Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Santorum Ignores Economy – Makes his Religion a Problem for Voters
more from Hrafnkell Haraldsson
The media is slowly becoming wise to the fact that Rick Santorum’s campaign is fueled by religion, not the economy. His stance on issues is religious, his rhetoric is religious and his appeal is not to fiscal conservatives but to social conservatives, to those on the religious right who menace our democracy with the specter of theocracy. As Politico observes, “Since winning primaries in Alabama and Mississippi, Santorum’s standard remarks have generally excluded an economic plan — the heart and soul of the message his chief GOP rival, Mitt Romney, repeats at event after event, day after day” and that ”During two events in the Chicago suburbs on Friday and in a handful of Sunday appearances in Louisiana, primarily at churches — Santorum didn’t once mention jobs without being prodded by a questioner.”
I say the media is slowly becoming wise…some are slower than others – for example, Jack Cafferty at CNN who manages to notice that Santorum doesn’t care about the economy but somehow doesn’t notice that his focus is on his own religion instead. Still, he got the question right: is Santorum doing himself in? It is difficult to draw any other conclusion when as of Monday Santorum’s economic stance is this: “I don’t care what the unemployment rate is going to be. It doesn’t matter to me.”
All he wants to talk about (rhapsodize might be a better word) is being a Christian, and he seems particularly to love the fundamentalist meme that Christians are a persecuted minority in this country despite law after religiously-motivated law that prove the opposite is the case. This religious focus is in part proven by the outcome of the Illinois Republican Primary where, despite the fact that a solid 30 percent of the population is Catholic, the religiously driven Santorum lost hugely to the Mormon Mitt Romney, repeating a trend established in Michigan and Ohio. The evidence suggests that while Santorum’s religion sells to the socially conservative base, this base does not include women to judge by his wife’s eagerness to reassure them that her husband loves them (except, apparently, in Alabama), or Catholics, who are gravitating toward Romney or out of the party altogether.
Catholics have noticed, even if the mainstream media is slow to catch on. Interesting how the mainstream media and the Catholic Church have appeared equally clueless. But it’s a studied cluelessness. As Frank Bruni wrote in a Times op-ed the other day, the Church is invested in its own survival and wants to play the victim (as it has even when it’s the persecutor). The mainstream media is more than happy to report on Republican claims of persecution without letting on that it’s the Republicans who are the persecutors.
But even as he complains about the attention he is getting, Santorum keeps doing and saying things to draw attention to his religious focus. You ask, what has he done now? There is the (for him) unwelcome attention drawn attention to his reaction Sunday to a speech by Greenwell Springs Baptist Church pastor Dennis Terry. Speaking in his own church, which happens to be Tony Perkin’s home church, gave voice to fundamentalism’s disenfranchisement of the constructed other. Santorum applauded this speech, which said very clearly, as Right Wing Watch reports that America “was founded as a Christian nation” and those that disagree with him should “get out!”
Watch the video from Right Wing Watch:
I don’t care what the liberals say, I don’t care what the naysayers say, this nation was founded as a Christian nation, the God of Abraham, the God of Issac, and the God of Jacob, there’s only one God. There’s only one God and his name is Jesus.
I’m tired of people telling me that I can’t say those words. I’m tired of people telling us, as Christians, that we can’t voice our beliefs or we can no longer pray in public. Listen to me, if you don’t love America and you don’t like the way we do things, I got one thing to say: Get Out!
There is no possible way to misunderstand these words. There is no other way to interpret applause as anything but approval.
But once the backlash set in, Santorum began to stumble over explanations of his applause and Terry began to claim he was misquoted and his words twisted out of context, without actually telling us what part of his very clearly enunciated (and recorded) words are being misquoted and twisted (as if his words as spoken weren’t twisted enough).
This is what Santorum had to say in his own defense – hardly an improvement on his visible reaction, and again proving his proclivity for dishonesty:
“I didn’t clap when he said that. I do remember him saying that, I said, well, I wasn’t quite sure he was saying it for himself, I wasn’t quite listening to everything to be honest with you. But I wasn’t sure whether he was speaking for himself or speaking generally, but I didn’t clap when he said that because it’s not how I feel.”
