Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Rush Limbaugh Thinks Obama Is Going To Kill Bob Woodward With a Death Panel
Never one to let facts or reality get in the way, Rush Limbaugh is claiming that Obama is going to kill Bob Woodward with a death panel.
Here is partial audio from Media Matters:
LIMBAUGH: I don’t know, folks. I don’t know. I’m just not sure that what we’re dealing with here is a “you’re gonna have a dead horse in your bed tomorrow morning” kind of threat. I don’t think that’s what we’re dealing with. I do think the White House is gonna take care of Woodward with a death panel down the road. That’s how they’re gonna deal with this. We’ll never know. Woodward’s gonna get sick and the death panel will come in there and that will be that.
death panel, just handle that with death panel. So, you know, you can go either way on this. And, by the way, I do not doubt that the White House has threatened reporters. I don’t doubt that. I think one of the most prescient things that Woodward said was in explaining — and he thinks he was threatened. And Lanny Davis is raising his hand (paraphrasing), “Hey, was I threatened, too, and I have ‘poof.’ I have ‘poof’ that I was threatened.” And then Robert B. Reichhhhhhhhhh is saying (paraphrasing), “If they were threatened, it’s outrageous.”
…
I’ve read Sperling’s e-mail. That’s the e-mail that contains the “you’ll regret this.” And the way I read it, Sperling is telling Woodward you’re gonna regret this ’cause you’re wrong. You’re gonna regret it as a journalist. But Woodward is taking it as a threat, so that’s how we’re gonna deal with it. Well, “you’ll regret this” in “Chicagospeak” means that you’re gonna have a dead horse bleeding in your bed tomorrow morning or some morning, that’s “Chicagospeak.” But Sperling… I don’t know. Look, the conventional wisdom is that it’s a threat. That’s what everybody’s going with. To me, here’s the story.This is the story to me. Who is Woodward? Woodward is the reason that 99% of these so-called journalists got into the business. And they are throwing him overboard in favor of Obama. That’s the story. The guy who is the Walter Cronkite today. In the journalist circles, Woodward is it. Woodward, Bernstein are the reason people — Woodward primarily, are the reason people went into journalism. That and 60 Minutes. ‘Cause 60 Minutes you got to destroy people while on TV. But Woodward, he destroyed a president. That’s another reason to go into journalism. And they’re throwing him overboard.
I mean, for the most part, the Drive-Bys are siding with Obama. They’re siding with the White House. That, to me, is the big story out of all this. So that’s the umbrella. There’s a lot of stuff underneath that that we’ll get to on today’s program.
Now keep in mind, I’m not sure that Woodward was actually threatened, but he thinks he was, and that’s what counts. If he was offended, that’s all that matters. We’ve learned that.
He thinks he was threatened, and that’s the key, and he’s telling everybody he was. Lanny Davis has proof that he was threatened. I don’t doubt the White House did it. I mean, that’s how this type of president and regime operates. I have no doubt they threaten reporters every day.
Except for the pillars of the right wing Obama hate media (Limbaugh, Beck, Breitbart, and Drudge) the rest of the media has abandoned Woodward’s threat story. The only people who see a threat in that email exchange are those who make their money by pushing anti-Obama rhetoric. Limbaugh doesn’t care if it is true or not. He is going use Woodward’s story to spin the tale of Obama the evil dictator in order to give his audience what they want.
Here is what is really going on here. Bob Woodward saw some easy money to be made by pandering to rubes on the right, so he concocted the email threat that never was. Woodward soon ran it into a problem though, because it turns out that most of the con men/women who get rich by separating conservative fools from their money didn’t appreciate him muscling in on their turf.
The only outlets still running with Woodward’s version of the story are the people who see a chance use Woodward’s tall tale to fuel their own anti-Obama fantasies.
I do think that Rush Limbaugh might actually be on to something. Since neither one of them exist, a death panel would be the perfect fate for Woodward and his imaginary threat.
Bob Woodward has again changed his story on the "threatening" White House email. On "Face The Nation", W ...
Bob Woodward outed himself as a right wing shill by going on Sean Hannity's show and praising Hannity fo ...
In Pittsburgh, PA yesterday Vice President Joe Biden put to bed once and for all the rumor started by Bo ...
