Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Paul Ryan Outed the GOP Ticket’s Extremism on Abortion in VP Debate
Congressman Paul Ryan outed the Romney/Ryan position on abortion last night during the vice presidential debate at Centre College in Danville, Ky. American women found out that Paul Ryan wants to ban abortion, and doesn’t really think that exceptions should be made since “life begins at conception.” This means that all life is precious (except for live children, the elderly, our troops, and people on death row).
RYAN (emphasis mine): Now, you want to ask about why I’m pro-life. It’s not simply because of my Catholic faith. That’s a factor of course. But it’s also because of reason and science… All I’m saying is that if you believe life begins at conception that therefore doesn’t change the definition of life. The policy of a Romney administration is to oppose abortion with exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother.”
Ryan gave an uncomfortable nod to the far right, saying that he and Romney don’t believe “unelected judges” should be able to make those decisions. He also suggested that elected officials should be the ones in charge of Row V Wade, raising the alarm bell that a Romney/Ryan administration intends to implement a form of the Personhood Amendment, which did not make exceptions for rape and incest when Ryan introduced his version.
Watch here:
Ryan’s belief that life begins at conception means the Romney/Ryan administration would oppose abortion except in cases of rape, incest or a threat to the life of the mother, but that’s not the whole story, because Ryan has a history of working to restrict access even in the case of rape and incest.
In 2011, Ryan co-sponsored the Sanctity of Human Life Act, a Personhood Bill that defined life as beginning at conception. This is important because it uses the same words the public heard from Paul Ryan last night — “life begins at conception”. What does that mean policy wise? The Personhood Amendment does not make exceptions for rape, incest or the life of the mother and it can render some birth control illegal:
If the bills become law and zygotes are afforded the protection of legal personhood, abortion would be legally equivalent to murder, as would almost anything that interfered with the zygote’s development. That could include the morning-after pill, which primarily works by preventing fertilization but which anti-abortion activists insist prevents fertilized eggs from implanting in the uterus. (Many scientists disagree.) Intrauterine devices (IUDs), which can prevent implantation, would also be affected by the laws.
Birth control is, of course, the best method of stopping actual abortions from taking place. Romney has said he wanted to defund Planned Parenthood, which not only offers many health related services beyond abortions, but also provides birth control to low-income women. Abortions don’t decrease when they are illegal, but women do die from illegal abortions.
The Republican Party platform also includes a constitutional amendment to ban abortion even in cases of rape and incest. Many “pro-life” women, including Republicans, don’t think that abortion should be denied to a rape survivor. These are decisions that are best left to women and their families and doctors.
Paul Ryan worked with Republican Todd Akin to sponsor legislation that would have redefined rape as “forcible rape” and limited abortion coverage for rape victims. According to the Washington Post, “[a] Republican bill seeking to permanently cut off federal funding for abortions has angered women’s groups that say it alters the definition of rape, permitting coverage for the procedure only in cases in which the rape is considered ‘forcible.’ The most well-known provision that would become permanent under the bill is the Hyde Amendment, which prevents some federally funded health-care programs from covering abortions.” [HR 3 Co-Sponsored 1/20/11, Vote #292, 5/4/11; Washington Post, 2/1/11]
In an August 23 interview with WJHL-TV’s Josh Smith, Paul Ryan called rape a method of conception:
SMITH: Abortion, now. Something we’re talking about. And I think our viewers would love to know exactly where you stand, specifically when—you’re pro-life and Catholic…
RYAN: Oh, yeah. Yeah.
SMITH: …but specifically where you stand when it comes to rape, and when it comes to the issue of should it be legal for a woman to be able to get an abortion if she’s raped.
RYAN: I’m very proud of my pro-life record, and I’ve always adopted the idea that—the position that—the method of conception doesn’t change the definition of life. [Ryan Interview, WJHL (Tri-Cities, TN/VA), 8/23/12]
Terry O’Neill, President of the National Organization for Women, issued a statement on Paul Ryan’s desire to make abortion illegal, “A proud supporter of the ‘Let Women Die Act’, Ryan believes hospitals should be able to refuse abortion care to a woman even in cases of rape and incest, or when her life is in danger.” She continued, “And Paul Ryan has a track record of supporting measures that strip women of preventive health services, especially contraception coverage in the name of ‘religious liberty’. He firmly believes ‘our founding principles’ include allowing employers to deny women their basic health care needs.”
