Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
The Conservative LA Times: ‘The only thing he (Romney) really stands for is his own election’
By: Sarah JonesOct. 22nd, 2012more from Sarah Jones
In a flood of new endorsements for Obama, the consensus is that Obama has a vision for this country while Romney stands for nothing except a belief that he should be president.
While we’ve been focused on swing state endorsements, Obama also got an endorsement from the conservative LA Times in which they write that Romney’s ever-changing positions leave the impression that “the only thing he really stands for is his own election.” Additionally the Sante Fe New Mexican wrote passionately about the President’s gutsy leadership in getting Osama and Obama’s slow and steady approach that is focused on the needs of the country, working for the collective good.
The Sante Fe New Mexican endorsed President Obama for a second term, saying his steady leadership stayed focused on the collective good. They note Obama’s gutsy leadership in getting Osama bin Laden:
He inherited an unholy mess — an economy teetering on the edge of a second Great Depression and two foreign wars top the list of disasters. Slowly, steadily and with his eye fixed firmly on the needs of the country, the president has worked hard every day to improve our collective good. It was President Obama who bailed out the auto industry, salvaging 1.1 million jobs and keeping manufacturing alive in this country. It was President Obama who made the gutsy call to invade a compound in Pakistan, tracking down and killing Osama bin Laden. It was President Obama who finally signed comprehensive health reform so that no American has to fear bankruptcy because of a medical catastrophe. More work remains for a second term…
So much accomplished in four years. So much remaining to be done.
The conservative LA Times (yes, Virginia, conservatives do have a voice in Los Angeles) that Murdoch is eyeing up to buy in order to spread his filthy propaganda endorsed Obama, saying Romney is flat out wrong on the issues and his willingness to pander raise questions about who he is.
Republicans have sought to make the presidential election an up-or-down vote on Obama, hoping that voters will hold him accountable for the country’s stubbornly high unemployment and sluggish economy. But this election isn’t a referendum on one candidate, it’s a choice between two. And unfortunately for the GOP, its candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, has demonstrated clearly that he’s the wrong choice. He’s wrong on the issues, from immigration to tax policy to the use of American power to gay rights and beyond. And his shifting positions and willingness to pander have raised questions about who he is and what he stands for.
They call Romney out for not standing for anything other than his own reelection:
The most troubling aspect of Romney’s candidacy is that we still don’t know what his principles are. Is he the relatively moderate Republican who was governor of Massachusetts, the “severely conservative” one on display in the GOP primaries or the more reasonable-sounding fellow who reappeared at the presidential debates? His modulating positions on his own tax plan, healthcare reform, financial regulation, Medicare, immigration and the national safety net add to the impression that the only thing he really stands for is his own election.
Repeatedly, the editorials endorsing Obama call Mitt Romney out for standing for nothing but his own election. He is a man who has shown himself to have no core convictions other than a belief that he is entitled to the White House. On the other hand, we have President Obama who is praised for his guiding principles of working for the common good of all Americans, his steady hand on a teetering economy, and his diplomatic finesse in foreign relations.
The Republicans put up a candidate who quite simply has offered the American people nothing but his belief in his entitlement to the White House.
Swing state papers in Colorado, Ohio, North Carolina, and Arizona (yes, Arizona is turning out to be a 2 ...
The largest newspaper in the swing state of Ohio, The Cleveland Plain Dealer, endorsed President Obama f ...
While endorsing President Obama today, Gen. Colin Powell ripped Mitt Romney's 'moving target' foreign ...
Major papers in two swing states (Florida and Colorado) endorsed President Barack Obama for a second ter ...
After the Salt Lake Tribune endorsed Obama, Romney must have been relieved when his other home state paper ...
Anne
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 7:14 am
It speaks volumes about the extent of Willard Romney’s untrustworthiness that even conservative newspapers are publicly acknowledging the truth of who he is and endorsing Barack Obama. The LA Times hit the nail on the head when they described Willard as being only about getting elected and having no ethical core.
SinghX
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 7:39 am
It’s interesting that the news print media, the old establishment papers, are being somewhat “respectful” to both candidates however, this won’t sit well with the new radical right wing cable/web propaganda outlets. As stated, “Uncle Rupie” has his eye on buying out the LA Times as a way to run over, ruin, and build more of his empire upon whom ever disagrees with his media.
The Fundamentalist will see the newspapers as in the hands of Satan, the GOP will drag Sister Sara in front of the cameras to perform her infamous scree of trigger-words “lamestream media”, Karl Rove will spin the news and push more money into palms…Romeny/Ryan will slither around hissing more lies.
How many days until this is over?
