Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Republicans Attack Science To Advance Religion and Oil Industry Profits
A quotation attributed to Winston Churchill, “A well educated population is the cornerstone of democracy,” was Churchill’s praise for America’s universal education system that Republicans are attempting to bring to a whimpering end. It is in Republicans’ paymasters’ best interest to keep the public ignorant regarding science, because if their sycophants ever understood why science is so important to the nation’s well-being, they would lose a major share of their supporters; especially conservative Christians. Science has been under assault from the religious right because it disproves the mythos inherent in ancient Bronze Age understanding of the world, and to indoctrinate the next generation of Americans into believing fantasy over science, religious groups and Republicans are on a campaign to bring an end to science to advance religion and oil industry profits.
A couple of weeks ago a parent of a student enrolled in a Christian private school was shocked and appalled that his child was being taught creationist dogma as science. The image of the child’s 4th grade science quiz is not a joke, but it is typical of science instruction at private religious schools all over America, and unfortunately, it is being taught in public schools in Republican-controlled states such as Louisiana where Governor Bobby Jindal admitted he was thumbing his nose at the Constitution in pursuit of inculcating ancient fairy tales to public school children in lieu of science. Republican attacks on science have nothing whatsoever to do with religion or religious freedom, but to advance the interests of the dirty energy industry that is wholly responsible for the dangerous climate change that jeopardizes the world’s population.
The latest assault on science in Congress is courtesy of Lamar Smith (R-TX), who proposes ending what Republicans call “frivolous and wasteful research” in what may be the worst attack on the National Science Foundation (NSF) in history. Smith is the new chair of the House of Representatives science committee, and his legislation replaces scientific peer review at the NSF with funding criteria chosen by conservative Christians in Congress, and to guarantee that every other federal science agency is beholden to money-changers in Congress, it will set in motion a process requiring all federal science research to follow suit. If Smith’s bill becomes law, then it will be climate science deniers on big oil’s payroll who decide what scientists are allowed to research; not the scientific community. Smith’s bill is bad news for American scientific research to be sure, but it is horrible news for any chance America will ever address or take steps to combat global climate change and will provide anti-environmental groups like Koch Industries and fossil fuel advocates cover to continue pouring dangerous chemicals into the air that reached record levels last week.
Over the past few years, scientists and environmentalists gave particularly close attention to the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and late last week a monitoring station in Hawaii discovered that the daily mean concentration reached a level that is higher than at any time in human history at 400 parts per million according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). NOAA is focused on the condition of the oceans and the atmosphere, and the 400 ppm threshold is 50 ppm over what climate scientists have designated the safe zone for avoiding the worst impacts of climate change. It is noteworthy that it was not the bible, or young-Earth creationists, who noted that the dirty energy industry helped exceed the “safe zone” to avoid deleterious damage of climate change, but then again there is no mention of carbon dioxide destroying the atmosphere in the bible, so the creationist crowd and energy industry has no interest in the dangerous milestone.
The president of the American Meteorological Society, J. Marshall Shepherd, who is also a scientist, said that within the next year climate scientists will “see 400 ppm consistently, and that avoiding the future warming will require a large and rapid reduction in greenhouse gases.” It is not the kind of news Republicans’ in the employ of the energy industry want to hear, because nearly every scientist, environmentalist, and climate-conscious policymaker in the world agree it will require, at a minimum, slashing fossil fuel use, and in the meantime, taking bold steps to adapt for a world with higher temperatures, higher seas, and more extreme weather. Already climate change is wreaking havoc on the environment and is costing Americans hundreds-of-billions of dollars in natural disaster reparations that are the result of drought conditions, flooding, devastating wildfires, and extreme weather events across the nation.
The damage from global climate change is immeasurable, and because Republicans and their energy industry masters can no longer deny the Earth is becoming dangerously warm, they deny the cause and their first line of attack is refuting the scientific community’s findings and warnings by pandering to science-deniers clinging to thousands of years old myths and fairy tales. Their advocacy for teaching the next generation of voters that science is found in the Christian bible book of Genesis all but assures them of a well-trained and scientifically retarded voting bloc that is not only suspicious of science, but will reject it out of hand because they were indoctrinated to believe an all-powerful deity handed down “real science” to Moses.
