Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
The Silent Oppression of Women Is America’s Greatest Shame
By: RmuseMar. 6th, 2011more from Rmuse
March has been designated as National Women’s History month to honor the historical struggles and accomplishments of America’s women. Although women have made progress in America’s patriarchal society, they have not achieved parity with men and it is in great part due to conservative Christian ideology; not lack of ability, motivation, or will to succeed. The mindset that women are inferior to men did not begin with the founding of our country, but the Founding Fathers followed established discriminatory practices that have been in place since the bible’s earliest record.
The Christian bible mandates (1 Co 11:3, Eph 5:22) that women subject themselves to a man’s will in all things and male-dominated societies have promulgated that notion up until modern times; in some societies, it is still the law of the land. American women are not held in the same esteem as some Muslim societies are, but they are certainly not enjoying the same freedoms and equality as their male counterparts whether in government or the workplace. In fact, many Muslim countries have a higher representation of women in government than in America regardless that Islamic law traditionally considers women as little more than possessions. In some Muslim societies and third-world countries, women are culturally discouraged from bringing in more income than men. American women do not enjoy income parity with men in part because of culture and more ostensibly because of Republican policies.
In a White House report released this past week entitled, WOMEN IN AMERICA, Indicators of Social and Economic Well-Being, statistics showed that women earn on average 75% of what their male counterparts earned in 2009. The income disparity is across all levels of education and experience as well as all job descriptions. The numbers of women and men in the labor force are nearly equal, and young women are more likely to have a college or graduate degree than young men. In spite of a feminist movement that began in earnest in the 1970′s, it is becoming apparent that women have plateaued in the area of income parity. In other areas though, women are under assault from Republicans who are on a rampage to deprive women, primarily poor women, of their equal protection under the law guaranteed by the Constitution. It has been documented before in this column that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has categorically stated that women are not protected by the equal protection clause in the 14TH Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The fact that women do not enjoy income parity with men is not because they have not prepared themselves to be competitive in the workplace or education. Debra Fitzpatrick is the director of the University of Minnesota’s Humphrey Institute’s Center on Women and Public Policy; she said, “Despite women doing all the right things to gain economic parity, we’re still seeing there is this tenaciousness to these issues.” Fitzpatrick goes on to say that, “This all points to the fact that the revolution isn’t finished.” If, as data bears out, women are doing all the right things there should not be income inequality. However, despite being better educated and prepared to enter the workplace as men in the same fields, women still earn less as a matter of course.
In a New York state study of starting salaries by gender of physicians leaving residency programs from 1999 to 2008, the research showed that the gender gap cannot be explained by specialty choice, practice setting, work hours, or other characteristics. The study concluded that the trend is “unexplained” and “growing over time.” In 2008, male doctors starting in New York state made, on average, more than $16,000 more than newly trained female doctors compared with a $3,600 difference in 1999. The inequality may be growing and unexplained to researchers, but actions by the Republican majority in the House clearly show the blatant disregard and contempt our male-dominated society has for women.
Republicans have been unrelenting in attempts at cutting services for women; especially poor women. The current Republican attacks on teacher unions are more than just an attempt at union-busting. Statistics from 2010 show that 81.8% of elementary school teachers, 57% of secondary teachers, and 92% of kindergarten and pre-school teachers are women. Wisconsin Governor Walker exempted police and firefighters from the ban on collective bargaining because both of those professions are primarily held by men. Many public school critics say teachers are just glorified baby-sitters who deserve minimum wage and no benefits as if they are teenage girls earning spending money. There has not been the same level of anti-union sentiment aimed at traditional male-dominated professions like law enforcement (13% female), firefighters (3.6% female), or construction work (2.6% female). It does not seem to be any other reason than women are not valued the way men are.
In Congress and state legislatures around the country, Republicans consistently vote to perpetuate gender inequality in pay, health insurance, and health services because they are still laboring under the bible’s directive that women are not equal to men. There is a class-action lawsuit before the Supreme Court by about a million women against Wal-Mart stores for pay discrimination; gender inequality is rampant in this country and no profession is immune. There is no other reasonable explanation and in many conservative circles women are expected to stay at home, give birth, and empty chamber pots for the male. It begs the question; why would any woman ever vote for a Republican?
