Categories: Featured News

You Are Voting for Democracy or Theocracy in the 2014 Midterms

The Republicans really do not understand the First Amendment. And, as I will explain, when I say “do not understand” I mean, “do not care.” They seem to be saying that, “Just because the First Amendment forbids the establishment of religion, does not mean we should not establish a religion.”

But it’s far more sinister than that.

It would be nice if it were as easy as waving a copy of the First Amendment in front of their faces.

This Amendment, as most Americans know, forbids the federal government from establishing a religion in clear, concise terms anyone with two brain cells to rub together can understand:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

By ‘establish,’ what is meant is establishment of a state religion. The Founding Fathers were well aware of the centuries of religious strife endured by Europe – and also colonists here – because of state-sponsored religion: Protestants on one side, Catholics on the other.

They wished to avoid that being the fate of America.

It is as clear as the ringing of a church bell.

If the First Amendment is not clear enough, there is plenty of additional evidence in the form of letters and documents written by the Founding Fathers, especially Thomas Jefferson and his close friend and colleague, James Madison, the guy known as the “Father of the Constitution.” These documents explain to the dimmer among us their intentions.

Let’s just say it: It is virtually impossible for anyone to be anything but willfully ignorant of the First Amendment’s purpose.

Republicans like to play dumb. They say the First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion only to Christians. They like to pretend the First Amendment actually ESTABLISHES Christianity as a state religion even though it clearly forbids such establishment.

Or like Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, pretend that it doesn’t forbid that establishment:

I think the main fight is to dissuade Americans from what the secularists are trying to persuade them to be true: that the separation of church and state means that the government cannot favor religion over non-religion.

Right. We are only trying to convince you of what the First Amendment actually DOES say. So sue us.

Scalia wants to stop us from “forcing” Republicans to obey the Constitution. And yes, he came right out and said it:

“I think we have to fight that tendency of the secularists to impose it on all of us through the Constitution.”

Well, that’s sort of what the Constitution does, doesn’t it? It is ONLY the law of the land, after all.

If you parse this, you realize two things:

  1. Scalia says the First Amendment does not ban the establishment of religion; and,
  2. The Constitution can’t force Republicans do obey the dictate of the First Amendment

What does this tell you about the intent of the Republican Party?

Let’s look at some more examples:

Iowa Republican Joni Ernst say that we don’t need Obamacare because people should be relying on their churches. Comments like this can only leave us shaking our heads in wonder:

We’re looking at Obamacare right now. Once we start with those benefits in January, how are we going to get people off of those? It’s exponentially harder to remove people once they’ve already been on those programs.

We have lost a reliance on not only our own families, but so much of what our churches and private organizations used to do. They used to have wonderful food pantries. They used to provide clothing for those that really needed it, but we have gotten away from that. Now we’re at a point where the government will just give away anything. We have to stop that.

Obviously – and again, this needs be said only to the dimmer-witted among us – if the churches were working as Ernst claims, Obamacare would never have been necessary in the first place. We would have all this time been receiving the healthcare we need.

There was nothing stopping the church from paying for its congregations’ medical care. They just never did it. And they’re not about to start now. They WILL pray for you, but that won’t cure your cancer or replace your heart valve.

And then – talking about the dim-witted among us – there is Georgia Republican Jody Hice, who earlier this month asked who could possibly be offended by school-sponsored (in other words, government-sponsored) prayer?

Oh, I don’t know, anyone who can actually read the First Amendment?

Hice’s new “Big Idea” is that state-sponsored religion will put an end to government tyranny. Yes, religious tyranny will put an end to government tyranny. Let’s make this clear: Government-sponsored religious tyranny is preferable to simple old fashioned government tyranny.

To be in the midst of a fight against secularists who are trying to impose on all of us that it is unconstitutional to acknowledge God and to honor God, the secularists want to tell us that that’s unconstitutional. And Scalia is arguing that not only is that, in fact, constitutional, but it is in the best interests of who we are.

One of the biggest dangers that we are facing today, is judges who think that the Constitution is some sort of living document that changes with the times.

Hmmm…what was it James Madison said again? Oh yeah:

What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; on many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people.

And Jefferson said, in a September 23, 1800 letter to Benjamin Rush:

They [the clergy] believe that any portion of power confided to me, will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. And they believe rightly; for I have sworn upon the altar of god, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. But this is all they have to fear from me: and enough, too, in their opinion.

Of course, nobody has said that it’s unconstitutional to “acknowledge and to honor God.” What the Constitution says is that it’s unconstitutional to force everybody else to “acknowledge and to honor God.”

There is a huge difference between the two, obviously, one the Constitution makes clear enough for anyone but an idiot to understand.

Another willful dimwit is Peter LaBarbera, who said yesterday that America must “return to a basic law, a Christian oriented law that does not try to grant civil rights status to a sin, which is homosexuality.”

