Comments on: Romney is the Second More Disastrous Coming of George W. Bush

By: Victoria Lamb, MSHA

Victoria Lamb, MSHA — Wed, 09 May 2012 00:03:52 +0000

Thanks, Thurman. I have repeatedly tried to convince my Republican friends of the same thing.

What do you think? 0 0

By: Victoria Lamb, MSHA

Victoria Lamb, MSHA — Tue, 08 May 2012 23:58:36 +0000

President Obama has done what could be done. Few humans can do the impossible. He is a hard-working POTUS with the best interests of ALL Americans at heart. He has had nothing but obstruction from the congressional Republicans since 2010. I will certainly be voting for him again, as will the 8000 people who waited in line about 3 hours to hear him on Saturday in Virginia. Not only that but we will be doing everything we can to support his candidacy.

What do you think? 0 0

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Mon, 07 May 2012 00:30:34 +0000

There’s been no incompetence by Obama. The fact that you refuse to hold Bush II responsible for his disasterous 8 years shows you’re not serious. He was handed a budget surplus, gave everyone a $300 check (tax cut 1) because he didn’t want a surplus and since he stole the election, hoped to make friends with the American people; he refused to read memo’s that warned of an immminent attack; started a war in Afghanistan, lost interest; gave another big tax cut which benefitted those at the top; invaded a country for oil under false pretenses, which should’ve been an impeachable offense; started Medicare Part-D drug benefit that did very little besides add to the deficit; and let’s not forget, his wars were off the books. Obama put them on and you all squealed look at what the Democrat did to our debt. So yes, Bush is to blame for this mess considering Clinton handed him a golden goose which Bush choked to death.

What do you think? 0 0

By: Swiggy

Swiggy — Sun, 06 May 2012 22:06:53 +0000

I always wonder about how running a business is related to running a country. A successful businessman runs a company for a profit, while the government is a non-profit.

Or, as conservatives love to put it, “Obama isn’t a businessman: he’s a community organizer”. Yup, the perfect qualifications, only the community is the entire United States.

Businessmen are, for the most part, ignorant about running a non-profit like a country. They want to cut taxes on the rich “to create jobs” but either the jobs they create are overseas or accountants to hide their money in other countries. THEN, they want to raise taxes on the poor and working class. Didn’t they ever read Robin Hood? How about the French Revolution? Stupidity on the grand scale. If you want to raise taxes, do it on those that have money. Those that don’t end up in prison, then we have to support them.

What do you think? 0 0

By: Rmuse

Rmuse — Sun, 06 May 2012 04:42:58 +0000

Good call Thurman. Now maybe you can enlighten the people that cannot make that distinction before another “businessman” repeats the last “businessman’s” errors.

What do you think? 0 0