It is somewhat understandable that in third-world countries and Islamic culture women are treated as possessions for men. It is not understandable why in the greatest country in the world women earn 25% less than a man doing the same job. There are, of course, economic considerations at play and corporations will do anything to bolster their profit margin by paying women less than men. Many older conservative Americans who yearn to return to 1950 still believe that only men should work outside of the home and women should stay home and give birth. Many conservative politicians are doing everything in their legislative power to return women to the role of homemaker and little else.
This month 50% of Americans are being honored for their accomplishments and struggles toward gaining equality in the workplace, government, and civil rights. The White House report shows that women have made progress but there is much more work to do. Women have done everything they have been asked to be treated fairly in the workplace and still it is not enough, and according to statistics, they are losing the battle for equality on every front. Republicans continue to lead the attacks on equal rights for women, and it is a mystery why women support them.
It is time for men to stand with women and demand that half of our population is treated with the same respect and fairness that every man enjoys. Americans have much to be ashamed of, but mistreating our women and treating them like third-class citizens has to be at the top of the shame-list, and it all starts with conservative Christians who cling to bible mythology that women are less than men.
It is unfathomable in the 21st Century that we need to talk about this issue. However it seems that now is ...
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is campaigning in Albuquerque, New Mexico where he hosted a d ...
Today the Chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) re ...
Small government, conservative Maria Ciano kicked some serious Republican bottom tonight at the Democrat ...
In the legal system when there is a lawsuit against a business for negligence that caused death or disab ...
Eykis
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 10:35 am
Rmuse,
Great article. Thank you for the truth.
When old whyte guyz are thrown out of office, perhaps women and minorities in America will finally gain EQUALITY.
Until these same ole whyte guyz who have been in office since I was in my 20s are removed, nothing will change. I’m now 57 and cannot imagine being in my 20s and having nobody to represent me but these antiques who know little of the 21st century.
As my 98 yro Catholic grandmother from Dallas always says: “If men could gert pregnant, abortions would be free”.
She has said that for as long as I can remember and she also has a tale of an abortion in Victoria, Texas, circa 1935 – which is where these old whyte guyz want back.
Pathetic. Vote them OUT.
Sarah Jones
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 11:44 am
So true. Someone shared a FB pic with me yesterday that reads:
“If you cut off my reproductive choices, can I cut off yours?”
Abortions would be free and painless if men could get pregnant.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 12:19 pm
I like that! Bobbitize ‘em!
Sarah Jones
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 8:13 pm
Bobbitize indeed! Where is Bobby Franklin, again?
Reynardine
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 11:02 am
In fact, even to return to a 1950′s society of dad paying for a house, two cars, a college fund, and maybe a summer cottage while Mom stays home with her station wagon and all the shiny new appliances, and the kids all have braces and summer camp… well, it’d require returning heavy industry to America and income parity to the working class in a way the negative social engineers wouldn’t even consider. In dissocial engineering, however, the calculation is made that declassed males will accept their demotion tamely if there is another class to whom they are automatically superior. Any white man is superior to a n***; any American man is superior to a s**c; any man at all is superior to a c**t. As for why some women buy into this, probably Karen Horney pegged it best with what she termed begrudging envy: members of a subordinate class who have resigned themselves to their own “inferiority” are driven wild by other members of the same class who haven’t, especially if they appear to be getting away with it.
Sarah Jones
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 11:50 am
Those folks eaten up by envy are the most judgmental of others…and then there are the people who think they’ve won favor with big daddy so they won the “game” – never realizing they have no integrity or soul, having sold it to the highest bidder. Oddly, they are the people out there preaching about “morals” with their beehive hairdos and their porned up “political barbie” outfits.
Their fans run around telling all other women we must be fat and ugly since we “hate” so and so. That sort of mindset, where women are judged based on their looks, is exactly the problem and yet they are so clueless they don’t even know it.
Audrey Hepburn said that beautiful ditty about how to be beautiful, and these folks just don’t get it. As my mom always told me, beauty is as beauty does and what God gave you as a gift isn’t yours — you have to earn the important things; integrity, honor, kindness, compassion, courage. Those are yours once you’ve earned them. To take pride in your genetic “fortune” is absurd and it certainly doesn’t mean God loves you best, as some of these clowns posit.
