Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
The Obama Stimulus Created More Jobs In 2010 Than Bush Did in 8 Years
By: RmuseAug. 15th, 2011more from Rmuse
Americans are some of the hardest working people in the world, and it is not just their work ethic that drives them to toil for a decent life, it is the conditions conservatives have imposed on them that make it difficult to survive from paycheck to paycheck. In the western world, Americans work longer hours for less pay and less time off than their counterparts in Europe and it leads to shorter lifespans and less contentment. The economic situation has made finding a job nearly impossible because businesses are less inclined to hire new employees when the public can ill-afford to buy their goods much less daily rations of food and even shelter. The Republican candidates seeking the nomination for president in 2012 have assailed President Obama for failing to provide jobs for Americans, but their assertions that they have the answers to put Americans back to work are fallacious at best and at worst, outright lies.
First, it is worth noting that President Obama and Democrats created more jobs in 2010 than George W. Bush did in his eight year reign of economic malfeasance. From Bush’s first month in office until December of 2009, the economy added 1 million jobs, but in 2010 alone the economy added at least 1.1 million jobs and though the numbers show improvement, there is still a long way to go to get 14.5 million more Americans gainfully employed. It is unfortunate, but if Republicans were not so bent on obstructing President Obama’s economic agenda the unemployment numbers would be much lower and the economy would be on a more solid foundation. Economists have outlined what measures to take to improve job creation, but because Republicans are ill-equipped to take advice from experts they are resorting to their tired canards of tax breaks for the wealthy’s corporations and deregulation of environmental protections.
When Republicans won the House in 2010, they promised to make jobs their highest priority but instead of job creation, they focused on procreation and assaulting women’s right to choose their own reproductive health. After 8 months, Republicans have still not made any effort to help create jobs and instead have obstructed the president and the Democratic determination to create an environment that is conducive to job creators. When Democrats attempted to eliminate tax breaks and incentives for corporations that outsource Americans’ jobs, Republicans obstructed and eventually blocked the job-creating legislation. Their job-killing agenda served two purposes; to protect their wealthy corporate donors and to portray the Obama Administration as ineffective. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce president made the rounds on news talk-shows to tout the benefits to corporations of moving American jobs to India, Korea, and China, and although near-slave labor may be good for big business, it is devastating Americans’ lives as well as the country for the lost tax revenue from working Americans and corporations that avoid paying taxes on foreign earnings.
The Republican meme that regulations and the corporate tax rate are hurting job creation plays well to conservatives and cognitively challenged Republican supporters, but they are outright lies that have been around since the Republicans’ man-turned-god, Ronald Reagan, was president. It is an oft-repeated statistic, but it bears repeating again that during the Clinton Administration, the tax rate for the richest 2% of Americans was 3% higher than it is now and funding for regulatory agencies like the EPA was increased leading to millions of jobs being created and an environment that was considerably less toxic. When President Clinton’s term was finished, he left a budget surplus that the Bush-Republicans promptly turned over to the wealthy and the economy began a devastating slide that continued until President Obama’s initiated a stimulus program that started the painfully slow economic recovery.
Economists have said that the stimulus was good for the economy, but that it was too little to make the kind of impact that would lift the country out of the economic slump that remains today. Republicans objected to the stimulus the Democratically-controlled Congress passed, and continue the spiel that it did nothing to create jobs or help the economy. Republicans being the innate hypocrites they are decried the stimulus but took credit in their districts for the jobs it created and the infrastructure improvements it funded. The newest entrant in the Republican field for president, Rick Perry, is one of the stimulus hypocrites who condemned the stimulus as a waste, but took the money and used it to “plug nearly 97% of Texas’ budget shortfall for fiscal 2010.”
