Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
The Right’s Religious Liberty Lie Hides the Heart of the War on Women
Every parent recognizes the time their young child first exhibits reluctance to follow directions, and although they may be surprised that a four year old has an idea that is independent of mom or dad, they are certainly aware their son or daughter would not be an obedient robot forever. It is innate for individuals to want to have control over their own actions and freedom from outside compulsion, but understanding liberty involves how one imagines the roles and responsibilities of an individual in society and how it relates to the concept of free will. Religion, to its adherents, is anathema to free will and within the confines of a faith, willing participants make a choice of either acquiescing to give up control over their own actions, or are expelled from the faith for willful disobedience, and regardless if it is fair or not, membership in the club comes with restrictions and requirements. There are problems though, when a faith imposes their rules on people outside the faith and, throughout world history, there are examples of powerful religious groups forcing unwilling participants to give up control over their actions or face retribution that more often than not resulted in mayhem and death.
For the past two years in America, a consortium of powerful religious groups have used their legislative arm, the Republican Party, to force universal compliance of their standards governing women, and their latest catch-phrase to justify their actions is religious liberty. The phrase, in and of itself, is incongruent, but within the context of the Constitution’s First Amendment is understood to mean the freedom to worship without interference from the government. However, anti-choice religious groups have twisted the implication to mean their religious liberty entails enforcing their edicts on every woman whether they are members of the club or not, and they are having a measure of success in Republican controlled legislatures.
With the nation’s attention fixed on Willard Romney’s despicable abuse of the death of four American diplomats in Libya for political expediency, many Americans missed the news that anti-choice groups in Missouri used the religious liberty meme to give employers the power to deny contraception coverage to female employees if it conflicted with their religious or moral sensibilities. The measure was championed by the Missouri Catholic Conference, Missouri Right to Life, and other religious groups with the Christian-oriented Hobby Lobby Stores filing suit claiming the federal policy requiring employers to provide contraception coverage is an infringement on their religious rights. The bill had been vetoed by Governor Jay Nixon, but Republicans gathered their biblical cohort together to barely override the veto in both chambers of the state’s legislature. Supporters of the bill claimed it was to register their disapproval of the Obama administration’s policy requiring insurers to cover birth control at no additional cost to women.
In July when Governor Nixon vetoed the bill, he said it was unnecessary because Missouri already has strong religious exemptions in its insurance laws, and that the new law would allow insurers to claim a religious or moral exemption and deny birth control coverage to women who want it. After the veto override vote, Nixon said “the legislators who voted to override this veto are standing between women and their right to make their own personal decisions about birth control.” However, Rep. Sandy Crawford (R) said “This bill is about protecting our religious liberties,” and it gives the state attorney general, or other individuals and entities, grounds to file lawsuits claiming an infringement of their religious rights if they are compelled to cover contraception. The proponents of the law are lying, because their goal is giving religious-minded men the ability to deny women control over their own actions; when they give birth, and when they have sex. It is, in effect, the ultimate expression of negating a woman’s personal freedom under the guise of Catholic and evangelicals’ religious liberty to dominate and control women.
The religious liberty proponents fail to understand a very simple concept about offering contraception coverage; the President’s policy does not require any man, or woman, to use contraception or to abandon their own religious prohibition against using birth control. If the men who voted to override Governor Nixon’s veto are averse to taking birth control pills, their religious liberty allows them to control their own actions including not using an IUD, diaphragm, or other forms of contraception. However, their religious liberty does not give them the right to tell women that the only time they can have sex is if they intend on giving birth.
It is a tenet of the Christian religion that women must subject themselves to a man’s will, and Republicans went all-in to legislate the bible regardless the Draconian laws contradict the true meaning of liberty. According to the Guttmacher Institute, there are 62 million women in the U.S. in their childbearing years, and more than 99% of all women who have ever had sexual intercourse used at least one contraceptive method, and among those at risk of unintended pregnancy, 89% are currently using contraception. It is unfortunate, but now women in Missouri, married or not, are at the mercy of their employer, individuals, or the state attorney general’s religious or moral whims of whether or not they remain chaste and employed, or homebound birth machines. The Missouri Right to Life and Missouri Catholic Conference have successfully stripped show-me-state women of their right to control their own actions if they are employed, and the law is already being challenged by the Greater Kansas City Coalition of Labor Union Women who are seeking an injunction against the measure.
