Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Romney’s Bain Pain: Breaking Down the SEC Laws
Mitt Romney is set to do a bunch of interviews tonight at 6PM to beat back the growing Bain Pain about his inaccurate SEC filings or just when he left Bain, and how he could be President and sole stockholder but not be responsible for the outsourcing.
It’s a Friday news dump, so maybe he’s going to come clean, but it’s so unlike Romney to be definitive about anything. He was careful in his choices, picking the conservative on CBS, CNN, Fox News, you know the drill. He’s doing brief interviews – a few moments. Not a big sit down. But still, it’s another big Good On Mitt, he finally talked to some folks, even if the interviews are being pre-taped as opposed to those risky live interviews like a press conference or a live interview.
You can expect a lot of “I was there but not there, this here is how business works, etc” but mostly, if I know Mitt Romney, we’re going to be hearing about how mean Obama is and what a liar Obama is for letting his staff suggest that Mitt Romney is either a criminal or a liar.
The Obama campaign hit back hard on the surfacing SEC filings today:
Deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter laid out the issue as the Obama team sees it: “Either Mitt Romney, through his own words and his own signature, was misrepresenting his position at Bain to the SEC, which is a felony. Or he was misrepresenting his position at Bain to the American people to avoid responsibility for some of the consequences of his investments” including layoffs and the outsourcing of jobs.
This all picked up a lot of steam yesterday when Mitt Romney released a $675,000 ad campaign calling Obama a liar, based on Obama’s calling Romney an outsourcer — which was proven true within hours of Romney releasing the ad by an article in the Boston Globe detailing SEC filings that showed that Romney/Bain said he was in charge.
Insults like “liar” are apparently acceptable when coming from a Republican, but unacceptable when coming from a Democratic staff member who is simply repeating what FactCheck.org said about Romney’s position – that he couldn’t have been at Bain after 1999 or else he would be guilty of a federal felony.
Yet several different Bain related companies show him on the board, he was the President, CEO and sole shareholder of Bain until 2003, and then there are his own disclosures, which say he was there to the state but say he wasn’t there to the feds.
You can understand why Mitt is confused and angry and would rather blame Obama for busting him than admit he should have just owned up to the job outsourcing and none of this would have come up. It seems as if Romney’s team isn’t prepared for a national election.
Here’s the Romney camp’s reply today:
President Obama’s campaign hit a new low today when one of its senior advisers made a reckless and unsubstantiated charge to reporters about Mitt Romney that was so over the top that it calls into question the integrity of their entire campaign. President Obama ought to apologize for the out-of-control behavior of his staff, which demeans the office he holds. Campaigns are supposed to be hard fought, but statements like those made by Stephanie Cutter belittle the process and the candidate on whose behalf she works.
This is pretty weak from the Romney camp. There isn’t an outright denial in this statement. They call the Obama campaign’s response “reckless and unsubstantiated” but they don’t say it’s untrue. They are trying to paint Obama as reckless — that’s not a great plan. President Obama is famous for his cool, measured style. If Obama came out this hard, he’s going somewhere with it.
Obama campaign counsel Bob Bauer hinted that there is more to come. Romney should know by now that President Obama doesn’t make accusations he can’t prove. The man is a Constitutional lawyer who already ran a successful Presidential campaign in 2008, and never did he accuse John McCain of something like this. In fact, making accusations isn’t Obama’s style.
To that end, let’s break down the SEC laws, so everyone can understand them before Mitt graces us with his Why It’s Obama’s Fault interviews. Legal experts in corporate law broke this down for us:
The majority of securities fraud cases in the United States involve Section 10b and Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. Section 10b is a general provision that prohibits any person from using fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. Rule 10b-5 specifically prohibits making any false statements or omissions in connection with the sale or purchase of securities. A “false statement” is defined as any statement that misleads or creates a false impression. To be actionable under Rule 10b-5, the false statement or omission must be material.
A statement is material if it would be important to a reasonable investor making an investment decision.
Additionally, the statement or omission must be made with the intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud. Thus, ‘reasonable mistakes of fact’, made without a malicious intent, are not actionable under Rule 10b-5.
Misrepresentation of financial information by corporations is classified as accounting fraud. As a result of several major accounting scandals, the government enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which imposes a number of securities law reforms aimed at increasing financial disclosures – such as who is your “chairman of the board, chief executive officer, and president” — and discouraging corporate fraud.
Bottom line, there are only two possibilities: Bain misled the SEC (felony) or Romney has been misleading the public.
So there you have it. It’s either fraud or a lie. We’ll see how Romney puts lipstick on this pig tonight.
For additional reading on Security Laws, click here and download the Security Law Primer.
The Obama campaign put this hard hitter out Friday - a Friday the 13th I'm sure W. Mitt Romney will reme ...
President Obama is putting more pressure on Mitt Romney as he is demanding that the Republican nominee a ...
Let's review. FactCheck has denied the President's allegations that Romney was an outsourcer based on ...
Mitt Romney puts out new ad today calling Obama a liar for saying he outsourced jobs. On the same day, a ...
Romney is hiding something. He doesn't want to release his tax returns and he seems to be not telling th ...
