Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Sarah Palin’s Legacy of Ignorance
more from Hrafnkell Haraldsson
“‘Refudiate,’ ‘misunderestimate,’ ‘wee-wee’d up.’ English is a living language. Shakespeare liked to coin new words too. Got to celebrate it!‘” – Sarah Palin, Twitter, July 18, 2010.
Former part-time Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin has repeatedly demonstrated her lack of knowledge about…well, almost everything, really. If there is an antidote to the European Enlightenment, which threw back the darkness of the Middle Ages and gave birth to the United States of America, it is Sarah Palin. She is to knowledge what kryptonite is to Superman. She is anti-knowledge.
What is more, and what any sensible person would think worse, she seems eager to demonstrate her complete and total ignorance. It is difficult at times to know whether to laugh or cry. Her fans, however, cheer. Which is worse? The fool or those who cheer the fool?
And these people think they can run the country. Come to think of it, perhaps it’s no surprise that such a crowd would cheer Sarah Palin.
For the rest of us, those not lost in the bliss of utter ignorance of national and world affairs, the problem of Sarah Palin remains. While we can’t take away her right to be as ignorant as she wishes to be, we can make it costly for her with a few judicious votes in the upcoming Midterm Elections. With this in mind, let’s take a look at some of Sarah’s whoppers.
At the top I have to put her complete inability to name anything she has read. When asked by Katie Couric to name a magazine or newspaper she has read, she answered:
“All of ‘em, any of ‘em that have been in front of me over all these years.” – Interview with Katie Couric, CBS News, October 1, 2008
Is there anyone else on the planet who can’t name one thing they read? I can name newspapers and magazines I read forty years ago as a child.
Given the claims of the Tea Party to represent the beliefs of our Founding Fathers, it’s a little astounding that their heroine can’t name any of them. Asked by Glenn Beck to name her favorite Founding Father, Palin answered:
“You know, well, all of them because they came collectively together with…so much diversity in terms of belief but collectively they came together to form this union.” - Glenn Beck Show, January 13, 2010.
Even Glenn Beck, who is no blazing intellect himself, wasn’t buying that one. Having answered that she reads “everything” because she reads nothing she says all the Founding Fathers are her favorites because she doesn’t know who any of them are.
Under prompting from Glenn she finally names George Washington. But then, every American can name George Washington. Can’t they?
So now that Sarah has established that she doesn’t know anything she has read and doesn’t know any Founding Fathers, she demonstrates that she doesn’t know any Supreme Court Decisions. Asked to name a Supreme Court decision other than Roe v. Wade that she disagrees with she answered:
“Well, let’s see. There’s ― of course in the great history of America there have been rulings that there’s never going to be absolute consensus by every American, and there are those issues, again, like Roe v. Wade, where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there. So, you know, going through the history of America, there would be others but ―” – Interview with Katie Couric, CBS News, October 1, 2008.
Apparently, Sarah believes herself immune to the consequences of her ignorance. In her wacky private dimension she would be immune from ethics violations if she were elected President of the United States. Remember, it was ethics violations which derailed her governorship of Alaska. So, wishful thinking when she says (?):
“I think on a national level your Department of Law there in the White House would look at some of the things that we’ve been charged with and automatically throw them out.”ABC News interview, July 7, 2009.
Interesting that she thinks she would possess an immunity President Clinton lacked, and which Republicans think President Obama also lacks if they regain control of Congress. In all fairness to Sarah, President Bush felt he was immune to violations of the Constitution as well, and events have shown him to be correct in his assumptions (if only thanks to Executive and Congressional forbearance), so perhaps we can give a flier on this one.
Of course, it’s only fair to mention that there is no such thing as a “Department of Law” in the White House.
Honorable mention must go to her belief that Vladimir Putin flying over Alaskan airspace makes her a foreign policy expert:
“As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where- where do they go? It’s Alaska. It’s just right over the border.” – Interview with Katie Couric, CBS News, Sept. 24, 2008
Her most recent is perhaps one of her most egregious displays of ignorance:
“This Statue of Liberty was gifted to us by foreign leaders, really as a warning to us, it was a warning to us to stay unique and to stay exceptional from other countries. Certainly not to go down the path of other countries that adopted socialist policies.” – Dena’ina Civic and Convention Center, Anchorage Alaska, September 11, 2010.
