Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Texas Sues The Federal Government For The Power To Suppress The Vote
There are myriad opinions on whether or not America is a democracy, a republic, or a representative democracy and it is reasonable to conclude that the nation is a bastardized form of representative democracy. The concept of the population electing representatives to govern the country has never taken hold in America since its founding because all of the people were not allowed to vote until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that echoed the 15th Amendment to the Constitution in 1870 giving African Americans the right to vote. In their never-ending attempt to deny the right to vote to all Americans, Republicans have proposed voter ID laws meant to disenfranchise likely Democratic voters and in Texas, they are suing the federal government claiming the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is unconstitutional.
For the past year, at the direction of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), states with Republican-controlled legislatures have enacted a plethora of voter-suppression laws aimed at restricting students, the elderly, low-income, and minority citizens from participating in the democratic process. ALEC is a corporate-funded group that gathers business interests and conservative legislators to advance agendas that make it easier for corporations to influence elections and make it more difficult for voters to cast ballots. Republicans in several states followed ALEC’s directives and passed voter ID laws that, according to proponents, are meant to “erect barriers to voting by college students” because they are more likely than not to vote for Democrats.
The Texas lawsuit is in response to the Justice Department’s suspension of a strict voter ID law that will disenfranchise more that half-a-million Latino voters who lack government-issued photo ID cards. Other Republican-controlled states have enacted similar laws to dissuade alleged voter fraud and in-person voter impersonation by claiming they are protecting ballot integrity. The claims are a ruse to disenfranchise voters because several studies revealed that voter fraud is nearly non-existent and there are sufficient laws on the books to cite and prosecute cheaters. The Justice Department’s decision is well within its purview to suspend the Texas law based on Section Five of the Voting Rights Act.
According to Section Five, the federal government must approve changes in voting rules in states and counties with records of race-based discrimination, and the Texas law certainly qualifies as race-based discrimination because it primarily affects Hispanic voters. Recently, Texas lost a court battle with the DOJ over redistricting maps the courts found were violations of the Voting Rights Act. Texas claims that the Tenth Amendment gives them the right to restrict voting if they please, but several federal judges on separate benches independently “concluded the state’s Republican-controlled legislature drew new legislative districts that intentionally kept communities of color” from electing representatives to Congress and the Texas legislature. However, illegal redistricting aside, it is the various states’ voter ID laws that are a major threat to America’s fragile democracy according to a Wisconsin Circuit Judge.
The ruling last Monday by Dane County Circuit Judge Richard Niess was a compelling argument why Wisconsin’s voter ID law is unconstitutional. In his ruling, Niess wrote, “Without question, where it exists, voter fraud corrupts elections and undermines our form of government. The legislature and governor may certainly take aggressive action to prevent its occurrence. But voter fraud is no more poisonous to our democracy than voter suppression. Indeed, they are two heads on the same monster. A government that undermines the very foundation of its existence—the people’s inherent, pre-constitutional right to vote—imperils its legitimacy as a government by the people, for the people, and especially of the people. It sows the seeds for its own demise as a democratic institution.” Judge Niess’s order “permanently enjoined forthwith from any further implementation or enforcement” of the voter ID law.
The Republican voter ID laws are particularly construed to target students, the elderly, minorities, and poor Americans who lack government-issued photo identification cards. According to NYU’s Brennan Center, 11% of Americans of voting age lack government-issued photo identification and the GOP’s attacks are a “massive attack on voting rights.” College students who attend schools that are not near their permanent residences cannot acquire IDs because of their temporary residency status, and elderly Americans who are shut-in in retirement or nursing homes do not have the ability to get ID cards. Minorities and low-income Americans who are apt to move to find affordable housing cannot get photo IDs because of residency requirements. The Republicans’ voter ID laws are deliberately constructed to make it nearly, if not entirely, impossible for those groups to ever vote because they will never be able to get the “proper” photo ID. Some other Republicans schemes to suppress voting are reducing early voting periods and restricting late voter registration.
