Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Romney Starts Spinning Republican Reaction to Wisconsin Sikh Temple Shooting
Update: Romney did in fact say shooting in the first line of his statement. I have altered the post to reflect my error.
Republicans are already trying to spin the attack against a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, as Mitt Romney tried to redirect emphasis away from the gun’s role in the shooting.
Mitt Romney’s campaign released a reaction to the events in Wisconsin, “Ann and I extend our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s shooting in Wisconsin. This was a senseless act of violence and a tragedy that should never befall any house of worship. Our hearts are with the victims, their families, and the entire Oak Creek Sikh community. We join Americans everywhere in mourning those who lost their lives and in prayer for healing in the difficult days ahead.”
Compare Romney’s statement to what President Obama said, “Michelle and I were deeply saddened to learn of the shooting that tragically took so many lives in Wisconsin. At this difficult time, the people of Oak Creek must know that the American people have them in our thoughts and prayers, and our hearts go out to the families and friends of those who were killed and wounded. My Administration will provide whatever support is necessary to the officials who are responding to this tragic shooting and moving forward with an investigation. As we mourn this loss which took place at a house of worship, we are reminded how much our country has been enriched by Sikhs, who are a part of our broader American family.”
Romney was careful to try to spin what happened in Wisconsin away from the gun. In contrast, President Obama used the word shooting twice in his statement.
Remember, the NRA’s motto. Guns don’t kill people. People kill people.
It is a subtle difference between the two candidates, but the fact that the Romney campaign would rather do a soft shoe number instead of angering a constituency by pointing out the obvious speaks volumes about the character of the man and his campaign.
The violence was indeed senseless, but it was also a shooting. What the Romney campaign engaged in was a bit of spin. We don’t want to talk about the role of the gun, so let’s just talk about senseless violence.
From a macro perspective, we have now gotten our first look at how the Republican Party is going to spin this. The GOP is going to try to de-emphasize the role of the gun.
I know for many on the left the second mass shooting in a few weeks will enhance their call for gun control, but this discussion will be one sided and futile if the Republican Party acts like Mitt Romney and downplays part that the gun played in the violence.
A real leader steps up in times of crisis, and with his statement today, Mitt Romney once again demonstrated that he lacks the character to lead.
While most of the media interrupted regular programming to report on the tragic shooting at the Sikh Tem ...
President Obama has released a statement condemning the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and several ...
Governor Scott Walker issued a statement today about the mass shootings at a Wisconsin Sikh Temple this ...
There is a lot to be desired when looking into Romney's taxes and investments, but Gawker has acquired a ...
It's all Greek to Romney. Sikh, sheik. What's the diff, right? In case you were wondering how the fa ...
k l m
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:14 pm
What??? He said ‘shooting’ in the first sentence!! Let’s not be as bad as FOX news, ok???
Jason Easley
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 9:04 pm
Thanks to everyone who pointed out my mistake. I am grateful that we all care enough about this website to want everything to be accurate and correct. I apologize for the error.
Headly Westerfield
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 9:10 pm
The article makes no sense now. I’m not a fan of Romney, but he’s not the one spinning this, you are.
Graypets
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:16 pm
He did call it a shooting in the first sentence. So I guess the NRA is not going to be happy with Mr. Romney.
Terrance
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:16 pm
Ummmmm, I really detest Romney but he used the word “Shooting” – it’s even in your quote
Terrance
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:34 pm
You still have “Republicans are already trying to spin the attack against a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, as Mitt Romney did not use the word shooting in his statement.”
Come on guys – we can’t let enthusiasm make us worse then the Right.
Lysa
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:16 pm
Um, not to nitpick or anything, but Romney called the event a shooting. “Ann and I extend our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s shooting in Wisconsin.” That goes against everything you just said.
Matt
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:17 pm
Doesn’t Mitt Romney refer to it as a shooting in the first sentence of his statement… ?
You published it and it clearly says “shooting” just like President Obama’s statement.
“Ann and I extend our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s SHOOTING in Wisconsin.”
PJ Williams
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:17 pm
Am I missing something or are you but it would appear that Romney used the word “shooting” in his first sentence. I understand the point of the article and agree with it’s sentiments but it looks like your evidence is shot!
CA
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:17 pm
You state is your first paragraph that Romney’s statement begins, “Ann and I extend our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s shooting in Wisconsin.”
I distrust/dislike/disdain Romney as much as anyone else, but he did use the word “shooting” in the statement, if your quote is accurate.
David Miller
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:19 pm
Ummmm… he clearly did refer to it as a shooting in the very first sentence.
“Ann and I extend our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s shooting in Wisconsin.”
JM
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:19 pm
just about to say the same!
“Ann and I extend our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s shooting in Wisconsin.”
Politicsusa and Jason Easley, please get your facts straight. Retract or correct this.
It looks insane.
elizabeth
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:22 pm
Your Romney quote has the word “shooting” in it. Do you have the other one?
Shawn Rosvold
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:23 pm
The word “shooting” is in the statement you quoted. Do you have an editor working there?
j10s
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:23 pm
Errrr if I read this correctly (and I CAN read), he says, ““Ann and I extend our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s shooting in Wisconsin.”… Now correct me if I am wrong, but is that not the word SHOOTING right in the middle of that? I am as Lefty as it gets, but I would like to see postings like this be CORRECT and not just baseless fiction…
Golgaronok
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:23 pm
The statement you quote here uses the word “shooting” in the very first sentence.
Rosalind Hurwitz
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:23 pm
Wtf — Romney’s statement does say “shooting” as quoted by you.