If Republicans and their creationist voting bloc want their children to enter adulthood with an understanding of the world that rivals stone age cave-dwellers, that is their prerogative and more power to them. However, their assault on real science is an existential threat to every American including those who believe tyrannosaurus ate plants with man on the 6th creation day, and adamantly believe their tenure on this Earth is approaching its end because they will be spirited away when Jesus returns in five years. However, for Americans and the rest of humanity, the prospect of a world ravaged by droughts, water and food shortages, and air saturated with poisonous fossil fuel emissions is a clear and present danger that cannot be ignored if they are to survive.
It is possible that some Americans are too ignorant to understand the importance of scientific research that warns and helps combat the dangers of a rapidly warming Earth, but Republicans know all too well the predicament their dirty energy advocacy is creating for Americans. Still, they have made their decision to help big oil and the Koch brothers defame the scientific community and deny the preponderance of evidence that climate change is man-made, and if they can create the next generation of young-Earth anti-science advocates, and control what scientists research now, then they can rest assured that in their pursuit of profits, they helped create a world that neither dinosaurs nor man can exist in.
There is a sickening trend in this country of conservative Christians decrying science as fraudulent, an ...
For News is using the winter weather on the East Coast this weekend to once again argue that there is no ...
Belief in supernatural causality entails knowing, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that one event leads ...
Now that Republicans control the House of Representatives, they promise to fulfill their threat to investiga ...
In an interview with ABC's This Week GOP 2012 candidate Jon Huntsman took his fellow Republicans to task ...
Churchlady320
May. 18th, 2013 at 7:52 pm
It is clear that the creationists have some power in some places, but they do not block science so much as obstruct policy based on that science. Science itself is not in danger. What is would be our ability to fight climate change, be careful with finite resources such as clean water, and dealing with population growth.
The concern that the Religious Right will eradicate science is misplaced; the concern that they can block good policies is the core concern. Being angry at the religious right (who are neither religious or right – they are materialists using faux theology to advance their personal gains) moves us the wrong way. We have to VOTE so that our capacity to have intelligent, well informed people in office is vastly improved.
Trying to talk sense to these folks is like talking to an open window. Just never mind them but do take measures to thwart their power over policy. THAT is what matters.
as promised
May. 18th, 2013 at 8:40 pm
I’m not so sure how misplaced the concern is. Think a generation from now… or less. Soon the country will be producing more and more students who cannot compete at real universities – giving more power to the “Christian universities”. And thus, the cycle is born.
The one good thing is that a larger proportion of the population is eschewing organized religion but still, that one pocket (with deep pockets!) remains.
Churchlady320
May. 19th, 2013 at 2:05 am
It’s not a matter of eschewing Christianity or religion but in whether anyone, secular or of faith, is well educated. That is entirely a matter of policy, too. Paying attention to who’s running your school board, community colleges,universities is incredibly important. That’s not got ANYTHING to do with religion because the corporate thugs got there first. They dumbed down schools to make the 60s never happen again. Smart people resist class power. Dumb people identify with it. Hedge fund CEOs, the Kochs, etc. haven’t a religious bone in their body, don’t even pretend to.
We MUST stop ignoring policy and who controls it. All the OWS movements will come to nothing if we don’t take back authority over all parts of our legislative and administrative spheres. You will have allies in the secular and the progressive/liberal faith communities – know who is on your side and who is not by what they think, not the labels you slap on them.
Reynardine
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:23 pm
You are quite right about dumbing down the culture to make sure the Sixties never happened again.
The byword of the Eisenhower era was to make sure everybody was “adjusted” and didn’t rock the boat. People were supposed to know enough to live good, productive, tract-house lives and run the wheels of industry. For this, some knowledge of science was necessary, and you didn’t see young-Earthism, flat-Earthism, or creationism being taught in schools. All the same, there was a climate of anti-intellectualism. It ended, in that era, with Sputnik, and for the next eight years or so, there was a tremendous push for academic achievement. This produced young adults who could actually think.
Reynardine
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:36 pm
However, as the Vietnam War escalated, it became apparent that these young intellectuals were thinking too much. Even in the later Johnson days, you could see them being helotized. The drug culture was not something that arose sua sponte. The drop-out culture was not something that arose sua sponte. These movements were instigated to make sure that those who already “knew too much” would not effect change from within. With Nixon, we saw “creative polarization”- the deliberate turning of middle-class, middle-aged white people against their own children, teaching them to see the young as demon-possessed monsters out to destroy “ril uhMericuhn values”. With our landing on the Moon, it was felt that the space race was over, and it was time to start dismantling the education system that had made its graduates “too smart”.