The law was unnecessary because Missouri already had several conscience protections, and a 2001 law states birth control prescriptions shall be covered under policies that include pharmaceutical benefits at the same co-payment or deductible rates as other medications. The same law also allows insurers to offer policies without contraception coverage to people or employers who say it violates their moral or religious beliefs prompting Democratic Sen. Jolie Justus to say, “At best, this is a cheap political stunt that re-states current law, and at worst, it just creates another obstacle to women accessing birth control.” Based on the evangelical and Catholic drive to ban contraception in other states and Congress, it was meant to put up another impediment to birth control and a woman’s right to choose her own reproductive health.
The Missouri law and others in the works are nothing more than a religious imposition to abridge women’s liberty, and their reproductive health. It is the new meaning of religious liberty that most human beings thought perished with the end of the Vatican’s world domination of a bygone era, but this is America in 2012 and in a last ditch effort to hijack the government, religious fanatics are imposing their religious edicts on the entire country beginning with an assault on women. The Republican presidential candidate has promised, that if elected, to pack the Supreme Court with justices who will overturn Roe v Wade to begin America’s foray into theocracy. It is more than a cheap political stunt or a repudiation of the President’s contraception policy; it is an attack on women, their right to choose, and their liberty, and any American that believes for a second religious edicts will end with contraception, they are as naïve as those who believe that offering contraception is a breach of religious liberty.
One of the inherent rights of American citizenship is individual freedom and it transcends nearly every ...
This week, among other over-the-top comments, Justice Antonin Scalia expressed his belief that ...
It is not uncommon for people to repeat particular behaviors based on their life experience and environm ...
Throughout recorded history, religion has been responsible for most of the atrocities perpetrated agains ...
Throughout mankind's recorded history, women have been relegated to subservient roles by men who use any ...
Mary
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 10:16 am
The zealots have now turned into domestic terrorist. When mitty loses so will the terrorist and teahaters.
Reynardine
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 10:30 am
They will not give up if they lose, but they must not win, because if they do, don’t be surprised by the repeal of the Nineteenth Amendment.
robyn ryan
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:03 pm
They would also have to repeal the 13th amendment, which bans forced servitude or physical bondage. Involuntary pregnancy is forced servitude and bondage.
They sure do love their Jim Crow, don’t they? The group changes, but the hate stays the same.
Ned Champlain
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 10:52 am
The only way the right wing extremists can justify any of their draconian obsessions is using religion as its pretense. Fortunately, those with a thinking brain can use the same book to thwart them. We know that men come from the wombs of women, and that women do not come from the ribs of men. We read that god puts no value on human life until one month after birth. Leviticus 27 1~8. Of course, they will not realize this as they would rather listen to tales, then to look for answers themselves.
Reynardine
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 11:01 am
I recall that Hitler decreed that “The German girl is a subject of the state; she only becomes a citizen when she marries”. I have seen the never-married Ann Coulter insist the same be done with American women, because single women vote for Democrats.
SinghX
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:44 pm
“During the election campaign in 1932, Adolf Hitler promised that if he gained power he would take 800,000 women out of employment within four years. In August 1933 a law was passed that enabled married couple to obtain loans to set up homes and start families. To pay for this single men and childless couples were taxed more heavily.
“When Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933 he appointed Gertrud Scholtz-Klink as Reich Women’s Leader and head of the Nazi Women’s League. A good orator, Scholtz-Klink’s main task was to promote male superiority and the importance of child-bearing. In one speech she pointed out that “The mission of woman is to minister in the home and in her profession to the needs of life from the first to last moment..”
“The decline in unemployment after the Nazis gained power meant that it was not necessary to force women out of manual work. However, action was taken to reduce the number of women working in the professions. Married women doctors and civil servants were dismissed in 1934 and from June 1936 women could no longer act as judges or public prosecutors. Hitler’s hostility to women was shown by his decision to make them ineligible to jury service because he believed them to be unable to “think logically or reason objectively, since they are ruled only by emotion.”
www.spartacus.schoolnet.c...
[Now, where did I put that quote from Rev Peterson who was interviewed on Fox News by Hannity....ah here it is!..."I think that one of the greatest mistakes America made was to allow women the vote. They vote Democrat, which is a vote for evil and destruction"]
Reynardine
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:49 pm
Indeed, the parallels are eerie.
