Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
EmoProgs and Tea Partiers Throw A Childish Tantrum Over Obama Jobs Speech
By: RmuseSep. 2nd, 2011more from Rmuse
Every society has subcultures that espouse theories, abstract ideas and doctrines that may not accurately represent a country’s population, but because they are vocal, organized, and well-funded they appear to speak for a larger group. These subcultures are often populated by zealots and ideologues whose belief systems have as their basis unrealistic expectations and impossible to attain goals that guarantee a perpetual level of dissatisfaction toward common enemies whether they are other groups, government, or elected officials. America is a country of ideologues whose particular dogmata defines them as either conservative or liberal, and at one time it was simple to distinguish between the two extremes. However, in the past two years, it is apparent that although liberals and conservatives are allegedly diametrically opposed, the extremists on both sides share more in common than they would ever admit.
The ridiculous flap over scheduling the president’s address on jobs to a joint session of Congress and the nation typifies the similarities between neo-conservatives and the so-called professional left, and it shows the level of unfounded contempt for President Obama that is not unlike religious extremism; frankly, it is incredibly childish. It is unclear what the motivation was for scheduling the president’s speech on the same night as the Republican presidential candidate’s debate, but regardless of the reason, the president was correct in rescheduling it for the next day. By rescheduling the speech, President Obama avoided giving the debaters a forum and opportunity to attack his jobs message in real time, eluded a very public sophomoric squabble, and ultimately gets the last word in after hearing the positions and talking points of the Republican candidates. The president also comes across as reasonable, and as has been the case throughout his term is the only adult in a room full of petulant children. However, the benefits or motivation for rescheduling his speech are irrelevant; the reaction from the two extremes of the political spectrum reveals a level of disrespect that is common to both sides.
Although the Republican reaction and response to the president’s request was nothing short of a four-year-old’s tantrum, it was not surprising whatsoever. Teabag king Jim DeMint threw a typical rant and reproach that shows the right’s belief that Obama is not really the president. DeMint said, “If he has a jobs proposal, put it in writing, give us a cost estimate, and send it over. I want to read the bill, not listen to talking points off a TelePrompter. If he insists on playing politics by picking the night of the GOP debate, I will object to the session.” DeMint also said the president should watch the debate to learn how Republicans plan to create jobs. He said, “He will hear job creation ideas that don’t involve more wasteful stimulus spending, and he’ll hear ideas that don’t include job-destroying tax hikes.”
DeMint is so predictable with his teabagger rhetoric that he revealed the Republican candidate’s talking points that makes watching the debate a waste of time. Americans have heard it all before and it is contrary to conventional wisdom and viewpoints the majority of Americans hold; that a larger stimulus will create jobs and tax increases on the wealthy and corporations is the right approach to help the economy. But Republicans are ill-prepared to listen to economic experts or the American people so they parrot the same tired canards as a matter-of-course. The so-called professional left also reacted in typical fashion and regurgitated their pre-packaged criticism of the president.
Every time the president has followed the will of the American people who complain that Washington engages is partisan politics instead of working together to solve the country’s problems, far-left extremists criticize Obama for caving to Republicans. A comment on social media outlet Twitter typified the far-left’s reaction to the president’s decision to reschedule his jobs speech. The brief message was, “Obama obeyed Boehner using his ‘bullied pulpit’.” Many on the left have labeled the far-left extremists “EmoProgs,” and although the label is apropos, it does not accurately portray their dysfunction. The so-called EmoProgs are egocentric malcontents that suffer from self-importance and unrealistic expectations that all Americans share their ideology. Not only do they fail to acknowledge the country does not share their single-minded vision, but they lack an understanding of the power a president possess. It is expected that ignorant teabaggers lack rudimentary understanding of presidential power, but seemingly intelligent Liberals who think the president is a monarch informs their misunderstanding of the Constitution. They also lack a realistic understanding of the electorate.