The Republicans who criticized the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (stimulus) that helped the nation’s economy and put Americans back to work did not have a big problem with the Bush stimulus (TARP) to prop up banks and Wall Street that caused the mortgage crisis that decimated the world’s economy. It is a continuing narrative that Republicans hate spending on the American people but love enriching corporations, banks, and the wealthy. All the while, Americans are suffering from high unemployment and loss of programs that primarily help the poor, children, and elderly as the top 2% of the wealthiest Americans enjoy record earnings and low tax rates.
Republicans fighting for the party’s nomination have echoed the Heritage Foundation and Koch Industries talking points that the deficit and out-of-control spending are responsible for the sluggish economy and slow job growth, but spending cuts and deficit reduction have nothing to do with job creation. Michele Bachmann has called for the elimination of the minimum wage and Rick Perry’s state boasts the most workers at or below the Federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. They echo the Chamber of Commerce president’s contention that without a minimum wage, Americans can compete with slave-labor wage levels in places like China and India. Obviously big business is looking for Americans who will work for $1 dollar-an-hour and if that happens, they will consider moving manufacturing back to America but only if the EPA is eliminated and America adopts the dirty-air standards China and India tolerate. Michele Bachmann has promised that her first task as president will be to cut the power and lock the doors of the EPA to restrict them from hurting corporations.
The overwhelming theme of the Republican candidates is helping big business and not the American people. It is nothing new though because it has been the goal of Republicans for decades. In the spending-cut frenzy in February, Republicans’ proposed cuts would cost over one million jobs at the same time they blocked attempts to extend unemployment benefits. Nearly every credible economist that does not work for the Heritage Foundation or Cato Institute has said that spending cuts kills jobs and they have advised much larger stimulus programs and infrastructure improvements that are guaranteed to create millions of jobs. Earlier this year, the CBO said the government needed to hire tens-of-thousands of inspectors and regulators for food safety programs and to collect delinquent income taxes, but Republicans ignored those recommendations and promptly cut spending to those programs killing even more jobs to cause the most damage to the economy as possible. At some point, the economy will not recover and the fault is squarely with Republicans and their job-killing measures.
There is ample proof that President Obama and economic experts know what works to get Americans working again, but with recalcitrant Republicans and cowardly Democrats balking at bold measures like public work programs funded by a large stimulus, the economic picture is not rosy and job growth will remain slow. However, if the President and Democrats continue telling the population what has worked and what is necessary to create jobs, sooner or later they will catch on. Republicans running for president will keep repeating the meme that cutting regulations and taxes for the wealthy is the only path to job creation, but they are running out of morons who believe them. The public should be aware that Bush-era tax cuts have been in effect for ten years, and that corporations and oil companies pay little or no taxes whatsoever and no jobs were created; but an investment in America by President Obama created over 1.1 million jobs in 2010 alone. The Democrats need to keep those figures in the public’s conscience to have success in 2012.
The religious malcontents who support any Republican who wraps themselves in the flag, with a bible in one hand and a gun in the other are a lost cause and there is no reasoning with them; Democrats should not waste their time trying. However, for unemployed Americans who yearn for a decent job and place to live and who want this country to thrive and succeed, it may take reminding that the country can return to the Bush Administration’s failed economic policies, or remain with Democratic job growth and infrastructure improvements. The choice is simple for decent, hardworking, and intelligent Americans, but for ignorant conservatives looking the next white bible-thumping gunslinger, the field is crowded.
There are occasions when it is prudent to take a go-slow approach in any situation to be as certain as p ...
As the battle rages over extending the Bush-era tax cuts and Republicans continue to argue that 2% of th ...
When Americans vote for their representatives in Congress, they assume each member will work to make Ame ...
In the lead up to the midterm elections of 2010, Republicans repeatedly said if elected, they would fix ...
It is not unusual during elections for candidates to cast aspersion on their rivals to portray the ...
QuantRec.com
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 10:28 am
Where are these supposed ‘jobs created now’?
Such BS & tripe about the stimulus floating around.
If so many jobs were created than why is unemployment officially at 9.1% percent???
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 11:39 am
for one example, you can look at the big three automakers which could comprise over 1 million jobs in itself globally. 400,000 jobs for General Motors alone at home.
