Right-Wing Media Caught In Another Lie As Darren Wilson Did Not Suffer An Eye Fracture

cnn don lemonedited

 

On CNN Thursday, Don Lemon confirmed through a source that Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson did not sustain a broken bone in his face prior to shooting unarmed 18-year-old Mike Brown six times. Recently, right-wing media sources have been running with the news that sources close to the situation revealed that Wilson was treated at a hospital for an orbital fracture and that his face was severely swollen. After rumors had been swirling in the conservative blogosphere about the fracture, Hollie McKay at Fox News reported on Wednesday that Wilson was beaten nearly to the point of unconsciousness.

Darren Wilson, the Ferguson, Mo., police officer whose fatal shooting of Michael Brown touched off more than a week of demonstrations, suffered severe facial injuries and was nearly beaten unconscious by Brown moments before firing his gun, a source close to the department’s top brass told FoxNews.com.

“The Assistant (Police) Chief took him to the hospital, his face all swollen on one side,” said the insider. “He was beaten very severely.”

 

With a major news network giving credibility to the story, The Blaze, and other conservative websites and newspapers, ran with it. Ann Coulter, who never, ever makes unfounded and wholly inaccurate statements, wrote a piece for NewsBusters claiming that there was already an X-ray of Wilson’s busted eye publicly released. Of course, no such image exists. My guess is that Coulter got her bit of info from stock images that wingnuts were passing around via blogs showing what an orbital fracture looks like. Allen West used the image in a blogpost of his Tuesday claiming Wilson suffered an “orbital blowout fracture.”

It didn’t seem to matter that videos taken from the scene of Brown’s shooting show Wilson walking around seemingly injury-free and not tending to his face. Nope. When a good rumor comes along that fits nicely within the narrative you’ve set, you need to push it, and push it hard. Well, right-wingers intent on assassinating Brown’s character and placing Wilson on a pedestal took a big hit Thursday when Lemon revealed Brown did not break Wilson’s eye socket.

Below is video of the report, courtesy of CNN:

 

 

So, how will Fox News and the conservative media entertainment complex spin this over the coming days? What gets me is that inevitably, the truth was going to come out about this anyway. Somewhere down the line, we would all see that Wilson didn’t have his face smashed in and his eye bone broken. While saying these things might make those who support Wilson feel good about themselves for a bit, the truth still catches up eventually.

80 Replies to “Right-Wing Media Caught In Another Lie As Darren Wilson Did Not Suffer An Eye Fracture”

  1. This is how stupid these idiots are. They got this story from Jim Hoft, THE STUPIDIEST MAN ON THE INTERNET, the X-Ray they use if you look in the corner it say University of Iowa.

    The shame of it of it is the so called liberal media ran with it.

    There are lies, damn lies and effing idiotic lies.

    And they are doing this to protect a man that carried out a summary execution.

    Then they have the big brass ones to say its you that is the racist and cant we all get along?

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  2. Because of all these lying rightwing snakes this country is on the berg of exploding in a mushroom cloud, but I just hope I live long enough to see the physical demise of every single one of these rightwing trouble making bastards.

  3. How could telling a lie, such as this, make someone feel good about themselves? The lie will be found out sooner or later, then how do they explain the fact that they spread these lies?

    And you know its a tad difficult to beat someone “nearly unconscious” when one is being pulled or lunging inside trying to get to a gun. Try it some time.

    Just because faux news has a bunch of twits, women AND men, as “reporters”, they shouldn’t assume that everyone is as stupid as they are.

