Sen. Rand Paul Says He Didn’t Know Obama’s Views on Marriage Could “Get any gayer”

The Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition (IFFC) held its 12th Annual Spring Kickoff on Friday. The guest of honor (I can’t say “big draw” for reasons that will become apparent in a moment) was Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who is, of course, Ron Paul’s son.

There were several other luminaries there as well: Chuck Grassley, Steve King, Ralph Reed. Grassley talked about Christianity being under attack. Steve King talked about Christianity being under attack. Ralph Reed talked about Romney defeating Obama. The Iowa Republican reports that “The Ron Paul supporters in the crowd who still think he has a chance of winning the GOP nomination did not like those lines.”

But it is Rand Paul’s speech that interests me here. Last night, Sarah Jones wrote that where marriage equality is concerned, Republicans must evolve or die. We apparently have our answer from Rand Paul: he is choosing not to evolve. He is choosing to act like a third grade boy instead. We know he’s not: he knew something his crowd did not, obviously, who Dostoyevsky is and about “All Quiet on the Western Front”, references that bored his audience, so he went all Republican bully instead. Declining to address Obama’s decision to support marriage equality on its merits, he made fun of them saying: ”Call me cynical, but I wasn’t sure his views on marriage could get any gayer.”

I did not know you could have a “gay” view on marriage. This is, literally speaking, a third grader alternative to intelligent discussion.You all know how it goes: “That’s gay!” or “You’re gay!” to which the immature response is, “Oh yeah? You’re gayer!”

On the one hand, we have President Obama very eloquently articulating why he has decided to announce his support for marriage equality. The president said,

“I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married.”

On the other, we have Rand Paul, who says, ”Call me cynical, but I wasn’t sure his views on marriage could get any gayer.”

It’s nice to know the Republicans are represented by such people. It will make our task easier in November. Schoolyard bullies are never popular.

Watch the video from the Iowa Republican (Paul begins talking about Obama and marriage at about the 5:20 mark):

Paul’s immaturity got big laughs from the underwhelming crowd of 300, which the Iowa Republican reveals, consisted mostly of “SCC members, politicians and political staffers”. See their numbers and tremble:

Looks like Romney’s crowds, doesn’t it? Looking at that forlorn image, I am uncertain if we should be angry or laugh hilariously ourselves.

Channeling that third grade bully, Paul went on to the amusement of his crowd of sycophants:

“It did kind of bother me though that he used the justification for it in a biblical reference,” he continued to more laughter. “He said the biblical golden rule caused him to be for gay marriage. And I’m like what version of the Bible is he reading?…I don’t know what version he’s getting it from.”

He continued: “Now that doesn’t mean we need to be harsh and mean and hate people…But that doesn’t mean that we have to go ahead and give up our traditions. We’ve got 6,000 years of tradition.”

Well, not really 6,000 years. We have about 2,000 years of Christian tradition tied precariously to about 1200 years of Jewish tradition, making about 3,000+ years, give or take – and for most of the 2000 years Christians hated and killed and forcibly converted Jews. Even the hated Romans never outlawed Judaism, not even after three revolts. Of course, they didn’t outlaw Christianity either.

But then we know the GOP isn’t good at math and fundamentalists are even worse so what’s a third grade bully going to do? We should ask Paul which tradition he is talking about: the hating Pagan tradition (synonymous in fevered Christian imaginations with sexual immorality) or the hating Jew (they killed the Lord) tradition. It’s easy to get confused.

And I’m not surprised that Paul didn’t get the reference to the Golden Rule (Obama’s reference was to Matthew 7:12), which is of course much older than either Judaism or Christianity. Difficult as it is for religious bigots to admit, morality, loving your neighbor, philanthropy, have all been around for a lot longer than the Bible, which didn’t even exist until more than a century after Jesus’ death.

Paul could have taken Amy Sullivan’s route in the Washington Post, that “Obama’s case for same-sex marriage shows that invoking faith isn’t just for conservatives anymore” but that’s not as much fun as calling the other guy a heretic, is it?

The new Golden Rule is, of course: “Do unto others. And if they complain, cry persecution.”

But let’s not nitpick, because Paul wasn’t through. Channeling his inner Santorum, he said it was time for traditionalists to stand together to “save the Republic” and that the traditional family unit needed to be defended.

“The family is a really important thing. We shouldn’t just give up on it,” he said.

Because as we all know, fixing the family will fix the economy and pull millions of Americans back to work, get them back into underfunded schools, put food in their bellies the Republicans have taken away, and magically make our air safe to breathe and our fracked up water safe to drink! “”Atta boy!” you want to shout.

Once your head stops spinning, of course.

Of course, just to make sure we don’t forget he hates women as much as he hates gays and lesbians, Paul reminded the crowd of his already serious conservative cred:

“We’ve introduced the Life at Conception Act, the Pro-Life Act, the No Taxpayer Funding forAbortion Act, the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, I’m also co-sponsor of the Human Life Amendment,” Paul said. “I’ve also been trying to defund Planned Parenthood. Anybody here for that?”