Paws
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 5:29 pm
Romney is the liar here and he knows it. He’s trying to get out from under this but the more he and his team try to wiggle out of it, the deeper in the hole he gets. At this point, I wouldn’t believe a word he said. He’s going to try to double-talk his way out, try to tell us, basically, that he’s wealthy and successful and we should just trust him. I wouldn’t trust him with a pet rock.
JJM
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 5:46 pm
Romney is begging to go on the network news, thinking (probably correctly) that they will help him smooth this over and repair the damage.
But he makes the same mistake all sociopaths make: he believes absolutely in his ability to lie so purely and seamlessly that no one will see through him.
Maybe the news guys won’t see through him, but the people already do…
get real
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 5:55 pm
When you have absolutely nothing, shoot the messengers.
–Mitt Romney
Well, he may not have said that but he sure is doing it!
Ken
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 6:18 pm
Romney will bring his shovel to tonight’s song and dance, and leave with it further up his ass. Just watch his eyes. Will they be straight forward as if speaking the truth? Or darting all over trying to think of more lies. This is exactly why most defendants in criminal cases do not testify. This will be good theater and woul show up on SNL if it were’t for summer re-runs.
JML
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 6:25 pm
Your ignorance regarding how the private equity industry functions, structures specific investment funds, and eventually winds them down is no excuse for drawing the nefarious conclusions about Romney’s purported involvement in the time frame listed. This is all absurd smoke and mirrors; partners at PE firms are legal beneficial owners of the securities in the funds even if they don’t haven an involvement in their management – this is not rocket science- its about as banal as can be. Yet you folks are intent on spreading libelous inferences without an accurate view of the legitimate reasons why his name are on these documents.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 6:43 pm
Right. SO its ok to say I had nothing to do with them then find out he did have something to do with them. Your attempt to excuse lies is meaningless
Sarah Jones
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 6:50 pm
We await a lawsuit from Romney if your claims are true. It hasn’t come yet. Perhaps you are the one making charges you have no basis for.
Until then, we all want to know why Romney’s signature is on those documents and why the disclosure forms for the state are different than the federal forms and why several companies said he was doing business with them and listed him as the person at Bain. There are rules, but it seems you think Romney is above them.
Most importantly to the American people, why is he making money off of outsourcing while claiming he had nothing to do with it?
get real
Jul. 14th, 2012 at 1:31 am
Yep, a pro-lifer like Romney who invests and makes big money with a company that disposes dead aborted babies is pretty banal stuff.
Romney apologists are a truly pathetic and hypocritical lot.
If Obama had done exactly the same as Romney he would have been impeached by now.
SinghX
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 6:35 pm
…”President Obama ought to apologize for the out-of-control behavior of his staff, which demeans the office he holds…”
O what foul, wicked, vanity suffocates Romney’s camp in making such statement…surely the loyal Rrromney minions are under control! They must enter the room, bow on one knee and say, “My Liege” before providing him information; it is befitting of his “title”. And, that means the President “ought” apologize…
And I hope he does…and makes a complete fool of this pompous jackass…naw, we should let Stewart or Colbert do the lifting on this one for the Prez…
Thomas Johnson
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 7:28 pm
YES!
Stewart and Colbert are legen – wait for it – dary for making mincemeat of shenanigans like this. I am looking forward to their return.
Elizabeth
Jul. 13th, 2012 at 7:47 pm
That is the statement that says to me Romney is in real trouble. Let the real investigations begin. That was a “I’m completely cornered and hitting out” statement.
keymanjim
Jul. 14th, 2012 at 12:41 am
Go ahead and bring the charges, if you can make them stick.
I’m sure this will not, in any way, make obama look like he’s exploiting his office to defame his challenger while going into an election cycle. /s/
LOL, BAINiacs.
Anne
Jul. 14th, 2012 at 4:38 pm
Willard is tying himself into knots by trying to vow disinvolvement with a company that he was claiming to be president and CEO of for about 3 years after the so-called disinvolvement. It’s hilarious because this was supposed to be his rationale for why he should be elected president.
Gary Vaughn
Jul. 14th, 2012 at 9:43 pm
Well it is Saturday and the article was spot on.He said exactly what you said he would about not being there, and nobody understands how business works, only him. And Singhx, I like the fact that he cried about Obama apologizing for his “out of control” people, when I have never heard him apologize or even berate anything Limpballs, Nugent, Allen West or any of the other bloviating ignoramus’ in his party.
Paul L. Wegner
Jul. 16th, 2012 at 2:28 pm
Whether Romney was there or not is almost not even relevant. The simple math is, if you’re the sole shareholder of a corporation (which Romney was until 2002) then: Bain Capital = Mitt Romney. Simple as that.
MsPacNWer
Jul. 16th, 2012 at 5:07 pm
Let TeamRomney tighten their own ‘noose of falsehoods’ a little more…then kick the box out from under them: “Obama campaign counsel Bob Bauer hinted that THERE IS MORE TO COME.”
Wait for it….wait for it…. ;0)
(Even FOX”News” isn’t treating TeamRomney favorably about this: www.foxnews.com/opinion/2... )