Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
On His Birthday Sarah Palin Sodomizes The Legacy of Ronald Reagan
more from Jason Easley and Sarah Jones
Sarah Palin at Reagan 100 Dinner
This is one event Sarah Palin couldn’t block the press from, the Reagan 100th Birthday Dinner in Santa Barbara, California tonight. She gave the keynote address which was supposed to reflect on Reagan’s October 27, 1964 speech, “Time for Choosing,” a campaign speech for Barry Goldwater, also known as attack the Great Society and big government speech. Palin promised to draw parallels to today while inspiring the Young America’s Foundation to continue the “Reagan revolution.”
Here are a few of the highlights:
She is introduced as a “great leader for liberty and freedom.”
(I would guess some people in Arizona and Alaska would not agree. Palin says Reagan was a western conservative like she is, she considers herself a western conservative in his spirit.)
Palin says Reagan gave his famous speech for Goldwater’s campaign, and it was a call to action against fundamental threat to freedom, given by a former Democrat and union leader. He saw the Great Society as bad. We could choose socialism or freedom, free markets. Not so much of the “chipper Gipper”
Here is what Palin leaves out. Reagan also used the 1964 speech to defend America’s most Socialistic program Social Security, “Yet anytime you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, we are denounced as being against their humanitarian goals. They say we are always “against” things, never “for” anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so. We are for a provision that destitution should not follow unemployment by reason of old age, and to that end we have accepted Social Security as a step toward meeting the problem.” (Unlike Palin and today’s GOP, Ronald Reagan was about more than just say no).
The next Palin blunder was when she claimed that in 1964 Ronald Reagan discussed a choice between the swamp and the stars.
Actually, Reagan was discussing the Vietnam War, and he said, “As for the peace that we would preserve, I wonder who among us would like to approach the wife or mother whose husband or son has died in South Vietnam and ask them if they think this is a peace that should be maintained indefinitely. Do they mean peace, or do they mean we just want to be left in peace? There can be no real peace while one American is dying some place in the world for the rest of us. We are at war with the most dangerous enemy that has ever faced mankind in his long climb from the swamp to the stars, and it has been said if we lose that war, and in doing so lose this way of freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment that those who had the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening.”
He was “mocked and criticized” and he was able to put up with so much. Palin wonders how did he handle it? He handled it like a “duck with the water off its back”. (Obviously Palin is saying she is like Reagan because people hated Reagan and they hate her.)
Cheers for her mention of his election in 1980 and 84. “Bad ideas are never gone for good. (As Palin’s continued presence and celebrity attests to). Folks we have seen big government encroach on us and it was subtle at first and it was couched as compassion.” In 2008 with the financial devastation, she says two years later the left has ruined the country.
Later Sister Sarah started to lapse into things that weren’t in Reagan’s 1964 speech, like “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”
Palin also gave us a fishing analogy since we learned from Sarah Palin’s Alaska that hunting wasn’t her thing. She says that right here in California where farmland lays fallow and lives are destroyed because some faceless Dem took away their lifeline to protect a two-inch fish. “Where I come from, we call that bait. No reason to destroy lives over that bait.”
(I curse you Dem who took away someone’s 2” fish!)
She goes on to say that the outrage came with passage of Obamacare. Liberals stopped at nothing to get it passed, even the Constitution. Last November Americans rose up and fired big government. (Hey, let’s put an end to this meme right now. Republicans did not win the Senate and they’re not in the White House for a reason. America did not fire the government, although some in government have quit on America. Cough.)
Later she totally abandoned Ronald Reagan and went into full 2012 stump speech mode by claiming that the 2010 election were we the people said enough is enough! Less than 90 days after the freedom message was sent! No, we were just told in the State of the Union Address you’re gonna pay for it whether you want to or not! Now it’s much worse, couched in language in American greatness; this is the left’s idea of American exceptionalism. Now we are great by government decree.
