CNN’s Anderson Cooper Joins Rush Limbaugh’s Enemies List

Rush Limbaugh Attacks Anderson Cooper for Taking Ronald Reagan's Name in Vain
Yep, Obama is nothing like this guy.

CNN’s Anderson Cooper joined Rush Limbaugh’s enemies list last night when on his program he dared to compare Obama’s efforts on reducing nuclear weapons to Ronald Reagan’s. Limbaugh said that nobody watches Anderson Cooper because he doesn’t get that, “Reagan’s name is being taken in vain here.” Reagan has now been officially deified and Republicans are worshiping a false God.

Here is the audio courtesy of Media Matters:

On his program Anderson Cooper said, “His efforts a lot like former president Ronald Reagan, so why are so many Republicans criticizing him?” Limbaugh responded with a dose of revisionist history insanity, “This is why so many people don’t watch Anderson Cooper. His effort is a lot like former president Reagan so why are so many Republicans criticizing, because Reagan’s name is being taken in vain here. There is absolutely no similarity what so ever in Obama and Reagan. This is Carter, and the way he would approach things and did approach things. Obama is simply the second term of Jimmy Carter.”

At this moment, I think it is best to present a little of both Barack Obama and Ronald Reagan on the nuclear arms issue. On April 5, 2009 in Prague, Obama said, “Some argue that the spread of these weapons cannot be stopped, cannot be checked — that we are destined to live in a world where more nations and more people possess the ultimate tools of destruction. Such fatalism is a deadly adversary, for if we believe that the spread of nuclear weapons is inevitable, then in some way we are admitting to ourselves that the use of nuclear weapons is inevitable.”

Obama continued, “Just as we stood for freedom in the 20th century, we must stand together for the right of people everywhere to live free from fear in the 21st century. And as nuclear power — as a nuclear power, as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act. We cannot succeed in this endeavor alone, but we can lead it, we can start it. So today, I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. I’m not naive. This goal will not be reached quickly — perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence. But now we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change. We have to insist, “Yes, we can.”

Here is what Reagan said on May 16, 1983, “I can’t believe that this world can go on beyond our generation and on down to succeeding generations with this kind of weapon on both sides poised at each other without someday some fool or some maniac or some accident triggering the kind of war that is the end of the line for all of us. And I just think of what a sigh of relief would go up from everyone on this earth if someday-and this is what I have-my hope, way in the back of my head-is that if we start down the road to reduction, maybe one day in doing that, somebody will say, ‘Why not all the way? Let’s get rid of all these things.'”

Here is President Reagan on May 22, 1984, “Most of the people have been hearing in political dialog from one side, since we’ve been here in the 3 1/2 years, that I somehow have an itchy finger and am going to blow up the world. And that has all been duly reported by so many of you that that is the tone that the people have been getting. And it doesn’t do me any good to tell you that, having seen four wars in my lifetime, I don’t know of anyone, in or out of government that is more determinedly seeking peace than I am. And my goal is the total elimination of nuclear weapons. If we can get those fellows back to the table and get them to start down that road of mutual reduction, then they might find out what common sense it would mean to eliminate them.”

This is what President Reagan said on October 20, 1986, “It is my fervent goal and hope…that we will someday no longer have to rely on nuclear weapons to deter aggression and assure world peace. To that end the United States is now engaged in a serious and sustained effort to negotiate major reductions in levels of offensive nuclear weapons with the ultimate goal of eliminating these weapons from the face of the earth.”

Finally here is what Reagan said on March 25, 1988, “As I have indicated in previous statements to the Congress, my central arms control objective has been to reduce substantially and ultimately to eliminate nuclear weapons and rid the world of the nuclear threat. The prevention of the spread of nuclear explosives to additional countries is an indispensable part of our efforts to meet this objective. I intend to continue my pursuit of this goal with untiring determination and a profound sense of personal commitment.”

By looking at all of the above statements, you can see for yourself that Obama and Reagan do have a lot in common, and Anderson Cooper’s question was beyond reasonable. It isn’t just that people like Limbaugh have warped and deified Reagan. It is also that the right wing refuses to acknowledge that Barack Obama is great deal like Ronald Reagan. Both men maintained personal popularity even when their political standing was down. Even those they are ideologically different, both men have/had leadership and vision, and both men are/were prone to sentimentality about America and its place in the world.