“If the question is, do I agree with his statement that America shouldn’t do that? No, if he was speaking for himself he’s obviously allowed to believe what he wants to believe but, obviously I believe in freedom of religion and all religions are welcome and should be. I think I’ve made that pretty clear throughout my campaign that I believe very much in freedom of religion, and folks should be able to worship whoever they want to worship and bring their thoughts in the public square and have at it and give them the opportunity to make their faith claims, and make their claims to reason and any other claims. That’s what America’s all about. As far as I’m concerned they should be here and make their arguments the best they can.”
This is certainly not the message Santorum has repeatedly sent in speech after speech, including his recent faux pas over JFK’s 1960 speech about separation of church and state, which, Santorum said, made him want to vomit.
Which brings us to Pastor Terry’s attempts to extricate himself from the embarrassment of being caught saying exactly what he thinks.
Watch the video from Right Wing Watch:
When this ploy (at least he didn’t use the expression ‘urban legend’) didn’t work, Terry released an exclusive statement to David Brody at CBN and as might be expected, played the ever-popular martyr card, with his persecutors being “Muslims, Hindus, people of different religions or no religions.” Again no surprise, since in his speech he stated that we (Americans) “don’t worship Buddha, we don’t worship Mohammad, we don’t worship Allah!”
Right Wing Watch points out that when Terry quoted himself he left out the crucial first words of his speech, “I don’t care what the liberals say, I don’t care what the naysayers say, this nation was founded as a Christian nation …”
It’s a lot easier to play the victim when you alter the evidence. There is a reason the Nazis tried, belatedly, to destroy evidence of the death camps in 1945. There is a reason President Nixon tried to destroy the evidence of the Watergate break-ins. But as so often happens, Republicans continually fail to understand the nature of modern technology: we can watch and listen to him make his speech any time we want, again, and again, and again. Neither Terry nor Santorum can destroy the tapes.
Terry claims that he loves America. But he doesn’t and his words prove it. As I argued yesterday and have argued on other occasions here, fundamentalists don’t love America; they love a fantasy America that has never existed, an America that is the product of their twisted imaginations. And Tony Perkins, whose Family Research Council is identified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, proudly and unsurprisingly doubled down on Terry’s hateful message, just in case we didn’t understand it the first time, again framing the fundamentalist war on the Constitution in religious, not political terms:
“I think it’s time we made clear that we’re not going to back up, we’re not going to shut up, and we’re not going to give up!”
In fact, Perkins thinks “there is not a better church in the United States of America than right here.”
This is as clear and ringing endorsement of the message of intolerance Christian fundamentalism has been sending since the 1960s. And after Terry’s speech and Santorum’s applause, various news outlets, Politico, The Associated Press and others, had questions for him about the incident. Both HuffPo and the New York Times addressed it, as did the Washington Post, Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC reported it, ABC even picked up on it. Rick Santorum would do well to realize that we are watching and listening to his words and that he won’t be able to hide from them as we approach Election Day 2012. The vitriol he uses to attract the base will splash onto him, and losing to Mitt Romney (as seems ever more likely) might, in the end, be the best thing that ever happened to him.
Photo from the Washington Post
The development of language is regarded as one of the foremost advances in human history, and with the a ...
Rick Santorum fed his Christian base what they love the most when he responded to a New York Times repor ...
With his win in Louisiana tonight, 5 of the top 6 pornography consuming red states that have voted in 20 ...
It's not exactly breaking news to announce that Rick Santorum has made some ridiculous comments about ga ...
Unintentional comedy gold took center stage on Fox News’ Hannity as Sarah Palin gave her expert analysis ...
Reynardine
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 10:15 am
His website (which I did not go to personally, but which was cited by someone over at FSTDT who had the iron organs to go there) has now declared his all-out war against (consenting adult) pornography, which he has declared the greatest threat to our nation, to be already illegal, and to be Barack Obama’s secret agenda against the moral fiber of the nation, which the President is deliberately promoting by diverting the resources needed to fight it to such trivia as national security, crime prevention, education, the environment…etc. I’d call him Sarah Palin with a penis, except that where she actually *is* pornography, I don’t think he could arouse lust in a women’s prison. But, like many others, I wonder what he has in his closet.
