Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Sequester Squeals: Republicans Get Their First Taste of the Recession and They Don’t Like It
Who would have guessed it would come to this.
Republicans are a mess right now; coming face to face with the cuts they’ve championed in rhetoric for years is causing an utter collapse of purpose. Republican staffers are complaining that GOP leadership is giving them no clues about how they can prepare for the upcoming cuts, while leadership is complaining that without being able to pay their staff (public sector workers) a decent wage, including a raise, they can’t attract the best workers.
The Hill reported Monday:
One veteran chief of staff lamented that his office hasn’t given raises to its employees for several years — worrying that without a reward for their hard work, it will be difficult to attract bright individuals to Capitol Hill.
“What’s the incentive for smart talented people to come work for Congress?” the source said.
Head banging on desk. Yes, Republicans… Come to the water. Come slowly to the water. Now drink.
Guess what, Republicans? Most Americans aren’t getting raises right now, and it’s not because they suck at their jobs. Also, thanks for making the exact same argument that public sector unions have been making regarding cuts to teachers’ pay, etc.
A source told The Hill that no one is giving them any input about what they’re supposed to do. They have leases! They have people who were being paid x amount for years! You can’t cut their pay!
Good God, people, it’s almost like there’s a recession. A few concerned Republicans are consolidating two positions into one and offering to pay for their own postage when they write constituents. They love the idea of making due with a wee bit less. It’s like a dress up game. Look, I sacrificed something! SO CUTE!
Can you still eat? I’m not sure we’re on the same playing field yet. See, these cuts are going to take food from babies and seniors. Forgive me if I find that a little more troubling than Republican retention.
The White House has put together a list of how the sequester cuts will hit jobs and middle class families across the country. They kindly included the District of Columbia, so let’s see how this will break down for folks other than Republican staffers (I’m not against those staffers earning what they are worth; but it’s ironic that Republicans are making this argument given their attacks on public sector unions).
If sequestration were to take effect, some examples of the impacts in the District of Columbia this year alone are (I’ve edited the list for length; click here to find your state):
Teachers and Schools: The District of Columbia will lose approximately $533,000 in funding for primary and secondary education. In addition about 1,000 fewer students would be served and approximately 2 fewer schools would receive funding.
Education for Children with Disabilities: In addition, the District of Columbia will lose approximately $925,000 in funds for teachers, aides, and staff who help children with disabilities.
Head Start: Head Start and Early Head Start services would be eliminated for approximately 200 children in the District of Columbia, reducing access to critical early education.
Military Readiness: In the District of Columbia, approximately 13,000 civilian Department of Defense employees would be furloughed, reducing gross pay by around $111.3 million in total.
Law Enforcement and Public Safety Funds for Crime Prevention and Prosecution: The District of Columbia will lose about $80,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, prosecution and courts, crime prevention and education, corrections and community corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness initiatives.
STOP Violence Against Women Program: The District of Columbia could lose up to $13,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims being served.
Nutrition Assistance for Seniors: The District of Columbia would lose approximately $191,000 in funds that provide meals for seniors.
The White House notes, “Already, the President has worked with Congress to reduce the deficit by more than $2.5 trillion, but there’s more to do. The President has put forward a balanced plan to not only avoid the harmful effects of the sequester but also to reduce the deficit by more than $4 trillion in total.”
See the President’s plan here. I know, it’s shocking- it includes both cuts and revenue, but somehow this is seen as not compromising because unless Republicans get everything they want, the media is very upset with the President. Squeaky wheel and all of that.
The White House countered that point, “Unfortunately, many Republicans in Congress refuse to ask the wealthy to pay a little more by closing tax loopholes so that we can protect investments that are helping grow our economy and keep our country safe… The President is willing to compromise, but on behalf the middle class he cannot accept a deal that undercuts their economic security.”
BUT HOW ARE WE GOING TO SURVIVE IF OUR BUDGET IS CUT, ask the Republican staffers. We have leases! (Americans have these things called mortgages, FYI, that Republicans voted NO on helping them deal with in light of the recession.) HOW CAN WE LIVE LIKE WE ALWAYS HAVE IN THE MIDDLE OF A RECESSION IF THE SEQUESTER HITS?!? Cuts and deficits are for THEM. Not for us.
Meanwhile, lost Republican staffers wander aimlessly looking for a few pencils they can cross off the budget as panic sets in. This is but the beginning of the sequester squeals, and it’s coming from within the Republican Party. Getting what they wanted isn’t working out quite as they imagined.
Update: First paragraph, “of purpose” added after “utter collapse” for clarification.
The ever clueless Republican Rep. Tom Price of Georgia thinks the sequester is necessary to "get this ec ...
Republicans have lost the sequester battle so comprehensively that according to the new USA Today/Pew Re ...