Anne
Mar. 7th, 2011 at 9:15 am
Yes, it’s a truly sad joke that other women are supposed to be jealous of emotionally and intellectually stunted women like Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Not only are these women judged by their looks, which are overrated in my opinion–but they are also used as tools in the oppression of their own gender. What we’re being told in effect is that we can succeed by being brainless bimbos. By the same token, I would bet that these bozos would have no use for these women as they age and lose the looks they do have. The same clowns that push this nonsense are also the main ones in denial about the importance of the women’s movement in the first place. They are showing the attitudes that necessitated that movement to begin with.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 11:39 am
Great article, Rmuse and a much-needed corrective to the disinformation and propaganda put out by the conservatives. It’s outrageous that we even have to talk about this, as though it is not perfectly natural that everyone should be treated equally. The current Republican attacks on women must be defeated; we must not let the clock turn back to the Dark Ages. Next thing you know, they’ll be wanting to burn them as witches. Like I always ask, what do you guys have against mommies?
Karen
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 12:05 pm
What do they have against mommies?
I call their bluff and say they DONT care about mommies. They only care about wombs that have the potential to incubate more sons.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 12:18 pm
That IS very Dark Ages of them. Of course, once those sons are born they don’t give a damn about them either.
Karen
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 12:30 pm
I counter that thought -
They seem to have plenty of energy to spare to protect the privileges of SOME of them.
When looked at in human terms it’s very easy to see who’s privileges are being protected.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Sure, they take care of their own but they don’t care if all the babies they force to be born are taken care of or not. They don’t want to have to “pay for” anybody else’s healthcare. If all the “untermenschen” die, the Republican supermen will rule the world.
Cassandra Vert
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 11:50 am
I read a persuasive explanation that men and women, in broad general terms, think differently and approach problems differently. While the female approach (more collaborative and analytical) is considered superior in school, the male approach (more individual and assertive) is considered superior on the job. This explains the glass ceiling more than it explains pay disparity, but it has some implications for pay disparity too. This is not a conscious choice; it’s one of those assumptions we don’t realize we’re making, and it affects well-meaning people of both genders who think they are being fair.
Karen
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 12:13 pm
Everything is ultimately a conscious choice. Being aware that generally speaking some brains perceive differently than others is only the first step.
The second step is working with that knowledge to become aware of our own perspectives and conditioned responses and attempt to transcend them.
Our brains are all unique and we all perceive differently. Giving credence to only one view is shortsighted and only leads to more suffering.
lilly lily
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 12:35 pm
It is horrifying what the fundi or is it Tea Baggers men are doing. I’m appalled, especially by the man in Georgia who wants to pass a bill investigating miscarriage, to make sure it isn’t a abortion. Pure and simply appalling.
How demeaning.
And Sarah Palin is their standard.
A woman who has done all they object to?
Reynardine
Mar. 6th, 2011 at 12:41 pm
Having kept assorted species in numbers, I’d say alpha fighting is more common in males, but when you have a “queen bee” among females, she may be downright murderous. Several entire males can, in fact, exist in a group, even if getting there isn’t always pretty. All mammalian societies appear to have started with a mother and offspring, generally female, that didn’t leave, as many mothers drive off sons when they reach breeding age. In times of peace, female leadership seems the rule; threat by predators or rival males brings out male dominance. How much, if any, of that applies to human beings cannot be known, as individual differences and cultural pressure play an enormous part in how we turn out, as do family pathologies. Every individual deserves an even break and a fair chance, and I reckon I’ve shed no light at all.
Reynardine
Mar. 7th, 2011 at 9:07 am
Without untermenschen, there can be no uebermenschen. To paraphrase George Orwell, the face must always be there for the boot to stamp on, and as one untermensch group is extinguished, another must be designated, a principle Hitler understood perfectly. As for babies, the “right” babies are seen as seedbanks for future uebermenschen, but “wrong” babies, once they have served their function of punishing their mothers for nonvirginity, are likely to be targets of terrible malice: Gideon Hausner, among others, reports the special sadism directed at Jewish infants, and designations like “anchor babies” and “terror babies” leaves no doubt our own bigots would do as much.