The extreme left are laboring under the mistaken belief that all Americans are hard-left extremists and that the president is shunning the will of the people. The egocentric left either cannot or will not acknowledge that America is a right-leaning Centrist population that rejects the EmoProg’s agenda on principle alone. This is not an indictment of the far-left’s core beliefs, because their philosophy is shared by nearly all Liberals; but not all Liberals are self-important and lack understanding of American voters. Most Liberals also do not share the belief that primarying the president will “pull Obama to the left” or encourage him to award Bradley Manning the Congressional Medal of Honor, but then most Liberals are not self-important egocentrics either.
What most Liberals do possess is respect for President Obama and the difficult conditions he labors under with an obstructionist Republican Party and cowardly, unsupportive faction within the Democratic caucus. One would think the remarkable legislative achievements President Obama pushed through Congress in a hostile environment would be enough to win over the professional-left ideologues, but as petulant children are wont to do, nothing short of blind obedience will satisfy them. In that sense, EmoProgs are exactly like teabaggers. Regardless what the president accomplishes, unless he grants every wish far-left crybabies demand, they will continue showing the president the same disrespect teabaggers do.
Ideologues of any stripes are dangerous for their lack of pragmatism and fervent reliance on their own opinions as reality. Americans hold varied opinions, and most understand that it takes a pragmatic approach to govern a diverse population, but like teabaggers, EmoProgs are stuck inside their own little world and cannot envision America as anything but politically far-left. In that respect, teabaggers and Republicans are superior to the professional left and it is why they win time after time. The real left is fighting to win the center and they could use help from all hands, but all of the left is not on the same page. Perhaps if President Obama gives EmoProgs rainbow unicorns and lollypops for life, they will join the fight to save America. Unfortunately, the professional left adheres to an egocentric world-view that they can pull President Obama to the left and win their unicorns. It is unrealistic, but most ideologues are unrealistic, and when EmoProgs help elect President Perry, they will get a taste of what realism means and they will not like it.
Most parents have had the unpleasant task of dealing with a child who anticipates an outcome unhinged fr ...
Over 31 million Americans tuned in to watch Obama’s jobs address before a joint session of Congress last ...
In a conflict between two opposing forces, it is crucial that each side shares a common goal and commitmen ...
An ideology is a comprehensive vision, and a way of looking at things, that when practiced by an adheren ...
There is always a tendency to blame the person at the top for every problem in an organization whether i ...
Nobody Special
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 10:25 am
I have been saying this for a long time. We need to come together to win this election. Do you think any right winger would even admit to there being a “far right”, much less denounce them (I’m looking at you Tea Party)? I think this just goes to show that most of us on the left are rational and intelligent. I know there is a “far left” and most of them are crazy to think that Americans all share the same views. One would think that the people on the “far left” would realize the damage that they are causing. Do they want Obama to lose? I seriously doubt it.
Marc McKenzie
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 12:25 pm
Agree with all your points.
What rankles me, though, is that with all the yelling and screaming about the changing of the schedule of the speech….how come no one has realized that, “Hey, we’re getting a speech about jobs!”
Isn’t that what most of the Emoprogs have been screaming about? Isn’t that what the TeaParty claimed their candidates wanted to address (but have not done so since being sworn in)?
We are getting a speech about jobs and the President–not the GOP, not any of their Presidential contenders, and certainly not any of the EmoProgs–has a plan.
Why are people missing this?
The forest for the trees, I tell you….
trog69
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 12:14 pm
When Obama reneged on his FISA/Telecom Immunity vote, that was when I decided that he’d govern as just another corporate-friendly Centrist, and so far, he’s run exactly as I anticipated. I will say that his continuance of the Bush admin. warrant-less surveillance policies, as well as his high-octane battle against whistle-blowers has surprised me, but I guess I’m naive.
