Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Rush Limbaugh Claims Everything but Polling and Voting Points to a Romney Landslide
By: Jason EasleyNov. 5th, 2012more from Jason Easley
Rush Limbaugh is predicting a landslide win for Mitt Romney based on everything but the data on polling and voting. Limbaugh claims Romney is heading for a big win if we don’t consider the whole voting thing.
Here is the transcript:
My friends, I’ve been looking at all the data that you have been looking at. I’ve been trying to separate feelings from thoughts and come up with some sort of an educated prognostication. You know, common sense tells me this election isn’t gonna be close and shouldn’t be. And yet every poll, every single poll, has this race tied. Obama’s up one, down one, tied, doesn’t matter where you go, ’til you get into the internals, then it gets really confusing or it doesn’t make any sense.
I’m just gonna be honest with you, for the longest time — and you people that have been regular listeners know this. I have said that as we get down to the election, the polls are gonna reflect what’s really gonna happen because the pollsters want to get it right for the future. That has not happened. It has not happened. There’s not one poll that gives either candidate an edge, not one pollster is willing to stick his neck out here. They’re all saying that this is tied, every which way from Sunday, at least in the overall popular vote, national surveys. Now, when you get into the internals it looks a little odd, and we’re gonna do that here at the beginning.
There’s also something that, I guarantee you if a football game had a different outcome yesterday, you would be hearing nothing but this today. But since the Washington Redskins lost at home on a game before the election, it means, what is it,18 of the last 19 elections, that the out-of-power party wins. Honest, it’s called the Redskins Rule, and it’s so well known you can look it up on Wikipedia. In the 18 presidential elections that have taken place since the Redskins moved to Washington in 1937, 17 have been predicted by the team’s performance at its final home game prior to the election.
If the Redskins win at home, the incumbent party wins the presidential race, 17 out of 18 times going back to 1940. If the Redskins lose at home, the challenger prevails. Well, the Redskins lost to the Carolina Panthers. That means Romney wins. I guarantee you, if the Redskins had won the game, that’s all you would be seeing on the media today. I guarantee you. You can’t find it anywhere. It’s only because I know the Redskins Rule that I was looking this up, and I did see a little blurb in one of the pregame shows before the football game started yesterday. I just saw a tail end of the blurb and I wasn’t sure so I went and looked it up, and that is what it is.
….
This is Paul Bedard in the Washington Examiner. “Romney Winning Independents 59%-35%.” That is 24 points. Twenty-four points, Romney up independents! Folks, we’re talking major landslide if that’s true, and yet it’s a CNN poll that shows Democrats plus 11 and the race tied at 49-49. NBC/Wall Street Journal final national poll: Obama 48, Romney 47. Romney leads independents by seven. The sample is Democrat plus two.
Rush Limbaugh’s point was that if we don’t consider the polls or the early voting preferences gathered from them, Mitt Romney is heading for a landslide. Spin doesn’t get much more desperate that what Limbaugh put out there today.
Limbaugh went on a long winded quest to try to explain why every single state poll is wrong and biased. He rambled on about skewed polls towards Democrats, and how the electorate tomorrow is going to look like 2010, and how Romney is going to win Ohio because they elected Kasich governor in 2010. Limbaugh’s most reliable piece of “data” was the result of the Redskins game.
The right still isn’t willing to accept the reality that Mitt Romney is an 85% underdog to win tomorrow. There is going to be no Romney landslide. Rush Limbaugh is still feeding his listeners the Kool-Aid, and reaffirming their allergy to facts by claiming that all of the data that has been collected is wrong. In Limbaugh land, there are really a lot more Republicans than Democrats in the country, and they are going to carry Mitt Romney to a landslide victory. Richard Nixon’s silent majority has been replaced by Mitt Romney’s invisible one.
According to Rush Limbaugh, if we ignore facts, reality, data, and how voters tell us that they voted/plan on voting, Romney is lock for the White House. If people didn’t actually vote to determine the next president, Romney would be a shoo-in.
