Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Psst Republicans: The Senate Passed The Budget Control Act in August 2011
As we await almost sure political suicide from Boehner’s broken down tea House, it’s important to remember the facts. To hear the wailing from Republicans on the floor you’d think that the President never proposed a budget with real spending cuts and that the Senate never did squat regarding spending.
Oh, they cry, Democrats just want to spend! They obviously think we missed the decade of Republican borrow and spend. In spite of the Republican love for bumper sticker slogans, a spending agreement was in the debt ceiling deal. It is called the Budget Control Act.
Senate Democrats explain, “The Budget Control Act achieved all of the essential elements of a traditional budget – setting discretionary caps, providing enforcement mechanisms, and creating a process for addressing entitlement spending and revenues.”
In many ways, the Budget Control Act was even more extensive than a traditional budget:
It has the force of law, unlike a budget resolution that is not signed by the President.
It set discretionary caps for 10 years, instead of the one year normally set in a budget resolution.
It provided enforcement mechanisms, including a two-year “deemer,” allowing budget points of order to be enforced.
And it addressed entitlement spending and revenues by creating the “Super Committee,” which was given explicit authority to reform entitlements and the tax code. The Super Committee process represented an enhanced version of the reconciliation process that can be established under a budget resolution. And it was further backed up with a $1.2 trillion sequester.
So, you see, a budget mechanism is in place. Yes, it’s not technically a “budget”, but it operates as a defacto budget in the sense that it addresses spending. Indeed, Republican Senator Collins (R-ME) referred to the Budget Control Act as a “Budget Agreement” and a “Budget Plan” in August of 2011. She said, “The budget agreement also requires a vote on a balanced budget Constitutional amendment by the end of the year…While I supported the budget plan recently passed by Congress, I did so with serious reservations.” [Collins Column, 8/5/11]
Eric Cantor said at the time (my bold), “While all of us would like to have seen a lower discretionary appropriations ceiling for the upcoming fiscal year, the debt limit agreement did set a level of spending that is a real cut from the current year level. I believe it is in our interest to enact into law full-year appropriations bills at this new lower level.”
Senate Democrats explain, “The Budget Control Act, passed by the Senate in August, set the federal budget for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 – a fact acknowledged in recent months by leading Senate Republicans.” Republicans have admitted that they know this exists:
Sen. Grassley Called the Budget Control Act a “Budget Agreement.” “We should be doing those things not only in this budget agreement, this deficit reduction agreement, but in all the decisions we make in the Congress.” [Congressional Record, 8/1/11]
Sen. Alexander Called the Budget Control Act a “Budget Agreement.” “The budget agreement we came to in August pretty well got 40 percent of the budget under control, the part we call discretionary spending – everything from national defense to national parks. It’s only growing at about the rate of inflation over the next 10 years.” [NPR, 9/22/11]
Yes, it’s a “budget agreement/plan” until Republicans are trying to paint Democrats as fiscally reckless, and then they’ve never heard of it. (They ignore that the President’s spending is the lowest since the Eisenhower Administration.)
Republicans love to throw out the accusation that Democrats have done nothing about the budget in the Democratic controlled Senate. This is inaccurate, and it’s also used to distract from the fact that the House is responsible, per Article 1 of the Constitution, for the budget. Surely the House Republicans covered this in their Constitution reading session on the taxpayer dime. Both chambers present proposals, as does the President. These proposals are then reconciled into something that will pass.
The Budget Control Act was passed by both chambers and signed into law by the President. It “created a reconciliation-like process to consider entitlement and tax reform,” and that’s where we are now.
The President’s budget has been on the White House blog for over a year and Republicans still can’t find it. Makes you wonder what they’re doing with their time. Debunking the meme that the Democratic Senate has done nothing about a budget is slightly more complicated, and this is why Republicans are so successful in selling their bumper sticker fantasies. Parsing for the win.
Last week, the House Republicans gave up after Boehner’s failed Plan B. They threw their hands up in defeat and told the Senate to fix it. Once again, the Senate stepped up to do what the House could not. Now the House is saying they don’t like how the Senate did it. Chances are slim that they’ll even put the Senate’s agreement up for a vote at this point.
The time for reconiliation has come. Man up, House.
Image: President Obama signing the Budget Control Act of 2011.
CBO analysis of the Budget Control Act here.
Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) tried to name legislators to the "conference" so that ...
Eric Cantor issued a statement saying that the House would authorize a 3 month debt ceiling increase as ...
Paul Ryan took the stage at CPAC, and completely ignored the reality that he and his ideas lost the 2012 ...
John Boehner leads one half of the most unproductive Congress in history; yet, today he told President Oba ...
Congressional Republicans' latest scheme to force Congress to cut Medicare and Social Security could end ...
garfunkle
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 4:28 pm
notice not one member of either party has even mentioned the weight of the military budget. you could cut it in half, and still be out spending the next 25 or more country’s. including red china and russia. end the bush givebacks, close the medicare loophole, cut defense and then you’re talkin real fiscal mgt. but not one of these spokeholes [on either side] for the MIC will have the balls to say it. except our pal sen sanders.
