Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
When Republicans Govern, Government is the Problem
Elections definitely have consequences. Instead of the job creation they promised, House Republicans spend what little time they are in session working on votes to repeal Obamacare, doing all they can to prevent job creation and supporting a sequester that, according to Macroadvisers, will kill 700,000 jobs and reduce economic growth by .6%. Senate Republicans abuse the filibuster to the point that everything needs 60 votes. The only thing worse than Republicans acting like spoiled children in Congress, is a Republican running a state.
We know about Rick Snyder’s obsession with replacing elected officials with unelected (and unaccountable) Emergency Financial Managers. We know about Scott Walker’s attacks on unions. We know about Rick Scott’s voter suppression program, along with his opposition to Obamacare. Maybe North Carolinians thought that somehow their new Republican Governor, Pat McCrory, would some how be different. Maybe as the moderate as he said he was during his campaign and during Monday’s State of the State Address, but he’s turning out to be a boiler plate right wing extremist on steroids.
Of the laws McCrory passed since he arrived at the Governor’s mansion, nothing captures the essence of his mind set like his unemployment law. It includes cuts to Unemployment benefits reducing the maximum weekly cap from $530 to $350, North Carolina Unemployment Benefits Cut – North Carolina Takes A Turn As Mississippi – Esquire reducing the duration of benefits from 20 weeks to 12 weeks and eliminates benefits for people who left work for health or family reasons. McCrory’s statement about the bill sounds like he’s channeling Paul Ryan’s logic on Medicare and his worship of the almighty job creators, “This bipartisan solution will protect our small businesses from continued over-taxation, ensure our citizens’ unemployment safety net is secure and financially sound for future generations, and help provide an economic climate that allows job creators to start hiring again.”
But wait, there’s more. Aside from the dramatic cuts in benefits, the law increases unemployment taxes paid by businesses through a combination of eliminating the zero-percent rate that roughly 30,000 businesses weren’t paying, a 20 percent state surcharge and Federal taxes of $21 / employee. Aside from these goodies, North Carolina will lose Federal emergency relief benefits that were part of the fiscal cliff agreement. According to the Charlotte Observer:
” The federal benefits, extending payments past 26 weeks of unemployment, were awarded as part of the “fiscal cliff” deal in Congress. But the federal law requires states to maintain their existing benefit structure. The U.S. Department of Labor said 170,000 people will lose an estimated $780 million in benefits in North Carolina because of the new law.”
Besides gutting unemployment benefits at a time when the unemployment rate in North Carolina is 9.2%; McCrory signed a new law that should make xenophobes everywhere proud. After resisting Federal requirements for states to issue drivers licenses to undocumented immigrants under Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, (DACA) McCrory changed his mind and opted to issue the licenses albeit with a North Carolinian version of Star of David armbands.
The Winston-Salem Journal reports: ”Across the top of the new license is a pink strip. In the center, red capital letters say, “NO LAWFUL STATUS.” On the side another set of red capital letters say, “LIMITED TERM,” referring to the license holder’s two-year reprieve from deportation.” As Moises Serrano, told the W-S J : ”Imagine trying to get on a flight at the airport, and you have to use this license. It’s an invasion of my privacy. I am undocumented and unashamed, but I say that on my terms.” I’ll bet the Queen of “papers please” wished she could high-five McCrory for this stroke of genius.
As if cutting unemployment benefits when unemployment is high and stigmatizing DACA license holders, McCrory is looking to Jindalize North Carolina’s tax system . He also said no to expanding Medicaid under Obamacare, though if Rick Scott can change his mind, it’s remotely possible that McCrory will do the same. McCrory’s plan to make education more “business friendly” by discouraging post-secondary education got a nod from the State House. The House gave overwhelming final approval Wednesday to a bill creating new kinds of high school diplomas and course plans that emphasize vocational or career paths that don’t require 4-year college degrees. (my emphasis) Oh, and there’s one more thing. It seems that McCrory wants to replace members of local boards with people who think like he does because it just makes things more efficient. From the News Observer: ”The state’s GOP-dominated legislature and Republican governor would have a free hand to sweep out all the members of several key boards and commissions and replace them with their own appointments, under a bill advanced Tuesday.”
The barbarity doesn’t end there. Cherie Berrie (I swear that really is her name) who was recently elected as North Carolina’s Labor Commissioner, wants to abolish the minimum wage. Of course, one may be tempted to wonder why on earth would North Carolinians vote for these people? The answer reminds us just how consequential state elections can be. This is the sort of government that gerrymandering builds. Erik Spanberg of the Charlotte Business Journal explains:
“Two years after the GOP took control of the House and Senate for the first time in a century, the party increased its margins to super-majorities, meaning Republicans are now veto-proof. As for a Congressional delegation now firmly in Republican hands — Dems held a 7-6 advantage but enter 2013 with just 4 of the state’s 13 Congressional seats — and the dominance in the General Asembly, Parker and others say the vote is more evenly divided (true) and skewed by redistricting carried out by Republicans (also true). State Senator Dan Blue of Wake County, a Democrat who spent 22 years in the House, calls the revamped districts “resegregation” and hopes legal challenges will lead to new boundaries.”
One can’t help noticing the irony. When Republicans govern, government is the problem.