She drifted further from Reagan by attacking the stimulus, “Which didn’t stimulate anything but a Tea Party!” Now they’re calling it investing. They have all sorts of half-baked ideas on what to invest – spend- our hard earned money on- solar shingles and fast train tracks. The only things these investments will get us is a “bullet train to bankruptcy.”
Even though his name is on the building, Palin was now ignoring Reagan completely and attacking green energy by saying Green energy? I’m in favor of a sound all of the above approach to energy independence, like the conventional kind we use to fuel our economy, our own oil for one! (Again with the “our own oil”? Someone who inaccurately portrays herself as an energy expert – sitting on the Oil and Gas Commission as the citizen watchdog doesn’t make you an energy expert any more than spending hundreds of millions on a pipeline that isn’t to be — ought to know that our oil is sold on the global market).
She hilariously called Democrats corporatist, and continued to neglect Ronald Reagan by reviving drill baby drill. Purchasing foreign oil, they don’t have America’s best interests at heart! This is insane! They say green energy will save us and they point to Spain. Well, they can’t anymore! (sneer giggle cheer). This is diversion and social engineering. This is not the road to national greatness. It’s crony capitalism on steroids! Corporatists agenda! (Yes, she did just call green energy crony capitalism, because, you know, they get all the subsidies that big oil gets from their friends in government…er….fail.)
Now she’s on taxes: You can’t be for big taxes and still be for the little guy. Big business, big labor, they have seats at the table! But we’re the ones left holding the tab. (What? GOP is party of big business….Big labor? Oh, are they bringing down oil companies or is that Palin who did windfall profit taxes on the oil companies in Alaska which they claimed made Alaska unattractive place to do business. Just saying.)
Bashing the current administration: These unsound policies will end in decline and defeat. We’re in worse shape. We’re not a manufacturing powerhouse. We’re deeply, dangerously in debt (this is too much coming from someone who left Alaska with a 70% debt to GDP ratio and borrowed money from the APF which violated her state’s constitution and took hundreds of millions in earmarks and then didn’t even build the bridge or the pipeline).
Here she goes on jobs, or rather deregulation: We need a strong vibrant America. We need not just jobs but livelihoods. Our loss of manufacturing is not caused by high costs of labor but of regulations and corporate tax rates.
More Palin, no Reagan as she discusses freedom, but later managed to work Reagan’s name in at the end. She said, Do we still believe in the values this country was founded on? God given rights? How we answer will be America’s glory or our shame (I was unaware we could feel shame over our country. Is that legal now?). God doesn’t give us a spirit of fear. He gives us power and confidence. Seek that confidence. Our success lies in the courage and hard work of individuals. We are built on freedom and hard work. It was those values that inspired Ronald Reagan to build the fences on his ranch. They will endure just like our values. We must connect with them. We must be as motivated as our grandparents and our grandparents (sic). They put their faith in god, not government.
Palin then spent the rest of the speech drawing parallels between 1964 and today, while portraying herself as the 21st Century Reagan. She gave us doozies like overlooking parts of American history by claiming that they didn’t need bailouts and they didn’t need stimulus (I don’t know about her grandparents, but many of our grandparents grew up in the Great Depression and they certainly were helped out by Big Government stimulus). They didn’t retreat, they tried again until they succeeded. These are the virtues that are lived by the same great Americans whom are found in uniform, our United States military is a great example of the steel spine and moral courage.
She tried to sell that there will never be another Ronald Reagan, but framed herself as the next Reagan, “There are a lot of people looking around for the next Ronald Reagan but he was one of a kind and you’re not going to find him” (But look at me in red right here and think 2012!). He said “I’m not a great man, I just believe in great ideas.”
She claimed that Reagan would be a Tea Partier,“I think President Reagan would be proud of the conservative movement today…So no, there isn’t one replacement for Reagan but there is a whole army of patriotic Davids ready to stand up to Goliath and say ‘Don’t Tread on Me.’”
This was supposed to be about Reagan’s speech, but it was not about Reagan. This was a 2012 stump speech. She only referred to Reagan’s speech a hand full of times. Her remarks were a garbled mess of half facts, parts of speeches taken out of context and misapplied, and an infomerical for Sarah Palin Version 2012.
