Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Rand Paul Says Ashley Judd is Attractive, Articulate and Doesn’t Represent Kentucky
Tea Party representative Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) was on CNN’s State of the Union this morning in an attempt to establish his SOTU address pre-buttal narrative. Asked about the negative ads running against Ashley Judd, Mitch McConnell’s potential 2014 opponent in Kentucky, Rand Paul said she was attractive, articulate and and doesn’t represent Kentucky.
Asked about Karl Rove’s negative ads against Judd in Kentucky, Rand said, “Part of politics is making sure people know about who you are running against. Ashley Judd’s a famous actress, she’s an attractive woman, and presents herself well, and from what I understand, is articulate. But the thing is, she doesn’t really represent Kentucky.”
I guess Rand’s Kentucky doesn’t want to be represented by an attractive, articulate woman. Or maybe it’s that Rove’s GOP PAC Crossroads painted Judd out to be a radical liberal from Tennessee who loves ObamaCare because you should really “know” who is a Muslim Kenyan socialist without a birth certificate, rather than focusing on the people who are still clinging to the Affordable Care Act as a get out the vote tool even though they know they can’t overturn it. After all, the last thing Republicans can afford is to have actual policy discussions with voters.
Rand also offered up his peculiar brand of Tea humor, “When I heard Ashley Judd might run for office I thought maybe it was Parliament since she lives in Scotland half the year.” Oh, European boogeywoman! Good one, Senator.
If Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Republicans aren’t worried about Judd, then why are they going out of their way to attack her? Good question. Mitch McConnell has lowest job approval rating among 90 members of the Senate. His job approval rating is at 37% with a 55% disapproval in Kentucky, according to a Public Policy Polling poll from December. And in a hypothetical match up, Judd was only trailing McConnell by 4% until voters were fed a few tidbits about her, such as her grandmother calling her a Hollywood liberal. Hence, the pre-emptive ads against Judd focusing on her comparative liberalism (also known as wanting Americans to have healthcare) in a conservative state like Kentucky.
Rand contradicted reports that the Tea Party is going to primary McConnell, saying it’s unlikely that the Tea Party would run someone against McConnell. But the European Socialist Hollywood Actress Tennessee loving ObamaCare radical might try to take him on….
Also, in case you thought it was weird that Republicans are giving a double response to President Obama’s State of the Union, Senator Paul assures us this is not weird and it’s also not a problem for the Republicans because he is not going to contradict Marco Rubio in any way. Which begs the question, then why is he giving a second response to Obama?
It’s an “extra response”! Rand danced around this awkward moment, “To me, I see it as extra response, I don’t see it as necessarily divisive. I won’t say anything on there that necessarily is like, ‘Oh, Marco Rubio’s wrong’. He and I don’t always agree, but the thing is, this isn’t about he and I (sic), this is about the Tea Party, which is a grassroots movement, a real movement, millions of Americans who are still concerned about some of the deal making that goes on in Washington.”
Yes, okay Senator. You’re not going to say Rubio is wrong, it’s just going to be an “extra” response because the nation can’t get enough tea rhetoric and the Republicans aren’t trying to run away as fast as they can from the tea damage. Please proceed.
A secret audio tape leak, and now a new PPP poll has added to Mitch McConnell's woes by revealing that h ...
Hours after urging the FBI to investigate what he called a Watergate style Democratic bugging, Mitch McC ...
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) will deliver the Tea Party response to the State of the Union address, so says ...
The right is trying to spin reports that Progress Kentucky is behind the leaked Mitch McConnell tape as ...
Sen. Rand Paul went on Fox News Sunday and told a pretty big lie about marijuana. He claimed, with zero ...
Bash
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 12:57 pm
Ashley Judd used to spend part of the year in Scotland – her soon to be ex-husband is a Scot who makes his living racing in the US, and they would spend part of the racing off-season there.
If she runs, Rand would be foolish to take her lightly – she’s more connected, experienced and educated in public service/administration than he is. She’s been on the board of Population Services International for about a decade (Barbara Bush is another board member) and has traveled the world learning about issues of health, poverty and opportunity as well as meeting with world leaders to advocate for solutions to these issues. She completed a masters in Public Administration at Harvard in 2010. She’s got more chops than Rand even knows.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:00 pm
Thats true but shes running against the turtle,Mitch McConnell
JAMES
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 9:56 pm
Really?? We want a woman that just chose her mommy over her husband?? Ashley judd has always been a mess. She doesnt represent any real women who believe that their husbands and families come first and mommy comes second!!! she has already had at least two nervous breakdowns,,,and you libs want her to represent you?? go for it. she wont win.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 10:09 pm
Women follow their husbands?OKAYYYY
Ruby Andrews-Lester
Feb. 11th, 2013 at 12:56 am
You poor thing, another woman hater, your mother would be proud. Speak for yourself, I have a mind of my own. and Ashley is someone that I would vote for. All of you insecure men, come out of the closet and stand up….I can feel your fear dear, and to top that off, you’re a sniveling idiot….and you wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for a woman birthing you…I’ll say it again, you don’t speak for me…
Jeff R
Feb. 11th, 2013 at 1:22 am
Ms. Judd has RECOVERED depression caused by years of abuse and neglect. She did not have even one “nervous breakdown.”