Image: Greensboro101
What to do if you have a tense relationship with the Latino community and your party is trying to rebran ...
When North Carolinians elected Republican Pat McCrory in November, they thought they were getting a "mod ...
Republicans are going to learn how to talk to women and minorities, and then spend ten million dollars o ...
Sen. Mitch McConnell has returned from Christmas, and is threatening to kill unemployment insurance for ...
According to a new PPP survey, Florida Gov. Rick Scott has alienated the state's Independents to such ...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 10:09 am
And I will bet you, that once these cuts really start hurting the people of the state, they will bow their heads and keep voting for these clowns. They must vote republican and they must support the almighty dollar of their masters.
I would expect nothing less of the people of the southern states. Stockholm Syndrome is alive and well in the republican party.
PSzymeczek
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 11:07 am
GED Jan won’t even do that much.
robyn ryan
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 11:31 am
The Constitution says We,the People. Not we, the economy. We pay taxes to operate the government as our shield against corporate lust for profit at any price. And against religious power grabs.
Because ‘shrinking the government’ doesn’t guarantee a return for our collective tax dollar investment. Instead, it turns off all the alarm systems.
What Norquist wants to do is drown the apparatus that keeps him and his ilk from robbing us blind.
When you trade in the government’s vampire hunters for a for-profit attack hamster, you ARE on the menu.
Remember,vampire corporations are using OUR common resources for their private profit. Our water, OUR roads, our air and our common welfare. Heck, they now own most of the public assets our parents and grandparents bought for us with their tax dollars. we have to rent them back.
What do WE get? Where’s our profit? Or at least a shield to protect us from the blood suckers.
Sex, drugs and guns dangled by the GOP are shiny toys to keep us amused while they steal our common wealth.
Government is there to represent Labor (that’s US.) And to keep keep the vampires from bleeding us dry. That’s why they hate it.
novenator
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 11:56 am
Powerful article Adalia!
Cheryl
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 1:11 pm
I’m ashamed to say I’m from NC. But I did not vote for McCrory or any Republican. I am a Democrate. I knew this was gonna happen when they got elected. The problem is that the Rep. attack ads worked and the voters drank the kool-aid. Its sad to say that the Bible belt is as strong as ever. But I do have hope that the voters will come to their senses in 2014 then again in 2016. People will realize that they made a mistake.I just hope that the we the people don’t suffer to much before it happens.
Peter Barnett
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 3:07 pm
They’re illegal. They don’t have a right to privacy in this country.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 3:16 pm
Let your hate go.They do have constitutional rights
Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)
In Yick Wo v. Hopkins, a case involving the rights of Chinese immigrants, the Court ruled that the 14th Amendment’s statement, “Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws,” applied to all persons “without regard to any differences of race, of color, or of nationality,” and to “an alien, who has entered the country, and has become subject in all respects to its jurisdiction, and a part of its population, although alleged to be illegally here.” (Kaoru Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86 (1903) )
Plyler v. Doe (1982)
In Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law prohibiting enrollment of illegal aliens in public school. In its decision, the Court held, “The illegal aliens who are plaintiffs in these cases challenging the statute may claim the benefit of the Equal Protection Clause, which provides that no State shall ‘deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.’ Whatever his status under the immigration laws, an alien is a ‘person’ in any ordinary sense of that term… The undocumented status of these children vel non does not establish a sufficient rational basis for denying them benefits that the State affords other residents.”
It’s All About Equal Protection
When the Supreme Court decides cases dealing with First Amendment rights, it typically draws guidance from the 14th Amendment’s principal of “equal protection under the law.” In essence, the “equal protection” clause extends First Amendment protection to anyone and everyone covered by the 5th and 14th Amendments. Through its consistent rulings that the 5th and 14th Amendments apply equally to illegal aliens, they also enjoy First Amendment rights.
” My faith in the Constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total.” Barbara Jordan, 1974
My faith in you to not to be hateful, well….
Sabyen91
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 6:50 pm
I saw you going 2 miles over the speed limit on the way to work. You are illegal.
inez
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 10:48 pm
Now we have Republican GANGS OUT TO KILL THE American dream. Thugs without weapons waiting to pounce on anyone who is NOT in their class. What a pox on NC. Hope the Dems stop this cruelty in 2014.I feel sorry for thos who DID not vote for him or his ilk!
charlie
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 11:25 pm
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 11:54 pm
Why the middle class?
To Reduce Inequality, Tax Wealth, Not Income
www.nytimes.com/2012/11/1...
The one tax graph you really need to know
www.washingtonpost.com/bl...
Everybody always say lets tax income but never raising a tax on financial transactions.Look at what the EU is doing about that
Taxation of the financial sector
ec.europa.eu/taxation_cus...
The middle and poor are tax enough with property,payroll,sales,gas and I am quite sure I left out a few.What is this obsession of protecting the rich against your own interest?
Anne
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 11:52 pm
It is the height of stupidity that people who call government the problem do their level best to get elected to the very same government. Once in office, they do all in their power to undermine the government’s effectiveness. This seems to be the only country with people who have such a bizarre, out-of-touch view of the role of government, which provides the framework for all the privileges and rights they take for granted.
Esther
Mar. 1st, 2013 at 4:15 pm
I wonder how the Native Americans feel about this debate…I’m just sayin’…