SinghX
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 6:00 pm
The irony of the “eerie” is the woman “Sholtz-Klink”
In the old “Hogan’s Hero’s” there was a female character who showed up periodically to needle the Commandant. She was “Gertrude”, General Burkhalter’s sister. The General was persistent in trying to have his sister marry Colonel Klink.
Church State
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:02 pm
It would be interesting to get Mitt Romney’s and Ann Romney’s views on the ERA and Sonia Johnson. Don’t count on it since they both seem to be quite secretive and evasive, and refuse to elaborate about anything of importance to the American public. SONIA JOHNSON born Sonia Ann Harris, was a fifth-generation Mormon. In 1977, Sonia began speaking out in support of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). She and other Mormon women founded the organization called Mormons for ERA. She received national attention in her 1978 testimony before the United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights, and she continued speaking and promoting the ERA and denouncing the LDS Church’s opposition to the amendment. Soon afterward the LDS church began disciplinary excommunication proceedings against Johnson after her delivery of the speech “Patriarchal Panic: Sexual Politics in the Mormon Church” at a meeting of the American Psychological Association (APA). An excommunication letter in late 1979 listed her misdeeds.
Livvy
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:29 pm
>It is a tenet of the Christian religion that women must subject themselves to a man’s will
not to be nitpicky of a really tremendous article but I think it would be much fairer and more accurate to say it is a tenet of Christian fundamentalism.
A very large set of denominations of Christianity teach that patriarchy was a cultural norm at that time and no longer is correct any more than slavery or a number of things found in the Bible.
The earliest women of the church showed amazing equality in being followers and evangelists. This was quickly quashed as time went on of course and the church happily became the vanguard for putting them in their place.
All that said I think many would be shocked at just how much many fundamentalist evangelical churches believe in patriarchy and many of them – given the chance – would impose it on all of us as “God’s plan”.
I have witnessed abused women who were being told by their fundamentalist ministers it was their fault – if they would pray more and submit more all would be well. The fear & paranoia that women would made decisions for themselves is tangible.
Indie in CT
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:52 pm
Romney’s polling among African-americans is almost a *goose-egg* aka ZERO !
It should be the same for Women!
It is the height of hyprocisy that The GOP/TP/RWNJ’s CLAIM to be for a smaller Govt, but want to control the outcome of EVERY pregnancy in the country!?
Some even advocate NO abortion for ANY reason ! My daughter would be DEAD if that were the case, because she had an Optopic pregancy. She even ASKED the Dr if there was a way to move the fetus to where it should be. But no, that was medically impossible. I am actually pro-life.
But I am PRO-CHOICE because I am a MAN! I have NO idea what its like for a woman to have to face this kind of decision. THAT should be a DECISION between herself, her Dr, her God, or what-ever faith she belives in.
The GOP/TP/RWNJ’s have NO RIGHT to FORCE EVERYONE ELSE to adhere to THEIR religious beliefs.
NativeSonKY
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 1:20 pm
I have a niece who has to take birth control in order to control some “female problem” I am not privy to and don’t understand how it helps her, since I’m not a woman. But I wonder how would young women like her be treated under this law? This is just more of the double-speak from the far right. They say they want small government, but they also want it small enough to fit inside your uterus I guess. Our biggest mistake, as usual, was letting our guard down and thinking they would ever stop fighting this. Hopefully we won’t get fooled again!
Reynardine
Sep. 17th, 2012 at 5:58 am
The birth control pill, sometimes in higher doses than those used these days for contraception, is used to suppress endometriosis. It is also used to control irregular, too frequent, or excess periods. Certain formulations are useful to control PMS. I believe there are other applications.
Most pills function by suppressing ovulation, which means there is never a zygote to be “killed”. The Pill is taken every day for twenty-one days of the cycle (unless, for some medical applications, it is being taken continuously) regardless of the level of sexual activity, which, in some medical applications, may be none at all. The old, high-dosage pills were used sometimes when there was delay or difficulty establishing puberty. Probably there is a modern application of the kind.
Rush Limbaugh is a deliberate idiot.
A Walkaway
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 1:24 pm
“It is a tenet of the Christian religion that women must subject themselves to a man’s will”
It’s not anywhere in my version of Christianity, or that of a large number of people I know.
