Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Mourdock Loses Ground in Senate Race But GOP Party of Rape Not Even Close to Getting It
By: Hrafnkell HaraldssonOct. 26th, 2012more from Hrafnkell Haraldsson
The message of the Republican Party seems to be that rape really isn’t so bad, and anyway, it’s God’s will, so what are you whining about? They’re telling women, “men want to put their penises in you and fill you with their sperm and by God, you’ll not only not complain, you’ll be honored that you were thought sperm-worthy.”
Here’s the mantra:
It’s not like you’re going to get pregnant, because you got magic vaginas, and even if you do, it’s not like your pregnancy has any chance at all in resulting in a threat to your health, let alone your death, so just chill and lay back and enjoy our ownership of your vaginas.
Yeah, that’s the way to get the female vote, GOP. Stay classy.
The worst of it is, this isn’t hyperbole. This is crap these yokels really say.
I find it terrifying that anybody is still taking the Republican Party seriously.
This is Patriarchy Dammit. I worked with a guy once who liked to say, “I’m gonna tear that p@ssy apart.”
That could be the motto of the Republican Party: “We’re gonna tear your p@ssy apart.”
Because, and here’s that mantra again, “really, it’s not your p@ssy anyway. It’s ours. You’re not even in the conversation. Well, except as an object to be used by us when and how we choose. If we want your opinion, we’ll give it to you.”
As Jon Stewart said last night, in the Republican scheme, “If a woman wants to have a baby via IVF she can not. Rape? She has to.’\”
It’s like the corporate memo from hell.
But the mainstream media, while mentioning it, no more wanted to drag Romney into it than they did Paul Ryan, who has called rape “just another form of conception.”
Haven’t we had enough? Some have. Look at what Morning Joe said yesterday about Richard Mourdock and his ilk:
SCARBOROUGH: But they are driving away so many swing voters. This Mourdock statement in Indiana, just beyond the pale, dragging God into it. And, I mean, he’s not alone. You’ve got other Republicans out there just saying the craziest, most offensive — just think-what goes through their mind? Do they go, you know what I want to be when I grow up? The next Todd Akin. They’re morons.
But FOX News basically ignored it. Sally Quinn, writing for the Washington Post, doesn’t attack Mourdock but his critics as “sick and twisted.” And Mitt Romney, though he said initially he did not agree with Mourdock, now refuses to talk about it. How can we have a national conversation about the issue of rape and women’s health, if the Republican candidate for president won’t even talk about it?
Tina Fey had a word or two to say in that regard on Wednesday:
“I wish we could have an honest and respectful dialogue about these complicated issues,” the comedienne told the Center for Reproductive Rights Inaugural Gala. “But it seems like we can’t right now. And if I have to listen to one more gray-faced man with a two-dollar haircut explain to me what rape is, I’m gonna lose my mind!”
Fey went on:
“I watch these guys and I’m like, what is happening? Am I secretary on Mad Men? What is happening?”
“Todd Akin. Oof. This guy,” she continued. “Todd Akin claims that women can’t really get pregnant from a legitimate rape because the body secretes hormones. Now I can’t even finish this sentence without getting dumber; it’s making me dumber when I say it—but it’s something about the body not being able to get pregnant when it’s under physical stress.”
“Mr. Akin, I think you are confusing the phrase ‘legitimate rape’ with the phrase ‘competitive gymnastics.’”
On Thursday, with two days of silence from the Romney campaign behind us, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, called out Romney for his silence.
It’s Friday, and I think it’s a safe bet Romney is going to hope this one just goes away. He’s willing to do or say anything to get elected and he knows he needs GOP congressmen to power his agenda, whatever that turns out to be.
So again, why is the GOP even in the conversation? Why hasn’t this attitude sparked so much outrage that they have to start next year from scratch?
Are there really that many woman-hating Americans out there?
Sure, Yahoo News is reporting that Mourdock’s support is withering and that his opponent, Joe Donnelly is climbing in the polls, but that’s hardly enough is it? We get rid of one and another pops up and the GOP, Party of Rape, is still going strong like some nation-spanning, nightmarish fraternity.
