Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Obama Camp: It Only Took Romney One Term as Governor to Raise the Debt and Ruin Jobs
In spite of Romney’s claims that a businessman can fix what’s broken, his record in one term as Governor of Massachusetts tells another story. In one term, he managed to explode the debt per capita and decimate job growth, in addition to raising taxes and fees on everyone but the wealthiest residents.
Yet in Romney’s new ad, his campaign claims “Some can’t live up to their promises. Others find a way.” The narrator says that a four-year term is “all Mitt Romney needed. He turned Massachusetts around, cut unemployment, turned the deficit he inherited into a rainy day fund, all with an 85% Democratic legislature.”
Kudos to the Romney camp for finally managing the adjective “Democratic” instead of “Democrat” (that intentional misuse of the English language is an old and deliberate Republican trick intended to deny Democrats being associated with “democratic”.)
Obama for America spokeswoman Lis Smith released the following statement on Mitt Romney’s new ad:
“If his latest ad is any indication, Mitt Romney’s Romnesia is only getting worse. But he is right on one point- he only needed four years as governor of Massachusetts. That’s because in just one term, Romney drove the state down to 47th out of 50th in job creation, increased per capita debt to the largest in the nation, left his successor a $1 billion deficit, and pushed through a tax cut that overwhelmingly benefited 278 of the wealthiest residents while raising taxes and fees on everyone else. And he did all of this while refusing to work across the aisle. Mitt Romney wouldn’t make Washington better- he’d make it worse.”
In one term, Romney did manage to decimate job growth. “Unlike Obama, Romney took office during an economic uptick. Massachusetts had a net job growth of 1.4 percent under Romney. However, that was far slower growth than the national average of 5.3%. As Romney’s opponents have frequently, and correctly, noted, Massachusetts ranked 47th in job growth over the entirety of Romney’s term. The only states that did worse: Louisiana, Michigan and Ohio.” [Fact Check, USA Today, 1/5/12]
Romney and Republicans like to paint their party as the party of low spending, but George W Bush’s term of drunken spending that was not paid for tells the real story. Romney has a similar record in Massachusetts, where “State Spending Rose By 22% On Romney’s Watch, Nearly Double The Rate Of Inflation.” [Los Angeles Times, 6/9/12]
Romney left a billion dollar deficit in his wake, even though he claims otherwise in public. From an op-ed by Peter Gelzinis: “In off-the-record comments to reporters, those leftover Romney aides conceded that the state’s finances were in much rougher shape than their boss with Potomac fever had admitted to. Even as Mitt’s mouthpiece, Eric Fehrnstrom, scrambled to get out of Dodge a year ago, he declined to offer an on-the-record explanation for the huge discrepancy between what Mitt and his people were claiming in public and what they were privately telling their successors in Deval Patrick’s administration.” [Boston Herald, op-ed, 2/1/08]
The debt per capital did increase under Romney, to such an extent that Massachusetts topped U.S. as debtor state. [The Republican, 2/3/07] The Tax Foundation listed their debt as first in the nation, and per capita as $10,546 at the end of fiscal year 2007. (Alaska was second.)
So unconcerned was Romney with the debt that he found a way to reimburse the wealthiest in his state for capital gains they had paid 3 years previously. “Gov. Mitt Romney proposed on Friday that Massachusetts residents forced to pay retroactive capital gains taxes from 2002 get the money back in rebates over three years… The Department of Revenue has already begun mailing out the new tax bills. About $78 million of that is owed by just 278 wealthy people, who would pay an average of $281,000 each.” [Associated Press, 11/18/05]
According to a Mitt Romney press release, “The state is required to refund between $225 million and $275 million to the estimated 157,000 taxpayers who paid the higher capital gains tax rate in the last eight months of 2002.” Press Release, Mitt Romney, 12/8/05]
There’s always money in the till to reimburse the folks like Romney — those who aren’t “victims” and shouldn’t have to pay their fair share. It doesn’t matter how much it balloons the deficit, so long as entitlements for the rich are in place.