Even if she had, there are hundreds and perhaps thousands of people who defeated similar mental problems to become powerful successful people.
I can think of several current and retired politicians who, rather than confront and defeat their mental problems, made careers out of turning their neurosis into national policy. Can you say “unitary presidency”?
Rena Ogle Benfield
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:08 pm
Run Ashley Judd, Run. Let them know you are a challenge to be reckoned with… You have the talent in all the fields to beat them at their stupid games… You Go Girl, for our Country.
Aaron
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:16 pm
Why so we have to abbreviate everything these days…POTUS, SOTU or to a lesser extent when a tea party person says something…WTF?
Tom
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:19 pm
Following up a show named state of the union with the words state of the union might confuse people who resent abbreviations. But you seem focused on tea party abbreviations. TP/teabagger/teaklan doesn’t get it for you?
Jeff R
Feb. 11th, 2013 at 1:32 am
I do actually resent abbreviations. The constant use of abbreviations and acronyms is, like trade jargon serves to exclude people from the conversation.
Even when exclusion is not the intent for using abbreviations and acronyms, exclusion is the result.
It is not unusual for Acronymfinder.com to turn up with 40 or more possible meanings for many acronyms.
It seems to me that simple good manners would motivate people to type out the entire phrase. It is not like we are hand painting illuminated manuscripts. It is just a few key strokes in the midst of a typed statement that all of us are choosing to post.
If we want people to understand what we are saying, we must actually SAY it, not merely hint at what you mean.
Clare
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:21 pm
Well, and everybody know Rand Paul is the Go-To guy in the republican party. NOT!
Anne
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:23 pm
Karl Rove must be threatened by this woman on some level in order to have launched preemptive attacks against her. It’s the standard operation of someone who attempts to win, successfully or not, by tearing down and demonizing a real or potential opponent instead of providing a compelling reason to vote for whoever his chosen candidated might be. I hope she runs and sends the turtle back into his shell where he belongs.
former mormon
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 3:39 pm
I agree. My guess is that he does see Ms. Judd as a serious threat. Mitch McConnell doesn’t just represent a Senate seat for Kentucky, he is also the Senate Majority leader and Rove does not want to lose him in that position. Just think of how much impact McConnell’s obstructionism has played a part in the non-workings of the government over the last four years and ongoing now. The Republican Party can’t afford to lose that to someone who might be reasonable.
If Rove didn’t see Ms. Judd as a serious threat he wouldn’t be spending this much time and money working to defeat someone who hasn’t even declared their candidacy. Rove didn’t spend a dime to challenge anything Palin during her undeclared potential presidential run in 2011 – that was no threat. Ashley Judd – threat.
Dolores Campbell
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 3:52 pm
Harry Reid is the Senate Majority Leader, Mitch is minority.
former mormon
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 4:05 pm
Thanks for the correction – I hope everyone understood my intent.
Ed
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 4:02 pm
The reason he never challenged Palin is she was a Republican.Which is who Rove backs…..DOH!!!
former mormon
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 4:31 pm
You may be missing my point. Rove has worked against other Republicans, too, if he feels they are a threat to his agenda. Perhaps the use of Palin as an example threw you. No one took Palin as a serious threat.
Just A Dumb Fireman
Feb. 11th, 2013 at 9:42 am
I hope she runs and sends the turtle into a CAN OF SOUP where he belongs.
Howard Creech
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:25 pm
Ashley Judd is an 8th generation Kentuckian – born and raised in the Bluegrass State. Rand Paul is (like his daddy) from Texas – he met and married a Kentucky gal and decided to go into business in (her state) Kentucky. In the opinion of many Kentuckians, Rand Paul – rather than Ms Judd – is the one who doesn’t represent Kentucky. He’s just another right-wing capetbagger with presidential aspirations. In the final analysis Rand Paul can say whatever he wants, it isn’t him who has to defend his seat in 2014 – that’s Mitch “the bitch” McConnell who has an approval rating of only 37% in the state where he has been a senator for almost 30 years – Mitch is the one who will have to run against the lovely and articulate (and liberal) Ms. Judd.
Don Beams
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:27 pm
Two comments: 1. She isn’t running against anybody for any office YET. 2. To Rand Paul: She doesn’t represent Kentucky YET. My sincere hope: that she does run, if for no other reason than to make Karl Rove look like the small-dicked loser that he is, and that she kicks Mitch McConnell’s ass, big time.