  4. There will be no spin. They will just move on to the next fake story to make another Black person look bad.

    This is exactly what one can expect from Fox News. Nothing more, a great deal less

  5. They believe it because to them we are savages who when in a restaurant holler out “WHERE IS MOTHERF*CKING ICE TEA” We have been dehumanize as thugs, welfare queens the takers. We always want the pure white women, we have no morals. In other words we are 3/5ths human

    Dred Scott:Born a slave in Virginia, Scott sued in a St. Louis court for his freedom. The case went to the Supreme Court, resulting in a landmark 1857 decision that African Americans were not citizens of the United States and therefore had no rights to sue in federal courts. The court described blacks as “beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”

  6. People who watch Fox also believe that there has been constant looting and rioting because Fox hosts have implied there is. Fox has a livestream of the protests. All the viewers would have to do is click on the livestream and they would know it was false. But they won’t even do that. They’ll just take Fox’s word for it and then take to twitter to troll every pro-Ferguson comment with the looting and rioting claim, and when you inform them that there hasn’t been anything that could even resemble looting or rioting for over a week, they’ll tell you you’re wrong. They also refer to large groups of Black people as “animals” and then claim they’re not racists. And they are passing the stock image of the orbital fracture xray around as proof. They live in a bubble of confirmation bias and nothing is ever going to pop it.

  7. Just like the “right-wing-nuts”, this guy is making statements that may or may not be true that he heard from his “source”; he is, after all, the all-knowing/lying “media”. He doesn’t state his source, so I take what he says with a grain of salt (or less). I believe Nancy is right in stating that we won’t know what really happened until it comes out in court.

  8. The problem is that despite the reports being disproven, the Fox Gnus herd will continue to believe it from now until eternity.

  9. Fox (I’ve quit calling it ‘News),
    as recently as this evenings shows
    (propaganda), are still presenting
    this fabrication as fact.
    “We KNOW the officer had an Orbital Blowout!”
    Now the rest of us who live in the
    real world know damn well that if
    that injury truly existed, it would
    be displayed on a never-ending LOOP
    a la George Zimmerman’s injuries.
    But then, Fox never lets the truth get
    in the way of a really good lie, do they?
    They’re so F’n predictable…………

  10. I actually haven’t seen the liberal media run with this yet, but that may depend on what you call “liberal media”. haha.

    I did see this pop up on my feed from one of the RWNJ sites a couple of days ago though … you know how Facebook disgustingly “suggests” articles you “might” want to vomit over…er I mean read. I noticed it right off that it was a visual showing what an orbital fracture looks like. I couldn’t find any sign that it belonged to Wilson. I just wanted to see how long it would take for it to hit the big time.

    Natch, at least half of the incredibly dumbass conservative Fox viewers will defend this report to their last dying breath.

  11. RW media makes false claim out facial fracture . . . What horrible journalism!

    LW media claims Brown was shot in the back . . . “Crickets”!

    Can we all agree the media on both sides is really playing this up and lying to audiences? And both sides are flat wrong and manipulating the population?

  12. Look at the way she phrases the statement: To paraphrase: He was beaten severely and had a broken eye socket…according to inside sources. It seems to me the claims that Brown was shot in the back were never reported in nearly the same way. I’d be interested in seeing any claim coming from CNN or MSNBC that said anything other than “according to Joe Jones, Brown was shot in the back.” There is a big difference. And CNN and MSNBC had the witnesses on the TV. Fox did not.

  13. That was gonna be my reply to Blayne.
    Some of the injuries COULD have happened
    if they came from the back, we don’t
    yet know. IDK WTF happened, I was not
    there. It does seem tho’, like the
    Ferguson PD are attempting to protect
    the officer. I get that, it’s a Brotherhood, a Familia. At the same time,
    the residents of Ferguson are defending
    one of their own who they feel was
    killed by an officer using excessive
    force. It’s a sad story. There is no
    happy ending.

  14. Pat, it’s a deliberate manipulation of human nature: the longer a lie is out, the harder it is for people to accept that it was disproved. Even if they accept it, the lie has done its job: it’s shifted their emotions and anger further along one track or the other, and that doesn’t usually change even if the lie is later disproved.

    In short, it’s a propaganda tactic. Hoff got a lot of mileage out of this one, because once again major news outlets counted on wherever *they* got it from to have checked out the source and verified.

    So even though word is getting around that it’s a lie, there are still those who don’t know, those who won’t believe it’s a lie, and those who accept it was a lie yet go “But they’re still animals…” because the lie confirmed what they *want* to believe, and the feeling behind it that it reinforced is still there.

    And yeah… that’s SICK.