It’s a tenet of CONSERVATIVE “Christian” religion. Not everyone takes the Bible as absolutely fact or dictated by God (thank God!). A lot of us reject the patriarchal ideology and mindset that demands subjugation of women.
Anne
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 1:28 pm
Being both an African-American and a woman, I have very sound reasons for rejecting the idea of a Romney presidency. Even before his selection of Lyin’ Ryan as his VP choice with his own disdain for women’s reproductive rights, he was saying he would defund Planned Parenthood, even though the 97% of its services that are non-abortion are federally funded. He was also too cowardly to speak up in defense of Sandra Fluke when she was unjustifiably insulted by the obese toad aka Rush Limbaugh, a misogynist in his own right. In addition, Romney has taken cheap shots at African-Americans with ignorant and erroneous comments about welfare recipents. In doing so, he has echoed comments to the same effect from the equally sorry likes of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum.
Katherine Hamilton
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 3:59 pm
Any woman who votes Republican this year, is voting for the elimination, not only of her own right to choose gestation or not, but that of her daughter, her sister, her best friend, her aunts…in short, she is voting against the rights of ALL women. I urge women to consider that if abortion and contraception are ‘distractions’ or ‘non-issues’, as the GOP continually intones, then WHY HAS THIS CONGRESS CONCENTRATED ON THEM for the last 3 years, to the exclusion of nearly all other issues? What jobs bills have been passed? Here are the numbers – these facts should speak for themselves.
“The numbers: Republicans have introduced 44 bills on abortion, 99 on religion, 71 on family relationships, 36 on marriage, 67 on firearms/gun control, 522 on taxation, 445 on ‘government investigations,’ and zero on job creation.”
www.voterocky.org
Rocky Anderson, 2012
Karen
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 4:41 pm
Very well written! Not all religions share the view of the extreme bible thumpers though! Religions are created by like minded people and using the bible to justify their need to control is wrong!
503me
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 4:52 pm
I always wonder after reading an article like this, why any american woman would vote for the GOP(gods of poverty and american taliban in training) and thus be voting to end womens rights? Please all ‘sane’ american women vote this year, women outnumber male voters, lets show them what happens when ‘women get mad’ Obama 2012 and progressive democrats for all open seats in the country.
SinghX
Sep. 16th, 2012 at 8:41 am
“…I always wonder after reading an article like this, why any american woman would vote for the GOP(gods of poverty and american taliban in training)…”
I don’t.
There are women who are “trapped” by various things in their lives that, if they were a practicing christian, they would reject…greed being the major vehicle that drives self-inflicted depravity.
I have met lots of “R” women who privately tell you how much they support ERA, Planned Parenthood, give them money…but as soon as some “patriarch” (husband, cleric) gets wind of their “activities” they are silenced like their throat is slit and arms cut off…remember the “finger-wagging” Queen Anne gave women about how they better shape up and vote for a man to take care of them? Well, these “R” women are told that their funds will be cut permanently if the “assert” their rights again…or will have an “accident” or beaten in an alley, something like that…they are threatened; that’s how they are kept in line.
John
Sep. 16th, 2012 at 1:46 pm
Hasnt the WAR been on BABIES? Is this how twisted the dems have become…to somehow frame the right to kill your own child as something good? Even if you favor abortion..does it not sicken you that good people who sticking up for the rights of precious babies is framed as war on YOU? In a war people die….millions have died in the war on defenseless babies.
Look, abortion is never getting overturned, people are too selfish. But someone has to stand up for what is right–it would be easy to pander to the selfish vote but at the cost of morality? Thats the godless Democrats ticket. These votes have eternal consequences and these politicians have sold their souls for votes
How long are people gonna allow these deceivers to twist what is right into being wrong? Look at the border situation. Do the dems do what is right–what the people want and stop illegal immigration? NO..they pander for the latino vote. They wont say War on Terror because they lose muslim votes. This is what you want? A president with 40% white vote because he knows the core of society doesnt agree with his liberal policies so he panders to every minority to steal power–then dos nothing for any group? Use your intelligence and stop being manipulated by these animals.
Or are you one of them? One of those people so afraid God might be real that if you allow anything Christians say to be right..you wont be able to sleep at night? They HAVE to be wrong dont they? They have to be haters–cause if they’re not–you’re doomed. Or maybe its the people who fight to crush babies head with forceps that may be wrong? Have fun explaining that one to God.