In point of fact, a gerbil could represent Kentucky better than McConnell or Rand Paul. We are talking about two men who are not intelligent, sane or useful to Kentucky or the nation.
LookingForward
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:29 pm
They are scared of something that hasn’t even happened yet. She hasn’t said she is running. She is interested in politics! Mitch is from Louisville, the largest city in Kentucky, outside the urban area he is disliked..he hasn’t done anything notable for Kentucky that people are aware of…coal is on the decline in eastern KY, she is seen as a “tree hugger” (A negative). If she or someone else could bring in some type of industry to replace these jobs, they could beat him!
Sally
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:55 pm
If she could bring in industry to replace coal? Gee, Democrats have been trying to do that..and are blocked at every turn by the GOP and their smoke-loving lobbyists. What do you want her to do…walk on water next? Frankly, if I were a Kentuckian, I’d be grateful an articulate, intelligent being was running against Turtle.
LookingForward
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 5:25 pm
Sally, I am a proud liberal…I would love someone, anyone to challenge Mitch McConnell. I am also a Realist!
Anyway here is the latest industry Rand is pushing in KY….
www.kentucky.com/2013/02/...
Reynardine
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:49 pm
Well, someone intelligent, articulate, and attractive isn’t representative of Kentucky. Rand Paul said so. You think about that, Kentuckians.
peter
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:54 pm
Ashley Judd is attractive and articulate and doesn’t represent Kentucky. You can’t make this up! Why is Rand Paul insulting everyone in Kentucky. Are they really all that inarticulate and unattractive?
Anne
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 2:25 pm
Rand Paul obviously wouldn’t recognize irony if it hit him upside his big head. Apparently, he doesn’t realize that his words can be and are being interpreted to mean that he holds the intelligence and eloquence of Kentuckians in low regard.
LookingForward
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 4:02 pm
Anne, thank you….you nailed that one on the head! It is a problem with many Politicians and “others”…there’s no reason to be Condescending!
Doris ~
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 2:36 pm
Hey Randy,what does your party of he// no represent?
absolutely nothing and only waste our billions of tax $ obstructing this country…OUST THE TGOP!!!!
Doris ~
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 2:38 pm
Randy,what does your party of he// no represent? absolutely nothing! while wasting our tax $ and getting paid to do NOTHING! oust the TGOP!
braindrain13
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 3:59 pm
I live in Indiana, and would love to see Ashley run, I only wish I could vote for her! McConnell and his cronies need to scared, she is highly educated, articulate unlike them. It is hysterical that they do not see her as a threat but they are preemptively trying to discredit her.
Jacob Pratt
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 4:07 pm
So, I’m confused..is Rand Paul saying that Kentuckians ARE NOT an attractive and articulate people?? That’s not cool, Rand.
Miguel
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 4:51 pm
It is time for the state of Kentucky, to see the light. Ashley Judd, can easily debate any topic that is address to her, in an articulate, smart and non-threatening manner. It is time for a woman to show Kentucky, how it is done, without any nonsense from the current clowns, they have representing them.
Notanother LIB
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 5:37 pm
Yes vote her in, she has said she is with Obama on all these CRAZY gun bills.She will try to make Kentucky same as NY on guns rights……PEOPLE look and read what she has already said!!!!for the love of GOD don’t let her get voted in.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 5:51 pm
I guess your god laughed at you and gave you this
Just because a majority of the Supreme Court declares something to be ‘constitutional’ does not make it so.
Rand Paul
Or who can forget the turtle filibusting his own bill
I leave this bit of wisdom from randbo
A free society will abide unofficial, private discrimination, even when that means allowing hate-filled groups to exclude people based on the color of their skin.
Rand Paul
Just A Dumb Fireman
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 7:35 pm
“Attractive, articulate, and doesn’t represent Kentucky”.
Randy, you’re not selling me on the merits of your state very well…
Tim Moore
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 8:56 pm
That little Rand Paul stays flappin his gums. You’da figured they’d be plum tuckered out by now…
Al Lindseth
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 9:03 pm
So what Rand Paul is ugly, stupid, scared of Ashley Judd and dosen’t represent Kentucky either.
Donna Alley
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 10:56 pm
well, I would rather vote for her than him. But I don’t live there. Up to you guys…..
TeaBaggers are Bigots
Feb. 11th, 2013 at 9:43 am
Attractive and articulate. Must be why Rand Paul doesn’t think she represents Kentucky: she’s too smart.
Glenn Thompson
Feb. 11th, 2013 at 11:55 am
Like Rand Paul is a beauty ! On a scale of looks, this dweeb was in the back of the line.
Leanne Clark
Feb. 11th, 2013 at 4:27 pm
A girl in his office just said to me,”Well, I don’t know anybody that would take it that way.” When she just heard my infuriating rant about these comments. Let’s flood her with calls today. Rand Paul’s office in DC is 202-224-4343