  15. So, it seems to me that you are caught up on the “broken bone” part of the story and conveniently ignoring the other important parts…like the officer being beaten by Mr. Brown and that Mr. Brown was shot while charging the officer after already beating him. It is almost unbelievable to me that the media, whichever your choice to watch/read/listen to, has tried this case in the court of public opinion and convicted the officer based simply on the fact that he is white and the deceased is African-American. You, the media, are responsible for “poisoning the well” in this case, perpetuating stereotypes and assuming that justice can only be found by punishing the officer at any cost regardless of what the facts are. Shame on you…and shame on everyone who is exploiting this situation.

  16. You, the media, are responsible for “poisoning the well” in this case, perpetuating stereotypes and assuming that justice can only be found by punishing the officer at any cost regardless of what the facts are

    As it seems you are assuming that only the officer is “innocent until proven guilty”. The FACT that the officer killed Mike Brown for the underlying offense of jaywalking seems to have escaped your version of facts.

  17. I never proclaimed anyone to be guilty or innocent. I was simply commenting on the great disservice our so-called news organizations are perpetrating on the public in this case. Your ridiculous assertion that Mr. Brown was “shot for jaywalking” is all the proof one needs to drive home the very point I was making…so thank you.

  18. Yep. Because if they started demanding facts to back up hearsay, they wouldn’t be RWNJs anymore. And that’s bad for Corporate America’s bottom line.

  19. And also, to have to come clean and admit that they’d allowed themselves to believe in such a blatant and easily debunked lie makes them look weak, gullible, and stupid.

    And although they aren’t the brightest bulbs of this nation, their egos are ginormous.

  20. Mike Brown was shot and killed before the report of the convenience store incident was ever broadcast. The officer stopped Mr. Brown for jaywalking. By all accounts an argument then ensued which led to the officer killing (notice I did not say murdering) Mr. Brown. These accounts vary greatly and without properly being investigated cannot be assumed to be factual.

    The only clear fact is that, according to our laws, Mr. Brown was not guilty of any crime at the time of his death.

    I also submit that if a police officer is incapable of subduing an unarmed individual without the use of deadly force, said police officer is either not properly trained and/or equipped or he is incapable of performing his duties “to protect and to serve” all members of his community.

  21. …like the officer being beaten by Mr. Brown and that Mr. Brown was shot while charging the officer after already beating him.

    That’s exactly what you’re doing, by injecting unsubstantiated rumors spewed by RW media in your (and their) desperate attempts to defend the extrajudicial execution of an unarmed eighteen-year-old by an overbearing, overzealous and most likely racist white Officer Darren Wilson.

  22. We most likely will never know what happened in the scuffle at the police car/truck. It could have been Brown attempting to protect himself as the weapon had already been drawn by Wilson…Just as it could have been Trayvon Martin attempting to protect himself facing a gun already drawn..Both young men are dead and have lost the defense of their actions. I have always found it strange how Zimmerman managed to get his gun that was “holstered” in his back waist band while on his back.

  23. Charles Johnson at Little Green Footballs has been all over this. Jim Hoft, “Gateway Pundit,” started the lie on his blog and it proceeded from there to other RW blogs and Fox News. Charles knows computers, so he did a little research and traced the image Hoft was passing off as an Xray image of Wilson’s injuries to an image on the U.of Iowa’s web site. Oops! Hoft had blocked out the U of I tag on the image.

    “Here’s another follow-up to my article about Jim Hoft’s dishonest tactics in promoting his bogus claim that officer Darren Wilson suffered a fractured eye socket in a purported struggle with teenager Michael Brown.

    CJ @LGF: “As I pointed out in the earlier piece, Hoft posted a stock image of a CT scan of a fractured eye socket, but apparently erased the words “UNIV OF IOWA” from his copy of the image.”

    http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/43759_Exposing_Gateway_Pundits_Dishonesty-_He_Altered_a_CT_Scan_Image_to_Trick_His_Readers

  24. The fact checking sites has done studies on how many times republican and democratic politicians have been caught lying and the republicans lie 300% more than democrats. So, I guess their voters are nothing but liars too.

