Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Obama Thrashes Romney and the GOP for Destroying the American Dream
By: Jason EasleyJul. 5th, 2012more from Jason Easley
While campaigning in Ohio, President Obama thrashed the Republican Party for having a plan to win an election, but no plan to restore the American Dream.
Here’s the video from C-SPAN:
THE PRESIDENT: And you know what, there are plenty of patriotic, successful Americans who agree with us. They want to do the right thing because they care about this country.
On jobs, on education, on housing, on health care, on retirement, on all these things that are the pillars of a middle-class life, we can’t go backwards. We’ve got to go forwards. And that’s the choice facing us this November. And the choice could not be more clear.
Now, I’m not here to tell you, Ohio, that this is going to be easy, or it’s going to be quick. Changes that we’re trying to bring about — we’re dealing with problems that happened over the course of decades. They’re not going to be changed overnight. And I know sometimes people feel like, well, Obama, he’s done some good things, but, boy, things are still tough out there, change hasn’t happened fast enough. I understand that. I get frustrated, too. But what’s required are long-term solutions, not slick promises, not quick fixes.
And there are plenty of well-funded special interests in Washington, and their powerful allies in Congress, who want to keep things just the way they are. But don’t ever buy the line that they’re selling that we can somehow accomplish more by doing less. That might benefit their interests, but it won’t benefit yours.
That’s not how we became America. Our parents, our grandparents, the founders of this country, didn’t set their sights lower. They didn’t settle for something less. And neither do we — because we’re Americans. If we’re going to be the country we know we can be, we’ve got to keep doing the hard work of building the future of this country for our kids, just like our parents and grandparents did for us. (Applause.)
And let me tell you something. From now until November, the other side is going to spend more money than we’ve ever seen before, and they will be raining ads down on your head. And they’ll tell you it’s all my fault — I can’t fix it because I think government is the answer to everything, or because I haven’t make a lot of money in the private sector, or I think everything is doing just fine. That’s what all the scary voices in the ads will tell you. That’s what Mitt Romney will say. That’s what Republicans in Congress will say.
And that’s their plan for winning an election, but it’s not a plan to create jobs. (Applause.) It’s not a plan to provide you with greater security for you and your family. It’s not a plan to restore the middle class or restore the American Dream. And that’s the kind of plan we need right now, is a plan to build the middle class and restore the American Dream.
This speech is an example of why Republicans are getting very nervous. President Obama is not only able to portray himself as the all-American candidate who had to work his way up from the bottom, but he is also defining Mitt Romney and the Republican Party as the killers of success stories like his.
Most Americans can identify with and admire President Obama’s personal story. In contrast, there are few people in America who can identify with Romney’s biography of being born rich and getting richer, but President Obama went beyond basic biographical contrast, and defined the American Dream. His American Dream involves opportunity for all. In contrast Romney and the Republicans only want opportunity for some, and they want to deny those in the bottom or middle of having any chance of getting to the top.
Obama is able to define Romney any way that he wants. He is meeting little to no resistance from a Republican Party that really doesn’t care for their nominee, or from the nominee’s campaign itself. Mitt Romney is the empty canvas on which Obama is painting a campaigning masterpiece.
In some ways, this is the president’s revenge for 2008. The first time Obama ran for the presidency his love of America was constantly question. The right attacked his patriotism and his love of America. Fast forward to 2012, and Barack Obama has become the All American candidate. The fighter for the middle class. The president with the biography that is the American Dream.
President Obama has turned the tables. He is the candidate who talks about personal responsibility. Obama speaks about the greatness of our nation, and the limitless possibilities for our future. Mitt Romney has become the one who offers up nothing but negativity and anger. Romney’s campaign has no optimism or joy. It is negative slog through the dark circles of American politics.
If hope fuels the Obama campaign, negativity is the Romney camp’s fuel.
Obama’s championing of the American Dream has become Romney and the Republicans’ worst nightmare.
In Pueblo, CO, President Obama took Mitt Romney to task for his self-deportation immigration policy, and ...
The Obama campaign answered Mitt Romney's are you better off question with a devastating 60 second reply ...
President Obama launched his 2012 reelection campaign in Ohio, not only fired up with a positive vision ...
School was in session today as President Obama gave Mitt Romney a lesson in the political importance of ...
Mitt Romney unveiled his plan for the middle class in Colorado today, but he only said the words middle ...
Johnee
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 4:49 pm
With apologies to Stan Lee, “nuff said”.
Sara
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 6:41 pm
Finally, someone had the guts to say it, the right has no plan!!! Thank you.
