragedy for political gain.” That’s an apparent reference to those who have introduced responsible gun control legislation.
“How do we protect our children right now, starting today, in a way we know that works?” That statement is fraught with self-serving and ignorant assumptions that I’ll address momentarily. Before spelling out his ‘way’, LaPierre launched into a finger-pointing orgy of blame starting with politicians. He singled out Democratic legislators who pass laws for gun-free school zones. To the NRA that means that every demented monster would know that schools would be obvious places to fire away.
Apparently only the mentally ill commit murder. That was the recurring LaPierre theme; mentally ill monsters. He’s right on one level. Those with mental health issues are most likely to be the mass murderers. Those folks are in the single digits. I guess the remaining gun-toting killers get a pass. Between 20 and 30 percent of homicides are related to domestic disputes. Of course, that involves guns in homes and God forbid that there should be the tiniest utterance about that fact lest it impact on gun sales. I wouldn’t worry if I were Wayne. As usual gun sales have soared to new heights since the latest massacre, as have new NRA memberships.
LaPierre continued. “We’re told that the President is protected by an armed Secret Service, Congress people by Capital Police Officers but our children are left utterly defenseless.” About this time a young man made his way through the media crowd yelling to LaPierre that the NRA is killing our children, “Stop killing our children. We’ve got to stop the violence.” He was quickly escorted out. LaPierre, who I’m sure is accustomed to such inconveniences, went back to reading his script. He continued his attack on the mentally ill repeating, “Our society is populated by an unknown number of insane monsters.” He’s sure somebody is already planning the next school attack. He claimed that our nation refuses to create a national database of the mentally ill. He then said something quite odd and very damning of the right. He was quite correct in his statement that federal gun prosecutions have decreased by 40% over a decade. What he failed to mention was that gun laws have been so eviscerated that it’s well nigh impossible to get a conviction. Ask the prosecutors in the ‘Fast and Furious’ case.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day and in the case of LaPierre he actually said something I couldn’t agree with more. He blamed many of our violence problems on what he called “another dirty little truth” about those corporate interests who would sell violence to their own people. He rattled off a few truly disgusting video game titles including “Kindergarten Killers.” He also talked about films and thousands of music videos. Again, right on point. What he didn’t talk about was, given the 16,000 murders the average child would see growing up why would you want to make millions of guns available to that population entering adulthood? He used the term silent enablers for the entertainment industry, but failed to include his own fine organization in their numbers.
Enter another protester. This time a woman. I didn’t get much of a look at her, but I could hear her loud and clear. “The NRA has blood on its hands; ban assault weapons now.” She was carrying a rather large anti-NRA sign that she waved as she was hustled out of the room. Way to go! A reporter yelled to LaPierre, “What is your reaction?” Not a word. The same guy then mumbled something about following a script. Way to go!
And LaPierre did, indeed, follow his script. In fact he never drifted from it once as he looked down at its contents about every other sentence. It was probably a coincidence, but the media was the next NRA target largely for “not knowing what you’re talking about.” He used machine guns as an example. I guess he’s referring to the fact that reporters may have thought machine guns were included in the assault weapons ban on semi-automatic weapons. New Machine gun sales have been separately banned for civilians for over a quarter of a century and remain so and have been very tough to get since 1934. Frankly, I’ve not heard or read any erroneous reporting on that subject. He also says no new laws will protect us where 20,000 laws have failed to do so. If those numbers are true, that’s the fault of the lawmakers who fashion such weak laws at the urging of NRA lobbyists as to be irrelevant. Even Connecticut’s so-called ‘strict’ gun laws didn’t stop Nancy Lanza from legally owning the .223 Bushmaster and 9mm Glock and Sig Sauer.