    That or they have all studied Nazi propaganda films and books by Goebbels and take that whole.. If a lie is big enough and you tell it often enough people will believe it…. crap seriously.

  25. So called liberal media is all but extinct. The main stream media has been whipped into submission by their corporate bosses and aren’t allowed to do real journalism any longer. On top of that, so called news organizations like Fox News parade as news, but are no different than the National Enquirer or other tabloid rags.

  26. This is Faux attempt to poison the potential jurors with misinformation and lies. Those who watch Faux live in the Faux bubble and never hear reports that debunk the lies. I’m quite sure that Faux will never admit or apologize for being wrong. The viewers will just continue to believe and repeat this lie. The Faux propaganda machine needs to be shut down as it is poisoning the belief system of our nation. News stations need to report the facts and allow the viewers to form their own opinions.

  27. It just amazes me that in each and ever case, it’s always told that the black man is the aggressor. It’s the black man provoking the police. Well, more and more, video, brave eyewitnesses and evidence, is showing that the opposite is true. It’s pretty clear that police are waging a war against people of color, especially men of color.

  28. Lovers of God love/seek the truth.

    A certain group of republicans along with Faux News, are not representatives of God.

  29. Everyone knows fox “news” stories are dictated by Roger with some tidbits thrown in by Cheney and delivered by bubble blondes with dresses hiked up to asscheeks to draw in the old men, who dont know any better. They are a dying breed. What you gonna do fox when your viewers are dead and gone?

  30. It wouldn’t surprise me if they don’t try to beat him up themselves….oh…it may be a little late for that! Where is this Wilson guy anyhow? In protective custody?

  31. Ferguson PD Fail To Produce Incident Report For Michael Brown Shooting
    St. Louis County prosecutor’s office confirmed yesterday that the Ferguson Police Department didn’t file a report after the shooting death of Michael Brown, leading to the assumption that Darren Wilson did not write one on the advice from his lawyer or the department’s orders, completely contrary to police procedure.
    http://crooksandliars.com/cltv/2014/08/ferguson-pd-fail-produce-incident

  32. The store owner never called in a theft of any kind, in his own words. There is also a different camera from the store that shows Michael Brown paying for the cigars. The police were very selective in what footage they used.

  33. Our black president has been disrespected since the day he won they were huddling in the backrooms conspiring obstructionism upholding racism & declaring that this black man has no right to be president so therefore,he will have no rights which they are bound to respect. Sad that 157 years later,racist teapublicans still have that same sick mentality but evil does not prevail.PSALM 37:10,FOR YET A LITTLE WHILE & THE WICKED SHALL BE NO MORE;INDEED,YOU WILL LOOK CAREFULLY FOR HIS PLACE,BUT IT SHALL BE NO MORE..VOTE!

  34. “uffered severe facial injuries and was nearly beaten unconscious by Brown moments before firing his gun,”

    Sounds oddly familiar, just like the nonsense that was circulated about George Zimmerman (he shot in his last desperate gasp of life JUST before Trayvon “THUG” Martin was about to bash his brains out.

  35. It’s patently rediculous that Wilson was “beaten almost to unconsciousness” through a car window. What likely happened is that when he grabbed Brown and tried to hold him,(repeating an action for which he got a commendation recently,) Brown punched back into his face. That alone would have enraged the cop into drawing his weapon and chasing a fleeing Brown, firing as he ran. This was not about stolen cigarillos. It was about a black kid challenging a cop and not the f*** getting away with it.

  36. A facial injury, especially to the eye, would cause noticeable damage.
    Swelling, disfiguration, eye problems…and the officer wouldn’t be walking around much since, you know, he’d likely experience trouble with that eye.

    ‘Blowouts’ of the orbit involve substantial swelling, discoloration, bleeding and loss of sensation. The thing about a blowout is, it’s rarely the kind of thing that you rush to an emergency surgeon. These things tend to heal on their own, and the most you need is some steroids and antibiotics.
    If it affects vision, you can safely postpone an operation for a few weeks, if needed. They tend to heal well and quickly.

    Doesn’t really fit the description of the alleged injuries, does it…?