Carrie
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 7:06 pm
Obama was on fire today. What answers does Romney have ? No ideas for the country just complaining about Obama.
bpaffen
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 9:05 pm
I love Marxists. They’re such an extraordinary, likeable bunch. Talking to them is like stepping into the twilight zone. They have their rose colored glasses on and they’re happily tripping along towards complete insanity. They make me happy because they are willing to destroy themselves for their own misguided principles (or lack thereof). In the end, Marxists always lose. What’s funny is this: to them, that’s winning. That REALLY comforts me somehow. It’s ironic, but my greatest peace in life has somehow been generated directly from their stupidity and lack of knowledge. I say, give them exactly what they want. Let them suffer the aftermath so many have before them. The sweetest thing will be watching their tears fall as the rose colored glasses drop and shatter into a million pieces. Don’t fight the Marxists. Instead, give them precisely what they’ve asked for. Give them what they most desire. They may not know the consequences of their actions, but their kid’s sure will. The best thing to carry away from all this is that they’re digging their own graves. Now that’s poetic justice. Let them have their “loved leaders”. Let them experience the accomplishment of orchestrating their own undoing. Poetic justice. Funny that “New York” actually had great meaning in the past. Now, New Yorker’s are, at the very most, the least of us.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 9:18 pm
And the best thing of all? You have no idea what a Marxist is. But you do have great cliches. Even better, painting New Yorkers with such a broad stroke shows you just being silly
Reynardine
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 9:40 pm
I don’t get that this person knows jack about Marx, Marxists, history, or New York, either, but, b’damn, s/he has sure been smoking some powerful Hammerhead Tea.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 9:42 pm
Straight from China
Carrie
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 9:49 pm
Omg! Ive heard about these but didn’t believe it. They really do believe. Betting money he doesn’t know Marxism from his toe.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 9:52 pm
Its a popular phrase among the uneducated. they all get together with chips and dip, set around the TV with their mouths open while Fox feeds them words.
Say marxist. Dont worry what it means. Theres a good boy. Repeat it on liberal sites.
Reynardine
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 10:57 pm
They think it means Groucho, Harpo, Chico, and Gummo. Groucho really did wear glasses, but I don’t think they were pink.
majii
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 10:27 pm
I taught world history, civics, geography, ethnic studies, and U.S. History for 34 years, and I can say that 10th Grade students know more about Marxism than you do. I have multiple graduate degrees in history, and I must say that you are one very confused person. Your comment lacks both substance and supporting documentation. One of the first rules of debate involves being able to supply information to support your position. You offer none. All you offer is a stream of regurgitated talking points. It sounds like you’ve been listening to someone on the Right who also knows nothing about Marxism.
john r
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 11:01 pm
easy othe por fellow….. he was taking about Grucho, and Harpo
labman57
Jul. 5th, 2012 at 11:56 pm
Romney is a master of both outsourcing and offshoring. He outsources his work force and he offshores his income — both done purely for personal financial gain.
ronald C Nichols Jr.
Jul. 6th, 2012 at 12:41 am
Marxist uptopian progressive socialists, that is who is in power of our government at this time, our current POTUS and his czars follows this ideology with a passion, their elists ways are such affront to to our blessed
Constitution that is blows my mind as to how people who are supposed to be so educated have no comman sense as it comes to freedom and liberty, just like this afforfordable health care act for which their are 21 separate tax
increases to help pay for it, along 2013 micro chip implantation, thank god for these governors who understand the Constitution and will not implement
this insane piece of legislation, don’t believe me read SCOTUS Mayberry vrs
Madison just starters besides the fix is in the Biliberger groups believes they can make more money having Romney run the show for the next four years
Obama is unless he follows through with his plan to bomb Iran in October, thay will his Oct suprize read it and weep because we are going to be in for the ride of our lives here
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 6th, 2012 at 7:47 am
Ah yes, another one who has no idea of what a marxist is.
“along 2013 micro chip implantation”
They dont come much funnier.
Reynardine
Jul. 6th, 2012 at 11:02 am
*Mayberry* v. Madison? Just shows you are as stupid a rube as you appear to be. No wonder you write incomprehensibly. You don’t understand a word you’re parroting yourself.
A Walkaway
Jul. 6th, 2012 at 11:58 am
OH GAHD!!!
Another “mark of the beast”er.
Hey guy… you really REALLY need to do research on the fundamentalists and especially the dominionists. Take some courses on the history of the Bible. Talk to theologians and REAL Bible scholars.
I’ve not heard of a single liberal (or Socialist or Marxist) has ever suggested such a thing as implanting microchips or marking people. It’s been the “Good Christians” and conservatives who support that crap, especially the dominionist churches and corporations. Gotta keep those lazy poor people from getting a fair deal, after all… and gotta punish those who fell foul of the “oh-so-just” American legal system after all. Gotta mark them with the scarlet A (or P or C as the case might be).
Nice idea… have something imbedded in people that they can’t remove and that not only marks them for life, but also could carry their history along with them – NOT! You’ve ever heard of right of privacy?
Never mind that the ACLU and every liberal would instantly reject the suggestion. In fact, if my memory serves me right, some corporate elite (such as Gates) DID make such a suggestion and there was an instant and almost violent vocal rejection of the idea from the “left”.
Seriously, get a grip. That comes from a total misunderstanding of the one book that barely made it into the Bible… and that only because of some of the nastiest politics ever recorded. Yeah, the early church wasn’t going to include the Revelation of St. John in the Canonical scriptures, because it was too easily misunderstood and too cryptic (and not much liked). The same “Good Christians” who opposed the book were trying to get Arian thrown out of Christendom (as it turns out, probably the biggest mistake they could have made), and the price for support in their effort from a handful of Bishops was acceptance of a book that most of the rest detested.
I won’t get into the “Mark of the Beast” bullshit. Let’s just leave it at this – your understanding of what was meant is completely wrong.