As far as calling me names like EmoProg; fine, go ahead and divide us even further. That’ll work great. I certainly won’t bother reading this site again.
mel in oregon
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 1:11 pm
this is perhaps the silliest article to ever appear on politicus. notice no “far left” critic is named, only somebody on twitter. i’ll name you a few critics of obama’s economic & foreign policy who are hardly just this side of marxism. paul krugman, joseph stiglitz, ralph nader, noam chomsky, robert reich, dean baker, jack rasmus, & james galbraith. they are also hardly “petulant children”. look at the fact that only 26% of americans agree with obama’s economic policies. look at the new unemployment figures, 17,000 new private jobs, a loss of 17,000 public jobs. also it’s worse than this as the figures come from the bureau of labor who don’t even count workers whose employer has gone out of business. the bureau also fudges figures in other ways. you can look it up, there are dozens of brilliant articles on the subject. latest polls show obama’s approval rating at less than 44%, disapproval is over 51%. the only thing i agree with you on is that the republican wannabees are a bunch of ass clowns. obama though thinks he is a referee, not a decider. he has forgot what wise old harry s truman said, “the buck stops here”. maybe the stupidest comments of any of obama’s advisers was rahm emanuel, who among other things said, “where will the left go, they have no other choice”. nope, incredibly stupid. look at the electorate, a lot of independents as well as moderate democrats will probably not even bother to vote. it may be a foolish choice, but that’s exactly what will happen.
Oldsun
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 1:34 pm
You cannot win an election by going to the extreme side of your base. “Look at the fact that only 26% of Americans agree with Obama’s economic policies” not true 26% disagree on how Obama handled the economy not his policies the differences is that many feel that he kowtowed too much to the GOP, they believe that his policies will help the economy. More to the point, they want him to be tougher on the GOP. However, the wrong way to go, yes lead and that is what he is doing on job with his speech. Nevertheless, you cannot look like a bully doing that and you have lost. This is why so many are disgusted with the Tea Farce they are nothing but bullies. The disapproval rating is nothing but frustrated people, and the 5% of the racist out there who just hate a black man in the White House. For example look at the GOP numbers and congress numbers to put some prospective on the poll numbers. As for the unemployment rate here is a link www(dot)csun(dot)edu/bus302/Lab/ReviewMaterial/macro5(dot)pdf that explains what is going on you do not seem to understand the formulas.
mel in oregon
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 1:51 pm
ok, so you define it differently. so what? you didn’t refute anything from the critics i named because you can’t. you didn’t refute the bad economic news either because you can’t. go back & read what i said. also don’t put up a link to read, digest what your point is & put it in your own words.
MsJoanne
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 4:01 pm
Know who those emoprogs are? Everyone at the major lefty sites; Washington Monthly, Crooks and Liars and the firebaggers at FireDogLake.
Perhaps if you read those sites, and others, you might see how much on target this article is.
And a Decider? That’s just how the Constitution was written. The POTUS is the Decider and to hell with the other two branches of government. Yes, the buck stops at the oval office, but something has to arrive at the oval office first and congress is doing shit.
But that’s all Obama’s fault.
Fuck. Me. Say hello to President Perry or Bachmann.
Cha Eva
Sep. 3rd, 2011 at 1:36 am
No, they’re petulant adults. Whiny professionals.
President Obama’s base is strong because they know what he’s accomplished and don’t sit around the internet whining about everything.
Reynardine
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 1:50 pm
Let’s face it. The disrespect this President has gotten from both ends and the middle, starting with the denial of Blair House, going on through Justitute Roberts’s thalidomide swearing in, and proceeding right down to this business, can be summed up in a five-letter dirty word: b-l-a-c-k.
mel in oregon
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 1:56 pm
not from the left though, racists be damned, but obama has a cabinet full of wallstreet people, who if he is defeated will go back to their hedgefunds & executive positions, they care nothing about working americans which is what politicus never understands.
Cha Eva
Sep. 3rd, 2011 at 12:11 am
Bottom line is if you know what the Admin has accomplished it’s evident that the Admin cares about the People over those who can take care of themselves.
I think politicususa understands only too well what the President was handed and what they’ve gotten done so far to clean up bush’s mess with extreme opposition.
And, I thank politicususa for their work in getting out the facts!
Sarah Jones
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 3:04 pm
Welcome back, Reynardine! We missed you.
Rmuse
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 4:05 pm
Ditto Sarah! Reynardine, glad you’re back.
Reynardine
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 4:25 pm
Brave new world! I got an Android! Still learning about my new toy, tho.
Cha Eva
Sep. 3rd, 2011 at 12:15 am
Thank you, Rmuse! Great work on the EmoProgs/teabaggers.