Republican rejection of reality is nothing new. If President Obama wins reelection, the nation should prepare for an meltdown of epic proportions from the right. After all, these people still think that Mitt Romney is going win in a landslide, so if Obama wins, reality is about to give them a punch in the gut should send them reeling for months.
On his radio show today, Rush Limbaugh claimed that any poll that shows Obama leading is an attempt to s ...
After Sandra Fluke made Time's short list for Person of the Year, Rush Limbaugh demanded that he be name ...
Did Hurricane Sandy shift momentum to Obama? From New Hampshire to Colorado, President Obama leads Mitt ...
The new ABC News/Washington Post poll reveals that while President Obama's approval rating jumped to 55% ...
In his desperation to defend Mitt Romney's botched Libya comments, Rush Limbaugh has devised a wild cons ...
LAC
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 3:35 pm
Shorter Limbaugh – “my friends…FART, FART, FART…Romney will win. Time for break while the studio is aired out. KENYAN FAIL!!! FART!!”
Sherry Gorr
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 3:37 pm
Mr. Incoherent transcends himself… If he wants to predict something that has the potential to be accurate, he should say, “Don’t worry – Obama may win, but we’ll be able to steal it easy.”
K from Bellingham
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 3:39 pm
EVERYONE knows the 7-Eleven Big Gulp cup poll trumps the Redskins ;-)
Lori
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 5:03 pm
But, what about the pizza poll?
mjh
Nov. 6th, 2012 at 3:01 pm
That poll favors Herman Cain. :)
.
Papashanz
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 3:42 pm
when is this guy gonna be kicked off the air this guy is just so wrong in everything thats comes out of his mouth
Goddess1871
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 3:48 pm
All I had to read was “Wikipedia” and it was over. Honestly.
D Seltzer
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 3:53 pm
You get what you pay for!
Stojef
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:00 pm
The electorate is NOT going to look like 2010 because when some fair-minded people voted in the Teabaggers, they had no idea they were getting some far-right, racist, Christofacist, homophobic, misogynist nut jobs. Teabaggers promised jobs and the first thing they ALL did when they took office was swing the Republican party to the far right on social issues. I’m betting most people weren’t counting on that.
Carlos
Nov. 6th, 2012 at 8:31 pm
Yes, but the’ll vote the same A-holes back in today.
rob follett
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:09 pm
Yeah, that whole pesky voter thing..
WTF1113
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:11 pm
“I’ve been trying to separate feelings from thoughts and come up with some sort of an educated prognostication.” But that made Rush’s head hurt, so he snorted some Oxy and then verbally vomited the rest of this pile of nonsense.
Dallas powers
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:16 pm
I’m going to laugh when Romney really does win by a landslide tomorrow
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:39 pm
Laugh right up till you have to pay for a far larger military and the war in Iran he has promised Israel
Laugh when the wife or daughter loses her birth control.
Laugh I tell you, laugh
common sense
Nov. 6th, 2012 at 7:22 am
the health department has given free birth control for decades.
WTF1113
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:48 pm
You must be Rush’s Oxy dealer. You ever hear the phrase “Don’t get high off your own supply”?
Paul B
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:19 pm
It has nothing to do with the “Redskins Rule” if you heard Rush today. The fact is that in the polls there are more Dems polled then Republican’s. So how can you get a “true” and “honest” poll if you ask more of one party then another? Think about it….. If you asked a 50 – 50 of each you would see Romney up by 7% points. FACT…
WTF1113
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 5:05 pm
Paul – you get a “true” and “honest” poll by weighting the poll based on the demographics. If there are more respondents from one political party than the other, you give the lesser party more percentage points accordingly. Seriously, you’d think you GOPers never bother to learn how the world works.
Anon
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 5:56 pm
They are too busy making tinfoil hats to do that.
Eileen
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 5:33 pm
Inconvenient fact: there ARE more Democrats than Republicans. Do you think that could account for more of them being polled? That’s the way it works on my planet, anyway.
singhx
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 10:30 pm
…”If you asked a 50 – 50 of each you would see Romney up by 7% points. FACT..”
