Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Since the Sandy Hook Shooting the NRA Has Shown Nothing but Cowardice
One of the traits that separate human beings from machines is a conscious mental reaction such as anger or fear that is subjectively experienced as a strong feeling directed toward a specific object or an event. An emotion nearly every human being has felt is guilt when they believe they have violated some societal standard, and it is intricately tied to culpability that describes the degree of one’s blameworthiness in the commission of an offense. The failure to face up to one’s guilt is cowardice driven by a person’s excessive self-concern that overrides what is socially deemed as right, and cowards fail to demonstrate mental robustness and courage in the face of a challenge. There have been a plethora of emotional responses ranging from blame to open rejoicing in the wake of the massacre of 20 innocent children and 6 adults in Connecticut last Friday, but the people most responsible for the firearms that contributed to the tragedy have shown nothing but cowardice.
Most Americans were saddened beyond description at the news a gunman forced his way into Sandy Hook Elementary School and opened fire on 6-7 year old children and school employees that has given way to sheer outrage that another mass shooting occurred. In a show of respect for the victims and their families, the day of the atrocity was set aside to grieve and support the devastated parents and loved-ones left behind after their worlds were torn asunder in a senseless act of gun violence, but most Americans recognize that now, the time to demand America join the civilized world and put an end to the blatant proliferation of guns cannot wait another day. Many gun enthusiasts quickly reverted to their normal response when mass shootings occur, and promptly informed the nation that raw emotion was not conducive to intelligent discourse about gun control, or that more guns in the population was the proper response to another tragedy. However, it is hypocritical for gun advocates to assail emotional responses when emotion is the National Rifle Association’s favorite ploy to encourage its members to stockpile guns and ammunition.
The argument that after a national tragedy is not the time for discourse and action belies the nation’s response to the terror attacks of 9/11 when the government and nation was consumed with preventing terrorism. The only reasonable conservative in America, David Frum, said “if discussing gun control insults the victims’ memories, then after 911 was not the time to talk about terrorism, or after the Titanic disaster was not the time to talk about lifeboats” was prescient, but one group has been conspicuously silent after the horrific Connecticut massacre. Shortly after news of the shooting broke, the NRA’s Twitter account went silent and their Facebook page went offline. One theory is that many of its fans were openly rejoicing that the shooting proved bans on guns in schools does not work, but it is more likely even NRA leadership is guilty for their culpability in the proliferation of guns in America; particularly battlefield weapons whose only function is stalking and killing human beings.
The only statement by the NRA in the direct aftermath that proves they are clueless and that the nation felt they were culpable was a Twitter remark that “Until the facts are thoroughly known, NRA will not have any comment.” The facts were thoroughly known immediately. A man shot his gun enthusiast mother in the face with her own gun, and then drove to the elementary school, shot his way into the school, and murdered six adults protecting their students and then murdered twenty 6 and 7 year old children to death before turning the weapon on himself. The professional gun lobbyist, racist fear-monger, and leader of the NRA, Wayne La Pierre, is never at a loss for words, or millions-of-gun lobby dollars to promote arming the entire nation, but he has been silent in the aftermath of his handiwork and it is because he is a coward. La Pierre is not the only culpable coward to avoid answering for their part in the tragedy because invitations to 31 pro-gun Senators to appear on Meet the Press went unanswered out of fear of facing questions about their support and allegiance to La Pierre and his gun lobby money.
La Pierre has been instrumental in frightening gun enthusiasts by warning them President Obama did not take away guns during his first term because he was secretly planning to take them away during his second term. La Pierre has promoted the idea the President had designs on the 2nd Amendment all along, and he claimed on the Glenn Beck show less than two weeks ago that, “The media in this country hates the Second Amendment rights of American citizens and they’ll do anything to try and take that freedom away from average citizens.” His tactic to bolster gun sales was claiming “the media will team up with the Obama Administration to carry out a siege on the Second Amendment in this country like we’ve never seen before.” His ploy thus far has worked out well for the gun industry because before and after the election gun sales went through the roof as nervous gun fanatics flocked to stock up on firearms and ammunition ahead of what La Pierre has been warning about for over five years; a second Obama term. He has not uttered a word since the tragedy in Connecticut, but some of his gun rights acolytes have spoken volumes.