“What most Liberals do possess is respect for President Obama and the difficult conditions he labors under with an obstructionist Republican Party and cowardly, unsupportive faction within the Democratic caucus. One would think the remarkable legislative achievements President Obama pushed through Congress in a hostile environment would be enough to win over the professional-left ideologues, but as petulant children are wont to do, nothing short of blind obedience will satisfy them. In that sense, EmoProgs are exactly like teabaggers. Regardless what the president accomplishes, unless he grants every wish far-left crybabies demand, they will continue showing the president the same disrespect
teabaggers do.”
Excellent job!
MsJoanne
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 4:03 pm
I agree with you to some level…and the reason I say that is that no matter who the Dem was, they GOP would behave this way. Obama may be a ni**er, but Hillary would have been a c*nt. It doesn’t matter. The GOP will dis any Dem no matter who it is. That Obama is black is a special bonus for them.
John Henry
Sep. 2nd, 2011 at 8:20 pm
I guess I’m kind of falling in the middle on all of this.
On the one hand, the tea party has served its one useful purpose – opposing PATRIOT. Fine. Goodbye.
On the left, you have more than just two groups. You have two EXTREME groups:
- the extreme group who simply want bread and circuses and are likely migrants from the flag-waving right of the post-9-11 months. They aren’t left or right; they’re just “gimme.” Gimme revenge, gimme what I think is important, and to hell with everything else. These are the people who – to my never-ending annoyance – have turned “primary” into a verb and tend to support either/or/both Bernie Sanders (who I like, but not as an opponent to Obama) or Ron Paul. They see nothing but the sensationalist rhetoric, and hear nothing but what they want to hear, and – as I recently heard someone remark on Olbermann – if Obama walked on water at noon tomorrow, those people (along with the entirety of the Republican party) would be bitching that the man can’t swim before the evening news was finished.
- the other extreme group, who fall flailing into screeching accusations of FIREBAGGER and OMG PRESIDENT BACHMANN every time anyone points out ANYTHING about the Obama administration that they’re disappointed with. I have a number of points at which I’m not content with this administraiton: Guantanamo, universal health care, warrantless wiretapping, federal prosecution of state-legal providers of medical cannabis, and there are other issues as well. That DOESN’T mean I’m going to OMG VOTE REPUBLICAN or push for a primary opponent on the Dem side. I think those suggestions are ridiculous and stupid.
I also think it’s insulting and VERY dangerous to fall into a “my President/party right or wrong” mentality. That kind of thinking is exactly why I’m NOT a Republican. It’s lockstep, and that never, ever serves a positive purpose.
The left is not going to fall apart if we honestly and openly criticize the failures of this administration. For me, all of them come down to one key issue: a failure to lead, and lead boldly. Obama should have laughed out loud at the “death panels” talk, and he should have shamed the ignorant poor in this country who oppose UHC as well as the avaricious rich. There is simply no excuse for not doing so, EXCEPT that the Administration is chasing votes rather than leading people.
I appreciate the political expedience there, but I didn’t vote for Obama because I expected him to be the Great Compromiser. I voted for him because I expected “the audacity of hope.” The audacity to stand up and say “no, if we’re going to be the ‘greatest country in the world’ then we CAN NOT turn our backs on the poor and sick, even if they’re drug addicts or criminals.” I don’t think that Obama & team have faith in the power of their position, and it’s caused them to play a very conservative hand in terms of tactics if not politics.
I find it deeply insulting – and VERY tea party-ish – to be accused of betrayal or called names simply because I’m willing to criticize this president on the same basis I would any other. (I should make clear that I don’t *think* that is the author’s intent here, but I’ve run in to it quite frequently in other conversations.) Dissent is the single most important aspect of democracy; if you can’t or don’t speak up when you think something’s wrong, you may as well not live in a democracy at all.
I *suspect* I’m firmly in the middle with a lot of other folks on this one. Yes, I’m going to vote for Obama again, but I am not nearly as enthusiastic about him as I was in 2008. I recognize and credit his victories, but it’s been many small victories and really major losses or capitulation on almost every one of the most serious issues. He’s been too friendly and accommodating towards big industry, too compromising with the right wing, and has not displayed the *leadership* that I was hoping for. I also recognize that he’s face significant and completely STUPID opposition from the right in Congress…but I also think that excuse is a little too convenient sometimes, and that there have been times when he could have overcome that opposition if he’d been more…well, audacious.