Sarah Palin gave a pretty good stump speech tonight, if one doesn’t care about accuracy. She delivered her red meat applause lines with charm and energy, rousing her small audience to loud cheers over and over again. Hopefully Ronald Reagan wasn’t looking down from Heaven and wondering how his legacy got so distorted that it’s being coopted by a person of Palin’s low-information level and her lack of humility and grace.
Tonight Sarah Palin didn’t celebrate the legacy of Ronald Reagan. She sodomized it with a snarl, a wink, and a smile. The greatest disservice of all to Ronald Reagan’s legacy came in the form of having a speaker like Sarah Palin who represents everything Ronald Reagan rejected. Even on a stage designed to honor Reagan, Palin could not contain her urges to appeal to worst in America by hatred and division. Where Reagan saw a shining city on a hill, Palin sees blood libel. The biggest insult to Ronald Reagan tonight was the lack of hope, optimism, and belief in America that Palin expressed.
Sarah Palin, you are no Ronald Reagan.
Here is the video of Ronald Reagan’s 1964 Time to Choose Speech:
While appearing on CNN’s State of the Union, Sen. John McCain continued to carry 2012 water for Sarah Pa ...
In a speech in Anchorage today, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin claimed that Obama is trying to control the American ...
A perfect display of their famous fairness and balance was showcased today on Fox and Friends, when the ...
Sarah Palin’s 2012 strategy has now become so obvious that even the mainstream media can’t miss it. She ...
If you still don’t believe that Sarah Palin is running for president in 2012 it is being reported that P ...
tyler
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 2:20 am
How much did she get paid?
honestyingov
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 2:32 am
I watched the speech on C-Span. The so called ‘ EVENT ‘ was promoted and billed as something special and she would really W o W, the crowd.
These people looked like they turned out for the ‘ early bird special ‘ at some local Dinner Theater to see someone perform. The crowd was not really into her either… at least not based on their energy. There was some ‘ polite applause ‘… but not sure they even bought her BS.
They were around and saw their REAL Ronald Reagan… and this was just some cheap knock-off. NEXT!!!
I wonder if they had to PAY to have their picture taken with her as well…?
majii
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 3:45 am
Palin doesn’t do anything unless she gets paid. The speeches that she delivered for some politicians who were running in the November 2010 elections were paid for by the RNC. Steve Benen at the Washington Monthly reported that when the RNC asked her to speak on behalf of the candidates, she agreed, but for a price which was never disclosed. This woman is trying to trademark her name, and she’s doing it to make even more money!
janie
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 5:55 am
She is an idiot. She just reads something that has been written for her, with no understanding of what she is saying.
gah
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 10:41 pm
Like 0bama?
molinelobo
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 11:59 am
no, Bekka mansour is sarah’s screech writer. Our President collaberates with proffesionals in the field. Bekka just came in from the field.
MichoacanMike
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 12:18 pm
Obama write much of his own speeches…has a law degree, was a law teacher…yes, he’s black and that is why many don’t like him…we have a huge racist population, especially with the undereducated and misinformed…like you! The woman is a complete dumbass!
Reynardine
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 7:45 am
I think all of you are forgetting what a mean, dumb windbag Reagan really was, albeit he read his lines with much more charm. It just shows what a decline has followed that he has started to look good. Ketchup is a vegetable.
Ruffneck
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 8:05 am
Good piece, this one is.
You bash Palin for repeating Regans’s words. In some effort to make her out to be an idiot. Then to justify that stance you continue to bash Regan who up until a few months ago was considered one the more liked recent presidents from both sides of the isle. In the end leading back to the idea that Regan was then again a good president.
I don’t know know if the issue is purely age and experience but this pieces basically calls all in attendance idiots because they apparently didn’t agree with you by result of their applause during the event.
I don’t care if you don’t like the lady, but simply say that you don’t like the lady and keep the article a one liner. The continued attempt to draw four part lines of relation to some questionable piece of a speech is lunacy and hints at pure personal vendetta.