Reynardine
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:44 pm
What is wanted now is a permanent dumb, unemployed underclass, inculcated with prejudice and superstition, from whose ranks soldiers, private contractors, and eventually Brown Shirts can be recruited. Keeping them constantly insecure so that they can be turned against whatever outgroup is to be scapegoated is part of the plan. Above them are to be doctrinarily correct technocrats, necessary to maintain the technological support and standard of living required by the 2%ers. And at the top, the puppeteers…
djchefron(Moderator)
May. 18th, 2013 at 7:56 pm
Cant find the link right now but North Carolina and if I read it correctly ban the sale of electric cars.Now their reasoning was since TESLA didnt have dealerships that would have put the car dealerships at a competitive disadvantage.Its really getting to a point where it makes you wonder…..
SJ Reidhead
May. 18th, 2013 at 8:51 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Reynardine
May. 18th, 2013 at 11:53 pm
Historian? Like David Irving?
At present rates, the sea level is calculated to rise a meter by 2100. That is assuming there isn’t another Lake Agassiz hiding under the Greenland ice cap. Even a meter will render the lowlands of Florida, Louisiana below Baton Rouge, the coast lands around the Padma Estuary, and Bombay, to name a few places, uninhabitable and unproductive. As for an Agassiz-class flood, if you don’t understand the implications of that, you can quit pretending to know anything about paleoclimates
mathazar
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:35 am
A good historian would know that Greenland was not named because of an abundance of flora. Yes, it was once green, but never during the existence of Homo-sapiens.
And if I wanted to learn climate science, I wouldn’t go to a history teacher.
Reynardine
May. 19th, 2013 at 9:34 am
During the Medieval Climate Optimum, there was enough of a fringe of green on Greenland’s southeast coast for some Vikings to do subsistence farming. The Little Ice Age hit a couple of centuries later and wiped them out. These events probably had something to do with fluctuations in the North Atlantic Drift. The Little Ice Age appears to have abated by the mid Nineteenth Century, and we are now heating up faster than any time in recorded history.
Sceptical
May. 18th, 2013 at 10:16 pm
“typical of science instruction at private religeous schools”
Really? Is this one of those things that “everybody knows” or is there actual science behind that statement?
My daughter just finished 4th grade at a private christian school, and they had the same science book that my son had in 4th grade at a public school. She had to take the same, state mandated, end of year test that every other child in 4th grade did, public, private or home schooled.
I could be wrong, but I’d bet that test is a hoax. From the evidence I’ve seen, it’s definitely not typical.
Elizabeth 44
May. 18th, 2013 at 11:01 pm
I do not believe the test is a hoax because I have reviewed some of the texts being used by the far right homeschoolers. It is appalling. That being said, many Christian schools especially Catholic and mainline Protestants do teach good science.
Quicksilver
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:09 am
Most confusing time for me in Catholic school started in 5th grade 1963. 1st period was Catechism teaching Adam and Eve had 2 sons . 1 son killed the other then went into a city to take a wife. 2nd period came then the nun started talking about evolution. When I questioned it (in those days there was 1 nun teacher for all day classes in the same room)I was told I could not take all the sand from all the beaches and put it into 1 bucket. I lie to you not.The good thing that has happened.. it made me question everything.
Michelle Rhoades
May. 19th, 2013 at 8:33 am
The test is unfortunately real and in wide usage among fundamentalist schools and homeschool programs. www.snopes.com/photos/sig...
ARWKoppen
May. 18th, 2013 at 10:17 pm
Like To me Univerve was not even created, but became to exist:
0->Ø->%
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vac...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cas...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uni...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mul...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sol...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ear...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wor...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/His...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hum...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rel...
www.un.org/en/documents/u...
The global warming’s time-line is not in correspondence to the life-time of the Sun:
(*Proof*)
1: check the hyperlink about the sun: (written above)
2: check the earth-time-line by use of the following hyperlink:
www.google.com/intl/un/ea...