Fanatical evangelical preacher and Fox News personality Mike Huckabee said the massacre was retaliation by god for “kicking him out of public schools and the public square,” and that gun control would not have changed the tragic outcome. Texas congressman and perennial nutjob Louie Gohmert repeated what many NRA members and Republicans believe that if the Sandy Hook Elementary School principal kept a gun in her office, the shooting would have had a far less tragic result. “I wish to God she had had an M4 rifle in her office locked up and so when she heard gunshots… she takes his head off before he can hurt those kids,” and his sentiment was echoed by another evangelical nutjob, Bryan Fischer, who remarked on Friday that, “Shooters attack an elementary school in CT. – another “gun-free zone.” Makes children sitting ducks.” The insane idea that more guns equals less carnage is an oft-repeated notion that inspired Texas Republicans to push for guns in classrooms, and the evening before the Connecticut massacre Michigan Republicans passed a bill to allow concealed weapons in schools, churches, bars, and other public venues. They have all been silent since the latest in a string of mass shootings that will continue unabated until the people of the nation say enough.
Americans are finally saying enough, and they are not showing cowardice like the NRA and their paid legislators in the Republican Party. There are many, many Americans who feel guilty they have not spoken out sooner about gun control, but after seven mass shootings within a year, the people cannot be silent any longer. It remains to be seen if there will be repercussions for the NRA and the gun lobby for promoting a Wild West mentality in 21st century America, or if La Pierre and his sycophants will break their silence and take responsibility for their part in these horrific tragedies. Americans can only hope the mood of the nation, and legislators, remains repulsed at the degradation of civilized society because the cowards calling for more guns will not stay silent for long and with their gun lobby money, will not rest until there is war in the streets, shopping malls, theatres, and schools that appears to be the NRA and god-fearing evangelicals end game, and the end of America as a civilization.
Every society develops characteristic features based on values, accepted social practices, and patterns ...
It is natural for people to involuntarily react to repulsive stimulus, but it is also natural to revert ...
NRA Elementary School Armed Guards When human beings have a conscience and nominal ethics, they feel gu ...
After a horrific shooting at a Connecticut elementary school has killed at least 26 adults and children, ...
Ann Coulter suggested to Sean Hannity that the Sandy Hook school shooting would have been prevented if t ...
Otto
Dec. 17th, 2012 at 9:44 pm
No surprise here… It’s typically the biggest cowards who feel the need to keep guns around!
Anne
Dec. 17th, 2012 at 10:22 pm
They are silent mainly because they have no defense, especially because so many of the victims were very young children. They cannot publicly defend their stance without looking and sounding like a bunch of heartless ghouls who seemingly care more about their “gun rights” than human life. They have used their political power to thwart politicians who advocate sensible gun control laws, and are responsible for the Stand Your Ground law, which has been repeatedly abused by murderers trying to defend the indefensible. They are cowards in every sense of the word, because they lack the moral courage to admit that they are a big part of the problem. What also makes them cowardly is their cynical exploitation of gullible souls who are easily frightened out of their wits at the prospect of losing their guns. They are a bunch of sorry excuses for human beings.
Reynardine
Dec. 17th, 2012 at 10:26 pm
I daresay they realize that anything they say now is likely to be the wrong thing. They call it prudence.
Nathan
Dec. 17th, 2012 at 10:46 pm
Typical american ignorance blame the gun not the people responsible…
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 17th, 2012 at 10:50 pm
Reading problems? Or in such a hurry to defend guns that you have no idea whats being talked about?