You know how Romney is always saying that he won’t raise taxes (when he’s not saying that he will), and then he launches into loopholes and deductions but fails to be specific? In spite of his claims that he didn’t raise taxes in Massachusetts, he did in fact raise taxes in Massachusetts through fees and loophole closures, and he raised fees more than any other state in the nation:
“The Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation Estimated That The Former Governor Raised An Extra $750 Million Per Year Through Fees And Loophole Closures.” [Washington Post, Fact Checker, 6/12/12]
Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation also found that Romney’s fees hit just like a tax, and hit less fairly than a regular tax would. That sounds like our venture capitalist, harvesting the middle class to give tax cuts to the rich – which is exactly what he did in Massachusetts by cutting the capital gains tax and reimbursing the wealthiest for previous years while hitting the middle class and poor with fees and closed loopholes.
History does not confirm Romney’s claims that a businessman can do a better job in the White House, but even if it did, Romney’s own record speaks for itself. Furthermore, Romney’s experience as a businessman was not that of someone who grew a business or created jobs, but rather someone who harvested existing companies for revenue for his investors.
It only took Romney one term to leave Massachusetts in such bitter dismay that his disapproval ratings were exceptionally high. In one term, Romney built more debt, less job growth, and higher taxes on everyone but the rich. If his record is anything to go on, had Romney been at the wheel in the last four years we would not be in an economic recovery — we would be knee deep in Bushian fiscal failure for all but the wealthiest Americans.
Romney is telegraphing that once again he's going to sell the idea of himself as a bipartisan governor o ...
During a press conference call Friday afternoon, Democratic Massachusetts state Senator Karen Spilka deb ...
After Mitt Romney fired off a statement about Obama being out of touch on the economy, David Axelrod too ...
In the first presidential debate, Governor Mitt Romney claimed he had a bipartisan record as Governor, b ...
In a desperate attempt to change the subject, the Romney campaign is now claiming that you don't care ab ...
j
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 3:58 pm
On DU an article from Forbes gives blow by blow reasons why everyone should vote for Obama if they are concerned about the economy.
Deanne
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 4:41 pm
When you mention an article somewhere, it would be appreciated if you would provide a link.
You say ‘DU’ — that means what? Not everyone automatically knows. Might make sense after it’s identified, but by the initials – ????
Going to Forbes site – not knowing the post’s title, the author or date – it’s like going on a wild goose chase many times.
Goss
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 5:12 pm
DU stands for Democratic UnderGround
Deanne
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 5:21 pm
Thanks Goss!
I just returned to post the link as I have finally found the Forbes post. It is an excellent read.
“Want a Better Economy? History Says Vote Democrat!”
www.forbes.com/sites/adam...
GoGirl
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 5:23 pm
www.democraticunderground...
Tracie Counts
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 10:29 am
Thanks for showing us the real #”s Forbes
Anne
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 4:07 pm
If it weren’t for the ignoramuses who want to vote for this charlatan just to get the black guy out of the White House, the idea that someone who did so poorly as governor of one of 50 states could effectively run a 50-state country with infinitely more responsibilities would be laughable. Everything he says that touts his gubernatorial term in Massachusetts is sharply contradicted by people in the know who had a close-up view of how he presided.
FEDUP
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 5:28 pm
Being from MA I know this to be TRUE, TRUE, TRUE I’ve been waiting for someone to pick up on this information. He was the worst Gov. I can remember and why he keeps bringing it up is beyond me like he thinks he was great or nobody would correct him because he’s Mittens. Most of the time he campaigning for President and not Governing the State he was elected to Govern. Cutting Police, Fire and Teachers on top of 800 vetoes on everything else. He’s no good for America. He’s a good for nothing liar for his advancement using our lives. He loves his lemmings.
majii
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 9:44 pm
Yes, FEDUP, and if Americans really want to know whether Romney was a good governor in MA or not, all they have to do is look at the polls that show Romney losing MA to the president by at least 16 points. Also, I remember reading an article on HuffPo months ago that stated that Romney had no plans to even try winning MA. If he was as successful as governor as he says he was, he should be winning the state, and PBO should have no chance of winning the state at all.
