Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
By The Numbers: Why Republicans Are Terrified Of Occupy Wall Street
At the start of the Occupy Wall Street movement, critics claimed the protestors were without purpose and intended to create chaos in and around Wall Street. However, the general assembly of the occupy movement prepared a declaration that said they had “gathered to express a feeling of mass injustice by people who feel wronged by the corporate forces of the world,” and listed about 24 facts detailing how the wealthy and their corporations were subverting democracy and the ability of the people to have a voice in their own government. The movement’s complaints could be condensed down to growing income inequality, the lack of jobs with decent benefits, and corporate influence in government.
It is little wonder that Republicans are terrified by the occupy movement because the income inequality they cite in their declaration is the product of giving unfair advantages to the wealthiest Americans that Republicans have championed since Ronald Reagan was president. Although it has been thirty years since the Reagan Administration began promoting their trickle down economic scam, Republicans are still pushing the idea that giving the wealthy tax cuts and advantages is necessary and beneficial for economic growth and job creation that might eventually benefit the poor and middle class. The facts though, do not reflect Republicans’ contentions and if anything, prove what the occupy movement and many Americans already believe; the lion’s share of economic growth and wealth has trickled up to the wealthiest 1% of Americans.
A new report by the Congressional Budget Office shows that over the past 28 years, the wealthiest one percent of Americans’ income grew 275% and confirms the occupy movement’s claim that government policies disproportionately favor the rich. During that same period, twenty percent of the wealthiest Americans’ income grew by 65%, and those in the middle (60% of Americans) had income growth of under 40 percent. As is usually the case, Americans with the lowest income (20% of Americans) had income growth of just 18 percent. Those figures do not reflect the devastating effect of the Bush-recession caused by deregulation of the financial industry and continued tax cuts for the wealthy. It is surprising that it took this long for Americans to stand up and demand that the government halts the practice of allowing “corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice, and oppression over equality, to run our government.”
The occupy movement is necessary to bring attention to just how incredibly difficult it is for Americans who are not wealthy to make economic progress. What is most troubling is the rapid increase in the number of Americans who live in abject poverty while the wealthy continue making huge economic gains. The federal poverty level is $11,000 for an individual and at the start of the Bush-recession in 2007, there were 37.3 million Americans living below the poverty level. At the start of 2011, the number grew to 46.2 million as more Americans’ jobs were sent overseas and the Bush recession caused consumers to stop spending money on goods and services that create jobs. What makes matters even worse is that, according to the Pew Economic Mobility Project, of the people who are in the bottom 20% economically, 42% of their children will never escape poverty because there is no economic mobility left in America.
The economic news is no better for middle class Americans who saw the median household income decline by 6.4% since the start of Bush’s recession to $49,445 for a family of four. Interestingly, as union membership and jobs has declined, so has the great middle class that drives the economy to create jobs. The occupy movement realizes that fact and it is why they complain that the lack of good, living-wage jobs with benefits has contributed to the income inequality that is crippling the nation’s economy. Republicans across the country have derided unions and collective bargaining agreements as the reason the economy is lagging, but there is no veracity to their argument. In fact, there is no veracity to any economic policies Republicans and their conservative think tanks like the vile Heritage Foundation have put forth. Conservatives have one economic policy and that is cut taxes for the wealthy and their corporations at the expense of the poor and middle class so the rich can continue increasing the income gap between haves and have nots.
It is unclear how far Republicans will go to enrich corporations and the wealthy, but it seems until the 99% are all living below the poverty level, no Republican will be satisfied. What is clear is that the Occupy Movement is on the right track and as news of their complaints is verified by economic data, Americans who are getting poorer while the wealthy get richer will come out and support them on the streets and at the ballot box. The Republicans in Congress are digging in their heels to reject all of President Obama’s job creation efforts because Democrats asked for a whopping 0.5% tax increase on millionaires and billionaires to pay for infrastructure improvements and to help states hire or retain teachers, police officers, and fire fighters.
