Same-Sex Marriage Delayed In Michigan. But It’s Coming


michigan gay marriage


So then this is the question: how can a couple be both legally married and yet legally denied the benefits that legally married folks are supposed to get? Especially when other legally married folks in that state are enjoying those very same benefits without a hassle?


Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, who formerly referred to himself as “one tough nerd” during his first gubernatorial campaign, will, I am confident, soon be known as Mr. Wizard. Why? Because it is Gov. Rick Snyder who has voluntarily placed himself in the position of having to defend this glaringly indefensible position. And if, through some miracle, this perverse position of his does manage to remain standing after being subjected to more than 30 seconds of semi-intelligent scrutiny by a bored five-year-old, then we should all prepare to bow down low before His Twisted Majesty Mr. Wizard and plant a big wet kiss on those adorable clown shoes of his.

So let’s back up, just to provide a bit of context. Last Friday, March 21, U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman issued a flamethrower of an opinion that not only (temporarily) cleared the decks for same sex marriage in Michigan and overturned the voter-approved ban, but also leveled same sex marriage opponents like a newly sharpened scythe swinging its way through dry wheat. Or, if you wanna be a bit less poetic about it, he made them look like a bunch of idiots. Not that this was necessarily a difficult task, but it was fun to witness nevertheless.

An estimated 300 same sex couples managed to get themselves hitched after Friedman’s ruling, but then the U.S. Court of Appeals issued a stay on Saturday, March 22, blocking any more same sex marriages in Michigan until a ruling is made on the issue. Actually the stay was originally supposed to only extend to Wednesday, March, 26, but it has since been extended again until who-knows-when. In a courageous response to the ruling by the Appeals Court, Gov. Wizard proclaimed that the same sex marriages were legal, but that the State of Michigan would not be granting these legally married couples the benefits to which they are legally entitled because…ummm….

“I would not want to be one of the governor’s lawyers trying to defend that,” said Ken Mogill, co-counsel for the two Hazel park nurses whose lawsuit prompted all this activity.

They can delay and roadblock all they want, but in the end I just don’t see how we lose this argument. 

Detroit Free Press Editorial Page Editor Stephen Henderson had a pretty accurate take on the whole issue:

I’m not sure why Attorney General Bill Schuette thinks it’s his duty — or even a good idea — to fight to the last for invidious discrimination against gay people in Michigan, but it’s one of the most pathetic examples of moral leadership I’ve witnessed.

Schuette got slammed last week for his clownish legal defense of Michigan’s gay marriage ban in U.S. District Court Judge Bernard Friedman’s court. Friedman essentially labeled Schuette’s case absurd: a bizarre and unsubstantiated hodgepodge of attempts to paint gay citizens as deviants who shouldn’t be allowed to raise children. Friedman didn’t buy any of it and, in fact, didn’t even let the state examine its first witness because his credentials were so flimsy.

That really should have been the ballgame.

Why? Because Friedman’s opinion joins the chorus of an emerging majority in both federal and state courts (most important, at the U.S. Supreme Court) that has rejected the notion that fear, hatred or religious disapproval of homosexuals is sufficient justification for government to treat them differently.

From a legal perspective, that’s extremely important.

Indeed it is.


3 Replies to “Same-Sex Marriage Delayed In Michigan. But It’s Coming”

  1. I finally figured out the mystery of why all these ignorant republiklan politicians want guns, guns, guns. So they can shoot themselves in the foot. What is this guys problem? Another cash strapped state with it’s own set of problems and this clown is wasting time and money fighting a losing battle. Why does he care what goes on in someone else’s bedroom?

  2. @Phil I’ll tell you why? because the GOP isn’t a party for the people, their ALL about MONEY! that’s why they whore themselves out to corporate america, but they can’t win on money alone, that’s why they use “PHONY SOCIAL ISSUES” to recruit simple minded individuals to vote for them, They lure the idiotic gun nuts with fear tactics of non caucasians coming to get their lily white rear ends, they lure in the brainless psycho religious nut with nonsense about gay people turning their precious USA into Sodom and Gomorrah! and the ever popular, anti abortion cabal, because we know how republicans just LOVE children! RIGHT? the GOP has to appeal to all these INSANE groups because THEY need the VOTES!! I guarantee you behind closed doors many republican politicians don’t buy the fake rants in their own religious wing, that why republican politician are always getting BUSTED having SEX with people in the gay SEX TRADE! hypocrisy at it’s BEST you listening ted haggard??

  3. We need the media to hold the 6th Circuit panel accountable for their failure to properly evaluate the petition for a stay. The two judges in the majority gave mere lip service to the longstanding four part test laid out in Hilton, then ignored any attempt to properly apply the law. Their apparent reasoning: if SCOTUS can willy-nilly avoid applying Hilton by staying-without-comment the Utah case, then we should too. BUT they’re not the SCOTUS. They’re an inferior court bound by precedent. If SCOTUS wants to overrule Hilton, let them do it by a published opinion. [No one thinks Hilton isn’t good law, it’s just inconvenient when you’re a cowardly appellate judge afraid of progress]

    The media must hold these nitwits accountable or else they’ll do it again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.