->
THAT’S WHY SOME RELIGIONS DO NOT ALLOW US TO INVESTIGATE SOME PARTS…
ARWKoppen
May. 19th, 2013 at 2:33 am
I had made a key-board-error:
I intended to say Universe and not univerve
We all have one source;
Scientifically seen, or by use of religion.
Shiva
May. 18th, 2013 at 10:32 pm
Lets think about the world. The one that will pass the US by while we set here beholden to oil corporations. While thew rest of the world passes laws to regulate our future, the US will become the primary polluters of the world for NOTHING. It will gain them nothing unless they can force the rest of the world to do the same.
The god and Jindals state will lose the same as the rest of us. While the xtians think they are getting their agenda in, they will be shocked to learn they were used.
Its all in the vote.
Nancy
May. 18th, 2013 at 11:22 pm
I believe in science and climate change and think we should do whatever we can to stop it. I just want to pose some questions to the people who have commented and to any others who have read the article.
What if we’re wrong ? What if we continue on the way we are going and we have ignored the facts ? Do any of us know with 100% certainly that it’s all just something that happens every few centuries and is in no way due to our reliance on fossil fuel ? This world is much older than the religious section of the population wants to admit. There are some other possibilities in ancient history that could have caused change. One of those is volcanic eruptions. To my knowledge, we haven’t had any in recent memory that were like the ones that have been shown to have happened in the past.
So I pose again the original question…what if we’re wrong ?
Quicksilver
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:26 am
On the volcano issue, Alaska had one that erupted up to 30,000 feet recently if I am not mistaken.
On the oil industry, no one should want it unless you are highly invested. Otherwise, there is no doubt in my mind, that the fracking is causing major problems.Whether it is earthquakes, water poisoning, tree eradication,and or weather change. I believe that people should do a bit of history search on the repercussions the oil industry has had on other countries and their people.Even if you want to forget all the other points. Then you decide if the idea is incorrect.Wanting more oil is why any other science creation of free energy is being stifled . That should be everyone’s major concern.
John Anderson
May. 18th, 2013 at 11:34 pm
A very good book I’ve found helpful in evaluating so-called “experts” and their peer-reviewed studies or research is one written by David Freedman:
WRONG: WHY EXPERTS* KEEP FAILING US–AND HOW TO KNOW WHEN NOT TO TRUST THEM
*SCIENTISTS, FINANCE WIZARDS, DOCTORS, RELATIONSHIP GURUS, CELEBRITY CEOs, HIGH-POWERED CONSULTANTS, HEALTH OFFICIALS AND MORE
In the end, we each need to have a healthy dose of skepticism and do our own research. The so-called experts are shown to be wrong more often than right over the long term in Freedman’s book. [Check it out! Don't just take my word for it. I could be WRONG!]
TYBANDIT
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:15 am
Truth of the matter is we aren’t destroying the earth,we’re destroying OURSELVES.The earth will be around another 6 billion years or so;until the sun reaches red giant stage.To me the entire argument needs to be reframed from”destroying the earth “to that of us making the earth uninhabitable for humans.
ARWKoppen
May. 19th, 2013 at 10:36 am
Correct. We should take care for eachother and nature.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt...
ARWKoppen
May. 19th, 2013 at 10:41 am
Altruism or selflessness is the principle or practice of concern for the welfare of others. It is a traditional virtue in many cultures and a core aspect of various religious traditions, though the concept of “others” toward whom concern should be directed can vary among cultures and religions. Altruism or selflessness is the opposite of selfishness.
Zebulon Ross
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:02 pm
It’s a very simple and blatant truth. Religion has ruined this world. Offering nothing but slavery and injustice. I fear for my children’s future. They’re probably going to live in a toxic dump of a world overrun by psychotic religious zealots. Stop destroying the human race and our progress. There is no God. No magical old guy living in a cloud city in the skies. It’s nonsense and if you believe it then you’re an idiot and have no right to do anything which could have an affect on someone else’s life. Quit stifling human evolution and just die out.
Shiva
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:22 pm
But its a wonderful tool for keeping people under your thumb
djchefron(Moderator)
May. 19th, 2013 at 12:29 pm
Christine Daniel is a minister and doctor (although, not, to our knowledge, a realtor, dentist, or vampire hunter) who just wanted to help the world beat cancer! She did this by going on Trinity Broadcast Network and selling a mixture of suntan oil and beef flavoring.
Read more at wonkette.com/516903/sunda...