Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Obama Explains Exactly Why He Will Veto Bush Tax Cuts For the Wealthy
By: Jason EasleyJul. 10th, 2012more from Jason Easley
President Obama has turned up the heat on congressional Republicans and Mitt Romney by explaining exactly why he will veto any extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
Here is the video from WWLTV New Orleans:
The president explained why he would veto more tax cuts for the wealthy,
I would veto it and here’s why. What I’m proposing is that we give a tax break, that we make sure that taxes don’t go up on 98 percent of Americans. 98 percent. But to extend tax breaks for that top 2 percent of wealthiest Americans would cost us a trillion dollars over the next decade.
Now at a time when we’re trying to bring down our deficit to give me a tax break or Warren Buffet a tax break that costs a trillion dollars and 80 percent of that would go to people who make a million dollars or more, that would mean that we would have to cut something. So a trillion dollars would be cut out of student loan programs for kids going to college, for you know projects that take care of our veterans, for projects that benefit our seniors, and that’s not the best way for us to grow our economy.
So I understand the Republicans disagree with me on this. My attitude is let’s go ahead and work on the things we agree on, which is give 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of the small businesses confidence and security that their taxes aren’t going up and that we can have a good debate between now and the election about what we do for that top 2, 3 percent. I’m happy to have that debate but no need to hold hostage most Americans who need some certainty right now.
Obama has already got Romney and his party painted into a corner. Either they explain why the rich deserve another big tax cut, or they unreasonable by refusing to support and pass a cut that everybody supports for 98% of American taxpayers.
The Romney campaign has so far been bumbling and fumbling for answer to the question why do the rich deserve another tax cut. Yesterday, the Romney campaign tried to tell the middle class that what would be best for them is a tax cut for the wealthy.
Today, they have decided to go the fear route and tell voters that a tax cut for the middle class would be a job killer unless taxes are also raised for the top two percent. The Romney campaign is on their third different variation of an answer to this in less than two days. Just like on the Supreme Court’s immigration and ACA decisions they are clueless on the Bush tax cuts too.
Remember how the media was telling us all how the latest jobs numbers would allow Romney to pivot to the economy and get his campaign back on track?
That lasted for three days. President Obama has once again set the agenda and put Mitt Romney back on the defensive by shifting the agenda to tax fairness, but larger and more looming issue is income inequality. This debate over who should get an extended tax cut is opening the door for the president to make income inequality an issue. It is virtually impossible for quarter billionaire Mitt Romney to discuss income inequality without looking bad.
Obama has the message, the argument, and the American people on his side. With congressional Republicans appearing willing to fight to the death all summer long over these tax cuts, Mitt Romney has a big problem. The longer the House tea partiers drag this fight out, the more it hurts Romney.
Should Obama have to follow through on his promise to veto a full tax cut extension that includes the wealthy, Mitt Romney and congressional Republicans will have to explain why the president was wrong to not give the rich more.
It’s a win-win for Obama and an inescapable quagmire for Mitt Romney.
President Obama was in rare form today as he anticipated every Republican argument for extending the Bus ...
President Obama sent the message today through Robert Gibbs on CNN that he plans to kill the Bush tax cu ...
Despite the fact that President Obama has spoken of compromise throughout his presidency, CNN atta ...
A Sensata worker has a question for Mitt Romney, 'If transferring wealth to the top two percent creates ...
Mitt Romney is telling so many lies at the first presidential debate with Barack Obama that we had to ta ...
adult diapers
Jul. 10th, 2012 at 1:08 pm
Obama made a deal two years ago to extend the “Bush tax cuts” for the rich. In my mind these are now the Obama tax cuts and he’s now claiming he’s going to revoke his own tax cuts. I’m all for it, but lets tell the story like it is.
lm945
Jul. 10th, 2012 at 5:45 pm
You’re forgetting, or rather, ignoring, the fact that Obama and the Democrats extended the Bush tax cuts under duress.
The Republicans got massive tax cuts for the top 1%. In exchange, the Democrats got a cut in payroll taxes and an extension of unemployment benefits for the other 99%.
majii
Jul. 10th, 2012 at 10:32 pm
There are some things you seem to be forgetting. The original tax cuts had a sunset date of December 31, 2010. It was the republicans who reneged on the agreement. The agreement the president made with republicans in December 2010 about tax cuts for wealthy Americans also had a sunset date which is December 31, 2012. The fact that it is the president who wants to honor the prearranged agreement shows that you’re either lying, or you have no idea what you’re talking about. The republicans reneged on the 2001 tax cut deal in December 2010, and they’re reneging now on the December 2010 agreement. They’re also reneging on the automatic cuts they agreed to in the debt limit/deficit negotiations. They agreed to the automatic cuts to the Dept. of Defense budget, but they are now busy trying to weasel out of the agreement. For me, the important issue here isn’t what to call the tax cuts but who can be trusted to follow through on an agreement, and it isn’t the republicans in Congress.
Louisa
Jul. 11th, 2012 at 11:45 pm
Did you just crap in your adult diaper, Adult Diaper?
Did it ever occur to you that President Obama and the Democrats extended that old Frat Boy Bush tax cuts because they were under duress and being blackmailed by blantantly racist politicians?
The RepubliCONs are being played and have been for the past 4 years. Yes, he did extend the tax cuts but he was smart enough to do it in a non-election year. President Obama is so incredibly smart that he turned the tables on the CONs’ blackmail attempt. Now, during an election year, the President can make himself look good (which he does because he is good – to the core good). The CONs have been had and they’re so entrenched in theri racist red zone, they can’t even see it.
Change your diaper, Adult Diaper. You’re starting to stink!
Cheryl
Jul. 10th, 2012 at 1:14 pm
I think the real story is everyone will receive a tax cut on income up to $250,000. EVERYONE.
hnstyngov
Jul. 10th, 2012 at 2:32 pm
And to back up what the President said… Nick Hanauer ( also a Venture Capitalist )was on Lawrence last night and made the point perfectly clear.
” It’s just dead FALSE that people who run companies are job creators”.
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096...
c good.
Jul. 12th, 2012 at 6:11 am
obama is doing well.