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 16th, 2012 at 1:54 pm
This is about the right to choose.
You are hilarious
“Do the dems do what is right–what the people want and stop illegal immigration?”
And neither did the corporations allow any republicans do do so. Re Ronald Reagan
“They wont say War on Terror because they lose muslim votes.”
Kind of hilarious with Obama shooting people with drones in Pakistan right? Tool?
“panders to every minority to steal power”
Minorities together do not add up to the white vote.
Keep trying. Obama has done far more for America then Bush ever did. And I know your going to say you didnt support Bush. Good luck getting the job of writing for Saturday Night Live
Reynardine
Sep. 16th, 2012 at 4:47 pm
War on babies? Who is trying to starve them, deprive them of medical care, close their schools, make them work in factories when they’re little kids, foreclose their futures, make them sell themselves for war? You dare weep crocodile tears for itty bitty fetuses, just so they can be born to punish their mothers for having cunts, and then be condemned to this so-called future? I hope those crocodile tears come back to choke you, you hypocritical crotch.
JakeAZ
Sep. 17th, 2012 at 7:09 pm
That was such a great post I am gonna commit it to memory and spout it (with credit to you!) at everyone who goes all forced-birther in my face.
Anne
Sep. 16th, 2012 at 4:58 pm
If anyone is conducting a “war on babies,” it is the political party that is trying to enact the Personhood Amendment which gives the same rights to a zygote as to a born human being and would outlaw most forms of the very birth control that helps to cut down on the demand for abortions. It is a war on babies when these same sanctimonious fools want to cut the very programs that sustain so many families while at the same time trying to create a situation that would result in even more unwanted babies. I have zero patience with anyone who doesn’t see that cutting funding for job training, education, food stamps, Medicare and Social Security are actually ANTI-life. But that’s the modern GOP in a nutshell. Besides, outlawing abortion would only drive it underground, and we would return to the days when desperate women died or were maimed by using coat hangers or otherwise endangered themselves by turning to unlicensed charlatans.
kat
Sep. 17th, 2012 at 2:20 pm
Uh, John, get back to us when YOU can get pregnant. Until then, mind your own business.
Cecilia
Sep. 17th, 2012 at 8:17 pm
John – Wake Up…
You know who use to get safe abortions in the olden days? The people who COULD afford them! The rich! They were able to conveniently afford to quietly ‘go away on vacation’ to get their abortions. Or paid a REAL Doctor enough to end the pregnancy. It was the poor women who were left with coat-hangers or falling down staircases to produce their own abortions or sentenced to a life of poverty, due to unwanted pregnancies. Especially, when the men left for greener pastures!
If the morning-after pill was as easy to obtain as rubbers a heck of a lot of abortions would be unnecessary. But the rich Big Pharma controls that at $40.00 a pill! What teenager has that kind of money available to them? Or impoverished woman?
It takes two to create and raise a child- and men are rarely held accountable and skipped out regularly on their responsibility. So this has always been a woman’s problem never the man’s.
So instead of trying to control women and their bodies, why don’t you put your money where your mouth is – Support a child who already lives in poverty (that’s 1 out of 5 in the US/ 15 million ) for their entire life!
That’s what you want the Government to do!
Oh I forgot – you’re a Republican – whose goal is to cut all support to the poor in this country.
And you call WHO Godless?…Take a look in the mirror.
Ma Amin
Sep. 17th, 2012 at 2:56 am
Dr. Kevin Williams dismisses the notion that problems only have a negative impact.
“Problems are opportunities for you to think differently,” he told me during an interview. “Look at inventions; they derive from problems and the quest for solutions. The person who’s trying to get past it is the one who will be innovative.”
voices.yahoo.com/turning-...
His empathy for others formed as a child during the civil rights struggle of the ’60s when the Ku Klux Klan erected a cross on his parents’ lawn.
“My parents moved into an all-white neighborhood and one day the Klan came, erected a cross in our yard, and set fire to it. The National Guard had to come disperse the crowd.”
That event deepened Kevin’s desire to enter the ministry and today he is a pastor in both Greensboro and High Point, North Carolina. Also a noted author, Kevin has earned the respect of those he counsels in ministry to singles and counseling across a spectrum of life issues.