As the warrior “Warf” always said, “It is a good day to die…” Dream on Klingon, dream on…
Jose Martinez MSQR
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:31 pm
As a concerned member of society I am seriously worried for the mental well-being of the Romney 47%. Not the 47% he villified, but the 47% that wll probably vote for him.
The ‘true believers’ have so deluded themselves that Romney will win; they will be ill-prepared for the collapse of their house built on sand.
Please do not gloat, tease, or make sudden movements, when interacting with the holier-than-thou losers.
Paul B
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:40 pm
I guess we will see tomorrow whos house of “Sand” will fall. I am not gloating but just stating fact. Look at the polls. All the polls ask more Dems then Rep. on the major networks. FAIR, REALLY. Try getting the real facts!!!
KaraK
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 7:43 pm
OHHH the REAL FACTS.
LOL. Get help. Seriously.
MATH fool. More Dems than Reps.
auxhead
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:36 pm
Rush Limbaugh is a carbuncle on the butt of society!
SpiritOnParole
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:44 pm
“Limbaugh’s most reliable piece of “data” was the result of the Redskins game.” I thought they didn’t believe in hoodoo, hokum and magic?
Paul B
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:56 pm
If you read only the quote from Rush yes it looks like that is what he is refering to, but if you listen he was mocking the left saying that if they, the Redskins, had won they would have been all over this like a “Fly on Sh*t”. Just get your head out of the sand and look around unless you are getting too many things for “Free” from the government then I do understand your point… I can not wait to keep paying for you. Hopfully you can sense my sarcasm. Enjoy the life that the rest of us who pay taxes provide for you.
Rob M
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 6:24 pm
i love this continued fall-back position Repubs have about how they are paying taxes to support us “lazy-dems”.
Fact: I am a Democrat. Proud of it. I also have a take home income of roughly $150K per year. The difference between myself and Republicans like yourself is that I believe this country exists to benefit everyone. You believe this country exists to benefit you, and you only. I pay taxes, just like you. I work and raise my family and vote, just like you. If anyone needs to “get their head out of the sand” it’s you, Sir. Because if your illustrious leader takes office, unless you make $200K plus a year, you’re screwed like everyone else.
You believe Mitt will win and do the country right? just ask the citizens of Mass. how that worked out for them.
Fact: Romney vetoed over 800 bills while Governor. All of them were overturned.
Fact: Romney led Mass. into financial ruin, and left the state with a huge deficit.
Fact: Mass. had the lowest private sector job growth in America during his term. the also had some of the highest tax increases.
Facts hurt, huh?
KaraK
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 7:46 pm
To be fair, chances are the conservative you’re talking to doesn’t really pay taxes, is on food stamps and maybe welfare. Food stamps used more in republican counties and red states. So you paid for him and now he’s running around trying to ruin your life. Good deeds don’t go unpunished!
mathazar
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 11:56 pm
Cheers. Hate to be a stickler, but it wasn’t all 800 bills, just 707, and Massachusetts wasn’t last in job creation, only 47th.
Your point stands.
A Walkaway
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 7:04 pm
Yeah, you fucking jerk, and you’d probably refuse to hire someone who is disabled, then turn around and tell them “Get a JOB!”
That’s what I’ve learned is the standard MO of someone like you.
The funny thing is when YOUR health fails, then suddenly it’s all different.
Take it from me, it’s not. If your health fails, suddenly you will become the “lazy bum who needs to get a job”. Blind, selfish, cruel, hypocritical Republican fools!
greg
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 4:47 pm
That’s OK. Rush is right, Romney will win in a landslide, so you don’t need to go out and vote for him. LoL.
Seriously, how dumb is this guy?
Although he may be smarter than we realize. If Obama wins, he will continue to draw the angry white-man listener. If Romney wins, those people will stop listening to him.
mjh
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 5:15 pm
“I’ve been trying to separate feelings from thoughts . . .”
And you’ve succeeded, Limpballs; you’ve been separating your listeners thoughts from reality for over twenty years . . .
.
Anon
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 5:52 pm
It makes me really sad and disappointed in our country that nearly half of us actually believe that Willard Romney is a viable candidate.