The stimulus was not all encompassing. Not every company was given money. You may wish to delve into how many jobs are interconnected, meaning if one goes down how many other does it affect.
you may also want to know that on the day that President Bush left office the unemployment rate was 8.7% and we were losing 750,000 jobs a month. Do you think all of that just goes away in no time? You think all of those jobs come back immediately? How many of them will never come back no matter what.
Sarah Jones
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 12:31 pm
Gosh, you might want to talk to the Republicans about that because they are the people who took the language out of the stimulus about a certain percentage having to be spent on JOBS. This allowed the CEOs to pocket the money as bonuses.
Yup. Take the language out or the country gets it! More Patriotism from the Right. So NO ONE who votes Republican can complain about jobs or the economy. You voted for this crap, so find something else to pin on the President.
Fran Joy
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 8:51 pm
You tell them Sarah! I can’t believe the level of misinformed people still supporting the gun and bible toting Extremists who have infiltrated this government.
jimmy
Aug. 20th, 2011 at 10:15 am
You are really misinformed. The stimulus passed without ANY GOP support. abcnews.go.com/Politics/P...
Anyone who votes for the current POTUS again is an idiot.
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 20th, 2011 at 11:13 am
And strangely enough the prior stimulus bills passed with republican support.
If you havent been following the news, the GOP is against any support for the American people, being against jobs and unemployment. Our president is for supporting Americans in need beucase of the corporations that the republicans support and force the people to make up in their taxes what the corproations and rich get from tax handouts
Jeff R
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 12:04 am
“Conservatives” are truly weird. You give the new guy a shovel and then for two solid year stand around getting in his way and complaining that he hasn’t filled up the hole you spent the previous 8 years digging with a ditcher.
The jobs are still in the hole that the previous administration dug. Don’t forget for many months before Obama told office the economy was losing as many as 750,000 jobs a month.
Take a look at “The Bikini Graph” through March 2011 at thepoliticalcarnival.net/....
AFV007
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 1:42 pm
They’re not “wierd”. They’re stupid.
Robin
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 2:49 pm
They’re not stupid or weird, they are blind.
They are blind to anything that does not serve their agenda.
And what is this agenda? It it power, control, and money at all costs. In a word, fascism. This particular brand of fascism is based in christian extremism, which itself is more or less undefinable, due to the bible meaning anything they want it to mean in order to serve the agenda.
cute huh?
dubya
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 4:02 pm
stupid me: i need someone to tell me that quantity trumps quality — every time
oh, someone break it down for me how many of these jobs were *NOT* seasonal/temporary?
yeah.
that.
Chick Marshall
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 5:01 pm
Maybe over seas. Government jobs don’t count either. Oh I forgot, food stamps create jobs.
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 5:03 pm
Governm,ent and government related contracts do count. Sorry, thats a pretty weak assertion on your part
Chick Marshall
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 5:10 pm
I beg to differ. Government jobs are paid by taxes. When no one is working there are no taxes. So we borrow money. Hence the defict problem. Sitting at home and drawing a check does not qualify either.
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 5:18 pm
true, but there is money going back into the economy when people are working even if it is for the government. There are a lot of government contracts that are not all paid by tax money
Chick Marshall
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 5:24 pm
Borrowed money going into the economy. Hello….
freedom
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 7:20 pm
cause we let some socialist clown in office.
dm
Aug. 17th, 2011 at 12:34 am
Bush was many things but he wasn’t a socialist.
boil
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 10:53 am
how dare you use facts! and lets not forget there have been at least two dozen job and infrastructure bills ready to go, that the GOP has filibustered and slowed up to the point they have been killed. the prez has had these on the table since day one, yet you wont hear this on the so called news. all they want is food fight…… would have created millions of new jobs, and ancillary work…. you cant outsource fixing the interstates, and bridges,etc…
John Bovay
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 11:25 am
Mr. Obama works for the same interests which every U.S. president has worked for since the administration of Woodrow Wilson.
“Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not … they are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders. The sack of the United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.” ~ Congressman Charles McFadden, Chairman, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932
The Fed Audit – Newsroom: U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (Vermont): 1.usa.gov/riIpew via @addthis $16 trillion in secret loans to banks!
sanders.senate.gov/newsro...
(July 21, 2011)
A documentary which examines the contrast between Barack Obama’s pre-election promises and his post-election actions: www.youtube.com/watch?v=e...
A documentary which underscores how the Republican vs Democrat, right vs left paradigm is a marketing ploy to deceive voters into believing they have a choice in choosing their leaders: www.youtube.com/watch?v=V...
A documentary on how the mainstream media spins the news to favour the same interests which control the U.S. (and other countries): www.youtube.com/watch?v=e...
The game is rigged folks…
A documentary on the U.S. monetary system, why it’s broken and how it can be repaired: topdocumentaryfilms.com/t...
–
For any Canadians out there we too are being screwed by debt-spiral-inducing fractional reserve banking/fraud, inflation and compound interest:
Oh Canada Movie – dan.matthews – Picasa Web Albums: bit.ly/n7f23B via @addthis
picasaweb.google.com/ohno...
–
As long as the majority of North Americans remain ignorant of how their monetary systems actually work, then the status quo of economy-killing corruption will continue until the U.S. and Canadian economies implode, social order breaks down and marshal law is declared:
howgaysarebeingusedtocrea...
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 11:45 am
I have often thought that both parties were working for the exact same goal, just using preagreed on methods to get there. As far as I’m concerned the financial system in this country and globally determines how many people are working, what companies are successful and who really has money. The banks and financial institutions do little more than suck money out of the people that work, and when they’re done with them they are no longer working.
I do not believe for a second that this country is anything that is founding was ascribed to be. I think at that time the banking system was also pretty much in power
John Bovay
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 12:20 pm
A famous quote:
“Give me control over a nation’s currency and I care not who makes its laws.” ~ Baron M.A. Rothschild (1744 – 1812)
BTW. Important forms of manipulation we have been subjected to include…
Entertainment – Enslaving the Minds of the Masses – YouTube: bit.ly/py2EYn via @addthis
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3...
…and:
Charlotte Iserbyt: The Miseducation of America Part 1-Full – YouTube: bit.ly/o6a6PW via @addthis
www.youtube.com/watch?v=e...
Her book,’The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America’ is free at
www.deliberatedumbingdown...
–
We’ve been F’ed over BIG time.
Fran Joy
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 9:31 pm
That may be true, but it certainly did not begin under the Obama administration. President Obama was elected with the best of intentions. A few surprises took place right off the bat. First an overwhelming collapse of the economy by the Bush administration, then an extreme right wing religious gun toting bigoted sleeping giant woke up and united with the billionaires and corporations and decided they were going to destroy a black president and the country along with it. Then while Obama had a majority, his own Blue Dog democrats played the hands of undercover GOP and his support has been going down every since. I still say support the President; he is the people’s President. He’s as close as you’re going to get to a people’s President. The other candidates are extremists. Let’s support jobs, social security and medicare. Let’s support education and infrastructure. Let’s support America.
michael
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 4:57 pm
you don’t get it, Obama and Bush have the same goals… they work for the same people… and its not the american people… Bush took away freedom with the information act… Obama blames all his issues on Bush for 4 yrs while spending like there is no tomorrow… for the american people there is no win cause they do not work for us. Save the budget cut congress’s budget and presidents pay and we need to stop policing the world.
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 5:05 pm
Obama is not spending like theres no tomorrow. In fact most economists indicate more spending is required to kickstart the economy. The corporations who set on trillions certainly wont do it
Doug
Aug. 19th, 2011 at 2:31 pm
“…among these are Life Liberty and the PURSUIT of happiness” I must have missed the part about a check in the mail from the government. Seems to me the guys that wrote that passage were in favor of less control by a distant government. How about lets support: leave us alone, get your hands out of our pockets and for the most part we’ll do it without your supervision.