  37. When I read the supreme Court decision of that period, I cringe. Makes me feel very ashamed, I am an America as one who had family who fought in the Rev. War. Because while driving through a Nat. park one time. My Mother and I came across a black grave yard, who all were members of the colonial army. Never learned that in any history class. Something I believe should be taught. Blacks have as much right to any thing, ANY, white does. Blacks fought in the civil war the sec WW all with bravery and honor. So.. all you white bastards, that think other wise, stfu. By the way I am white. And I very seldom use such language, only at times I lose it completely.

  38. Im not surprised at all that this turbed into nothing. I expected it in fact because I read an article that debunked this theory before fox even got a hold of it. They did this hoping to get a jolt pf ratings and to justify what darren wilson did. No surprise there. They didnt care if anyone found out because their white viewers will believe them. Ive seen it a hundred times in the homes of my customers… we show up and fox news is on talking about something already proven false and what i hear the most is, “this wouldnt be happening if that damn Obama werent in office” despite the fact that the subject being discussed on fox could hardly be connected to the presidency: their viewers ARE in another reality. They simply will dumb truthful input in favor of Fox News’ version. This is the white customers though :)

  39. I apologize for my remarks and removed the post. I didn’t fully understand when I first read it and had to reread it.

  40. Doris,
    It was not only the people of color who had hope for a better country, it also was white people,the poor,the young, old, children , we all had a happiness,great hope in our hearts. Proud that a country such as ours, die defending other country’s, voting rights, religion, women and to turn on our President for wanting the same thing for our country. Then to see Our President belittled by those who call themselves
    Americans,Christians, makes me ill..I know Christians, they are not.I did not hear or see other peoples of other religion degrade President Obama, they were respectful,thankful.

  41. It just proves how right wingers never fact check anything. One post said who will watch Fox when all the old,dirty minded perverts are gone,easy,the goodie gun totin poorly educated group will take over. Instead of blonde bimbos with skirts hiked up to their nether regions they will sport AR’s. Just look at the Bundy supporters and you have a view of the future of Fox.

  42. I have defended neither the officer nor Mr. Brown. I did not inject anything into the discussion other than the fact that the media (pick your poison) has tried this case and pronounced judgment before any actual facts have been gathered. If you watch Fox you will likely hear a different result than if you watch MSNBC. The point is that both sides are poisoning the well trying to disparage either the officer or Mr. Brown. Your ridiculous attempts at Straw Man arguments aside, and trying to cast me as a “Right Winger” don’t even begin to understand or address the real issue. It is both laughable and sad how sensationalism and pseudo-journalism have been accepted as the final arbiters of truth and judgment by so many people. You weren’t there…neither was I. Any attempt to arrive at a fair judgment prior to court proceedings is ludicrous. Except now the narrative, which may or may not be true, has already traveled around the world.

  43. Mike:

    You did in Fact interject your own version/the rightwings version of events. You did just what you accuse the media of doing. You assumed that Mike Brown attacked the officer and that he lunged at him? Why? Because Mike Brown is black? You then cry foul and say that others “assume” you are a rightwinger. Oh please, you make it so obvious who you are.

  44. Sorry but that simply isn’t true. The issue here is that the media (both “sides) are trying to frame the narrative by only presenting one side. The writer of this article simply focused on the fact that the officer did not suffer a fracture but didn’t deal with any of the rest of the “other side” of the story. Why? I would assume because it didn’t fit their preferred narrative. Justice is not defined as ensuring someone is punished according to one side’s version of the facts. Ad Hominem attacks toward me or anyone else bring absolutely nothing to this conversation other than to illustrate the very point I initially made.

  45. …I too took everything with a grain of salt until I wound up with high blood pressure…then I bought a couple of Shares of Morton Salt stock…now I just fan myself with those when reading something of dubious authenticity…lol

  46. What’s sad is that the right wing nuts will keep lapping up the lies from the FOX News trough. FOX never apologizes for their reporting errors. They’re the same people who kept reporting that mobile weapons labs were found in Iraq soon after the invasion, and it was proven false. Did they apologize? Nope. They just moved onto the next lie to support their agenda.
    Meanwhile, someone like Dan Rather falls for a PLANTED false report regarding Bush’s service in the National Guard, and the FOX News fans were in an uproar over it. Rather apologized and quit his job, showing far more integrity than FOX News ever demonstrates.