The lady is a political hack, but you don’t have to justify that fact with some illogical rant. All those rants do is call into question why you have some idealistic hate of your own.
english saddle
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 8:28 am
What about she hardly mentioned Reagan’s speech did you miss? Speaking of personal vendettas you sound jealous and as if you have an agenda. You don’t like Palin or Reagan but you think mean author was mean by saying people applauded? Get a grip man. Seriously.
Ruffneck
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 11:07 am
I listened to the clip and put less value in the commentary.
I like to call that, having a grip on reality.
OverMountainMan
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 1:06 pm
That kinda says it all doesn’t it ? What did you hear a loud humming noise ??
Sarah Jones
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 4:28 pm
The clip doesn’t show Palin. It’s Reagan. So much for that reality.
Ruffneck
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 7:37 am
Again, the real clip of the speech, not the commentary.
Wow, this place is full of deranged ignorant political hacks.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 8:40 am
You miss the point, Ruffneck: she didn’t repeat Reagan’s words.
frsbdg
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 11:45 am
I have yet to read a grammatically correct, typographic error-free post from a Palin supporter. Thanks for keeping the streak alive.
omomma
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 11:52 am
R e A g a n.
omomma
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 11:53 am
You misspelled Reagan’s name.
jtl
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 1:02 pm
Who paid her and did Nancy know?…This appears to be a departure from her usual screened crowds..They stage the front to make it look full and enthused ! If people paid to see her I would be ever so surprised—it was about Reagan!
Other than that it is her usual self serving uninformed off topic ramble!
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 8:17 am
Brilliant dissection, Sarah, of this horrendous harpy’s delusional fantasy. I agree, it’s directed at 2012, not at Reagan or anything Reagan stood for. It’s not the first time she’s gotten Reagan wrong and I’m sure it won’t be the last. There she is in good company because all of modern conservatism seems intent on misinformation where Reagan is concerned. But Palin’s speech is especially egregious, being self-serving as it was.
Ruffneck
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 11:11 am
Do you feel the same way about Nancy Pelosi?
There are far more self serving people, with longer standing records in government, but instead we act like this is the first time a delusional politician stood up and said a word.
As for the modern conservatism, you should change those words to modern armchair politicians. Party serving to the end.
mocha
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 11:50 am
Nancy Pelosi is a hard-working public servant. She has served in the Congress for almost 24 years and even though she is 70 years old, she works from dawn until late into the night to serve her constituents and the American people. She is the model of what a US Representative should be. If not for Pelosi, Pres Obama would have been talked into abandoning the Health Care legislation. Every American who can get insurance now for their child with a pre-existing condition or can count on their child not being dropped from insurance if they develop a major health problem has Nancy Pelosi to thank. Nancy Pelosi will go down in history as one of the most successful Speakers of the House ever. Learn your recent American history. Palin is not worthy to shine Nancy Pelosi’s shoes.
Lthor
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 7:28 pm
Thank You for getting that out there! Truer words were never spoken. I think she will go into the history books as one of the most important women in politics!!
Ruffneck
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 7:41 am
Nancy Peolsi is one of the most self serving politicians that we have ever had. She did not draft any part of the health care legislation, was not on the boards that worked on the actual legislation and had no idea what was in the bill by telling us that we all will learn what is in it after they pass it.
Wow, that was a horrible interpretation of her great accomplishments in governance,
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 9:51 am
Ruffneck, you make a lot of silly assumptions. if you want to be taken seriously, why dont you tell us how you know Pelosi knew nothing about the healthcare bill?
KarenJ
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 12:12 pm
Stop with the RW parroting of false-equivalency comparisons.
and repeat after me, “this blog commentary is about Sarah Palin and her speech about Ronald Reagan”.