The concept of allowing all Americans to vote is one means of guaranteeing that every citizen is equal and represented in government. The president of the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin summed up the basic premise of equal protection in voting when she said, “Voting is one way in which all citizens are equal, and that is worth fighting for,” and it is why Republicans, at the direction of ALEC are so adamantly against allowing every American to vote. Apparently, Republicans are still furious they lost the White House in 2008 and are intent on making it as difficult as possible for prospective Democratic-leaning voters from participating in future elections. Instead of restricting all Americans from voting, there are some measures that could be enacted to give every American a better opportunity to participate in America’s disappearing democracy.
One simple approach is giving every working American a national paid holiday on the day of an election instead of restricting the time the polls are open. Closing polls at 7 p.m. is particularly restrictive for working Americans who may not have sufficient time to leave work and make it to their polling place in time to vote. Allowing more liberal late voter registration, provisional ballots, and extending early voting would give voters an opportunity to participate in elections, but that is counter-productive to Republicans’ intent of giving corporations control of elections. There are many Republicans who advocate for disallowing citizens to vote for Senators and instead, want a panel of Republicans to appoint representatives to the upper chamber.
Republicans know they cannot win fair elections because the American people are aware of their agendas of entitlements for the wealthy, corporations, the oil industry, and destroying protections for 99% of the American people. Republicans also cannot run against President Obama’s record because in spite of their obstruction, he has turned the economy around and passed legislation that protects the American people. Their only hope is suppressing Democratic voters to give corporations and theocrats control of the government.
It has been nearly 50 years since the Voting Rights Act passed that ended racial discrimination and Republicans who are most certainly associated with suppressing minority, low-income, student, and elderly voters are attacking democracy by claiming the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional. While they are at it, they should just nullify the entire Constitution and appoint a panel of corporate and religious leaders as the Supreme Council to issue edicts to replace the rule of law. Fortunately, the courts and DOJ are defending voting rights for all Americans to stop the worst assault on voting rights since the 1960s that has as its real purpose destroying democracy, equality, and finally, America.
As informed liberals know, voters across the country have been losing their constitutionally g ...
In the name of fulfilling their number one priority of making Obama a one term president, Republicans dedi ...
Conservatives and Republicans are waging a war on a key section of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), claiming ...
During America's founding, the Constitution's framers did not believe in the one man, one vote concept u ...
An entitlement is guaranteed access to benefits based on established rights or legislation and a right i ...
Reynardine
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 11:09 am
Again, what never fails to astound me (though it surprises me no longer) is the *shamelessness* of this stuff. Do they think the majority in this country agrees with them? Do they think we don’t notice? Do they think it doesn’t matter, because somhow- will we, nil we- they will inevitably get their way? Or is it to intimidate us into inaction, giving them time to become as invincible as (right now) they can only pretend they are?
Though I don’t have the case names at hand this instant, the Voting Rights Act has been tested and upheld before. Are they depending on a Supreme Court majority so corrupt as to completely overturn its own precedents, as it did in Citizens United? Whatever it is, this overboldness is…interesting, Watson, and it’s something to keep an eye on.
Shiva (Moderator)
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 11:11 am
Given that suppressing elections is as bad as voter fraud, the fact that the GOP is so blantantly doing this is nothing short of incredible. Its like they are waving a flag and telling minoritys we will not let you vote, we will suppress you, and we will not represent you until your skin color changes.
And they are getting away with it in so many places. While we recognize that it is happening, what I look forward to is seeing if the Dems take the congress back will they stop this legally.
Tim
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 11:40 am
Time for Texas to take back it’s state. The voters in Texas apparently do not how their tax dollars are spent and care little for democracy. They are in a race to the bottom.