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 19th, 2011 at 5:13 pm
Promote the general welfare
Most of us are Americans. We are not Iraqis or the chinese. Did you miss that too?
John Bovay
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 8:25 am
Examples of the mainstream media manipulating the public’s perception re which Republican candidates are currently leading the pack:
Jon Stewart | Ron Paul | Michele Bachmann | Mediaite: bit.ly/n1qoIz via @addthis
www.mediaite.com/tv/jon-s...
Establishment Media Admits Conspiracy To Ignore Ron Paul Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!: bit.ly/nBgcsa .
www.infowars.com/establis...
Allowing oneself to be fed is allowing oneself to be led:
At issue here is that many if not most voters are having their opinions on public policy issues relentlessly conditioned in favour of those forces which are bankrupting the economy and eroding personal liberty.
One would do well to expand one’s sources of information beyond the mainstream news to include a broad spectrum of those members of the independent media who have earned one’s trust in their reportage over time. On important issues the aim would be to average multiple independent sources of info together within the context of one’s own common sense.
Some eye-opening info and informative links:
Media Reform Information Center: www.corporations.org/medi... via @addthis
John Bovay
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 9:39 pm
CORRECTION: The above quote is not by ‘Congressman Charles McFadden’. It’s from a June 10, 1932 speech by Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the United States House Committee on Banking and Currency 1920-31
Louis T. McFadden’s U.S. House Speech,10 June 1932: bit.ly/pjz7iR via @addthis
www.afn.org/~govern/mcfad...
The Congressional Record, 1932, Page 12595: bit.ly/rdfdXv via @addthis
www.afn.org/~govern/mcfad...
Congressional Record June 10, 1932, Louis T McFadden: scr.bi/qisxVa via @addthis
www.scribd.com/doc/165023...
novenator
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 11:46 am
FTA – “First, it is worth noting that President Obama and Democrats created more jobs in 2010 than George W. Bush did in his eight year reign of economic malfeasance. From Bush’s first month in office until December of 2009, the economy added 1 million jobs,”
I’m glad the author (rmuse) did the research to attribute the correct total net jobs under the Bush/Cheney regime. Most authors are too lazy to do the proper research and regurgitate the bogus figure of 3+ million released by the conservative/corporate WSJ *before* the jobs crisis part of the Great Recession hit.
It should also be noted that the ARRA was 40% tax cuts. There would be literally millions more jobs today if that money was better spent on actual jobs programs like a new WPA.
The Platzner Post
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 5:47 pm
That’s all fine and dandy, but too many people are still unemployed!!!
Fran Joy
Aug. 15th, 2011 at 9:38 pm
And what do you think the Republican candidates are going to do about it?
The so called “job creators will have you working slave labor because they don’t even want the hard line of minimum wage to continue. And they only want the wealthy educated so they can keep you in a dumbed down state to control your future even more while they add to their bank accounts and take over all laws and civil rights.
Necia
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 10:47 am
We do not need the government to create jobs for us. When that happens, we become dependent on the government. Unfortunately, that is where we are headed. We need to be dependent on God not some president to take care of everything for us. Quit looking to the government to save us. We will all be better off.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 11:30 am
You’d rather be more dependent upon corporations who have only their own best interests at heart? And who manifestly are NOT creating jobs but sending them overseas?
J
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 1:29 pm
Hate to break it to you darling, but if God exists, he doesn’t give a damn about the well-being of the American people. You would really rather depend upon a questionably legitimate man in the sky who’s existence is largely only validated by millions of ignorant, uneducated people and a 2000 year old book, than a government that we can at least verify EXISTS and therefore ATTEMPT to change? You’re the reason we’re in this mess in the first place. Religious fervor will destroy this country.