JQ
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:24 pm
“Ann and I extend our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s shooting in Wisconsin….
I agree that he doesn’t have what it takes to lead this Country. But, your article doesn’t illustrate that well at all. Since he did actually refer to this tragedy as a shooting, your conclusions don’t necessarily hold up.
Logic
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:25 pm
“Ann and I extend our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s shooting in Wisconsin”
First line. Read it again. “Shooting” is right there, in the first line.
Jeez, I’m no Republican, but this is a pathetic attempt at trying to spin this tragedy into something political. Can we at least give it enough time for the details of the event itself to come out? If anything needs attention right now, it’s the community in Wisconsin.
Shameful.
Headly Westerfield
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:26 pm
Why is my comment still awaiting moderation when others have been approved after mine?
There’s nothing rude in my comment and I have only pointed out what others have said.
Lee
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:28 pm
Someone needs an editor. I’m pro Obama, but your statement is contradictory.
Shea
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:30 pm
Your transcript of his statement says shooting. Was that a typo on your part or did he actually say it? I can’t stand Romney but if he didn’t say it fix your text, if he did let it go.
Jessie Read
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:36 pm
I’m no Romney fan – but his statement does say “shooting”: “our thoughts and prayers to the victims of today’s shooting”. I do not see how his statement was offensive or political. You seem to be the one who is politicizing this event. Please, from those of us dealing with this tragedy near our home, tone down the political rhetoric, at least for a day or two. Now is NOT the time to be attacking each other politically.
pixsher
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:37 pm
It’s probably best to take this down completely. It’s inaccurate & looks like cloth spun from thread stolen from Fox News.
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 8:46 pm
I dont think Romney has the character to walk across the street.
However I do think he is sincere in his words about the tragedy as is Obama. The difference is Obama is not going to run from how it happened.
Face the music. We have some almighty sick people in this country. And Im not just talking about the Southern Baptists
Jason Easley
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 9:35 pm
Thanks to everybody who caught my huge mistake, and commented. In answer to a few questions, we can always use editors. My error was accidental. I would never try to intentionally deceive anyone.
Thank you again for being so passionate, and for reading PoliticusUSA.
Carrie
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 9:47 pm
The gun apologists are crazy today and Romney is bought by the NRA. Can’t believe some of these comments. Appreciate your honesty jason. Don’t let the ungrateful bastards get you down. Everyone loves to act like they’re perfect.
As if. Lol.
Neon Vincent
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 10:24 pm
Forget the part about “shooting.” The real difference is that Romney’s statement is very neutral, while Obama’s made a point of being inclusive.
phineas
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 10:24 pm
Reaching? If the Romney campaign wanted to be perfectly politically correct, NRA style, they never would have used the word “shooting”. The fact that the Obama statement used the word “shooting” twice is hardly a clarion call for America to wake up and figure out that maybe guns really are the problem.
Face it- Obama’s as guilty as the rest of our sad lot of politicians when it comes to facing up to the gun lobby. Until he actually introduces some legislation, as far as I’m concerned, he might as well be Charlton Heston.
Don’t get me wrong- I’m still voting Democrat in November- the alternative is a GOP regime bent on turning the USA into a Putin style oligarchy. But please spare us the silly spinning of meaningless statements of sympathy!
John smith
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 10:29 pm
Drone strikes….::cough::
Paul
Aug. 5th, 2012 at 10:33 pm
I do believe that Obama would be more likely to enact sensible gun regulations than Romney. However, I don’t get that from reading the two statements. As k l m suggested, I don’t think we should infer too much from these statements.
mikeyhatesit
Aug. 6th, 2012 at 12:13 am
So wait, no comparisons are being made with Holmes’ actions in Colorado? Granted, he was in dire straits with not being able to cope with life; while a white male attacks a religious community. Duh. Both had access to high-powered weapons, as is their right, but nobody seems to be able to catch a red flag on people with potentially fatal instabilities. Thus continues a pattern of behavior on the part of the right wing, insisting that guns aren’t dangerous while downplaying the statistics of the rise of mass shootings. Add to that a worsening economy, propaganda masquerading as news which has been repeatedly proven to lower comprehension of world events, and a jingoistic campaign against anything that isn’t part of a caucasian christofascist cultural worldview that promotes wage slavery.
I had to go to the Guardian to find some neutral reporting, and found something these two recent shootings have in common. Regarding the press releases from Obama & Romney: “Is it offensive to suggest that both men must by now have a generic template document offering words of consolation and succor in the event of a mass shooting in the states?”
neil
Aug. 6th, 2012 at 1:54 am
I feel that Michele Bachmann and her ilk have to bear much blame in this senseless tragedy.All this whipping up of hatred for some political gain is beyond absurd.When are we going to take a stand as a people and say enough.There has to be a way to stop this hatred and bigotry.And yes republicans are the ones responsible.
popeculture
Aug. 6th, 2012 at 3:16 am
In all sincerity, this article must be pulled. The entire premise of the article does not hold water after the correction has been made. I will be surprised if it doesn’t show up on Faux News tomorrow.
Ken
Aug. 6th, 2012 at 9:01 am
And, more to romney’s character is that Ann probably asked mitt what a Sikh is. Mitt probably would have shrugged his shoulders. If romney said the word ‘shooting’, his team did not vett it well.
Alan
Aug. 6th, 2012 at 4:23 pm
“guns don’t kill people people kill people” people invented guns to kill people more effectly people who hate and have guns kill people. When does it stop and when will we try peace. This act was was a crime of hate it is time for both parties stop the lies and show that hate is not the answer!