That said he *has* made some major dents – nuking DOMA and DADT come immediately to mind – and as things stand right now I can’t realistically imagine the circumstances under which I would even consider not voting for him in 2012…but I’ll do so hoping that his second term is a great deal more aggressive and bold than the first.
VCubed
Sep. 3rd, 2011 at 3:06 am
Excellent job. Love your furthering of “emoprog” and “firebagger” labels – further alienating those of us who want to stop the wars, have clean air/water for the poor, children and elderly, want human and civil rights honored, want universal health care NOT national budget-busting private health insurance or HMOs.
Never mind that many other nations – many of them poorer than ours – already have what we so desperately need. Let’s not even discuss the millions who are homeless, or the mentally ill rotting in a prison population that is larger per capita and in actual numbers than anything Russia or China ever did! Although those issues were ALSO in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY Platform.
Dividing what’s left of the Dems (there are now almost equal numbers of Dem, GOP and no-labels) is the final nail in the coffin. The vicious vitriol, including the very labels “emoprogs” and “firebaggers” that you dears who hate to be called “Obamabots” fling like crap, have made me determined to never, EVER vote for corporate Dems again, the opposite of your efforts to cow us into submission. Congrats! Until now, if it was a close race, I held my nose and voted for the Dem, ALWAYS. You’ve cured me! THANK YOU! Hope you’ll have better luck building unity w/the independents!
Many of we “emoprogs” are black, Latino, Asian. Those of us old enough also fought Clinton tooth-and-nail, esp against the Welfare Deform that has absolutely raised child poverty levels. The Obama I worked so hard for, for 2 yrs in 3 states physically, in ALL states by phone w/over 100 volunteers in our little city, in the primaries at phonebanks I helped organize, all together in one little Democratic Party local office on Election Day, for free (I’m on a walker, disabled, poor and in pain), ALSO was against that Welfare Reform Act.
The Obama I got elected delegate for flipped, and now APPROVES of Clinton/Newt Gingrich’s fiasco against the poor, women and kids especially. Good God, y’all.
Read the Dem Party Platform that we voted for in 2008, representing everything YOU/we asked for, then show me where Obama has honored it. THAT, not some ‘far left’ socialist utopia, is ALL we are demanding, as is our RIGHT as American citizens. Sure, he would’ve lost many of those fights, but he lost and didn’t even put up a fight. It’s astounding that the POTUS who finally got Bin Ladin looks so weak. That DEMOCRATIC PARTY platform, and Obama, were FOR all the things you call us names for demanding AFTER the election was won.
Sisters Marian Edelman of Children’s Defense Fund and Lisa Jackson of the EPA – who Obama as good as slapped today – must be emoprog. So must the Congressional Black Caucus. But wait! It’s all about racism! Or petulance! If we’re black/people of color, we’re all spoiled brats for expecting the Democratic Party Platform, that we Obama delegates voted for as representatives of activist Democrats, representing ALL the groups that are in the Dem Party, to be honored! Marian, Lisa, the CBC, are all self-important egotists. Right.
Note the diff between an LGBT broadcaster, Rachel Maddow, and black broadcasters. Rachel put LGBT issues front-and-center, boldly demanded Obama keep his campaign promises. Black broadcasters, for the most part, say we must not demand anything for OUR communities. Who got the most out of Obama’s tenure so far? Mmmm-hmmm. Latino broadcasters slammed Obama for not pushing harder for immigration reform – and we got an executive order that all but establishes the Dream Act.
If you think settling for a choice between a moderate corporate Republican aka Dems like Clinton and Obama, and a teabagger corporate Republican is fine, good for you – you’re in the perfect country! Don’t ask Obama to do a damned thing for you or yours.