Mo
Mar. 23rd, 2012 at 2:01 am
“I’d call him Sarah Palin with a penis, except that where she actually *is* pornography, I don’t think he could arouse lust in a women’s prison.”
WIN.
Johnee
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 10:26 am
Hmmmm. Well, since Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin didn’t worship Jesus, I guess they weren’t Americans either.
I have tried umpteen times to direct many of these dominionist/fundies to books and historical websites that contain the actual quotes of the founders. They won’t do it! They are so secure in their little comfort zone of historical revisionist circle jerking that they don’t dare go outside of it. I believe this denial is partly fear of what they might find. I have had copies of “The Age of Reason” with me but they are almost afraid to crack it open!
Rmuse
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 10:28 am
These fanatics may try that martyr ploy, and Santorum may play Mr. Tolerance, but as you point out; tapes don’t lie. The religion thing is going to hurt Santorum and Romney. Fundamentalists will not countenance a Mormon any more than they would a Muslim.
This religion thing is getting out of hand, but the best part of this piece is that media is finally starting to cover it. Still, where are the acclaimed “good” Christian organizations condemning these freaks? Terry’s sentiment represents a larger segment of the population than people admit.
As an aside, as a confirmed Zen Bodhisattva, in my studies of the Sutras I can say with confidence that Buddhists are forbidden from worshiping any Buddha. Pastor Terry’s ignorance of the Buddhist faith is equal to his ignorance of America’s founding and recorded history. Outstanding work Hraf!
A Walkaway
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 11:43 am
(Laugh!) Very true. They also believe that we (American Indians) worship the earth (mother earth) or nature or idols (and publicly teach their followers so) and that we’re pretty much monolithic in view and practice. There is a chart “comparing religions” that is commonly posted in many churches (the last time I saw it, it was in an Episcopal church) and you should see what it says about Buddhists and anyone NOT Evangelical (and fundamentalist) Christian.
The ignorance is appalling. In our case, it’s partially because we’ve been forced to keep our faiths largely hidden (because people who follow a more traditional way have always been attacked), and because newagers make crazy claims about us “because their spirit guides told them so”. In the case of other religions, it’s partially because the only sources they listen to or read are “Christian” and don’t tell the truth.
Reynardine
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 2:17 pm
Ah, their spirit guides told them! I remember, twenty-four years back, when a “psychic” glowered at me and told me, “My spirit guides tell me you mustn’t [pursue a matter of conscience]“, and I replied, “Well, my spirit guides tell your spirit guides to f- themselves”.
Seriously, though, for us poor Terries to worship Earth makes more sense than most of what we’re told to worship. After all, we can’t leave home without it.
Jo Hargis
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 7:55 pm
If Santorum ever got the nomination, you’d see the media come unglued with the coverage on his weird, obsessive religious ideas, and his sexually repressed homophobic views. I think they leave it alone largely now, because he has no chance of getting the nomination.
That said, I’d just like to point out it’s absolutely NO coincidence that virtually every meeting, stump speech, etc. he holds is at some type of religious outfit.
OKParrothead
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 10:48 am
@Rmuse:
“Still, where are the acclaimed “good” Christian organizations condemning these freaks?”
I wonder that myself. I’m afraid if moderate Christians don’t stand up and denounce these reactionaries, they’ll become the Christian version of the Taliban.
A Walkaway
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 11:58 am
While I understand why the churches in Florida (with some exceptions) don’t condemn people like the Republican candidates (because so many of them have been steeplejacked), at the same time I also ask the same question.
It could be that they HAVE condemned the candidates, but we never hear about it because of the media. The media IS, after all, very conservative and supportive of the dominionists.
Plus there is the separation of church and state issue. Speaking out against the Republican candidates, even if it is to condemn their stances (such as “If you don’t like our religion, you can leave”) is risky for the more liberal churches, while it always seems that the more conservative ones get a pass.
I remember an Episcopal church in California being censored and punished because of a sermon “Jesus debating Kerry and Bush”. It was really not that biased either way, but called both candidates on issues. (I’ve got a copy of it on my hard drive somewhere.)
A Walkaway
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 11:35 am
All Santorum did was repeat what you hear from Dominionists all the time… if you don’t like their way, leave! (And eventually it will be if you don’t like their way, DIE! as they take over country after country.)