  47. I was just looking at the Prosecutor’s Office’s terrible website and came across this: I APPRECIATE AND UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS OF THOSE WHO HONESTLY BELIEVE THAT I CANNOT OR WILL NOT BE FAIR TO ALL IN THE GATHERING AND PRESENTATION OF THE EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO THE TRAGIC DEATH OF MICHAEL BROWN. ALTHOUGH I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS, AND DO NOT TAKE LIGHTLY THE DEMANDS THAT I RECUSE MYSELF FROM THIS CASE, I ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT I HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO THE FAMILY OF MICHAEL BROWN, THE PEOPLE OF FERGUSON AND THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY.

    AS I HAVE STATED REPEATEDLY, I HAVE NO INTENTION OF WALKING AWAY FROM THE RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES ENTRUSTED TO ME BY THE PEOPLE OF THIS COMMUNITY. ADDITIONALLY, THERE IS NO BASIS IN THE LAW TO DO SO. I HAVE FAITHFULLY AND FAIRLY CARRIED OUT THOSE RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES FOR MORE THAN TWO DECADES AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO FOR AT LEAST THE NEXT FOUR YEARS.

  48. Continue:I ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT THE DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY BY GOVERNOR NIXON GRANTS THE GOVERNOR EXCLUSIVE POWER TO REMOVE ME AND MY OFFICE FROM ANY FURTHER INVOLVEMENT IN THIS MATTER. ALTHOUGH I STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT SUCH ACTION WOULD BE A MISTAKE ON THE PART OF THE GOVERNOR, I DO URGE ALL SEEKING MY REMOVAL TO EXPRESS THOSE DEMANDS TO THE GOVERNOR AND, AS I HAVE, DEMAND THAT HE MAKE A DECISION TO REMOVE THIS OFFICE OR NOT REMOVE THIS OFFICE AND END THIS DISTRACTION. ONLY THE GOVERNOR CAN ANSWER THIS QUESTION.

    WE HAVE BEGUN PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE TO THE GRAND JURY AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO IN A FAIR, FULL AND IMPARTIAL MANNER. HOWEVER, THE GOVERNOR MUST SETTLE THIS ISSUE NOW. TO LEAVE THIS ISSUE UNRESOLVED NOW LEAVES THE POSSIBILITY OF EXERCISING THIS POWER AT A LATER DATE WHICH WILL CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT AND UNWARRANTED DELAY IN THE RESOLUTION OF THE INVESTIGATION AND RESOLUTION OF THE CASE.

  49. Continue:WE HAVE BEGUN PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE TO THE GRAND JURY AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO IN A FAIR, FULL AND IMPARTIAL MANNER. HOWEVER, THE GOVERNOR MUST SETTLE THIS ISSUE NOW. TO LEAVE THIS ISSUE UNRESOLVED NOW LEAVES THE POSSIBILITY OF EXERCISING THIS POWER AT A LATER DATE WHICH WILL CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT AND UNWARRANTED DELAY IN THE RESOLUTION OF THE INVESTIGATION AND RESOLUTION OF THE CASE. THE FAMILY OF MICHAEL BROWN DESERVES AN ANSWER, THE PEOPLE OF FERGUSON DESERVE AN ANSWER AND THE PEOPLE OF THE ENTIRE AREA DESERVE AN ANSWER.

    ROBERT P. McCULLOCH
    http://www.stlouiscopa.com/Default.aspx

  50. Which one is true? We don’t know what, if any of either side is true yet. That is the point. Yet people are crying for “justice” based on an incomplete story. One side wants the officer jailed and claims racism and the other wants the officer exonerated and claims Mr. Brown was a thug who got what he deserved. Rushing to judgment in either case is not justice at all. Either way, you can imagine the public outcry if the officer is exonerated even if the facts prove to support him. If the media hadn’t already tried and convicted the officer in the court of public opinion along with the cries of racial injustice from the likes of Sharpton this wouldn’t happen. Because of the coverage of the media and the exploitation of the situation by them and other national figures, there is always going to be a large number who believes justice was not served regardless of the outcome. And that is too bad.