Reynardine
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 9:05 am
The Salt Lake City Tribune said essentially the same thing, with a twist: they had dearly wished Romney had been worthy of their endorsement, but he wasn’t.
David Harper
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 11:03 am
The LA Times is not conservative…not even close… If you lived in LA you would know…
Archie Turteltaub
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 11:15 am
Well, they do print Jonah Godlberg’s column, every now and then!
Richard
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 2:03 pm
All I can say is that Sarah Jones must not read the LA Times very much to think it’s a conservative publication.
vicki
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 11:09 am
He is in his 6th yr run for his presidency, His need for this power is actually pretty scary, and not normal. You watch him speak, and you see him pause with that smirk taking in the applause, he has to have it and feed upon it. This man in not mentally sound, I dont want him at that button! Any man without true conviction at his age is not trust worthy!
ray
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 11:56 am
and while we’re at it don’t forget the Salt Lake Tribune a devastating put down of Romney
Tim
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 1:25 pm
‘The only thing he (Romney) really stands for is his own election”
I disagree I think Mitt stands for raiding the public trust for social security, medicare, the VA and education.
These guys are like crack addicts, there is a pile of money setting there with no one able to get to it and it is driving these boys nuts.
kevin
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 1:48 pm
These endorsments speak the truth,I have been a voter for almost forty years, and I must say that I have never seen a candidate quite like this idiot, Romney. The lying, the flip-flopping,and just the uneasiness about this guy. In my old neighborhood, he’s the guy that no one respected and basically got his ass whooped because of it. Dont be fooled, he doesnt care about you or me (I,m certainly in the 47%).This idiot really thanks that he is entitled to the White House. He has been campaigning for 6 years and I still don’t known where he stands. Regardless of Political affiliation, race or gender, dont fall for his bullshit.
Peter
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 1:49 pm
Even if the other side doesn’t I think we should keep trying to get the facts right. The LA Times certainly isn’t a conservative paper.
James Threadgill
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 2:20 pm
This is clearly a battle of the greedy, self-entitled, and dispassionate elite and those of the angry white working class they can manipulate with lies, fear, and racism against everyone else. To frame it in any other terms is ignorant at best, disingenuous, cynical, and self-centered at worst.
regressivewatch.org
Jeff Aline
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 6:34 pm
Wow! Eight adjectives in 2 sentences.
@damspahn
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 2:50 pm
No wonder Murdoch wants to buy them. The conservative LA paper thinks for itself. He’ll put a stop to that!
labman57
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 2:51 pm
Even many conservatives can plainly see that Romney has been channeling his inner Whimpy:
“I’ll gladly change my policy position today for your vote on Tuesday …”
mjh
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 8:34 pm
Or, as the Mittster himself said:
“I stand by what I said, whatever it was.”
www.youtube.com/watch?v=I...
.
stan Lewis
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 5:57 pm
Romney: Where are your tax returns for the 8 years prior to 2010? You asked for and received 10 years of returns during the vettng process for Paul Ryan. Weii the American people have the right to vet you too. What are you hiding??? I cannot vote for a candidate who refuses to come clean with the voters about his fiancial dealings.
Darnelle
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 8:35 pm
The LA Times use to be conservative, but it has become more liberal in the last 5-10 years. Regardless, I am glad they have endorsed Obama. I’ve never seen a campaign that has had so much lying and just plain creepiness. I thought George Bush was bad but he seems tame compared to Romney. Republicans have been accusing Obama of flip-flopping lying, all the things their candidate is, it’s insane.
I can honestly say I am worried if Obama doesn’t win, it feels like there is a huge dumbing down in America…Hoping for good to prevail.
Inez
Oct. 22nd, 2012 at 9:15 pm
Just finished reading , again, abut Mormonism, Shocking, one of their beliefs is “civil government shall be replaced by RELIGIOUS GOVERNMENT> If Mitt is elected the White House will be a MORMON TEMPLE>>>>>>Their doctrine proves that!
Lucy Brown
Oct. 30th, 2012 at 10:16 am
The new CEO of GM, chosen by the President is in China
saying,”we are with China.” We are with the Chinese Unions, we are going to bring our American our research and development to China. GM is going to be
Global.
Who is outsourcing?
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 30th, 2012 at 10:22 am
GM has been global for a long time. After the recovery some of GM’s biggest sales were overseas. GM has been producing in China for a long time.
GM is also hired almost all of its people back and is re-opening some of its plants here.
Certainly remember years ago when Signor Lopez was in charge of GM procuring parts he encouraged suppliers to move to Mexico and China.
Ford and Chrysler do the same thing