Dave
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 6:32 pm
You people are idiots. Freedom is more important than health, military defense should not have a budget at all. Retards. It is the only thing keeping you alive so you actually need healthcare.
No perspective on history and your coddled short lifespan represents nothing but ignorance and risk taking without recognition of potential risks. You are the equivalent of irrelevant.
UncaJoe
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 6:44 pm
What countries have unfettered defense spending? Perhaps China… maybe Cuba or North Korea? Who directs all their available funds to military uses? Would that be Al-Qaeda?
Ignorance: the state or fact of being ignorant; lack of knowledge, education, or awareness
djchefron
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 6:58 pm
Look eric cantor I know you hiding out here like a scary cat but do we have to resort to name calling?Tell you what I show you my DD214 if you dshow me yours.Now go fight for your freedom and get out of mommy’s basement
garfunkle
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 11:07 pm
oh be very afraid. those commies are coming for our children. those scary muslims are going to blow us all up. the biggest enemy the USA has is teahadists like you skeeter. the GOP and you baggers are the ones we socialist union thugs will have to fight, not some poor un educated kid in ashcanistan….
yep, lets keep spending 10b a week in that rathole. and all your war comrades are getting maimed, killed, and ptsd for nothing but kbr and haliburton.
djchefron
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 4:45 pm
The defence industrial complex will not get cut in any meaningful way because of one simple reason.If you ever look at the budget for buying and maintaining weapons systems the Pentagon has contracts in just about every congressional district.Now what congress critter will be going on the record closing down plants?Dis iz a bizness and that bizness means jobs.BTW if there was ever a definition of welfare this is it.
Sugapea
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 5:51 pm
Sad…But true. I have a dream…
‘OBAMA-CARE’ will initiate a brilliant Healthcare-Renaissance, making the USA the cutting-edge/state of the art in science/health, resulting in economic revitalization for America’s future!
What better realm to place our focus/money/energy than Health Care?
Dave
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 6:34 pm
You want free healthcare? Take it. Just like you have free legal representation when you need it. Be careful what you wish for stupid, you might just get it.
djchefron
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 6:53 pm
You do know Obamacare has a provision for mental health treatment?For the children please use it.Pretty please.
John Hay
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 5:50 pm
America’s military industrial complex confronts politicians in the way of political quicksand. This chapter must close.
Therefore, for America to change and prosper, its budget must be severely reduced.
This will help balance the American economy and improve the quality of American life.
That is what politicians need to agree on. Failure to act is not an option.
Dave
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 6:38 pm
It is the one governement organization that runs with precision and accompliahes the goal which is to maintain our freedom and keep the war off our shores. Just like a democrat to make suggestions to take away something that works to fund aomehing that doesnt.
If you are wrong, is it worth it? Think about what is at stake. If for some reason you arent all knowing, do you think it is worth finding out?
No free healthcare could mean larger medical bills and huge personal debt. No decent military could mean attack on our nation. No brainer.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 7:22 pm
“No free healthcare could mean larger medical bills and huge personal debt. No decent military could mean attack on our nation. No brainer.”
No, universal healthcare cuts bills and cuts the largest reason people claim bankruptcy. Healthcare. Please david, do some reading.
Who is oging to attack us? Chilie? We have an oversized military now that hasnt known how to fight a war since Korea
djchefron
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 7:48 pm
You do know that Red Dawn was just a movie?
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 8:29 pm
Unfortunately for some, it actually happened and they are pissed they missed it. It wasnt televised
Sabyen91
Jan. 1st, 2013 at 8:25 pm
“It is the one governement organization that runs with precision”
Hahahaha! Holy crap, you are funny.
Rudy Gonzales
Jan. 2nd, 2013 at 3:43 pm
Boehner, Cantor, Grassley and Collins must have known what they had entered into and they are now boxed into a circle to shoot at each other with no right-angles. Key point to make: It has the force of law, unlike a budget resolution that is not signed by the President. It set discretionary caps for 10 years, instead of the one year normally set in a budget resolution. Makes you wonder what the TEA-types will come up with to counter this. Millionaires have had their way long enough! It’s the wage earner who needs the most protection. Millionaires have tax attorneys and accountants to help them. Do not sit on the sidelines. Help remove the TEA-types from office in 2014 in your region, district, state and Congress! And the 2014 Mid-term election is a-coming!
Deb
Jan. 3rd, 2013 at 11:41 am
Actually for 2013 Defense (which includes the military, veterans benefits and Homeland security) is 23% of the budget or $868 billion, pensions are also 23% or $854.5 billion of the budget, interest on the money we have borrowed is 9% or $321 billion, health care is 24% or $868 billion. These are some of our biggest expenses
Deb
Jan. 3rd, 2013 at 11:50 am
The budget control act is like saying in your home budget; we will cap our mortgage payments somewhere at about 30% more than pay now. We will never spend more than 33% more on groceries than we spend now. We won’t spend more than 50% more on gas and transportation than we spend now. We won’t spend more than 80% more on charities than we are spending now. Sorry to tell you but IT’S NOT A BUDGET. A budget takes into account what you are actually making and what you are actually going to spend.