Deborah Montesano
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 11:45 am
Like a fraternity that misbehaves, can’t the GOP be suspended from operation until they clean up their act?
ottomarcos
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 11:46 am
As a Proud Liberal Democrat living in the very progressive city of Austin, where one of the biggest universities in the country is located, I’d like to stress that it’s actually the “GOP attorney general” of Texas, backed by our repugnant “governor” and “lieutenant governor” that is suing the Federal Government. Be assured millions of Texans oppose this action. It is incumbent upon the Democratic Party to do as much as is humanly possible to step up voter registration of minorities (Hispanics, in particular), and then to get Democratic voters out to the polls for every election held in our state. Instead of giving up on Texas, Democrats could really turn things around here, in the future!
Johnee
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 1:13 pm
Fellow Austinite here. Democrats can turn things around in Texas. Remember however, that Austin is an island of tolerance and reason surrounded by by a sea of ignorance and fundamentalism. Texas… home of the giving equal time to “intelligent design” in public school science classes. What’s weird is the contradictions that exist in the rest of Texas. Both Dallas and Houston have a large gay population that reside in a sizable section of those towns. Houston in particular has a downtown area that is very art, science, and culture oriented. One wouldn’t expect to see these kinds of things, to this degree, in cities where most of the rural population and elected officials are extremely conservative.
Debbie Perry
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 1:36 pm
I agree…I don’t live in Texas but I support all the Dems who work so hard to make their state great. I do not judge the state by it’s loopy Govenor.
Corey Mondello
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 12:56 pm
The question shouldnt be what is America a democracy, a republic, etc…. because it really doenst matter. since its creation, there have been two bickering sides that intermingle within the two major parties; First, those who are follow the conservative ideology, like John Adams that locked people up for saying/printinh thing he didnt like, and George W Bush who helped make it illegal in atleast 5 states to wear a particular t-shirt he didnt like. Secondly, those like Thomas Jefferson, those who one could say follow a more liberal ideology, that stopped the law passed that allowed John Adams the ability to dissent, and those who support rights for the minorites, like supporting a woman’s right to get an education and to vote, for Quakers and Mormons to not be lynched legally by Puritans, for protecting consumers against corporation who have enough money to literally get away with murder, etc. The question should be, What kind of country do you want to live in?
Troy
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 3:51 pm
So if you are a citizen of the USA and can show you are no matter who you are minorities or not what is the issue of showing a ID before you vote? I would like this to protection against illegal voting by anyone but those who would not I must conclude feel it’s alright for non-citizens to vote. Too much drama over this issue, we do allow merchants to ask for Identification before selling alcohol or cigarettes to minors, are you people against that too? I would’ve been when I was sixteen but I am an adult now and See that this is a necessary measure to protect the public. Just my opinion though think what you want, our left and right thinking citizens died for that privilege! Remember the vote is a honor bestowed on citizens not a public service due.
Reynardine
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 5:11 pm
What the Hell do you mean, Troy, by, “the vote is a [sic] honor bestowed on citizens, not a public service due”? The vote is a Constitutional right inherent in citizenship and majority, not an “honor” or a privilege awarded for being “good”. As such, it can only be revoked for good cause, such as a felony conviction or an affirmative showing that the voter was either not a citizen or not of age. Once a citizen has lawfully obtained a voter’s registration card, it is not permissible for the state to impose ever more burdensome requirements that disenfranchise already-qualified voters on the chance that they will detect a few fakers, and the chances are that such measures are in mala fides.
Elizabeth
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 8:05 pm
First of all, there is NO evidence of widespread voter fraud. Thus we are working to solve a non-problem. Second is the “hoops” the states have erected against those who would try to get THE required card. It isn’t just a matter of a picture ID, it is a particular picture ID obtained at a particular location during particular hours. In some states apparently you have to come back more than once especially if you don’t have the particular paperwork they want. In other words, they make it as hard as possible to obtain this all important state ID card.
Eli Cabelly
Mar. 17th, 2012 at 6:24 pm
Let me get this straight: The state of Texas is suing the Federal Government to suppress democracy and become a fascist state controlled by corporate and religious radicals. That would become a lot easier if they seceded from the USA first. Then they could do whatever they wanted. I would feel very sorry for the people of Austin though. They seem to be some of the few who understand the ideal of democracy.