WeakTea
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 1:51 pm
You know part of the government’s job is to actually create jobs, right? It’s worked in the past (see FDR’s Works Projects Administration) during the Great Depression. The “some president” you are referring to is Obama who, despite his shortcomings, did, as the article states, create more jobs in one year than Bush did in 8. He has just been hamstrung by an imbecilic right wing that wants to hurt Obama above all else, including helping Americans. As to being dependent on God to “take care of everything for us”, once I see his job creation numbers I’ll consider that approach.
Hammer
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 3:05 pm
Point me to the part of our constitution that says the government’s job is to create jobs.
WeakTea
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 8:15 pm
Part of the government’s responsibility is to stimulate the economy and BOTH create a climate that fosters job creation in the private sector (through tax incentives) and create jobs outright when drastic circumstances call for drastic measures. There is a belief on the right side of our political spectrum that the government has no business creating jobs, or that it’s simply impossible for the government to do so. Any jobs created by the government, they say, are only temporary “government” jobs – which somehow is worse than having absolutely no job at all, according to rigid conservative ideology.
If we must restrict the purview of our self-governance to the specific words that exist in the Constitution, then we wouldn’t have fire departments, police forces, public transportation or any national infrastructure. Of course some would say that these things might fall under the heading of promoting the “general welfare”. I don’t disagree. But I also think that creating projects to employ the citizenry in dire financial times where unemployment levels are as high as they are and the overall economy is sputtering would also serve the general welfare.
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 8:21 pm
If the government has no right to create jobs, I wonder why the republicans are running on their job creation records?
BTW I agree with your post
James
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 4:46 pm
Did you just say we need to be dependent on an entity that doesn’t exist? Even if there were a God, what makes you think He would care about people looking for work?
Better yet, people need to be dependent on themselves, not some belief in a god or even a government.
Jamie
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 2:03 pm
There’s a difference between Public Job creation and Private Job creation. A big difference.
Jamie
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 2:10 pm
The Obama-Pelosi Stimulus bill created 450,000 government jobs and delayed or destroyed 1,000,000 private sector jobs.
And, it only cost us $1 trillion.
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 2:15 pm
Evidence?
MJ
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 2:27 pm
Let’s use some common sense.
Bush left office unemployment rate was 8.7%. Now The unemployment rate is 9.1%. That 9.1 doesn’t include anyone no longer looking for jobs and were part of the original 8.7%.
Use common sense! They are both corporate, wall street whores!
Adam
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 2:59 pm
Im sorry,Im a republican for financial reasons, I would be an independent but the parties candidates suck. I believe in equal rights accross the board and I believe in abortion. Just because your a republican doesnt make you some freak. There are just as many dumb dem’s that read only left wing bullsh*t.
You can hate on Bush for the “Push on War” agenda that he some how created after our country was attacked and thousands died. I went to USMA (or for the uneducated, West Point)and after 2004 the school was ranked the hardest to get into because everyone and their grandmother was pro-defense at that time. 6-7 years later you all cry that Bush created this massive def. in jobs. Well your obv. 20 something and dont follow politics. Everything is intertwined, Clinton was easily one of the best presidents in my mind, the mans foreign policy was amazing. His downside was creating so much of an open market that these countries absorbed if not stole a large percentage of our countries jobs(i.e. india). but clinton absord difficulties from Bush sr. as well. it goes hand in hand in hand. The presidents job is to keep the country afloat and protect it as best as possible. Somtimes you cant avoid the ice burg ahead of you so you tactfully figure out a way to take it head on. Bush is one man, flesh and blood like Obama; they cant sit around for 365 days straight without sleep signing off on every slip that comes into the office and deal with all the bullsh*t its just not possible. Im sorry the democratic party has its flaws, you cant give out free subsities to everyone and expect the country to not have credit issues for not paying all the bills, these programs cost money, that money is taken aways from the job market. Just look at cuba for example, they are finally admitting(not openly of course)that they need to reduce their free subsities because there coutnry is officially broke, people took to much advantage of free housing, food and “healthcare” and now the country has nothing left…nothing. All im asking in this long rant is to be educated, dont blame this entire mess on one man, just like I dont blame Obama for braking all his promises(i.e. guantanomo)because these things are not fiscally/safely possible. obama will leave the office and dumb uneducated republicans will blame him for issues that are out of his control, I guess thats just how it is, but its a sad sad thing.