It seems beyond comprehension. We are going to talk about your vagina, but you’re not welcome to participate in this conversation because it’s a religious matter.
What?
And somehow, Sandra Fluke, the woman who was excluded from a discussion of her vagina by a bunch of dirty old men, became the villainous slut.
The problem is, literally, of biblical proportions. Women seem to be seen by today’s GOP as succubi, intent on corruption and societal destruction every bit as much as those “fags.”
Women have no right to object to who sticks their penises into their vaginas. White Evangelicals have every right to say who sticks what where.
Why?
Because the Bible says so. Moses even gave the captured women to his men to use (rape) and did God condemn him? No, God rewarded Moses (Numbers 31: 25-27). Rape has historically been the fate of female captives in war, but c’mon, for divine sanction you have to go the Bible.
And this, what, makes us Mitt Romney’s shining city on the hill? Rape capital of the world, more like.
“God says so” is a really shitty reason, when you stop to think about it. The books of the Bible were written 2,000+ years ago. The stories in the Old Testament derive from as far back as the Bronze Age. The Old Testament was written for a minority ethnic group that even by the Christian era accounted for only 10 percent or so of the population of the Roman Empire.
The New Testament was written for an even smaller minority. And their god is not everyone’s god. Why should the rest of us even care what their god thinks?
But today, in the land of the free, we’re all supposed to adhere to its outdated doctrines and superstitious assertions. Look at Florida’s Amendment 8 if you’re not taking any of this seriously. We are supposed to pretend twenty centuries of history never happened. As if the Constitution never happened. What is the idea behind this?
Rape them, and He will come?
Here’s the thing: the Republicans think your religions (or lack of religion) are shit. Sure, I think their religion is shit too, but there’s a difference: I am not trying to legislate mine into law.
Just the other morning, I had a religious tract on my doorknob telling me to “walk the road that leads to salvation.” It shows a sad man who can’t go to heaven because he is a sinner. It says sin is the “bad things we do.” It says my punishment for sin is “death in Hell.”
And here I thought it was having to put up with Republican religious bigots.
Actually, “sin” is “missing the mark” in its original meaning. And if there is any group in America right now that has missed the mark, it is the Republican Party, which has missed the mark as human beings.
If you think God wants women to be raped, vote Republican. If you think God wants rapists to impregnate their victims, vote Republican. If you think women who are forced to have their rapist’s baby should also be forced to endure visitation rights for the rapist, to have their rapist in their lives for the next twenty years, by all means, vote Republican.
I plan to cast my vote for women this year: I am voting for Barack Obama. Because I trust women.
And yeah, I hate Republican rape enthusiasts.
Graph from Yahoo News
On Fox News Sunday, Sen. Marco Rubio denounced the Senate's gun control bill while admitting that he has ...
When you kick back a Coors, think about who's beer you're drinking Horrified by the Republican platform as ...
National Organization for Women President Terry O'Neill issued a statement Wednesday saying that Republi ...
Tick tock. It's been two days since Richard Mourdock outraged women and many men with his comments on pr ...
On CNN this morning, Jim Acosta reported that Mitt Romney refused to answer questions about his support ...
Laars Johnsen
Oct. 26th, 2012 at 12:39 pm
Hrafnkell, you’re allowed to write the word “pussy”. It’s the internet.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Oct. 26th, 2012 at 4:37 pm
Actually, it would not let me type it – it automaticaly replaced it as you see it in the post, apparently.I have no idea why it didn’t display properly
Dan
Oct. 26th, 2012 at 12:55 pm
I think it’s a bad strategy to try and infer that the GOP is pro rape. Someone hears that they are going to just turn a deaf ear to it. Just more over the top political noise. Where the hay is to be made is in pointing out the callusness of it all. People heard Murdock say that and immediately turned to party leaders on both sides for perspective. The Democrats came out strong against it. the GOP kinda hemmed and hawed and hedged their bets, because they know their base is crazy. They have to test the waters to see how it’s gonna poll before deciding what to do. It’s crazy that the loons of the Republican Party are so numerous that they actually guide policy to a certain extent.