Contrary to Paul Ryan’s claims about President Obama’s birth control policies, the President expanded women’s access to contraception while protecting religious liberty by exempting churches and religiously-affiliated organizations from paying for contraceptive coverage. That is religious liberty for all, rather than imposing the religious beliefs of a few. Vice President Joe Biden explained that he believes in the Catholic Church’s teaching on abortion, but, “I refuse to impose it” on others.
Mitt Romney has been dancing around the abortion issue telling the public one thing and conservatives another hours later, but Paul Ryan made it clear Thursday night that this ticket seeks to outlaw abortion.
Paul Ryan might be proud of his pro-death for women policies, but American women might not agree that he should be making their medical decisions. It will be interesting to see the polls on women voters post the VP debate.
Post Ryan soul mate Todd Akin's "legitimate rape" comment that exposed the Republican Party's true age ...
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has a brutal new series of ads running against Republican Representative To ...
On "Meet the Press" today, Romney surrogate Senator Marco Rubio confirmed a troubling fact: as President ...
Paul Ryan gave his first interview in Pennsylvania to CBS Pittsburgh, in which he alleged that women won ...
The Todd Akin, Tom Smith one-two media gut punch is hiding the fact that three quarters of those polled ...
Anon
Oct. 12th, 2012 at 9:31 am
Like I always say the GOP is only pro-life until the moment of birth, then you’re on your own.
RMuse
Oct. 12th, 2012 at 10:02 am
Ryan is not pro-life according to his budget.
Colleen
Oct. 12th, 2012 at 10:03 am
GOP-Stay out of my reproductive system. After you force women to have these unwanted children, where are you hiding when it comes to supporting and educating them. You are a bunch of hypocrites. This is not the 19th century where you think that I am you chattel and you can run my life as you see fit.
Otto
Oct. 12th, 2012 at 10:22 am
As someone who walked away from the church at age 15, I can factually state that Paul Ryan is a perfect example of “The Catholic Taliban”…
Eykis
Oct. 12th, 2012 at 10:42 am
The Repiggery has been claiming all week they were winning the “young single women” – LIES THEN, LIES NOW. No woman in her right mind wants to be RULED by LilPaulieBoy and his RePigFacist Tyranny.
Heartless
Oct. 12th, 2012 at 10:59 am
One person’s personal religious beliefs should NOT be forced upon ANY other person. Period. End of discussion.
Yet this is exactly what R & R are trying to do. In their view, because they believe that life begins at conception, then we all have believe that way.
Sorry, but I do not!
And props to Joe Biden, who stated that he did not believe that his personal religious beliefs should be forced on anyone else – and he is a Catholic, and does believe in the sanctity of human life.
The big difference is that he understands that not everyone is a Catholic, and may not believe in the same things as he does.
Recognizing that people do have differences, and taking into account those differences, and that those differences ARE valid, even if they might clash with your personal ideology – that is a sign of a true leader.
Phillip Roberts
Oct. 12th, 2012 at 11:19 am
This cracks me up. The republicaNazis want to tell women who, what, when, where and the why of their lives, and yet offer nothing to them but pregnancies, black eyes, home bound, and 50′s mentality on what a woman should be. Never mind that women are able to vote—given the state of the republicaNazi’s ideas, even THAT would be on the table……if you’re a woman, and you vote for these NAZI fools, then you deserve what will happen to you!! Too many women fought for equality, and here you give it away as if you were drunk ready to give something else away to some fool……….
Kylie
Oct. 12th, 2012 at 1:54 pm
This is the ultimate cop out issue – where women pick their stance on this ONE topic and use it as an excuse to avoid self-educating about other issues on the party platforms. We have to start basing our votes on more than one, politicized, fear-mongered issue.
If you ask the average woman a basic foreign policy question or basic question about the economy … they’ll draw a blank and retort…”END THE WAR ON WOMEN!”
What does that even mean?
Paws
Oct. 12th, 2012 at 5:42 pm
When you have political candidates and parties making it a part of their platform to roll back the clock on women’s rights and her ability to earn a living and provide for her family and care for her children, you might forgive some of them for being a bit more concerned about what’s going on at home right now than asking them to delve into the nuances of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
robyn ryan
Oct. 13th, 2012 at 12:19 am
not a mother – my choice.
I’m a citizen, not a slave.
I’ll defend my rights as a citizen – 2nd amendment remedies, anyone?
Or are guns more sacred than liberty?