I’ve heard that very thing many times, when we used to do the “First Friday” events, I’ve seen the same sentiment on billboards, in stores and “on the sidewalks”, and used to hear it (hushed because they were still cautious) back when I was more conservative. I’ve heard it on the radio: “America, Love it or LEAVE!”, and it’s the basic thinking of most of the “Patriots” who demand that people support their country right or wrong (especially when a nutcase conservative like Bush or Reagan is in control).
Usually the same speaker will then advocate abusing some minority or disenfranchising someone. The “Church Leader” who told me on the last time I was in a “mainstream” (steeplejacked) church that gays should all be stoned to death, also said if people didn’t like America as it was, to leave the country and go live in some communist place (during Bush’s reign). (He was also a big proponent and supporter of war and the military, and at the same time claimed to be a “Good Christian”.)
Johnee
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 1:07 pm
Yeah. What people of other faiths or non-faiths need to do is turn that phrase around on them the next time they grumble and moan about a secular or pluralistic society, actual SCIENCE being taught in school, adults actually ENJOYING that dirty nasty sex, gays walking around actually daring (gasp)to hold hands in the open, etc. We should stand up and say: “THIS is America! If YOU don’t like it, then get out!!
A Walkaway
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 2:03 pm
Correction – what Santorum did was APPLAUD what you hear from Dominionists all the time…
I misread the article and thought it was something Santorum had said himself.
Mea Culpa.
Diane
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 11:46 am
Do evangelicals really really think that rick santorum believes that they are truly ‘christian’?
His Catholicism will not allow him to believe that any other religion except his, is the true religion.
He is using them. He will use them and if elected, he will turn on them. He is a zealot, and he is slightly crazy.
He is hell bent on making this a Catholic country. His zealotry can allow him no other recourse.
All other types of “christians” should be aware if they vote for him. He follows the pope and takes his marching orders from Rome.
Reynardine
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 11:51 am
Maybe, but maybe he’s a steeplejacker. I even knew some real *franquista* diehard Catholics back in the day, and they didn’t talk like this guy.
Reynardine
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 11:48 am
There is no the F way I am going to leave the country I was born in (and my parents, and my paternal grandparents) because these freaks are demanding uniform superstition, and there is no more reason to think we would find any more asylum than we have given to others. What this means is that thosae who happen to be in the increasingly freakish category of American-born but enlightened had better be willing to do what we can to keep these types from getting control, not only in debunking the arguments of the frank Dominionists, but in “outing” the stealth candidates and appointment- seekers, especially for lower-level but crucial positions like school boards. There is a report out now that the propagation of ignorance is threatening our national security; I’ll try to find thecite and post it.
If we lose this one, we’d better prepare for guerra a la cuchilla.
Johnee
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 3:23 pm
This “propagation of ignorance” could very well be damaging to us in many ways including national security. We are the only western country that has a sizable voting bloc of one of our major political parties that literally believes in an alternate reality version of history. These dominionist twits spread outright lies and misinformation faster than a cancer. If people grow up thinking that America was founded as a theocracy, evolution is a made up story, and Jesus actually promoted trickle down economics, those people and the rest of their peers are going to be trying to break through the walls of rationality for years to come. I think their eventual demise is on the horizon, but you’re right, we can’t fall asleep at the wheel.
Elizabeth Nadler
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 11:55 am
I wonder if Santorum or if anyone associated with him have read the Constitution, particularly the Establishment Clause, and if they did read it, why they didn’t understand it. It doesn’t take rocket science. The language is perfectly clear.
Santorum is all about religion and nothing but religion. What is frightening is that he is just as much of an extremist as any terrorist – it’s just that he wants to try to work within the system by becoming POTUS. He figures if he can get it encoded into law, he can make us all Christian. I don’t think he has a snowball’s chance in hell of becoming the Republican candidate, but just the fact that anyone is seriously considering him is enough to make me feel sick.
Jo Hargis
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 8:01 pm
Everyone needs to understand that Santorum is not just “Catholic”. He’s a member of Opus Dei. They promote the taking over of society by USING political office, that is a major tenet of theirs. Check it out on Google, scary stuff. Just one more factoid about Opus Dei: there is a church in Virginia that a lot of politicians who ascribe to these beliefs attend. That’s not a coincidence. This is also why a lot of Santorum’s so-called beliefs don’t jibe with regular mainstream Catholic beliefs.