But the NRA is riding in with the Cavalry. LaPierre has the answer to gun violence. Load up our schools with people with guns. EVERY school. The NRA has a program called the national school shield safety programme (fancy spelling is the NRA’s). It’s going to call upon all those aging retired police and security officers and military types to get those faded uniforms out of the attic and head for their nearest school. When the sure to be insane ‘Monster’ shows up BAM!!! End of story. Bob Jones grad and reliable right-winger Asa Hutchinson will head the show and our problems will be over. The less than 1% school homicides will plummet, though the ‘suicide by cop’ crowd is more likely, not less likely, to head for the nearest center of learning. And there’s always outside the school where in many instances long bus lines are the norm.
No word about the other 99 plus percent or what should be done for the ‘monsters’ or why states slashed law enforcement budgets to the bone. I’ll have more on this subject after Christmas.
Wayne LaPierre went so far off the crazy cliff today that even Fox News had to call out his conspiracy l ...
NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre held a presser regarding the NRA's position on gun control in response to the mas ...
Wayne LaPierre has adopted a new strategy to oppose any changes in gun laws that would prevent mass shoo ...
When the assault weapon ban expired in 2004 as part of its "sunset provision", Wayne LaPierre, the exe ...
While Wayne LaPierre was testifying against gun control in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee at le ...
mjh
Dec. 21st, 2012 at 11:40 pm
LaPierre starting talking about 20 minutes after the announced starting time. The media was informed that any Q & A would have to wait until Monday at the earliest.
Lemme get this straight:
The NRA held a “press event”, where the principal participant was 20 minutes late, and where any questions for this event will not be asked until three days AFTER said event?
Huh??
.
Beaglemom
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 7:23 am
My thoughts exactly. How do you have a press conference without any questions from the press? When his refusal to answer questions was announced the reporters should have boycotted the non-event. All he wanted anyway was free publicity. And, with reporters present, he got it.
Sharin Khosa
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 4:11 am
Mark Glaze said it all:
MARK GLAZE, executive director, Mayors Against Illegal Guns: Well, generally, I was surprised.
It was incoherent. It was factually incorrect. And it was so politically tone-deaf to suggest to a nation that is sort of rising up for action that the answer to too many guns in our society is to put an armed guard in the classroom. I think that Wayne LaPierre has a problem, not only with the country, but also within his organization
Aimee
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 4:27 am
Right… So whenever a person enters a school, with plans of a massacre they automatically look insane…and that these trained officers and security guards, will be able to tell them apart from any other person, parent and, hopefully not, child that enters a school on a regular basis…? I’m in school still and live in Australia and this sounds absurd… But i suppose living in a country with guns everywhere you would be used to all the guns around you, I know for a fact if someone had a gun near me I would be feeling very nervous around them, not thinking that the dangerous weapon they hold is going to protect me, perhaps on a policeman that has trained for years of their lives, but not on someone I see shopping or even my dad having one in the house. I would say people with guns living in my area were thugs, or drug dealers, or some kind of fellin, but in America thugs and good people alike carry guns… I don’t think that is particularly the safest thing. Only thugs and people that associate with them are really the only ones you here being injured on the news in Australia, there is the occasional person who has not deserved it, but really which country has more deaths by guns, putting aside the population size difference, it still shouldn’t be happening at a large number like that.
If you read this thank- you, although I was pretty sure you would have stopped reading half way through, but thanks all the same ^.^
*RANT OVER*
labrat
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 6:13 am
I watched this live and, after picking my jaw up off the floor, thought, “THIS is your response on the one week anniversary? Are you KIDDING me?” The arrogance is astounding.
Paws
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 7:42 am
Boggles my mind that they took a week to say even one word about it and this – this hot mess – is all they could come up with for a statement during their days of silence.
46A9MA
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 7:56 am
Armed personnel in schools? So that was all you could come up with, Mr LaPierre? We have already heard that from your avid supporters this past week. The late Mr Charlton Heston will surely be proud of you.
Have you ever think that despite lots of other countries around the world have seen most if not all of Hollywood’s violent action movies, they do not suffer the same problem as the US?