Nathan
Dec. 17th, 2012 at 11:40 pm
No not defending guns just looking at the problem being more of a social issue not cause guns did it…
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 12:34 am
Yes, the more I think about it the more I think you are right. He could have used a riding lawn mower instead of guns
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 1:34 am
Yes he chose to use a gun free will not the guns fault societies fault. If the media didn’t glorify these people I think that there might be less of this kind of behavior. So I blame society for this not guns…
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 12:07 am
There is no excuse for the murder of innocent women and children. The NRA are only worried about the gun manufacturers who line there pockets but don’t blame guns blame who is responsible. Guns didn’t kill anyone a persons actions did.
MrsGunka
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 12:42 am
The kid did not walk into that school with a BB gun fearing he would put someone’s eye out! He picked a gun that would do the most damage as quickly as possible after he had shot his mother 4 times to the head. Over-kill!….by a person!
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 12:58 am
That’s right a person and his actions caused the death of those people…
Sandra
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 2:43 pm
A person picked up those guns and killed twenty innocent children and six teachers trying to denfend those children. If guns were not available, these deaths would not have ocurred. A gun is a weapon used by man humans to kill their fellow humans and animals, sometimes wantonly. No matter how you play it, gun are weapons, deadly weapons that cause destruction, death, pain and suffering.
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 12:39 am
Make a believer out of me tell me why you think getting rid of guns is going to solve the problem. Those people who do the mass shootings will just build bombs and why not they seem to be easy to make. The problem is deeper than guns people and I for one am tired of arguing about it. So make me a believer… Please…
Rob
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 7:42 am
Just last week some nut job went berserk in an elementary school in China and attacked 23 children with a knife. Not one of those children died. I’ll contrast that for you with the story of a nut job that walked into an elementary school in CT and killed 20 children and six adults, he walked into the school with an assault rifle and enough ammo to wipe out the whole school. I think not having the assault rifles or guns would have made a difference, don’t you think Nathan?
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 1:17 pm
I would be afraid to find out what else they would use if they were to ban firearms IED maybe the problem is not the guns its the people I wish you guys could just see that I can’t believe this country would be so willing to take the easy way out and ban guns instead of resolving the root of the problem…
Sandra
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 2:50 pm
We’re talking about assault rifles and magazines that hold too many bullets which is causing the most devastation, not pistols or hunting rifles. And yes, there ought to be regulations and a waiting period to review the history of buyers to prevent people with a mental/psychiatric disorder/illness and criminal history from obtaining guns. Tax the damm bullets already.
Inez
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 9:52 pm
It seems that the perps all commit suicide with their weapons after the fact. Maybe without a gun available they would hang themselves,use their car’s tailpipe, or injest a way out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 1:31 pm
Finding out why these people are doing such things is the should be our goal as a society NOT BANNING FIREARMS
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 1:32 pm
Finding out why these people are doing such things should be our goal as a society NOT BANNING FIREARMS
Southwind
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 1:41 pm
Gun laws in CT. are tight, didn’t help. Mental illness, over prescribed RX’s, and a total lack of respect for other humans is what is causing these problems. This is what happens when the liberal mentality took control of this country. For mass killers looking for their 15 minutes of fame, they will find a way, with or without guns. May God bless the families of this horrible crime. (By the way, is God spoken here?)
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 2:48 pm
I’m sorry, but this has nothing to do with the liberal mentality. It’s not the liberal mentality that made this guy pick up a weapon that can kill 27 people in a matter of a couple of seconds.
Anybody who blames things on a liberal mentality shouldn’t be asking if God speaks here.
AntiCitizenOne
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 2:12 pm
To all antigunners:
www.ipsc.org/ipsc/regions...
This is a list of all non-US countries that participate in the International Practical Shooting Confederation. Some of these countries allow their participants to use these dreaded “assault weapons” in these competitions which are just semi-automatic handguns and rifles that have pistol grips, large magazines, etc. There’s not much keeping these competitors from turning their guns on one another at matches, let alone sneaking off the range and turning their guns on innocent people. Yet when is the last time you heard of one of these competitors going off on a shooting rampage?