—————
Jason and SarahJ, I beg to differ about the following line: “She delivered her red meat applause lines with charm and energy…”
She delivered that speech with a charmless mostly-head-down-to-read-notes bow to not using a Teleprompter, and her inflections and modulation were not in sync with the highlights (such as they were) of the speech. She delivered her lines almost as jerkily as she did her resignation speech.
Could it be that she had just received the text of the speech and barely had a chance to familiarize herself with it? It was delivered in the same way you might hear from a sudden-substitute speaker.
Sarah Jones
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 12:49 pm
I see your point:-) But look at it from the POV of the GOP/Tea Party. Did she pass the test? Remember, the bar is very low. I think her audience was satisfied with the mean comments about liberals, her perky looks and the few smiles she threw out. They do not care if she reads from her hand. Literally. There was no blood libel or open mic debacle, and this makes it a success for Palin at this point.
I doubt that she just got the speech but rather that she didn’t bother to study it, as is her wont. Remember the Couric interview. She dislikes preparing for things.
Ruffneck
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 7:47 am
She has never been known to understand what she thinks she knows. She is the definition of a political hack and more likened to a hight school cheer leader.
She had a great thought at one time, less government is a good idea, but she cant seem to stay on target due to her inexperience in public speaking and failure to develop a deeper detailed platform.
The only issue I have is; is that worse than someone who is trained to lie and misdirect every time they speak? What is worse, an emotional hack or a well trained politician?
Melly
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 7:23 pm
Palin didn’t require any training in lying and misdirecting. They come naturally do her, like breathing, or farting.
OverMountainMan
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 1:03 pm
Did you know that during Nancy’s reign as Speaker of the House she passed every single piece of legislation that she sent to the floor, That is every single one and exemplary record
Ruffneck
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 7:48 am
That would say that everything that hit her desk was excellent legislation and would be illogical no matter what job she was doing. If I agreed to every idea that someone came into my office with, I would be fired for failure to manage responsibly.
Reynardine
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 4:54 pm
Whenever I hear someone drop Nancy Pelosi’s name into a discussion out of nowhere, as if it were supposed to be some kind of crushing, er, refudiation, I know I’m listening to a troll. Therefore, Ruffneck, kindly cash your little paycheck, zip your fly, and shut up.
Ruffneck
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 7:51 am
Even though I despise Palin, you still call me a troll for despising Pelosi in the same breath?
I am a troll?
This place is a study in insanity.
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 9:43 am
For someone that despises Palin, you certainly spend a lot of time here defending her
ericmiami
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 8:22 am
Ruffneck, who is this Regan you mention?
Reynardine
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 4:57 pm
¿Donald Regan?
crystalwolfakacaligrl
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 8:22 pm
ericmiami, he’s talking about RayGun!
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 10:05 am
One thing I like about Reagan
” from the swamp to the stars,” He believed in evolution :)
Sarah couldnt be a mote on Reagans left testicle. While he screwed the man on the street and helped make the rich richer, he was no one to admire. And neither is Sarah P. She will never understand who Reagan was. His dropping the upper brackets income taxes from 70% to 28% did not bring prosperity to America, there was no trickle down.
Sarah is about herself and whatever she can say to make herself look good even if she doesnt understand what she is saying. The stimulus didnt work? Did Sarah mention where we would be without it? Obama is ruining the country? Seen the latest market reports Sarah? Did Sarah mention the current lie and do nothing republicans in the House? Nope. Screw you Sarah P
Will
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 12:02 pm
Big deficit Ronnie Raygun……
Sarah, go back to porn movies….Nailin’ Palin sequel?
Darklady
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 5:48 pm
There’s already been a few sequels and a few non-Hustler Palin parody releases. Lisa Ann and I have agreed to ummm… introduce Sarah to …. ummm the joys of a vigorous multi-girl sex experience, shall we say. :-)
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 6:14 pm
Dont spare the crop
novenator
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 12:28 pm
Solid breakdown of it. Excellent analysis.
For the record, Reagan would not even be in the running for the GOP nomination today. He would be considered a RINO and blasted as being a “liberal.” That’s how far to the right the Republicans have become.
