Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Republican Jon Huntsman Says We Need to Fix Tax Loopholes In Order to Grow
That bell you hear is the happy discovery of the other sane Republican left in the country, sharing a lonely seat with Chuck Hagel. Ring ring goes the bell for the former U.S. Ambassador to China and 2008 Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman.
Huntsman broke with the Republican Party on the economy, telling Bloomberg TV’s Al Hunt that we need bipartisan solutions to the budget including curtailing tax loopholes in order to generate revenue (imagine that!). Huntsman said, “Some see it as revenue raising. I see it as cleaning the tax code of all of the encumbrances that keep us from growing.”
Watch Jon Huntsman talk with Bloomberg’s Al Hunt about the Republican Party platform for Bloomberg TV:
Huntsman urged bipartisan solutions for avoiding $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts per the sequester. “Some see it as revenue raising. I see it as cleaning the tax code of all of the encumbrances that keep us from growing.”
Huntsman also recommended cutting “entitlement” programs like Social Security and Medicare. While I don’t agree with Huntsman’s qualification of Social Security as an “entitlement” since we all pay into the earned benefit of the Social Security trust fund, with a serious Republican like Huntsman this debate can and should be heard.
If the modern day Republican Party were not so steeped in crazy rhetoric about legitimate rape and self-deportation, we could have real debates over ideology – the kind of vigorous debate this country was founded upon. However, given the fact that Republican ideology has failed over the last 40 years, it’s no wonder that they prefer to avoid a real debate.
Huntsman is a sane, logical Republican with whom real work could be accomplished. With someone like Huntsman, we can debate the fact that austerity is not a good idea in the middle of a recession. We could ask why Republicans are so focused on cutting spending when independent economists agree that the deficit is not the emergency. The emergency is that the American people need decent paying jobs.
We hardly ever hear about the emergency of the unemployed and underemployed. All we hear about is the deficit, yet it is not the thing threatening to destroy our economy immediately.
Referring to the Republican Party’s focus on political strategy rather than ideas, Huntsman used Republican Governor Bobby Jindal’s birther bill as an example of the sort of Republican pandering that needs to stop, “It’s a message bill. Messaging and pandering and pledge-signing are all things that take our eye off the ball. We ought to be focused on a strategy for this country that speaks to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, growing the economic base, and giving people opportunity. If we’re not focused on that, we’re wasting time.”
Huntsman’s words serve to remind us of the days when the Republican Party was sane and offered needed balance to the Democratic Party. Reasonable people know that no one ideology should rule the country, and that the best solutions come as a result of being tested through smart, fact-based debate. There’s also merit in the conservative push-back against change, which used to serve as a check but now serves only to obstruct due to their refusal to even participate as reasonable actors in the debate. The problem for Republicans is that the facts have a liberal bias these days, and instead of regrouping, they keep trying to deflect.
Imagine if we were having a real debate about the economy: Instead of following the Republicans over every drama-filled fiscal cliff of their creation, we might actually be debating whether the deficit “crisis” is really an emergency and if it supersedes the unemployment crisis. Economic data suggest that the employment crisis is the issue of the day, and yet the Republicans and the media act as if it does not exist — until it’s campaign season.
Jon Hunstman was one of the few Republicans deserving a look in 2012, but he wasn’t crazy enough to win the GOP base. He’s speaking hard truths to the party, but even if they’re listening, they’re too busy following Luntz and Rove off the rebranding cliff to really get the message.
Romney is apparently utterly tone deaf, because yet another of his supporters has taken to the media to ...
What do Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, Herman Cain, Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum all have i ...
There are two former governors that don't really have a chance to become the nominee of the GOP but they ...
Jon Huntsman is about to become the latest Republican to endorse Mitt Romney who doesn't think he can de ...
Low-tax and low-regulation. Because this approach has worked so well in the past (yeah…not so much), Rep ...