Mike
Oct. 26th, 2012 at 4:16 pm
I agree with Dan that the issue is the callousness of the rhetoric being used. What I wonder is why these men are so frantic to talk about this. I suppose that they both (Akin and Murdock)both want to be on the science and technology committee, and are trying to establish their credentials. After all, who best to determine the nation’s science future than the people who don’t believe in science. Just as it seems to be popular to elect people to federal office who don’t believe in government. We should be electing people on the basis of a well trained mind, experience with decision making and the ability to work with others to reach a decision. It’s not a matter of compromise, but a matter of seeing the various attitudes and approaches to a problem and then to find the solution that achieves an objective while minimizing the unintended consequences that create and promote failure.
majii
Oct. 26th, 2012 at 5:06 pm
Mike,
You and Dan are bringing too much logic into the discussion, and you’re making too much sense. I don’t think logic or commonsense enter the minds of the hardcore far right wing of the GOP, but they should. It seems that many on the far right never think about rape–until it happens to them or someone they love/care about, then it becomes the most evil thing in the world. IMO, they lack the ability to imagine themselves in the places of the women who have actually been the victims of rape, and it never occurs to them that Ryan, Mourdock, Romney, Akin, and other GOPer politicians have never walked in these women’s shoes and probably never will. It’s sad.
Benne the Clone
Oct. 26th, 2012 at 5:12 pm
Dan: “I think it’s a bad strategy to try and infer that the GOP is pro rape. Someone hears that they are going to just turn a deaf ear to it. Just more over the top political noise.”
Mike: “I agree with Dan that the issue is the callousness of the rhetoric being used.”
By using casual comments about rape to scare and control women, these politicians are contributing to the rape culture that allows boys to be boys in America. This *is* about rape, this *is* about using rape as a weapon to control women, this *is* about punishing women because, with good contraception, they can finally have sex without consequences (a male priviledge for tens of thousands of years). And this is about forcing the religious beliefs of a group on the society as a whole.
What you see as overblown rhetoric is a symptom of the twisting of our culture, a change in a distinctly negative direction for the rights of the non-white non-male. Words have power.
cindy brown
Oct. 26th, 2012 at 6:41 pm
Combine this with John Scalzi’s sheer genius at whatever.scalzi.com/2012/....
It’s really scary. It doesn’t matter whether or not this is “official” republican strategy or viewpoint or whatever. What matters is that these people are being given a legitimate platform from which to spew their hate. Because make no mistake, this is stark, raw hatred of women
cwolf
Oct. 27th, 2012 at 11:42 pm
No, No, No,,,
It’s not sperm, It’s Seed.
Men plant their seeds in women,
you know
Like planting seed in dirt.
Religions believe women are dirt for men to seed.
Anne
Oct. 28th, 2012 at 3:25 am
The views of female sexuality that are emerging from 2012′s Republican party are sick, twisted, and archaic. It’s like they want to punish women for enjoying sex outside of procreation purposes and for being able to have control over our reproductive lives. That so many of them have such negative, outdated views on women in spite of being husbands, fathers, sons, brothers, etc. to women is downright scary. But what wins first prize for blatant hypocrisy and twisted logic is that these same troglodytes would push for unwanted motherhood for rape victims while denying in vitro fertilization for women who want to experience pregnancy and have no other avenue. What’s even more shameful is that there are equally dim-witted women who agree with them.
evette
Oct. 28th, 2012 at 9:39 pm
whatever.scalzi.com/2012/...
I found this the other day and think it it is the most perfect thing written to get the point across about a womans right to an abortion in at least the situation of rape and incest. Although I personally am pro-choice all the way but for all the others who won’t even make any exceptions. I hope if the link didn’t copy properly that you take the time to type it in AND to pass it on
Ilene Flannery Wells
Oct. 30th, 2012 at 10:51 pm
I just want my flashbacks to end.
www.tinyurl.com/pawnsofGO...