Comments on: The Silent Oppression of Women Is America’s Greatest Shame

By: Anne

Anne — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:15:09 +0000

Yes, it’s a truly sad joke that other women are supposed to be jealous of emotionally and intellectually stunted women like Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Not only are these women judged by their looks, which are overrated in my opinion–but they are also used as tools in the oppression of their own gender. What we’re being told in effect is that we can succeed by being brainless bimbos. By the same token, I would bet that these bozos would have no use for these women as they age and lose the looks they do have. The same clowns that push this nonsense are also the main ones in denial about the importance of the women’s movement in the first place. They are showing the attitudes that necessitated that movement to begin with.

What do you think? 0 0

By: Reynardine

Reynardine — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:07:35 +0000

Without untermenschen, there can be no uebermenschen. To paraphrase George Orwell, the face must always be there for the boot to stamp on, and as one untermensch group is extinguished, another must be designated, a principle Hitler understood perfectly. As for babies, the “right” babies are seen as seedbanks for future uebermenschen, but “wrong” babies, once they have served their function of punishing their mothers for nonvirginity, are likely to be targets of terrible malice: Gideon Hausner, among others, reports the special sadism directed at Jewish infants, and designations like “anchor babies” and “terror babies” leaves no doubt our own bigots would do as much.

What do you think? 0 0

By: Sarah Jones

Sarah Jones — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:13:23 +0000

Bobbitize indeed! Where is Bobby Franklin, again?

What do you think? 0 0

By: Hrafnkell Haraldsson

Hrafnkell Haraldsson — Sun, 06 Mar 2011 19:17:46 +0000

Sure, they take care of their own but they don’t care if all the babies they force to be born are taken care of or not. They don’t want to have to “pay for” anybody else’s healthcare. If all the “untermenschen” die, the Republican supermen will rule the world.

What do you think? 0 0

By: Reynardine

Reynardine — Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:41:09 +0000

Having kept assorted species in numbers, I’d say alpha fighting is more common in males, but when you have a “queen bee” among females, she may be downright murderous. Several entire males can, in fact, exist in a group, even if getting there isn’t always pretty. All mammalian societies appear to have started with a mother and offspring, generally female, that didn’t leave, as many mothers drive off sons when they reach breeding age. In times of peace, female leadership seems the rule; threat by predators or rival males brings out male dominance. How much, if any, of that applies to human beings cannot be known, as individual differences and cultural pressure play an enormous part in how we turn out, as do family pathologies. Every individual deserves an even break and a fair chance, and I reckon I’ve shed no light at all.

What do you think? 0 0