The Occupy Movement has one advantage in their favor; cold hard data. The wealthy continue to prosper and thrive while middle class incomes are declining and millions more Americans fall into poverty with every Republican economic policy. The wealthy have increased their incomes by 275% and nothing has trickled down to the middle class or the poor and yet Republicans continue promoting the insane trickle down scam as if it will start working any day. It will never work and now that the Occupy Movement is drawing Americans’ attention to the widening income inequality that is destroying the 99%, the idea that government and the people owe the wealthy and their corporations more entitlements may finally come to an end. The alternative is an America with 99% of the population living in poverty while the wealthy 1% increases their wealth. There are historical instances where a few wealthy families control all the wealth, but the outcome is never good for the rich. Americans owe a debt of gratitude to the Occupy Movement for bringing the income inequality out in the open, for having the courage to stand up and say they are sick and tired of the wealthy and their corporations controlling the government, and especially for the prospect of finally ending the fallacy of the trickle down scam once and for all.
There is an illusion in America that the Founding Fathers intended for the nation to be a representative dem ...
America was, at one time, the land of opportunity when an industrious man or woman, with hard work and d ...
The Occupy Wall Street movement has garnered interest, opposition, and solidarity from pundits and ...
For the past thirty years Republicans have used every argument under the Sun to convince Americans that ...
Republicans are enamored with the term American exceptionalism and they have belittled President Obama f ...
Reynardine
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 11:24 am
Half a century ago, C. Wright Mills warned that the endpoint of a colonial economy-whether an overt one, like those of Europe, or a covert one, like that of the United States- was endocolonization. Endocolonization is here, and the once-proud 99% are being reduced to peonage.
Harold Duplain
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 5:49 am
Yeah, Mills was great, almost prophetic with his erudite exposition of the reality of American society in “The Power Elite”. Why didn’t his ideas get more emphasis for future generations?
dem9586792844592
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 11:44 am
Nice job.
Anne
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 12:04 pm
Rmuse, you have summed up in a nutshell why Republicans fear this movement. They realize that the steadily increasing support for it indicates that an increasing number of Americans are not falling for their okey doke. This increasing recognition of these realities is occurring in spite of the GOP’s efforts to induce people to vote against their own interests. Their efforts to do this are laughably transparent in spite of the facade of “diversity” they present with people like Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, and Sarah Palin. Along with people like Rick Perry, they try to present these folks as everyday, aw-shucks folks who have what they call “horse sense,” and unfortunately, too many Americans fall for it. Because of this, the GOP has been successful in getting folks like these voted in governor mansions and Congress, where they have been able to do the very damage along with Wall Street that has resulted in the forming of OWS. The Republicans are perfectly aware of this, which is why their efforts to discredit the movement stem from fear.
Eykis
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 12:10 pm
Rmuse and Anne,
Terrific article, terrific response.
You are both correct. Nashville is doing it a bit differently – the Rethug politicians including the Guv are in hiding – They KNOW that Nashville is Blue, plus the FACT that there are 5 universities within 3-5 miles of Legislative Plaza here in Nashville, the Occupados being shown on the local news are primarily GRADUATE students of these universities. The crowds are diverse, peaceful and well-spoken. Two nights in a row, they have been arrested and released. This is making the movement grow here in Middle Tennessee – so the Rethugs who WREAKED HAVOC at the statehouse with Baggery, are silent:
www.tennessean.com/
Catch and Release……NO CHARGES
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 12:16 pm
I smell false arrest complaints in Nashville’s future
Ingarose
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 12:27 pm
If the protests continue through the winter, as they are planning to do, O’Reilly will have a heart attack. He is getting angrier and more hateful against them every day.
Jim Showker
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 12:53 pm
How about an article about why Democrats are terrified of Occupy Wall Street? Democrats are furiously trying to co opt the movement so that it can become part of the L/R paradigm. The message that both the Dems and Repubs are owned by the bankers and against the best interests of the people would be nice.
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 1:02 pm
Interesting. The Dems are terrified of the movement? Is this based on your opinion or some kind of fact?
Harold Duplain
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 6:03 am
The Democrats should be terrified of the OWS movement because OWS rips the hypocritical mask off the dems’ faces as well. They occupy a cushy MONOPOLY with an inevitable pay check (i.e., the US gov’t and federal reserve) while paying useless lip service to helping the working class. Yet since Clinton, they have buckled to the machinations of the actions of the repubs, allowing unions to be destroyed, plunging us into the whirlwind of casino capitalism with crap like the housing speculation boom, and in the end, handing George W. Bush a blank check to continue the insane and futile wars halfway around the world.