With more than 780 troops still on state active duty in Massachusetts, the National Guard's warning abou ...
Republicans rushed to fix the sequester airport delays that were about to impact them, but they refuse t ...
In a statement today, Speaker Boehner issued more tough talk about about no new tax hikes as a part of a ...
Barry Roope
Feb. 25th, 2013 at 3:05 pm
The Republicans are not worried about this sequester stuff, this is exactly what they want, this will put a big crack in the Social safety net for the poor and disabled, and once you have a crack, you just keep putting pressure on and before long it breaks, Don’t let the Republicans fool you, Until it hurts big business, you will see no hurry to fix this problem.
aspromised
Feb. 25th, 2013 at 3:25 pm
I think each Congressman should have to hand-pick which kids, which seniors and inform these people themselves. Now THAT would require guts.
lm945
Feb. 25th, 2013 at 4:02 pm
Some of them would probably enjoy.
Armchair Activists
Feb. 27th, 2013 at 8:12 am
They have no guts. they have been PAID for by the lobbyists and must do the job corporations want them to do, they are evil, they do not represent the 98%.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 25th, 2013 at 3:35 pm
Like I said “A Benny Hill skit”
idic5
Feb. 25th, 2013 at 4:41 pm
“…the cuts they’ve championed in rhetoric for years is causing an utter collapse. ”
Please try to stick to the facts. save ‘utter collapse’ for the apocalypse.
vwjan
Feb. 25th, 2013 at 5:24 pm
Hey guess what…………welcome to the real world Repigs, this is what has been happening to people for a few years now and it is about time that they are effective by it now. Like I said “WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD”
Jonah Arnot
Feb. 25th, 2013 at 6:50 pm
I’ve always said the best way to deal with stupidity is to give them exactly what they want, and sit back and watch the fireworks. I imagine it probably took being in our present time before giving the republican Congress exactly what they wanted wouldn’t completely destroy our country as a whole, what with us so strongly and successfully recovering from the Great Recession, but I am just immensely glad our president, President Obama, had the balls to stand up and let them hit a run out of the park. They are for smaller government, this is what it looks like. “It’s outta here…wait…the ball just hit a spectator in the face! And fell back in the park! It’s still on, folks!” Enjoy the flavor, repugnicans.
Stanton
Feb. 26th, 2013 at 12:06 am
My only concern with doing that is that the resulting fireworks of destructive stupidity may set the entire neighborhood on fire.
Tazzle
Feb. 25th, 2013 at 7:06 pm
This has been a wake up call for some people I know who work in Federal Civil Service. I’ve always been bemused by the fact that so many civil servants are staunch conservatives and can’t understand that when people talk about cutting “Big Government,” they’re talking about cutting their jobs. I’ve worked as a nurse for the Department of Justice, the Department of Defense and at the VA and I’ve always heard them beeyotching about Big Government. Then, they get pay freezes and they get hiring freezes that strain our workforce because we don’t have enough personnel to adequately do our jobs and they don’t connect it to their gripes about government spending. They don’t understand that we, that they, are Big Government. It’s always been a conundrum to me how so many people that collect government benefits seem to howl the most about it’s spending. Witness elderly teabaggers on Medicare who scream about socialized medicine.
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 25th, 2013 at 7:15 pm
I blame Reich wing media and the education system that they have gutted over the past 40 years.
majii
Feb. 26th, 2013 at 1:41 am
They find it difficult to believe that GOPer politicians would actually do things that would hurt them. In their minds, it’s always the slacker over there who needs to be punished. I live in GA, and I’m frustrated as hell with the conservatives here who have no idea that the GOPers they voted to send to Congress don’t care about them. Many of these folks receive public assistance for housing and food, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, work at low wages jobs, and don’t have a clue that the spending cuts they’ve been calling for will have the greatest impact on them. I’ve recently taken the position that maybe it’s time for them to experience the effects of what they’ve been demanding, and besides, I’m tired of caring about things that help them that have no impact on my life and having them disparage me for being concerned about it. Republicans in FL are so disillusioned with Rick Scott that a majority of them don’t think he should run for re-election next year.
Lorraine Russell
Feb. 26th, 2013 at 1:53 am
GOP crashed the world economy sending millions to the unemployment line and financial ruin.
Now they’re hell bent on destroying the safety net.
Their motto should be “We make takers so we’ll have more to hate!”
Gemster
Feb. 26th, 2013 at 6:10 am
Of course the GOP leaders aren’t giving their staffers a clue about what to do. You can’t give what you don’t have. Someone should have told the Republicans, when they welcomed in the teabaggers, to be careful what they wished for.
Kimbutgar
Feb. 26th, 2013 at 12:50 pm
Those republican congressional aides should be the first to be laid off. Let the congress critters deal with their own $hit. You reap what you sow. Let them suffer directly and try to run their offices on their own.