  51. There you go again like the rest of your pointy head friends blaming the Rev. At this point you should be quiet because your inner grand dragon is trying to get out.

    You have no idea on the conditions of that town, the military response to peaceful demonstrations, Constitutional rights taken away at the point of a gun but all that is Sharpton’s fault. You are an idiot

    BTW I searched for what you had to say about a real criminal, Bundy who pointed weapons at your beloved Police. I turned up crickets but I did come across this when you were watching it
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  52. …like the officer being beaten by Mr. Brown and that Mr. Brown was shot while charging the officer after already beating him.

    It seems that you do feel Mr Brown is guilty. I have heard of conflicting accounts of the moments before the shooting. Where did you get your evidence? Have you given a sworn deposition to the police?

  53. BS..no police report? What do they think it is going to go away if they don’t have a report?

    These bastards executed an unarmed man. I wonder if there would be a police report if the one executed was a white person?

    This is the problem that has been a pattern in the shooting of black people. The “details” are always vague. Never anything cut and dry. Its total bullshit. This was a human life..WHERE ARE ALL THE PRO LIFE RIGHT WINGERS NOW? Different topic, but just to make a point. This just makes me sick.

  54. For all the ‘lefties’ and ‘righties’…. get ready to hold on to your hats! There are TWO videos of the incident the authorities have and they show the entire incident. You don’t have to believe it but you’ll find out soon enough! It will exonerate the officer.. as an independent I’m sick of all the far right and left….. NONE of ya’s act like you have a lick of sense because ya’ll just dig your heels in…. what I just said is money in the back! I know someone who has seen them! Just a little FYI…. everyone just take the high road!!

  55. And how do you know there are 2 videos of the incident? If there are 2 video’s does that mean one video is false?

  56. There was looting and violence every night until the last two and then only a few little skirmishes.. MOST of the trouble came from out of town vermin who came to incite violence.. It did not except for a few individuals come from people who lived in the area and they were horrid individuals. The residents protested almost 100% peacefully and resent the outsiders coming! You want truth.. there you have it!

  57. Actually there are more than 2 videos. At least 10 people have come forward stating they videoed the incident & the police IMMEDIATELY confiscated their cell phones.

    Hmmm…..

  58. I bet that Wilson was never attacked by Brown. I bet that another officer beat Wilson as a cover up. To claim self defense. Wilson had enough time to ponder the situation as the ambulance was deterred from being called. It violates so many rules of conduct and morals. Wilson is a fat ass liar who will be caught.

  59. Do you guys realise that in that news they say that officer wilson had a swollen face and that he had a fight with brown. So how can you turn this thing against him? Lots of shit in news at first were only rumors but the thing that brown really attacked officer wilson seems more evident by every passing day.

  60. And you know this how? First they were struggling for the gun. LIE. Then he had a fractured orbital bone. LIE. Now his face was swollen. Now you call yourself truth, SNICKER, I just have one question for you. Where is the incident report? What’s that? Oh I thought so.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  61. There was no swollen face. Watcht eh video. He walked around the body like a conqueror and there was nothing wrong with his face

  62. See at that time of day the angle of the sun in conjunction with the planet Venus made it appear that his face wasn’t swollen. Don’t you libs know anything?

  63. I’ve seen many things in the “news” that turned out to not be true. Conservative, liberal, and otherwise. Does it even matter if the bone was broken or if he was just merely beaten? I wouldn’t expect that I could get away with beating a cop and not at least having a gun pulled on me. All that matters is the truth. What really happened.

  64. If Mike Brown just beat the officer where are the pics? I mean they released a report that he was high so wouldn’t common sense suggest they would have released some pictures to back up that claim? Oh I get it we have to take their word

  65. Oh my God, what’s this? Common sense? This article could’ve been written nearly verbatim about stories coming out of liberal media sources about the Brown shooting (or any story, really). There is no truth in media – liberal, conservative or otherwise.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.