Sarah Jones
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 12:56 pm
Spot on point.
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 1:01 pm
They would have skewered him for supporting SS. Something that pertains to “people”.
Anonym
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 12:34 pm
Of course, her largely illiterate, star-crazed cult will pronounce the speech to be a “classic” and praise her “amazing” delivery.
I’ll say this about That Woman From Wasilla: she plays REALLY well to the alternative reality crowd. You know: the ones who believe George W. Bush left the country debt-free when he moved out of the White House and Barack Obama is the cause of each and everything that ails this country today.
physicsmom
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 12:43 pm
Shiva got to my comment first, which is that this phrase
“…from the swamp to the stars…”
refers to evolution, not to the Vietnam war.
I think it’s hilarious that Palin didn’t get that and blithely quotes him with so little understanding. She is an idiot.
Eykis
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 3:13 pm
Excellent article, as always. I saw it live last night. It sounded like it was written for the Snowbilly Grifter by someone who hates her as much as I do – it was pure garbage from start to finish and Snowbilly Grifter failed at delivery.
There is no way she is ever going to announce her run for 2012-she’s toast and the speech came off as one of her worst.
I clicked between C-Span and Faux Noise to see if Faux was running it in its entirety. They were. Interesting thing, on the National Day of Prayer, both MSNBC and CNN ran President Obama’s speech in its entirety, Faux Noise did not run it all.
BongoBeach
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 4:35 pm
Ronald Reagan was a very nice person, but not God made president. Sarah Palin isn’t a very nice person and, thank God, not president.
George Jones
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 5:09 pm
“Republicans did not win the Senate and they’re not in the White House for a reason. ”
Yes. And the reason is: The White House, and most of the Senate, were not up for election in 2010. If they had been, the presidency would be Republican, and 70 seats in the Senate.
AKRNC
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 8:53 pm
With Boehner and McConnell’s help, the Democratic party will take back the house, retain control of the Senate and re-elect President Obama in 2012. They have done NOTHING since the November elections. They are not the least bit concerned about the lack of jobs in this country because they have a job. However, they can and will be removed in 2012.
William
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 6:45 pm
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is not a political party, it’s an agency that works under the United States Department of the Interior, it doesn’t represent political parties, it was originally called the United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries that was created by congress in 1871 under Ulysses S. Grant, a Republican. When the 42nd congress established the ( United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries) both the house and the senate were controlled by Republicans. Also the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service which enforces the endangerment species act of 1973, belongs to no political party, and it should be noted that the endangered species act was signed into law by (Republican)President Richard Nixon not by some “”faceless democrat government bureaucrat”.
Richard Nixon – ” I have today signed, the Endangered Species Act of 1973. At a time when Americans are more concerned than ever with conserving our natural resources, this legislation provides the Federal Government with needed authority to protect an irreplaceable part of our national heritage–threatened wildlife.”
When Sarah Palin announces in that stump speech you posted, that the endangered species act is some “faceless democrat government bureaucrat” in action, she apparently has no knowledge of the history of the Endangered Species Act or the history of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. I noticed also that she didn’t even mention that there were solutions to the Delta Smelt Minnow problem within the protocols of the endangered species act, like the incidental take permit, she seems to be accomplishing nothing more than demagoguery in her stump speech. Also does Sarah Palin know that Federal Judge Oliver Wanger ,the judge who denied a request by California farmers to lift a restriction on water pumping, was in fact nominated a federal judge by President George H.W. Bush ?
Sarah Jones
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 7:00 pm
Great catch, William. Thanks!