PolitiPorn
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 6:22 pm
He said the same thing in 2008:
www.newsmax.com/InsideCov...
David
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 6:52 pm
Limbaugh was caught an illegal prescription of Viagra on his way back from the Dominican Republic. Prostitution is legal in the Dominican Republic. Connect the dots…
Curtis
Nov. 7th, 2012 at 5:29 pm
Not accusing him of anything (unlike Lush’s way of doing things), but the UN also rankes the Dominican Republic as the second worst (behind Rio de Janiero) for child prostitutes!
Rathia
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 7:00 pm
“Well…Y’know Romney’s got some plans. I’d still like to see…Really…What some of his ideas are out there.”
“Changes, lotsa changes!”
“I don’t know what he’s wantin’a change, y’know…Everyyyy…President I know says alot of stuff but it never follows through. So I don’t know.”
So your ace in the hole is a guy who:
Divulges nothing about how he plans to fix things…
Will presumably change things with as much precision as potentially deciding that the ideal density of raisins in muffins should now be a quarter gram.
And may not even be telling the whole truth according to you because no electoral candidate has actually convinced you that they are worthy of support, trust, nevermind getting elected.
Meanwhile, his most avid supporter short of the Fox Network is a Christian radio-show host who makes voodoo predictions on the internets about magical landslide election wins.
BUT ALL QUAKE IN FEAR AT THE MUSLIM ATHEIST HARBINGER OF DOOM!
evette
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 7:05 pm
Actually everybody if you wanted to be idiotic enough to use football to predict the election here’s another way to define it: starting in 1952 it went lose’ win 6 times then there was 2 losses and 2 wins, then it’s gone lose, win 5 times with the next one to be a you guessed a win for the incumbent. So see you can look at any silly data and find a way to make it read the way you want it to. If you don’t believe me go to wikpedia (chuckle) and look at the chart. So thank you Rush you’ve just predicted a win for Obama NOT Romney. HA HA HA
evette
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 7:14 pm
Just to clarify I am not using the Redskins winning or losing record-I only used the column that dealt with only the elections. If Rush can use football statistics then I can play the odds-right?
Mark
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 8:14 pm
Of course he would claim that. Republican’ts are doing everything to keep people FROM voting and steal the election, so as far as they are concerned, the whole voting part of the election is irrelevant.
Jill
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 8:33 pm
Keep an eye and an ear on Rush. And learn his distinction between gab and real points. Lot of responses to this – yet none cite facts about the problems with Obama’s problems. Bunch of hot air and rubbish. Wise up kids.
mjh
Nov. 6th, 2012 at 3:34 am
“And learn his distinction between gab and real points.”
The distinction is already clear:
- gab is whenever Limpballs opens his mouth
- real points are what sane, non-oxy abusers use
.
UncaJoe
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 10:59 pm
It’ll all come down to who do you trust more, Rush Limbaugh or Honey Boo-Boo?
1voice1vote
Nov. 5th, 2012 at 11:41 pm
Lindsey whipsaws Limbaugh’s Wednesday lineup of conspiracy theories
“If we lose this election there is only one explanation — demographics. … If I hear anybody say it was because Romney wasn’t conservative enough I’m going to go nuts. We’re not losing 95 percent of African-Americans and two-thirds of Hispanics and voters under 30 because we’re not being hard-ass enough,” – Senator Lindsey Graham (Pssst, Senator, women; you overlooked women.)
The great divide – put the sore in loser, billionaires/Republicans
Gary Vaughn
Nov. 6th, 2012 at 12:20 am
An educated prognostication from a dropout, man you got to love his stupidity.
julia patterson-massey
Nov. 6th, 2012 at 12:39 am
rush limbaugh is an idiot
mjh
Nov. 6th, 2012 at 11:56 pm
The only landslide Limpballs can predict is the one that occurs when he gets up from his chair . . .
.
John
Nov. 7th, 2012 at 8:06 am
LOL. Limbaugh says the “internals” are confusing, so a football game is the deciding factor. Of course the internals are confusing to an idiot like gasbags. He should just start gutting pidgeon’s on his show to tell the future–or why not save the birds and gut himself.