You speak favorably of countries outside the US with stricter gun laws, but how are you missing these? Some of these countries have lower crime rates, lower gun death rates, etc.
It is the person, not the weapon, that is the issue. What is it in the mindset of these competitors that keeps them from going nuts? That is a question for everyone to answer over the next year.
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 2:47 pm
And what you are missing is the fact that these other countries are not embedded in a gun culture. How stupid is it to suggest that people who are in a shooting organization would turn their guns on each other?
None of the other countries walk around bragging about the right to own weapons. You are right it’s the person not the weapon, except for the fact that we’re about to limit the number of people you can kill per second. I’m sure that’s going to hurt you but you’ll get over it
Sandra
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 2:57 pm
True Shiva, here in Canada, we don’t have a right to own gun(s) written in our Constitution so we don’t have that fixation on guns that the Americans do. I sometimes think some Americans worship their gun more than the god they profess to love and worhip. I don’t understand why Americans are allowed to walk around in public with one or more guns strapped to their body. It boggles the mind but then I’m Canadian and our laws forbid that kind of action/behaviour including walking/driving around with concealed weapons.
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 3:05 pm
many of our so-called gun nuts are fierce Christians of the fundamentalist persuasion. These people think that owning a gun is just as important as their religion. This is why I do not think you can compare America to any other countries gun laws on Earth. Most of the other countries have a society that is old enough that it’s well past the need to have a gun stuck in their pants.
I know that a tremendous amount of people in Canada are hunters, and like many people in America think that owning a gun is second nature and use it as a device to fulfill their enjoyment of hunting and also to put food on the table. These type of people are not the kind of people we call gun nuts.
I understand how you feel about people walking around guns strapped to their body, here in America we call that trying to make up for a deficiency in thier genital areas
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 3:09 pm
People its not the guns that are hurting people it is the people. Yes limiting capacity and taking assault weapons out of the picture may detour some but these people will find other ways of implementing there means of terror. So why not try to figure out a way of dealing with the problem from the root, the people, rather than blaming inanimate objects…
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 4:20 pm
And in the meantime taking away the right to kill as many people as possible in seconds.
It IS the guns that are part of it. If a killer has to cock and aim a gun he is going to get laughed at while everyone runs away. If he has a semi auto he can kill them in their seats.
You will get over the loss of your assault rifles
Nathan
Dec. 19th, 2012 at 12:38 am
I have been reading your comments why do you choose to insult people. I served in th US Army for 8 years and qualified expert in both the M 16 and the M 9 I served 3 tours over seas have you ever even fired a weapon who are you to insult people I defended the constitution of the united states and if men want to carry a weapon then so be it your the one with the small genitals…
sandppppr
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 6:59 pm
The assault rifle is a weapon that is very efficient in what it does-wounding and killing people. It is lighter and easier to use than the 30-06 WWII rifle. You can kill someone with a knife, but it is a very inefficient weapon for mass killing. You can try building a small bomb, but most home-made bombs are not very reliable at all. People kill people with guns.
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 6:06 pm
I don’t own a assault rifle I just believe in the rights of descent american citizens…
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 6:16 pm
What did GUNS ever do to you… I think if they used a IED they would probably kill many more…
Juddon
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 7:46 pm
What happened to those children and teachers was truly tragic, it breaks my heart. But it is shortsighted to think that guns need to be outlawed. There are two many instances where guns have saved lives. If that principal had a gun and been trained to use it, the children and the principal would still be alive and Adam would be dead before he could harm anyone else. We live in a evil world and to outlaw guns or make it harder for the public to have access to guns is ridiculous! Criminals DO NOT obey laws and to think that more guns laws are going to change anything is stupid. Evil people have been around since the beginning of time and mass killings have happened plenty of times without guns ie, Timothy McVeigh. Don’t react on emotion alone!