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 7:06 pm
Come to think of it, there are few Republicans about that could stand up to Richard Nixon. If that tells you anything about the state of republicanism today
Sharon Hughes
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 9:02 pm
I tried to watch the clip of her speech and I just couldn’t go on after 2 minutes into it. She sounds like someone trying to land a part in the high school play ….everything she said just sounded so wrong, so juvenile and so …well…STUPID. Her voice grates on me, her snarky, sarcastic and asinine smirk….makes me want to punch her everytime I hear her or see her. And that really bothers me a lot. I don’t usually have such mean thoughts or reactions to people. i’ve just had enough of this phony grifter and I am totally baffled by how anyone would believe she has the savvy to stand up there and give a speech about a past president when she’s such a moral failure and quit her job to fleece her state as well as the rest of us…..ugh She is a MORON
dennisdread
Feb. 5th, 2011 at 9:11 pm
Reagan isn’t looking down from Heaven..he’s looking up from Hell. Well, if such things really exist, that is.
KatzKids
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 12:07 am
I watched the speech on CSpan too. She was terrible, a shell of her usual delivery. There was no enthusiasm, she just wanted to get finished with it. She looked unsure of herself, no smiles except fleetingly when someone politely clapped or she delivered one of her more snarky comments. Kept her head down, reading for most of the speech. There were a few occasions that there was enthusiastic applause, but for the most part, it was restrained and seemed more polite. She looked & acted defeated. The rules for photos were ridiculous and her usual nonsense. Aren’t people offended (rhetorical question.)?
I lived through Reagan’s two terms in CA. The State had been in the black for decades under Democratic administrations. He took the huge surplus he inherited and, like GW, turned it into such a huge deficit CA has never recovered from it. As bad as he was, he would have run away from the craziness of Ms Palin & the tea party crazies. And they wouldn’t have liked him either – he was much too “Librul.” He was a bad Governor, he was a worse President and now he’s a hero? Sure helps to be dead doesn’t it? Revisionist history at its finest.
Carmelo Junior
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 10:51 am
Many people don’t remember that Reagan was a LIBERAL DEMOCRAT who once thought F.D.R was the greatest president ever. A socialist Hollywood actor who after decades of supporting Keynes economics finally saw the light during the 60s.
No, Sarah Palin is not Ronald Reagan. Sarah Palin was not a socialist actress that mingled with Liberals and anti Civil Rights democrats and -RINOs.
Reagan did not rise from a poor household like Palin did. Palin married just ONCE to her high school sweetheart.
Reagan was great for his generation but Palin is greatest for our generation. Palin is not Reagan. Palin is a woman who has fought more than Reagan ever did. It took Palin just 2 1/2 years in Alaska to do what Reagan did not do in California in 8 years.
Reagan was a White(Protestant) rich and famous man from Hollywood. Palin was a poor White evangelical girl from Alaska.
No sir, Sarah Palin will never be Ronald Reagan!
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 11:08 am
You mean they both tried to destroy their respective states?
Palin has fought nothing. She fought off responsibility as a mayor and was forced to hire someone to do the job for her, she left Alaska in shambles with people dying from her death panels and debt. Sarah also dabbled in splitting from the union, thats something Reagan never did. Sarah will never be the legend in her own mind that she is
Carmelo Junior
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 1:55 pm
Reagan should have denounced Goldwater’s stance on Civil Rights. But no, he supported this man and he was lucky Carter was a mess.
Reagan went to the center picking Bush and forgot about all those racist Libertarian non senses. That’s why he won.
Nasty Liberal
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 12:27 pm
In my perversity, I visited conservatives4palin.com this day and discovered this:
The hilarity never stops! But please stop praising Paline here, okay?
Sarah Jones
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 12:39 pm
I personally found “far left extremists” to be the bone of contention. I tell you I haven’t made anyone give me their baby or their livelihood in minnows in like….days.
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 1:12 pm
Are we not all socialists here? Do we all not deserve a baby from the government?
George Jones
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 10:21 am
Barack Obama becomes more popular, with the Citizens of these United States, in direct relation to how much he transforms himself into a Sarah Palin Republican. Everything liberal Democrats stand for has been discredited and rejected. All the liberals have is to sit around and whine about ‘eight years’, and ‘George W. Bush’s fault’. How many years are you going to blame Bush for what Obama is doing? Your boy is in his third year of a four year term. And, he is doing exactly what Bush did, only more so. Therefore, if Bush was bad, Obama is ten times worse.