As the National Park Service tells us (and could have told her had she checked or cared):
“The Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World was a gift of friendship from the people of France to the people of the United States and is a universal symbol of freedom and democracy.”
Not from foreign leaders but from the people of France, not as a warning but as a sign of friendship, and needless to say, having nothing to do with socialism.
This is by no means an exhaustive list. There are many more instances of her breathtaking ignorance than can be named here. Suffice it to say, President Bush, while the most anti-intellectual President in US History, would be eclipsed by Sarah Palin should she ever attain the Oval Office.
At least there would be no need to fund a presidential library when her term of office was up – assuming she completed her term of office.
In the end, we don’t have to “refudiate” Sarah Palin’s claim to intelligence. She has done that herself. Many times over.
On the Tonight Show, Bill Maher called out Sarah Palin for calling him a coward and said that he would m ...
Sarah Palin has been all over the media since her book came out, but the one network that she hasn’t been on ...
Sarah Palin was back on the CBS Evening News with Kate Couric tonight, and she ducked, dodged, and gave half ...
Sarah Palin made her debut today on Fox News’ Glenn Beck program, and she ran into some trouble when Beck as ...
In an interview with Newsmax, Sarah Palin floated Fox News host Glenn Beck's name as her running mate for 20 ...
Older_Wiser
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 7:02 am
Wonderfully said! And I wish the MSM would stop promoting her (and her cohorts) ignorance.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 7:32 am
Thank you. I don’t know why anyone would willingly promote (and not hide) a potential candidate so completely ignorant (and so open about it). It’s a strange world we live in where the lack of knowledge is a badge of honor and not a profound embarrassment.
Anne
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 8:50 am
It’s utterly disgusting, but an ignorant population is easier to control. Her ignorance is packaged as authentic hockey-mom folksiness. A number of people are foolish enough to buy into it because they see it as an affirmation of themselves in their own ignorance about the world. The same people are threatened by intellectuals or people who are simply well-informed, which explains the disdain for so-called elitism. Politicians of the far right, who know better, play on this with the kind of phony populism exhibited by the Tea Party movement.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 9:51 am
And it is phony. Paul Collier, an economist, calls populism a “quack remedy”and he right.
Basheert
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 12:01 pm
You may be right HOWEVER there are rill ‘merikans who have fallen into the pit that she has dug for them. The ignorant, the chronically mentally ill, the racists, the haters – they all have swallowed her B.S. which is meant to stoke fear and (I believe) cause violence against those who disagree.
Like many cheap thugs, she uses others to do her dirty work.
It’s not that she is against knowledge, quite simply she HAS no knowledge. She cannot retain fact or education (‘rill larnin’) even if she is tutored.
She is a giant sqwaking billboard … they change her message as needed. It doesn’t make her less dangerous but if you toss in the lack of intellect and the obvious rampant paranoia, it does better explain how dangerous she can be in a racist, frightened group of low informed individuals.
Rvrctyrdnck
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 8:03 pm
Though she doesn’t know it she has an anthem: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8...
JayInDallas
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 8:09 am
If the MSM is going to follow Palin, I would rather hear more about her obvious deficiencies. She’s riding the Paris Hilton famous=for-being-fanous train and it’s time for her to get off!
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 9:54 am
Right!!
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 10:28 am
If Washington was one of her favorites, and you know she grabbed that name out of the air, she would have known tnhis about him.
“Washington’s Farewell Address (issued as a public letter in 1796) was one of the most influential statements of American political values.[46] Drafted primarily by Washington himself, with help from Hamilton, it gives advice on the necessity and importance of national union, the value of the Constitution and the rule of law, the evils of political parties, and the proper virtues of a republican people. While he declined suggested versions that would have included statements that morality required a “divinely authoritative religion,” he called morality “a necessary spring of popular government”. He said, “Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”[48]
Washington’s public political address warned against foreign influence in domestic affairs and American meddling in European affairs. He warned against bitter partisanship in domestic politics and called for men to move beyond partisanship and serve the common good. He warned against ‘permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world’,[49] saying the United States must concentrate primarily on American interests. He counseled friendship and commerce with all nations, but warned against involvement in European wars and entering into long-term “entangling” alliances. The address quickly set American values regarding religion and foreign affairs.”