Look, it’s not that hard to figure out: our country needs help and that help can only come from the government in the form of spending. We already know from Europe’s example that austerity is a one-way road to irrelevancy. Rand Paul’s solution is to take one thing already proven not to work and add to it two things that have nothing to do with the problem: embrace that austerity and to tell gays and lesbians they can’t get married and women that they have no right to their own vaginas.

I honestly don’t have anything to say to this. What can you say? I think Rand Paul has said it all, don’t you?

Note: While we’re on the subject, take a look at Five myths about gay marriage in this morning’s Washington Post. Oh, and Happy Mother’s Day!

13 Replies to “Sen. Rand Paul Says He Didn’t Know Obama’s Views on Marriage Could “Get any gayer””

  1. Rand is a typical, bigoted, misogynistic bible thumper who desires to control the masses and force them to live his narrow views instead of the FREEDOM bases thinking of the Dems who embrace allowing EVERYONE the FREEDOM to live their own beliefs. I am an Atheist but have read the bible front to back. The 6,000 year reference is about the universe, world and man being created 6,000 yearfs ago by their god. I went through the bible and charted the timeline. The only catch is the phrase in the bible which says, “A 1,000 years is but a day in the life of god.” This could add 1,000 years to each of the 6 days in which god worked his creation magic.

  2. Like his dad, nothing rand says is relevant or important. His past remarks on women have already put him in the role of an idiot

  3. Yes, and those 6,000 years won’t be found in the archaeological record, where we learn that the Jews arose from Canaanite hill tribes in the Bronze Age, and even then those Jews were, like their lowland neighbors, polythists. I was being overly generous when I granted them 1200 years since you can’t date the triumph of their monotheistic traditions earlier than the post-exilic period when they eradicated their fellow Jews who happened to be traditionalists (polytheists)

  4. The republican politicians are incapable of standing up to the Randian extremists in their party; every republican who appears on a ballot this November is an open threat to our democracy and constitution.

    Paul is doing exactly as predicted; doubling-down.
    He and his “pals” won’t regard the warnings that they will loose the election if they don’t change their views on “the gay”…

    I think they already know they’re on fast skid on thin ice with no brakes, so, what the hell? Taking down, destroying as much as possible, taking no prisoners, praying to gawd for a miracle in order to stay alive…aw heck, they’ve already got enough funds to leave the country, claim citizenship elsewhere (like Michelle). They’ll run to board the ships like rats with the plague seeking other ports (no offense to the rats as it was actually the flea that were the carriers of Bubonic plague).

  5. This comes from a man who feels that civil rights Act, was a huge over-reach for the government, Rand Paul is a teabagger who went to Washington to destroy government, not to govern and legislate as the voters expect, The teabaggers are going to be there causing more trouble than our country can handle, They won’t be happy until they collapse the American economy, so they can blame it on the first black President, This is their single goal, to prove that a black man could never be sucessful as President. They want good Americans to look back on these days as a terrible experiment, allowing a black man to president, so that in future elections, they can say, We tried a black president and he failed, so we can never let that happen again. I know this is their number#1 goal, I hope Americans are smart enough to see how the Republicans think their stupid and fools for beliving the nonsense they pimp out of the Fox News Studios. Americans won’t get too many more opportunitys to have a say in government, if they let the Republicans pull off their grand plan. Americans need to inform themselves on the issues, not by watching Fox, but by true news outfits like C-SPAN and others. most importantly, the citizens MUST VOTE, there is no other way, you Must Vote for true and honorable canidates. This is the only Answer.

  6. Agreed. I’ve been saying the Republicans are playing to lose right now, so they can leave the black guy holding the bag.

    I’m also very disappointed in the “libertarian” Rand AGAIN because all the libertarians I know stand for gay rights and it’s very specifically one of the ways they set themselves apart from the Tea Party (even though we disagree, sometimes violently, about social funding).

  7. First of all, it was only a matter of time until a high-profile Republican pol came out and called the President gay. Secondly, it figures it was that uncruthched* sheep’s butt without lanolin, Rand Paul.

    *Crutching is the practice of shaving the crotches and behinds of wolly sheep, so they don’t become hideously nasty with clots of manure and maggots.

  8. Such leaders the Republicans have for their junior high theatrics. Clever and delightful disdain and hatred is just so… so… um… asshole-ish.

    Note to Republicans: junior high students have the justification of not being fully developed when they act like dumb-ass bullies. You have no excuse.

  9. Actually, that has been one of their goals for years and subsidiary to the goal of establishing a theocracy.

    The forced collapse of the American economy and political structure followed by the establishment of a theocracy has been discussed since before President Obama even began running for office in 2008. The same people we were tracking and talking about then are today’s Tea Party… but the Tea Party is only part of the picture.

    It all ties together… into one huge, terrifying but surprisingly structured mess.

  10. The Pauls are nothing more than convenient Libertarians, willing to abandon their precious cause when it can win them votes with the extremist fundamentalists.

    From the Libertarian Party Platform:
    1.3 Personal Relationships

    Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.

Comments are closed.