Sure, the likes of Cho Seung-Hui and Adam Lanza are disturbed individuals, but why did they get their hands on the murder weapons so easily?
Anne
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 8:28 am
It’s obvious that they are all about the profit from the sale of guns, and the safety of kids is a distant second consideration if that. I would be willing to bet that he was late on purpose and intentionally prevented follow-up questions as a result. After all, he would have been subjected to some questions that would have amounted to truly harsh criticism of the NRA’s refusal to see the handwriting on the wall.
Dennis S.
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 10:01 am
To my Australian friend, Aimee:
Many years ago, board in hand, I hung around with my mates just outside Gold Coast. I love your country, especially since the males stopped using the term, “Bloody Sheilas” so much.
People may not know that Australia has some very strict gun control laws initiated by a very conservative administration. I’ll be writing about this and other gun issues after Christmas.
Great to have you on our Politicus team. Let’s hope our legislators (many are not the full quid) quit knocking back reasonable gun legislation.
Hooroo!!!
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 10:04 am
As a visitor to Sydney, I too can say they have a wonderful country with wonderful people
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 10:06 am
You might want to go watch Laurence as he destroys the NRA
www.mediaite.com/tv/odonn...
Howard Brazee
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 10:16 am
Having an armed guard certainly wasn’t the solution at Columbine.
somewhere
Dec. 23rd, 2012 at 9:14 am
How do you know that. It is with out question that the guards engaged them. They missed but at least they distracted the killers for whatever period of time they were fighting them. The could have saved dozens of lives in the time they were distracted. Another interesting thing to note is that Columbine happened DURING the “assault” weapons ban and no such weapon was used in that incident.
bee
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 12:48 pm
I read a suggestion that a teacher should be put in every gun store…….
Inez
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 10:34 pm
Putting a cop on duty is just another way to garner the sale of more guns. Ever heard of “suicide by cop”?We don’t want any more blood spilled in the presence of children. Too many of them will be traumatized or immune to such actions. Every gun owner should supply an annual inventory report to their local police and sign a contract covering the safe lock up of any guns not being used…tHEY SHOULD ALSO PAY MORE HOEOWNERS’ OR TENANAT INSURANCE IN DICATING OWNERSHIP OF THE NUMBER OF WEAPONS IN THEIR RESIDENCE. IF they don;t have insurance, then let the NRA begin to develop such policies, with concurrent premiums. The beneficiaries would be any victim(s)designee.or self in the case of injury………
andy
Dec. 22nd, 2012 at 10:41 pm
does anybody here have a better idea how to protect children in schools?
somewhere
Dec. 23rd, 2012 at 9:10 am
Of course they don’t. Guns are bad…duh?/ is all they can say. Yet when you call the police, they show up with…..guns. there is a reason for that/
labman57
Dec. 23rd, 2012 at 2:47 am
The NRA seems to be advocating a return to the days of the Old West, when most adult males were expected to defend themselves by carrying a sidearm, and anyone who opted to not “pack heat” — or hire gunmen to provide protection for their interests — was regarded as either a naive idealist or a coward.
Bottom line — The NRA does not represent the interests of gun owners, but rather the investments and fortunes of gun manufacturers.
steve
Dec. 23rd, 2012 at 8:58 am
I don’t like LaPierre’s attitude but I think it’s stupid when teachers and other staff members are left unarmed in similar situations. When I heard the news I was thinking about the safety regulations in my own country. A few days ago I read an article on my native Vancouver which is often presented as one of the most liveable cities with the safest neighborhoods in the world but only now I realize that you are never truly protected anywhere. And the risks your children are exposed to every day are omnipresent so it’s only natural that armed officers are needed to protect them.
somewhere
Dec. 23rd, 2012 at 9:09 am
I noticed that you didn’t mention the 2 programs that Obama defunded that were in place to help keep kids safe at school. Self serving? look in the mirror.