Patrick Corliss
Mar. 18th, 2012 at 1:28 am
In Australia we always vote on Saturday.
Have done for 40 years to my knowledge.
You don’t need a paid holiday.
Plus our voting is COMPULSORY !!!!
Or as Americans usually say MANDATORY.
John
Mar. 18th, 2012 at 7:30 am
I have to show a photo ID here (not in Texas) to vote. I have to be registered to vote as well and vote at the right place. Most people under 40 that I know do not vote but I vote every time in all elections and run off elections.My ex lives in another country and if they fail to vote they have to pay a fine; which maybe we should do here too. You have to have an ID to do anything here and I can’t imagine many people not having an ID and anyone too dumb to have an ID maybe should not be voting rather than voting several times in several places. Mandatory voting (one time) would certainly solve some problems and a photo ID should be part of the requirement.No more insane claims requiring an ID subverts democracy. Next we should be sure our children can buy strong booze without an ID so the rights of children are not being denied.
Reynardine
Mar. 19th, 2012 at 11:23 am
John, somebody pooped in your brains and forgot to flush.
We are not talking about *an* I.D. We are talking about a *particular* I.D., no more authentic than others that have been disallowed, but harder for specific people to obtain. Why is a carry permit or a hunting license accepted unquestioningly, while a student I.D., though issued by a school, college, or university in possession of a student’s records since kindergarten, not? Because, in the minds of the good lawmakers, students vote left and gun-owners vote right. Why are residency requirements being tightened right when so many people are being forced from their homes? Because the dispossessed might engage in “class warfare”; we can’t have that. Why are birth certificates being demanded? Because, again, that is the kind of document the dispossessed no longer have and may be unable to replace. Why are both voting and registration hours and periods being curtailed, and registration offices consolidated? Again, because people who have to hold down two or three McJobs can be prevented from voting that way.
One time, a cardinal principle of being American was being fair. Now, appeals to fairness are called “class warfare”.
Bruce
Mar. 18th, 2012 at 12:03 pm
I’m with you in spirit, but I really don’t understand the problem. On one side, there seems to be little-to-no voter fraud, so why create a new law? On the other side, why is it so onerous to show proper ID? It’s not like the TX voter laws are restrictive… here is a list of “approved” ID taken from the TX voter registration web page:
a driver’s license or personal identification card issued to the person by the Department of Public Safety or a similar document issued to the person by an agency of another state, regardless of whether the license or card has expired;
a form of identification containing the person’s photograph that establishes the person’s identity;
a birth certificate or other document confirming birth that is admissible in a court of law and establishes the person’s identity;
United States citizenship papers issued to the person;
a United States passport issued to the person;
official mail addressed to the person by name from a governmental entity;
a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the name and address of the voter; or
any other form of identification prescribed by the Secretary of State.
A Walkaway
Mar. 19th, 2012 at 10:59 am
For poor people, those documents may be hard to get, or they may not know how or where to get them. The states too have a nasty reputation of putting barriers in the way of people seeking to establish their documentation – for instance, fees that seem reasonable to one person are prohibitively expensive for the poor.
If someone is homeless, it is probable that they’ve lost all of their documents (for instance, the local police used a clamshell truck to take everyone’s camps to the dump… people lost everything including their papers. One notable loss – a woman lost the only pictures she had of her baby who had died). It’s hard to keep stuff like that, much less keep it in legible condition, when you’re living out of dumpsters and on the streets.
Just because someone is poor or homeless, that doesn’t mean they’ve also lost the right to vote or even should be punished by loss of their franchise. As most people who are homeless or very poor are in that situation because of things outside of their control (health, job loss due to outsourcing or acquisition, etc.), they should not loose their rights because they’re poor (nobody should loose their rights unless they’ve committed a crime anyway – and the punishment should fit the crime).
artisanrox
Mar. 19th, 2012 at 10:37 am
Koch Brothers (=ALEC) hard at work making sure the whole nation becomes a serfdom.