The Ghost of Vietnam Haunts the Left and Right Over Iraq

Leaving Iraq
Leaving Iraq
Advertisements

I don’t know about you, but for years, I’ve been secretly longing for that Time Life moment post World War II; the kiss of a returning soldier, the final exhale of an exhausted nation. I can’t say that I pictured a happy America, but I had imagined a unified America.

But we aren’t going to get that moment, because there was a war in between WWII and Iraq.

We’re dubious. Not only have we’ve been lied to rather recently (WMD), but we’re battling with the national scars from our defeat in Vietnam.

Advertisements

Touching on the open wound of American cynicism, one of the reporters covering a combat brigade’s return home actually used the words “Mission Accomplished”. He cringed as he said it, but noted it was true. The mission to train Iraqis to take over is winding down. In just a few more days, all of our combat troops will be home. It seems that post Vietnam and Bush, we can’t even feel good for a few minutes without waiting for the other shoe to drop.

This morning on CNN’s “State of the Union,” and CBS’ “Face the Nation”, Army Gen. Ray Odierno, Commanding General in Iraq, said that any resumption of combat duties by American forces is unlikely. “We don’t see that happening. (The Iraqi security forces have been doing) “so well for so long now that we really believe we’re beyond that point.” He also pointed out that it will take years before we know if the war was a success. So, it’s over but it’s not cut and dried.

Americans have been waiting for years to hear those words: the war is over. But when it happened, it was an over-simplified media event that belied the complexities of our invasion of Iraq. It seemed the media and Pentagon had just picked a day to declare the war was over, when in reality, we had been drawing down for months and knew that the official day for having all of our combat troops out of Iraq was August 31.

So it was a show, but it was a true show. We are leaving. But it does make me nervous.

In the wake of this announcement, the Left claims the war has simply been rebranded and the Right is moaning that timelines don’t work. Neither accounts for the complexities involved in this war. While we are leaving 50,000 troops in Iraq, they are necessary to help the Iraqis maintain security in their country. The final draw down to zero is set for Dec. 31, 2011 and while I am not questioning our commitment to this, it should be noted that this will depend upon the IA’s ability to keep Iraq secure. It was good to hear General Odierno’s confidence this morning. Still, we can expect instability and attacks during the transition.

When the Left claims that we need to get out of Iraq now and that any troops left there is simply a rebranding of combat, they’re operating from a position which confirms their world view that war is a horrible thing (it is) and that we never should have been there (we shouldn’t have). They fear that any troops left are really combat troops and an invasion of a sovereign nation. This position is a classic anti-Vietnam position wherein any bodies left means we aren’t out. The Left is haunted by their fear that wars are never really over until all of the troops are out.

When the Right warns that timelines don’t work, they’re operating from their belief that we can “WIN” this war; that there will be a definitive moment, like Bush’s “Mission Accomplished” that will confirm their world view that America is exceptional. But while Bush eagerly declared “Mission Accomplished”, he made a costly error in underestimating the instability of Iraq post conflict. An instability which ballooned in 2005-2007 until Bush finally changed his approach. The Right’s position stems from their post Vietnam war fear of bailing out and leaving a country to fail, as south Vietnam collapsed when we left. A fear of defeat haunts the Right.

The Right’s disapproval of a so called timeline strategy seems to be selective, in light of the fact that this draw down strategy was implemented by Bush before Obama. What the Right refuses to accept is that we are never going to “win” this war. The terrorists aren’t going to surrender to us. Really.

“Winning” in this case looks quite different. And to be fair, winning in this case is relative. After all, winning would have been never invading Iraq. But it’s too late for that. After several botched strategies, Bush came up with the draw down coupled with a surge to train the IA and security forces that has been effective.

Obama continued this strategy with an additional emphasis on diplomacy, part of which included giving the Iraqis a sense of authority over their country again. The Left fails to comprehend the role of Obama’s foreign policy in bringing our troops home. They’re too busy branding him as a war-monger because they hate war.

Most of us do.

The truth is that this war wasn’t like World War II, in the sense that we weren’t fighting an enemy who would surrender. This war isn’t really ever going to be over because insurgents don’t surrender. We had to set a realistic date to return to the Iraqi’s authority over their country. As that date draws nearer, with just days left to go, the real question is whether Iraq will fall into a civil war when we leave.

So when the Left says we’re never leaving they may be correct. But when they say we are never leaving because Obama is a war-monger, they are incorrect. When the Right says we need to stay until we beat them, they are being simple-minded but when they suggest that timelines put us and the Iraqis at risk, they have a point.

But perhaps both sides can put aside their ideological loyalty for a moment. Perhaps the Left can allow themselves to feel relief about a change in our level of involvement in Iraq and perhaps the Right can stop using the timeline argument to undermine their President’s authority and judgment.

Americans are bruised and weary after years of being lied to by a cynical administration that used the war to justify taking away our freedoms. But instead of giving into these lower reactions, one wonders if Americans can rally our tremendous spirit to celebrate a President who kept his promise to draw down and did it responsibly, to support our returning troops and their families as they go through this very challenging transition, and in light of all that others have lost, be willing to give up a just a few ideological prejudices.