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 7:55 pm
None of us were in those rooms. No one can say that it would have been any different. He had a semi automatic rifle and possibly the drop on everyone. More kids could have been killed as well.
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 9:07 pm
Amazing Im 62 as well. And I have tried to commit hari keri with a few big macs. Now I get sick just driving by a mcdonalds
Jared
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 10:57 pm
Anyone remember a time before M.A.D.D.?? When drinking and driving were a problem because of the high death rate of innocent people involved in accidents that involved drunk drivers? Anyone remember this?? I searched high and low for a law that has outlawed the automobiles, the ones that are to blame for all of those deaths. No ban on cars, but tougher laws were created and are enforced on the people who choose to commit the offense. Although the problem still exists, it is not as bad as it was because people still choose to drink and drive. What about when the automobile was driven through the line of children walking to school, crossing the street at a school cross walk, taking out the crossing guard as well. Did we rise up and fight to make automobiles illegal? Nope, we didn’t go after the D.M.V. or the D.O.T. who are all about expanding roads to make more room to cram more of these weapons out on the streets. Oh wait, that’s right, they accused the operator of that vehicle for the damage that was done. Why is that? You take away one common denominator from both of those weapons and all that you have are a couple of inanimate objects. Neither one of them will harm anyone any more than the person controlling them wants to.
Nathan
Dec. 18th, 2012 at 11:57 pm
Exactly what I have been trying to tell these people but they won’t listen they will just reply negatively instead of listening…
Largo161
Dec. 19th, 2012 at 2:31 pm
People who drive under the influence of alcohol do not purchase their cars with the intention of killing anybody.
Two inanimate objects: One designed for transportation, one designed to kill great numbers of people in a short time.
Accident vs premeditated murder. See the difference?
farkennel
Dec. 19th, 2012 at 3:14 am
The moderator is typical of the anti-gun activist.Attack the person they disagree with personal insults and have NO understanding of the truth.Would you feel better if a semi-automatic sporting rifle or shotgun was used? Would that make them less dead?
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 19th, 2012 at 8:24 am
1st, I am not anti gun.
2nd, the semi auto Bushman can kill more people in a shorter amount of time. They have to go. And they will. Asking would I feel better if a shotgun was used is childish and unnecessary. The truth is no person needs that type of rifle.
3rd, you need to write to your own government not complain here if you are unhappy.
Nathan
Dec. 19th, 2012 at 9:55 am
Its bushmaster learn your firearms sir and quit insulting people coward if you don’t know any thing about firearms maybe you should learn
Anne
Dec. 19th, 2012 at 10:11 am
One of the problems is that there are folks who confuse being pro-gun control with being anti-gun. The fact that there are gun owners who believe just as strongly in gun control is lost on them. They keep bringing up arguments about things that those of us who want gun control not only haven’t said but also don’t even think. Gun control goes beyond simply having laws on the books, because people who own them and act responsibly are also practicing a personal form of gun control. Conducting background checks on folks to ascertain their mental stability as well as lack of criminality is also a part of gun control. As someone who works with a law enforcement agency, I have knowledge about too many incidents in which negligence on the part of some gun owners led to needless deaths, especially those of children. I know of an incident 16 years ago in which a child was killed because her father didn’t secure his gun. Her death also led to the death of her parents’ marriage. So, the destruction that comes from guns in the hands of dangerous folks or simply negligent ones goes way beyond the actual bloodshed. If the murders of all those kids in Connecticut don’t serve as a wakeup call, I don’t know what will.
Cary
Dec. 19th, 2012 at 3:16 pm
I think the issue is this: it seems we are more than willing make our schools look like jails – with bars on the windows, armed guards, metal detectors and the like – in order to protect some others’ “right” to own an automatic weapon capable of so much destruction in such a short amount of time.
To the gun owners out there – keep your 22′s and shotguns, but you can’t convince me that you need such a powerful weapon that can be equipped with such a large clip of ammo. Where are you priorities?