Many people smelled a rat when Rush Limbaugh gushed praise at Obama for the killing of Bin Laden, and th ...
President Obama knows a mandate when he gets one. He's not taking the Republicans' obstruction laying do ...
RMuse
Feb. 28th, 2013 at 5:16 pm
Limbaugh never ceases to amaze, but apparently he has to feed his declining audience something conspiratorial. As for Woodward, he lost credibility and it’s too bad, he was a fairly respected journalist; it’s going to be exceedingly difficult to ever take him serious on any level.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 28th, 2013 at 5:30 pm
Here is the threatning email the right is going ballistic over.We report you decide
From Gene Sperling to Bob Woodward on Feb. 22, 2013
Bob:
I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. My bad. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here.
But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim. The idea that the sequester was to force both sides to go back to try at a big or grand barain with a mix of entitlements and revenues (even if there were serious disagreements on composition) was part of the DNA of the thing from the start. It was an accepted part of the understanding — from the start. Really. It was assumed by the Rs on the Supercommittee that came right after: it was assumed in the November-December 2012 negotiations. There may have been big disagreements over rates and ratios — but that it was supposed to be replaced by entitlements and revenues of some form is not controversial. (Indeed, the discretionary savings amount from the Boehner-Obama negotiations were locked in in BCA: the sequester was just designed to force all back to table on entitlements and revenues.)
I agree there are more than one side to our first disagreement, but again think this latter issue is diffferent. Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice. Your call obviously.
My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize.
Gene
From Woodward to Sperling on Feb. 23, 2013
Gene: You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice. I am listening. I know you lived all this. My partial advantage is that I talked extensively with all involved. I am traveling and will try to reach you after 3 pm today. Best, Bob
If thats the Chicago way then Chicago has really gone soft
Kevin Shinn
Feb. 28th, 2013 at 5:37 pm
Never forget Woodward is Naval Intelligence.
Reynardine
Feb. 28th, 2013 at 8:28 pm
Is that an oxymoron?
mjh
Mar. 1st, 2013 at 1:08 am
Never forget Woodward is Naval Intelligence.
Is that an oxymoron?
Speaking as a retired USN veteran, I can honestly say . . . yes.
.
Reynardine
Feb. 28th, 2013 at 6:12 pm
See here, Rush, it was the Neapolitans who did that, and the President is only chocolate and vanilla.
labman57
Feb. 28th, 2013 at 11:46 pm
Woodward yells “Fire!” and complains about an inferno — alas, it was all smoke and mirrors.
Of course, bombastic blowhards such as Limbaugh have never allowed reality to undermine their hyperbolic rhetoric.
majii
Mar. 1st, 2013 at 12:50 am
Recent developments include~
*Politico reports that Woodward says the WH threatened him
*RW media outlets blow the claim up and promote it heavily
*RWers like Erickson, Hume, and others read the emails that were exchanged and conclude that there was no threat
*Woodward says that he never used the word “threat”
* Politico closes with saying Woodward never used the word “threat
www.politico.com/blogs/me...
Bottom line–Somebody’s lying, and I don’t believe it’s Gene Sperling.
mjh
Mar. 1st, 2013 at 1:28 am
OK, let’s review . . .
Recently, Rush Limpballs has claimed the following:
- that environmentalists are coming to steal our electricity
- that President Obama is cheating on his wife
- that Sarah Palin wasn’t wrong — about anything
- and that he was “ashamed” of America
Adding all that to this latest claim, I can only conclude that either 1) Limpballs has to make more and more outrageous claims in order to maintain his shrinking audience, or 2) he simply go a hold of some bad oxy — or 3) both . . .
.
PSzymeczek
Mar. 1st, 2013 at 11:47 am
mjh, I’m going with “Both.”
Sherlock
Mar. 1st, 2013 at 11:39 am
I read the emails between Woodward and Sperling– if Woodward considers that communication a “threat” he is a bigger wimp than Hannity or Limbaugh. Maybe he should hire Maddow as a bodyguard to protect him from the big bad White House.
All Republicans are EVIL.
LookingForward
Mar. 1st, 2013 at 8:42 pm
Oh please……the Walrus carefully crafted his words to refer to our president as a Regime and his Drive byes……he has some loyal sheep, and he knows exactly what to feed them!