President Obama fulfilled his promise to end combat operations in Iraq by Aug. 31. And he did it with a divided nation, in spite of a miserable Left and an angry Right disagreeing with his decisions at every turn. Both sides are struggling with the scar tissue from Vietnam. Iraq is another step in the battle of our national self-identification with militarism. Both sides are skeptical, since neither side can claim their position won.

Oh, America. Can’t we dust off our national scars and unite, rising to this occasion?

14 Replies to “The Ghost of Vietnam Haunts the Left and Right Over Iraq”

  1. Well stated, and thank you!

    By the way, did you by any chance see John McCain’s tweet on this subject? I hate to sully your post with it, but here’s what he said:

    “Last American combat troops leave Iraq. I think President George W. Bush deserves some credit for victory.”

    Did you get that, America? If it’s a “victory” it’s to Bush’s credit, despite his lies to get us there, his lack of planning to get us out, and his willful deceit of Congress and the American people. It was a disaster from start to finish, but if there is credit to be had, it belongs to Bush.

    Don’t forget, though – if there is blame, that belongs to the man who got us OUT of there. President Scapegoat Obama deserves any and all blame for Bush’s failures.

  2. Oh, Leesa…..That’s heartbreaking.

    These people are so desperate to deny culpability for the lies they perpetrated against the American people that they will say anything in order to distract people from the truth.

    President Obama appears to be the scapegoat of the Right and Left, which is a real shame. People don’t want to be distracted with the complexities or realities of governing and passing legislation. Sadly, after Scott Brown took our majority away, our chances of getting things passed diminished and this fall they will be most likely be gone. The modern day Republicans have no interest in governing, only in getting elected.

  3. So true. Which is why they fight him so hard – or at least that’s one reason they fight him like they do. They would rather see Americans lose their jobs, their homes, and their lives than see Democrats fix the problems we’re experiencing. Power is all that matters to them.

  4. We had 2 wars since WW2. Korea and Vietnam.

    War for the right is like me hiking in the Smokys. The gf wants to turn around but I want to see whats around the next bend. The right thinks one more bend and we can win. The military never wins against a non military enemy. An insurgency is a political movement born from political means. We never get a victory especially when we went in unready and under estimating. Vietnam was not a victory in any sense of the word and Iraq will not be a victory to me. The number of innocents and homeless in that country negates any victory, especially when we could have taken saddam out in other ways and avoided the deaths.

    Aside from that your analysis about the left and right is correct. And if Iraq falls back into disrepair its their own fault. They are so horribly corrupt and there so much for themselves that I do not think they see all of Iraq. We put them in this position but we also gave them some tools to get out of it. If they dont I’m sorry. Thats why i dont agree that time lines are bad in this case. We have given them billions and billions of our money and weapons. Iraq has been given thousands of hours of training. Our Diplomats have worked with them endlessly. Its up to them. They fail I do not favor going back in. I am out of patience. Send Bush back in.

    I dont think Vietnam haunts enough people today. The fact that the right was so eager to go to war tells me that. I graduated in 1968 and it haunts the hell out of me. It haunts my friends. I’m not really sure it haunts individual congressmen unless they were there. Vietnam was a horror beyond horrors. If it haunts the political party’s its only for show and being portrayed as failures as a group.

  5. You’re correct. Technically there have been three wars, actually.

    I was focusing on the war that seems to haunt us the most. And of course, your point about the kind of enemy we’re fighting is the entire point.

  6. Typical John McCain. Disappointing but not surprising. They will continue to blame President Obama for the war in Afghanistan as well and give him no credit for any success we may obtain there. Given that President Bush could not even arrive at any objectives for either war, I think very little credit should attach to his name. You can’t win a war when you don’t know what the victory conditions are.

  7. Excellent article Sarah, and one that needed to be written. It would be as refreshing (maybe more so) to see honesty from the left as from the right. Nobody seems to want to reflect on the war with any honesty, but only through the lens of ideology. This is ironic since President Obama is probably the only person in the equation not looking at the war that way.

  8. Thanks, Hraf. With your vast knowledge re history and war, I’d be fascinated to read your thoughts on this in depth.

    Interestingly, today Frank Rich wrote an excellent, must read article wherein he wrote about how Fox News is betraying Petraeus (along with our national security- rather terrifying what the Republicans are stirring up with this mosque nonsense) and how no one covered Petraeus’s media tour. But we covered that Petraeus’ TV appearance in yet another unpopular but needs-to-be-said post on the wars.

    Here’s Frank’s piece:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/opinion/22rich.html?_r=1&emc=eta1

    I feel fortunate to write for an independent site where we don’t have to write things for popularity. And we’re fortunate to have an informed core readership (nod to Shiva, Nikolai, et al) who appreciate it, no matter which side of the aisle they’re on.

  9. This pretty much says it all “winning would have been never invading Iraq.”
    Hraf, I have to agree to disagree with you…b/c I never see honesty from the right…only excuses & lies.
    I’m shocked, shocked that we haven’t seen Mother Patriot of the year tweeting to welcome home the troops?
    Oh that’s right b/c President Obama is bringing them home.
    McCain…I think his melanoma has gone to his brain!
    Thank you Sarah for a another post “keepin’ it real” and saying things that need to be said…

  10. Crystal, thats an excellent tweet waiting to happen. Excuse me I will brb

    “haven’t seen Mother Patriot of the year tweeting to welcome home the troops?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.