Nations that took what America established – but took it farther – have more than 2 parties. They have real choices. They have proportional representation for the poor and working people. They’re called Labor Party, Socialist Democrats, and a few other names you all are as reactionary against as the teabaggers – and THEY are why ALL other developed nations have universal government-provided health care, tiny numbers of prisoners compared to us, lower poverty and crime, no death penalty at all, and no mega-normous military “expenses” aka payoffs.
But you call us, who want what you want and dare demand it, self-important egotistical “firebaggers” who won’t stay in our designated place. Because Democratic Party POLITICIANS lie, for their own benefit, and ignore Democratic Party VOTERS and the ACTIVISTS who most strengthened the Dem Party and turned several states blue FOR OBAMA.
Guess what, dears: Most of us don’t read, often or at all, the fire-whatever blog (found it, firedoglake, whatever that means), though I emailed them once, objecting to Jane Hamscher calling Obama devotees names on Twitter. You’re welcome. Yeah, right! As if.
The ideological ones are staring you in the mirror. Your ideology: OBEY, no matter how much they serve multinational corporations and screw you and yours, so long as they’re Dem and especially if they’re black (except you MUST diss black activists, black broadcasters and black administrators in Obama’s administration who challenge him, and the Black Caucus members, some of whom marched with Dr. King, if they criticize the New King – but wait, he’s not a king, that’s why he can’t do anything … What?!).
That’s what’s known as: The soft bigotry of low expectations. And it won’t do a damn thing for the next black woman or man who runs for office, especially if it’s for the Dems. Why would anyone vote in another Dem black POTUS, when you who most make excuses for Obama claim he can do nothing because he’s black?
Want rational thought? Here’s one for you: To serve our own self-interest, we must never elect another person of color to the presidency. omg. That’s so f//d up! But what other conclusion can be drawn, based on your own arguments?
Your argument makes the next person of color candidate as unelectable as a Socialist Democrat or Labor Party candidate. Welcome to the club. Enjoy the irony.
This blog’s aptly named, but it’s missing one word: corporate. It’s the 1000% corporate politics in the USA that makes the USA the most murderous country in the world, with the most exported weapons (our biggest export, matter of fact!), and the only civilized developed country with a death penalty, never mind a death penalty that murders child-criminals and the mentally disabled. Thanks to the nastiness of your critique, you practically guaranteed that Perry, the most pro-death-penalty gov in the USA, wins in 2012.
Because name-calling does not build unity. Most kids on the playground could’ve told you that.
Cappadonna
Sep. 8th, 2011 at 2:49 pm
If one took a critical look at Obama’s overall record, he’s pretty consistent with a centrist pragmatist and had far more liberal accomplishments than he’s given credit for by many on the Left. Obama’s far from perfect, but quite frankly he’s lightyears head of his competitors on the Left (who can’t win anything) and the Right (who don’t know anything).
But, in the world of the angry Lefty blogger-sphere, Obama is no different than Bush (I would laugh it if weren’t so dire in consequences) If all you listen to was Democracy Now and read FiredogLake.com, you’d think Obama was the worse thing since Satan.
I think the Obama administration has tangentially reveal many flaws in our political culture. A racism reactionary right wing that is willing to sell its soul and the country to corporations just to one up minorities or gays. An ambivalent mainstream ‘center’ that doesn’t have a clue what it wants or needs and is too fickle to really make a real impact. And a dysfunctional Left with little means of political capital and organize and also rife with egomaniacs with no real sense of politics, economics or basic cooperation.
Frankly, the so-called “Emo Progs” have been a bane of Liberals’ political existence for years. Ask any sensible liberal who tried to build the Green Party in the early ’00′s or survived the meltdown of Pacifica Radio in the mid 90′s. How about other progressive movements hijacked by guys like ANSWER? Or, if you really want to go back, ask some older liberals how they felt about militant cranks like MOVE, the Black Panthers or the Weather Underground.
Yes, these movements did some great things (community clinics and school breakfast come to mind about the Panthers) – but they screwed a lot of things up. Yes, hardcore liberals have passion, but their often strident commitment to their own ideas and egos cost the entire movement.
And I find it funny that we often take the advice of people who for the most part, never won office,never worked in real policy making and frankly, couldn’t organize a hotdog stand.