Reynardine
Feb. 9th, 2013 at 10:25 pm
Well, and there is Colin Powell, who is about to be driven out of his party, and Charlie Crist, who was driven out of his party…and maybe somewhere, enough people to assemble into a Sane Squares Party, who would be what the Republican Party *used* to be, and then the current Teahadis can be given a few dredge spoil islands somewhere to form their own nation of Trinity and Teabago, where they’ll probably be at no risk of being overcrowded.
rickson52
Feb. 9th, 2013 at 11:22 pm
So cutting Social Security and Medicare is closing loopholes? How about “carried interest”? How about oil& gas subsidies? Oh yeah, must be referring to the “loophole” that is the deduction for contributions? I’m sure the real estate and building industries would be agreeable to closing the “loopholes” that are the mortgage interest and real estate tax deductions. So which “loopholes” is Huntsman proposing be closed?
BTW: Let’s all remember that part of the unemployment problem is caused by the fact that there are 600,000 less government employees than there were 4 years ago.
inez
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 10:28 pm
tHe cato Institute stated”fiscalyear 2012 saw ******88BILLION in programs to specific companies or industries, Tax codes are manipulated for CORPORATE WELFARE…Sen. Sanders covered 21 companies and banks who have evaded $$$$$$28 BILLION in taxes with off shore or other manipulative actions……The tax code is the problem………..we are approving tax losses for the Treasury. .
LookingForward
Feb. 9th, 2013 at 11:41 pm
I actually like Jon Huntsman. I knew he was toast with the GOP when he said this during his run in the primaries; ” to to clear, I believe in evolution and I trust scientists on global warming”. Well….since they do not like smart people, He had to drop out a few weeks later! I hope we get to see and hear more of him in the future!
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 9th, 2013 at 11:48 pm
He is a good fella. Not a gee I gotta be a conservative type
Sally-n-Chicago
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 9:09 am
I honestly believe that Pres. Obama should re-hire Huntsman for a cabinet post. This man has good ideas and is super smart.
David
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 1:06 pm
“Huntsman is a sane, logical Republican with whom real work could be accomplished.” — NOT so sane if he wishes to cut Social Security and Medicare. SS is not an entitlement! I’ve paid into SS all my working life!
Vic
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 2:41 pm
2 questions for you?
1) Is there a difference between entitlement and safety-net programs?
2) Are Social Security and Medicare Defined Benefit, Defined Contribution or Insurance Safety-Net programs?
Just because one paid premiums into a social insurance program does not mean that one has to get all the benefits back regardless of future outcomes.
Will be glad to explain differences to you if you need some help.
Duffy Lewis
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 2:08 pm
I supported Jon Huntsman in the primary. He offered the most conservative budget of all the Republican candidates running. Huntsman’s ideology is not compatible with the current administration’s, but it is interesting that the author respects Huntsman enough to write a flattering article about him. Federal government spending has increased regardless of the party in power, most significantly since 1964, with a few years in the 1990s of a balanced budget. Deficit spending never help the economy, but 2009-2012 deficit spending grew astronomically. It’s shocking. I take issue with the assessment that deficit spending is not a crisis and that unemployment is the real crisis, as if they are not related. They are most certainly related, as well as the tax code. As government grows through spending and regulation, the market retracts and people have less economic freedom. It is a pattern proven in every example worldwide, regardless of time or place. Being that the U.S.’s trend is bigger and bigger government and more and more deficit spending, whose ideology is it that is failing? It isn’t the party of economic freedom and limited government, because if Republicans had been more consistent in applying their ideology, we wouldn’t be in this financial crisis that you deny we are in.
Elizabeth 44
Feb. 10th, 2013 at 2:54 pm
I have heard several interviews with Jon Huntsman. I think this man’s ideas need a whole lot more press. Sure, I don’t agree with everything he proposes, but he represents the kind of Republican party this country needs.
Edward
Feb. 11th, 2013 at 8:57 am
As Governor of Utah, Jon Huntsman fixed the state’s tax code and returned over $400Million back to the people.
jon2012.com/index.php/iss...
A PROVEN RECORD
On tax reform, Governor Huntsman offers more than rhetoric; he also offers a record of results.
In Utah, he signed the largest tax cut in state history, returning $400 million to families and businesses and earning him the “Taxpayer Advocate” award from the Utah Taxpayers Association.
The Cato Institute called Huntsman’s tax reform plan in Utah “very Reaganesque” and gave him an “A” in tax policy.
Along with historic tax cuts, Huntsman also balanced every budget and tripled the state’s rainy day fund, leading the Pew Center to name Utah the best-managed state in America.
Huntsman’s reforms helped Utah lead the nation in job creation under his leadership.