Jamie Reed
Aug. 17th, 2011 at 7:12 pm
George W. Bush, our most recent former President, signed the “No Child Left Behind” act in 2001. This small piece of legislation is probably why your post is an eyesore than one can barely decipher. When your children grow up and have no healthcare, no social security, no education, and are working at McDonald’s, they will probably be saying…Do you want a Bible with that?
Adam
Aug. 19th, 2011 at 9:06 am
Ok, I can admit it was a rant. But who are you to judge, how about you proof read your own posts. But I love how you assume the republican agenda is only Bible thumping. Im agnostic and my political views have nothing to do with religion. I dont believe in giving out all my money to free loaders probably like you.
Why would my kids have to work at a McDonalds if they dont have Healthcare or social security? That could have been one of the dumbest comments I have ever read. My kids, like myself, will be raised on how to respect other people and to work hard. Handouts should only be given to the people truly in need, not your kids down the street suckling on the tit of the economy because you taught them that way. Jamie I dont think your a loser because your a dem. I think your a loser because you pigeon hole people because of their political ideals. Hope the best for you and your future children.
Hammer
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 3:05 pm
Jesus Christ, I don’t know that I’ve ever seen such a circle jerk of people who want others to take care of them instead of taking care of themselves.
VNJD
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 3:41 pm
Jobs are created because something needs to get done. Something needs to get made or sold. With an unemployment rate between 4.2% (2001) and 5% (2008) most of the jobs that needed to be “created” already were. If most people had a job, what need was there for Bush to institute policies or stimulate things to create more?
So Obama spends a trillion dollars of taxpayer money, supposedly creates a million jobs, and unemployment is still over 9%. Great idea.
And… “…but with recalcitrant Republicans and cowardly Democrats balking at bold measures like public work programs funded by a large stimulus…”. Public work programs doing what? Who’s going to sell or buy what they’re doing? Oh yeah, a high-speed rail that nobody wants to ride.
John Rohan
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 4:26 pm
This part of the article is dishonest: “From Bush’s first month in office until December of 2009, the economy added 1 million jobs,”
Barack Obama, not George Bush, was president of the United States throughout 2009.
Compare oranges to oranges. If you are going to count Obama’s first year as some kind of holdover from Bush, then you need to take off Bush’s first year (which would include 9/11) and attribute it to Clinton instead. Fair’s fair.
This part of the article is dishonest: “From Bush’s first month in office until December of 2009, the economy added 1 million jobs”
Barack Obama, not George Bush, was president of the United States throughout 2009.
Compare oranges to oranges. If you are going to count Obama’s first year as some kind of holdover from Bush, then you need to take off Bush’s first year (which would include 9/11) and attribute it to Clinton instead. Fair’s fair.
bossman
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 5:36 pm
OH! To go through life sipping your own kool-aid, believing your own hype, while the rest of us try to survive paycheck to paycheck.
The words ‘blind’, ‘idealogue’, ‘drone’ comes to mind.
kendall morse
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 7:23 pm
Presidents don’t create jobs. Companies do, and right now all they want is to defeat Obama no matter what it does to the country.
Congress needs to lower corporate taxes to get the jobs back here. Obama can’t do that.
Remember, one of Obama’s costs is interest on the 10 trillion dollar debt he inherited from Bush.(168 million dollars a day!)
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 16th, 2011 at 7:42 pm
Kendall, the US is 2nd lowest on the list of civilized world in taxing corporations. The corps went to China which is the 2nd highest in taxing corporations. Do you still swallow the high tax thing here?