SinghX
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 2:41 pm
This whole thing should be “tarred and feathered” as a “McCain-Hagee” moment. McCain was forced to quickly dropped Hagee’s support like a hot potato or deal with the radicalism thrust into his campaign…but I doubt if Little Ricky will back down!
What a slimy, self-serving bass’turd he is; “well…I wasn’t quite listening to everything to be honest with you.”
So the “good christian” admits to his inept, shoddy character by not LISTENING to a minister endorsing him?? What an insult! Who else doesn’t he “listen” to; does he only answer to the voices in his head? So, he’s not responsible because he wasn’t listening? La-la-la, I can’t hear you??! He has no character at all to lie and pretend he wasn’t listening and then turn around and say “what he said, yeah…”.
1voice1vote
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 3:19 pm
Tony Perkins says, “there is not a better church in the United States of America than right here.”
“better” classic false-christian sect vs. unchristian sect speak: “Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.”
Downright un-American.
David29073
Mar. 21st, 2012 at 10:28 pm
It took awhile to read all the other information, but the best was the MSNBC bull vomited out by Santorums maggot. The verbal lies and dance this spawn of Judas spit forth to say that it was Tony Perkins Church, not Santorums, that Santorum didn’t stand up and cheer the spewing hatred was infuriating.
The verbal dance by all these Christen fascists in this opera puts the Novel 1984 to shame. The revisionist backtracking by everyone involved, including the hateful preacher is a study in how the GOP is using the media to manipulate the message.
There was this incredible outcry by the Media in 2008 over the Reverend Wrights hate filled sermons on the US. Where is the same outcry here. Wrights comments were carried over and over again, for weeks. This seems to have made a one or two day scream, and then…nothing…no followup. If I didn’t read about all the links here, I would have never seen the letter written.
Santorum is STILL in the race, and won’t leave, hoping to throw a monkey wrench into the convention. He may succeed. It’s gonna get uglier and dirtier as election day gets closer.
I need to take a vacation…off planet!
A Walkaway
Mar. 22nd, 2012 at 12:11 am
One problem I have… Wright was right. Anyone who has studied and researched “race” generally agrees with him and supports what he said. People who ARE a member of a minority often agree with him. He was speaking from the experience of minorities in the US, and his vitriol was and is understandable.
There are different experiences of this country, based upon SES (socioeconomic status) and ethnicity (generally called race). For the poor and “racial” minorities, this country has a lot to answer for and indeed, a lot of us (myself and my wife included) find this place to be a living hell most of the time. (And when we say it’s wrong to discriminate and harm minorities, people tell us to move.)
A lot of people don’t like his words, but most (I’d say all) haven’t lived his life or had the experiences we who have dealt with prejudice have.
SinghX
Mar. 22nd, 2012 at 9:08 am
As stated prior on this site, go back and watch the vid with the sound off; go in about 2:30 and watch the “action”, the hand motions and facial expression of this monster who claims to “preach”; at then end, watch the left hand “salute”…then the camera pans to the side of the stage and there is old Ricky giving the guy a standing ovation like a clappy-happy cultist, smiling, shoulder to shoulder the Perkins (spit!).
His lies appear to sound more and more the message of the “Fureher”. I actually went to youtube and “watch” footage of the 1930′s speeches with subtitles…It was a eerily similar message about the “good Germans’” being a “minority”, “persecuted” “god chosen”…
I have yet to hear one Dem give a speech like the ones that are be given at this kind of rally for any candidate.
A Walkaway
Mar. 22nd, 2012 at 8:18 pm
Damn. I just did that… and got the shivers as it reminded me of Hitler. I think if someone found one of Hitler’s speeches and paralleled it with Terry (and then Highlighted Santorum’s clapping), you’d have something that might even make the fundamentalists think.
I’m not so sure about the full-blown dominionists, however. I’m not sure if anything like that could get through their programming.
Robert
Mar. 23rd, 2012 at 10:22 am
Why isn’t this on the front page of all of the mainstream newspapers? As a non-Christian, this scares the … out of me.