Own up to it. Grow a pair. Admit the truth. You have been had. Fooled. Again. As always. Imagine being a liberal in America. Devoted to a long dead political philosophy that will never be revived, even by an inept little community organizer.
Obama has given more money to the extremely wealthy than all previous presidents combined. Deal with it. If you have the honesty. If not, just stew in your own juices, blaming everything on Bush, and fearing the palin future. Liberals are for entertainment purposes only. Like Mae West and W. C. Fields. Hopelessly out of date, but slightly funny anyway.
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 10:31 am
ohhhh its so awful isnt it?. Im sorry the Bush healthcare plan never got passed though
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 10:34 am
You haven’t successfully made the argument that President Obama is discrediting and rejecting everything liberals stand for (I am one and I do not feel discredited or rejected) and you haven’t successfully argued that “he is doing exactly what Bush did”. Therefore your claim that Obama is “ten times worse” is simply an assertion not based on any evidence.
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 10:49 am
“Obama has given more money to the extremely wealthy than all previous presidents combined.”
Yes, that was like when Obama Reagan gave the rich a tax break from 70% down to 28%
Dont you feel foolish now?
George Jones
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 11:04 am
Observe closely, now.
Obama has taken the middle-class taxpayer money, current and for many generations to come, and given it to the Super Wealthy. Nothing new in that. It is what presidents do. The only ‘change’ is the amounts. Obama has ripped off the middle class to a far greater extent than any previous president.
Obama is the greatest practioner of Trickle Down economics. He has taken your money and given it to his buddies, the Super Wealthy. A few bucks will trickle down to you, but the bulk will stay in the hands of the very very rich.
Even the government itself admits it. CBO says the Obama expenditures will add 12 TRILLION dollars to the National Debt.
You can look it up. But, you won’t. Liberals do not like anything that does not agree with their ridiculous ideas. You want to believe that Obama is saving the country, etc., and no facts will change your minds. Obama is robbing you blind, all the time using your natural ‘feelings’ to make fools out of you.
“Look over here! Look over there!! Just don’t look at my hand in your pocket.”
Simple magicians trick. And you let him get away with it.
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 11:23 am
You keep using the term “any other president” and not supporting it by anything but rhetoric.
Other than that you are just spouting RWNJ talking points. You are no longer interesting
George Jones
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 1:17 pm
Talking points and meaningless rhetoric are YOUR way of posting, shiva, not mine.
As evidence: “she left Alaska in shambles with people dying from her death panels and debt.”
Really, shiva? You have proof of this nonsense statement of yours?
Talk about uninteresting Lefty Lies.
You only have Bush Bashing and Palin Attacking. And, your boy couldn’t carry the intellectual jock strap of either of them. Your politics are dinosaur disasters. There are a few 60s hippies wandering around spouting such nonsense, but the rest of the intellectual world has long since committed leftyness to the scrap heap of history, where it belongs.
Step out into the light of the present day. Good for your soul. The left has failed. Even your boy Obama has discarded the discredited baby philosophy. Grow up in your thoughts. You will be much the better for it. Feel the bitterness change into betterness. Change we can believe in.
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 1:34 pm
Really?
www.adn.com/2009/07/14/86...
Never use talking points about things you have no knowledge of. Ever. Beucase you keep getting caught
As for the rest of your post, laughable
George Jones
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 2:19 pm
Nice capitulation, shiva. You have lost the contest. But then, that is what old hippie liberals do. Midnite toking, slow stoking, nonsense blowing.
You can’t get back in the game, now.
Remember:
Capitulation is forever.
Keep listening to Maddow, etc., though. That way, you provide us real thinkers with the occasional laughter break.
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 2:24 pm
I see you failed the reading exam. Well, you cant help those who are helpless. Gave you the book and all you did was drool on it.
My youi are full of OLD talking points! this is refreshing!
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 7th, 2011 at 2:27 pm
After all, a REAL thinker would have read the link and understood he was beaten. That leaves you out my friend. You are afraid of it