The woman doesn’t even have a clue on basic civics and yet people back her for president. Its a sad take on American politics. The followers never note that through all the rhetoric, she doesnt have a single answer to anything
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 10:55 am
That’s one of the things that bothers me most, Shiva, about this “folksy” crap. Abraham Lincoln educated himself and did a damn good job of it. It can be done. People CAN improve themselves. Davey Crockett is another example, and there are many others, people who rose above their circumstances rather than wallowing in them. As you say, is ignorant of the most basic civics education and unlike some truly great Americans, she seems completely uninterested in doing anything about it.
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 11:06 am
The fact that the McCain campaign admitted when they gave her data to ready herself for debates, the crib sheets were ignored and set aside. Afterwards she blames the media then the McCain people. She is intellectually lazy. This is a person that wants to be president with tons of briefings a day. With no one to blame
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 12:46 pm
I shudder to think what would happen to our country with her as president. She has no sense of personal responsibility at all.
dani
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 12:03 pm
What kills me about the statueof liberty lie is that France of all placed would not be warming against socialism as Palin defines it. She’s never even been to France. Remember when those Canadian radio hosts pranked her about loving her porn movie and she thought it was sarkiwzy?
Dorian M
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 1:10 pm
Entertainment = $
Sarah’s more of an entertainer now than a politician. The pay is better.
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 2:36 pm
Hey Dorian, you are probably right. However I think she see’s herself as a candidate entertainer.
TruthRocks
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 2:10 pm
“Which is worse? The fool or those who cheer the fool?” Great question!
In my opinion, the only thing more disturbing than Sarah Palin are the people who don’t find her disturbing.
AFM
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 2:18 pm
Anti-knowledge and she is damn proud of it. Yep, just like Bush who was proud to be a “c” student. Am willing to bet William Buckley is rolling in his grave.
TksABunchJohn
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 3:37 pm
Thank you for this article, I’m bookmarking it. It is truly phenomenal how Palin is able to control national discourse and debate given her obvious considerable lack of knowledge. Of course she is just the facade for those behind the curtains controlling the message, but for some reason the MSM reports her Facebook posts as Palin’s actual words, without questioning content or motive. She has maneuvered herself into a very cozy, sheltered place where she can get out whatever message the puppet masters wish to put out there, with no challenge of that message being entertained. While it is obvious to those of us who are not being programmed by Fox, those of us with an education, or at least intellectual curiosity, there are many out there lapping up this mass deception, and it is disturbing.
A whole new crop of tea party candidates are taking pages from the Palin playbook, denying interviews from anyone but Fox or conservative outlets, and, even more alarming, declaring that they will not be debating their Democratic opponents. Period. No debates. There will be no public discourse to challenge a platform, to investigate what a candidate actually publicly stands for, to decide if their ideas are good, bad, or non-existent.
I find it amazing that Palin invoked Orwell a few weeks ago, for two reasons. The first is the obvious doubt that she has ever read Orwell, and if she did for some community college she attended, that she retained any content. The second is far more disturbing, this new brand of propaganda-driven isolation politics seems chillingly Orwellian to me. And it appears to be orchestrated so. If these tactics are accepted as the new normal, and these candidates are actually elected, without ever subjecting themselves to public vetting, then the most terrifying words in the English language could be possible: President Palin.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 8:35 pm
I suppose if you want to make up a fake narrative that has no bearing on what really is, you need to insulate yourself in whatever way possible – no press, no questions, no doubts, no dissent. It’s all very totalitarian.
TksABunchJohn
Sep. 14th, 2010 at 12:30 am
Totalitarian… and they’re pointing their fingers in the other direction, screaming Socialism.
We are preaching to the choir, they have effectively isolated their targeted audience.
vilca
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 8:24 pm
Regarding the statue of liberty and foreign leaders, I think she just chokes on the word French. After all, those damn frogs took her chips away, and she had to fight so hard to get them freedom fries back.
The only French she will acknowledge is Louis Vuitton
Scott
Sep. 13th, 2010 at 10:30 pm
This continuous fascination with Palin and what she says and the impact of her words reminds me of a visit I made to the home of a relative in New Orleans who had a home immediately adjacent to an elevated train track that had an almost hourly train on it. Trains clanged and groaned as they gingerly made their way down the aging trestle. My relative’s two year old ran to the front door each time screaming, “twain…TWAIN!!!”
I asked him how he could stand living next to all of this commotion. His rely, “Eventually, you don’t hear it any more”. By the next afternoon, I realized, he was absolutely right.
cory
Nov. 21st, 2010 at 6:13 pm
I really enjoyed reading this====Thank you, Cory