Sarah Jones
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 1:07 pm
That would require the Democrats to be on board with deregulating the banks like the Republicans have been, and as you can see by the many moves by Dems in congress to regulate them, this is not true. The banks have also “abandoned” Obama, even though they traditionally give to the party in power, though they always give Republicans more. While I agree that both parties need a wake up call, it is not accurate to say Dems are equally owned by the banks. This is proven in both action more than anything, but Open Secrets will also reveal the amounts donated. Bear in mind that they will donate to whoever they think is going to win, as they want sway. The questions is, do they get it?
Reynardine
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 1:55 pm
Also, this comment smells of the “it’s all bullshit, anyway” gambit, used to dissuade people from voting or acting in their own interest. If we don’t want to wind up endocolonized for the count, we don’t fall for it.
Sarah Jones
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 2:40 pm
It’s all they have now:-)
Matt Dunham
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 2:58 pm
Yup
dem9586792844592
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 5:20 pm
Dodd-Frank?
makeshiftvillage
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 2:32 pm
www.youtube.com/watch?v=i...
Johnee
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 2:37 pm
The fact that independents and moderates are waking up in mass numbers to the trickle down bullshit that’s been laid on them is heartening. It’s also frustrating as hell. There seems to be this wide spread veritable light bulb coming on. One can barely hear above the din of the “wait a damn minute! Where are all the f****in’ jobs you promised us if we gave you the biggest tax cuts and loop holes in decades?” and “How come I lost my job and pension as you shipped out overseas?” It’s almost hard to resist saying I told you so, why did you help vote these assholes back in in’08?
Johnee
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 3:02 pm
Oops! I mean in 2010.
trekie701
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 3:22 pm
Cons should be scared of OWS. Tolerance for greed is running low and police are pushing their luck with their violent actions toward protesters. Sooner or later people will fight back and it won’t be pretty.
Jim Faubel
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 3:50 pm
When Faux News began promoting (excuse me, “covering”) the Tea Party “Movement” I missed all the reports of the hundreds of protests springing up spontaneously all over the country (and even in dozens of foreign countries). Damn Lame Stream Media! But then Faux News didn’t cover them either – probably because THERE WEREN’T ANY!
Of course, the RWingers at Faux are scared. A “grass-roots movement” is metaphorically about real grass; not the kind you can smoke and certainly not Astroturf.
“The rich have only ever wanted one thing: EVERYTHING!” Michael Parenti
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 5:50 pm
it’s true, those unions are bad for the rich. In the 50s, 60s, 70s and into the 80s when union membership was strong wages in America were strong as well. But now that they have declined to a small percentage point of the population wages have also dropped. How nice it must be for the very wealthy and it wages have dropped because that’s more money that they can suck out of the economy. If the middle class and the poor have more money, that’s less money for the rich and that cannot happen.
I can do nothing more than laugh and yet feel sorry for people who bash unions. Many of them will see their own wages decline, and as unions go way they will see their benefits and their working privileges such as vacations decline. They are in support of declining wages. And you have to know the most of the people who are against unions on these message boards and on the Internet are not the upper class. They are among the people who are affected.
and they are not very smart.
wiretap
Oct. 29th, 2011 at 11:26 pm
Dems had control of the house, senate and oval office. Dems appointed Geithner and Summers who promptly wrote a check to their Wallstreet buddies and also printed a couple more trillion in currency to prop up the financial scam of the century. To distinguish between dims and rethugs is a blatant mistake. OWS understands that the two party system is just two sides of the same coin. Corporations donate to both sides for campaigns. They don’t care which of their candidates/horses wins. They’ve got bets on either/both. The real money changes hands in the form of legal bribery called lobbying. Both sides of the two party system gladly trade favors for it. This isn’t a democratic OWS against a republican Teaparty. This is the working class against the money that controls either party and continues to enact laws designed to further the 1 percent’s economic advantages to the detriment of all other life forms. Don’t let the propaganda cloud your judgment…