The right wing has been feeding itself the fantasy that Obama is Carter in order to hope that they can defeat Obama in 2012. If people, like Limbaugh were to accept that Obama is like Reagan, then they would have to face the notion of almost certain defeat in 2012. The right has not only distorted the words of Ronald Reagan, but they are also in total denial about the personal popularity and success of Barack Obama. It is no big shock that the journalist, Anderson Cooper, would have the facts on his side against the propagandist, Rush Limbaugh.

All Reagan quotes are courtesy of The Global Security Institute

Reagan image from sodahead.com

5 Replies to “CNN’s Anderson Cooper Joins Rush Limbaugh’s Enemies List”

  1. I’ve heard the Right-wing radio talkers deifying Reagan for at least 3 years now. I used to commute through the center of Atlanta, GA and the only way to get good traffic reports was to suffer through Hannity. I got the feeling that if Saint Ronnie were alive and in studio with Sean, Sean would drop to his knees, and offer oral sex.

    And of course, now that a Democrat is saying almost exactly the same things that their favorite demigod said, it is blasphemy.

    The republicans sure seem to have short memories, have you noticed? The recent health care bill is virtually identical to Mitt Romney’s program in Massachucetts, yet now it’s evil, socialistic, (practically commie), and suddenly filibusters are all the rage, and expressions of true-blue American Pride (TM). In a few years, one way or another, the Republicans will find themselves in power once again, The US will elect another GOP President, and the Congress and Senate will be occupied by a moajority of Republicans – maybe not at the same time, I can hope – and the Dems will be in the position that the Reps are in now. Will the Republicans feel as charitable when a Democratic Congressman or Senator filibusters a Republican President’s signature program, or will they call for the erecting of gallows on Pennsylvania Avenue?

  2. @Bad Wolf, Good points one and all. I think I have never heard a Republican say that old Andy Alzheimer’s name was being taken in vain. That is what makes this so extreme.

  3. A Day in the Life of Joe Conservative*

    Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare
    his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-
    hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards. With his
    first swallow of water, he takes his daily medication. His medications
    are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to ensure
    their safety and that they work as advertised.

    All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer’s medical
    plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for
    paid medical insurance — now Joe gets it, too.

    He prepares his morning breakfast: bacon and eggs. Joe’s bacon is safe
    to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the
    meat packing industry.

    In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. His bottle is
    properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total
    contents because some crybaby liberal fought for his right to know
    what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.

    Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he
    breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought
    for the laws to stop industries from polluting our air.

    He walks on the government-provided sidewalk to the subway station for
    his government-subsidized ride to work. It saves him considerable
    money in parking and transportation fees because some fancy-pants
    liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives
    everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.

    Joe begins his work day. He has a good job with excellent pay, medical
    benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some lazy
    liberal union members fought and died for these working standards.
    Joe’s employer pays these standards because Joe’s employer doesn’t
    want his employees to call the union.

    If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, he’ll get a worker
    compensation or unemployment checks because some stupid liberal didn’t
    think he should lose his home because of his temporary misfortune.

    It is noontime and Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some
    bills. Joe’s deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some
    godless liberal wanted to protect Joe’s money from unscrupulous
    bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression.

    Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his below-
    market federal student loan because some elitist liberal decided that
    Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and
    earned more money over his lifetime. Joe also forgets that in addition
    to his federally subsidized student loans, he attended a state funded
    university.

    Joe is home from work. He plans to visit his father this evening at
    his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive. His
    car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating
    liberal fought for car safety standards to go along with the taxpayer
    funded roads.

    He arrives at his boyhood home. His was the third generation to live
    in the house financed by Farmers’ Home Administration because bankers
    didn’t want to make rural loans.

    The house didn’t have electricity until some big-government liberal
    stuck his nose where it didn’t belong and demanded rural
    electrification.

    He is happy to see his father, who is now retired. His father lives on
    Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking, cheese-
    eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe wouldn’t
    have to.

    Joe gets back in his car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk
    show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and
    conservatives are good. He doesn’t mention that the beloved
    conservatives have fought against every protection and benefit Joe
    enjoys throughout his day. Joe agrees: “We don’t need those big-
    government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I’m a self-made man
    who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I
    have.”

  4. I just like to post that to random blogs every few months. I don’t know the original source, but IMHO it’s golden, and should be circulated to every right-wing nut you all know.

  5. Evidently Rush forgets what Reagan did during his tenure of living with oxycontin. Not surprising.

Comments are closed.