Lily Lorber
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 5:45 pm
MITT ROMNEY FLUNKED AS GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS !
• Stagnant job growth: During Governor Romney’s term, Massachusetts fell from 36th to 47th out of 50 states in job creation, while the overall U.S. economy grew.
• Declining manufacturing: By the end of Governor Romney’s term, Massachusetts had lost more than 40,000 manufacturing jobs—a rate twice the national average.
• Higher taxes: Gov. Romney raised taxes on the middle class, but pushed through a tax cut that overwhelmingly benefited 278 of the wealthiest individuals in MA.
• Highest debt in the nation: Under Mitt Romney, Massachusetts’ debt burden grew to the highest per person in the nation.
• Increased government spending: State spending increased every year while Romney was in office, and he left behind a $1 BILLION deficit for the next governor.
• Jobs outsourced overseas: Governor Romney failed to protect good jobs in Massachusetts, and actually outsourced state jobs to India.
mjh
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 10:50 pm
And he keeps saying President Obama “can’t run on his record” . . .
.
grandmommy10
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 6:24 pm
Thats why I don’t believe the polls when they say Romney is ahead. He can’t be ahead in Massachusetts given his history as Governor. Therefore, Scott Brown can’t be ahead either. So why are we hearing all this stuff about how well he’s doing. Additionally, I’d like the “Liberal” press (so called by right wingers) to begin to report on all of the secrets that are emerging about how Romney has been conductin his “business”. Lets get some clarity here folks!
Jonathan Burton
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 6:26 pm
I have no respect for the current GOP. My step-father is a life long Rethug. He is a self described “son of a bitch” as according to him much of my family allegedly states (not true). He is a selfish person, and is a racist who took the GI bill after his service in the Navy of 4 years, helping pay for his college tuition, and finance his mortgage. He later worked for the Texas health department for 5 years before starting his own small business in pest control with a small business loan (government again there to help him). After several years he went back to the health department to work for them another 5 years. Why? Because he wanted the benefits of a retirement package and free govt. payed health care! He quit when his total of 10 years were up and retired at an early age to Colorado with my mother. He despises people who are on welfare, and take handouts and he thinks much of this country’s people are lazy and unable to make it on their own. Too bad he is describing himself. My step-father is a hypocrite and he disgusts me for his hypocrisy and lack of moral convictions.
Marisa Brown
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 7:14 pm
I hope the Obama campaign responds with an ad of their own exposing this as BS. I’m so sick of Mitt Romney trying to worm his into the White House. He is an embarrassment to himself and this country.
mjh
Oct. 21st, 2012 at 10:59 pm
Kudos to the Romney camp for finally managing the adjective “Democratic” instead of “Democrat” (that intentional misuse of the English language is an old and deliberate Republican trick intended to deny Democrats being associated with “democratic”.)
It is? I thought that was just George Dumbya Bush mangling the English language — again . . .
.
Laura
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 1:17 am
I would like to share this article. I oppose Romney and support Obama, but I have one concern that I hope can be answered. It says Romney pushed through tax policies that benefited the wealthy and imposed fees on middle class residents, increased the state’s debt, etc. How can that be reconciled with the fact there was a Democratic majority in the legislature?
Frank
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 12:10 pm
I was waiting on someone to answer this too, it seems he didn’t raise taxes however raised fees on everything else, ie marriage license, gun license, drivers permits , etc.. enough to generate about 500 million a year….
Laura
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 3:29 pm
Yes, if Romney was able to do these things unilaterally as governor, that would be one thing. If he did it with bipartisan support of Massachusetts’ legislators (which had a Democratic majority), that’s quite another and doesn’t really prove the point sought to be made.