This is pretty much in keeping with the views of Maryland secessionist Michael Peroutka, who said Wednesday that,

If you believe that you are God, as government has proved over and over again that it believes it is…you don’t want there to be another God, you don’t want anybody to have an allegiance to the one true and living God, the God of the Bible whose son is Jesus Christ, because if that exists it is the enemy of your own idolatry.

As you can see, this willful ignorance of the United States Constitution and its First Amendment is pretty much across the board. We can go right to the Supreme Court to see this behavior in action in a very meaningful and dangerous way. American democracy, as established by the Constitution of the United States, hovers on the brink of destruction.

Contrary to Scalia’s assertion, the facts are all in the liberal camp. What Republicans are telling Americans is that freedom = tyranny, and that tyranny = freedom. I guess if you want to insist up is down and down is up, feel free to vote Republican. We liberals do believe in liberty and if you want to be Bobby Jindal-stupid, that is your Constitutional right.

It is the next thing to impossible to find a Republican candidate today who is not a religious extremist, and the examples given here are, rather than exceptions, the rule, in conservative politics.

Keep that fact in mind as you go to the polls. When you cast your ballot, you will be voting for more than simply a candidate. You will be voting for a democracy, or for a theocracy. This election could tell us which we will have.

View Comments

  • Thank you for this article. Plainly and simply put; perhaps too clear for those whose minds are clouded with blind faith and fantasy.

  • ...and substitute for Government-sponsored overreach the tyranny of a nest of ChristoVipers.

    Just what we need.
    A nest of hissing, snapping, slithering vipers calling the shots.

    Uh huh.
    Yes indeedie.

  • It's easy to see how right-wingers misinterpret the Constitution, all you have to do is listen to what they have to say about what is written in the buy-bull, they don't comprehend what is written in either of them.

  • ...There was nothing stopping the church from paying for its congregations’ medical care. They just never did it. And they’re not about to start now. They WILL pray for you, but..."

    But, if you don't make an effort to pray WITH THEM they won't help you either...they will heckle you to death!

    This is their behavior patter, their track record; it has nothing to do with any belief they pretend to mime.

    Suppose, in a "christian" run state, our infrastructure falls apart because it's against their "freedom" to fix bridges, etc., we all can look forward to many communities living in isolation.

    However, since they're "good christ-tans" they'd find a way to cross that river, in their church bus (paid for by tax payers)and bring those isolated people the "good news"...maybe a few out-dated can goods 'cause that's all they deserve due to the "act of gawd's wrath" clause that they'll pass as legislation.

    That's just one example of what we have to look forwa...

  • It's unconstitutional to keep Jodi Hice from honoring or acknowledging whichever sky giant he prefers. What the Constitution does is keep others from being forced to acknowledge or honor his preferred sky giant. He's got it backwards, most likely deliberately but he needs his self-flagellation to appeal to his base. They see what the Taliban has done for Islam and are angered they can't do the same here.

  • I am so sick and tired of these religious liars that I could choke. Religion is tyranny over your mind and soul based on a lie that there is "one true god(s)"

    Every religion has the one true and living god(s). For the love of might Joe Young, why dont people wake up, and see that religion is nothing more then a way to form your mind to give your money to make certain people rich? And to give certain people power who crave it? All based on the lie that you will go to some nasty place if you dont. The stupidity of this concept is alive in every day life. Dont bow down to your boss? Your gone. Dont bow down to your god, your in hell.

    And now people dont care if those people make your daily decisions for you while claiming the government wants to do that.

    Everyone, if you are in need go to the churches and suck the lifeblood out of them. Or rather see if they will help you. The odds are against you. They are too busy deciding who to let in

    • I've never understood why an omnipotent being needs people to worship and honor it. That smacks of low self-esteem more than power.

  • 'We’re looking at Obamacare right now. Once we start with those benefits in January, how are we going to get people off of those?'

    I hear this crap all the time. What free benefits are we getting with Obamacare? Instead of paying $12,000 for health insurance in case we get sick, we are paying now $9,000 a year in case we get sick. Now at least everyone is paying something.

    I just get bent out of shape when all these government parasites talk about all these free entitlements that we've been paying since we were all 16 like unemployment, social security and health care insurance - it's called compensation.

    I wish that people weren't so racist that they have to lie all the time (because that is part of it).

    Don't vote in any more pathological liars like Ted Cruz, Corbett, Abbott, Palin, Ernst, Hice, Walker, Scott and McConnell, Ryan who just want to fill their pockets by doing the biddings of the super rich 1%. They don't follow Christ's teachings.

  • The word "god" appears in the Constitution exactly zero times.

    We. Are. A. Secular. Republic.

    Joel Osteen lives in an $11 million mansion...

    John Hagee lives on a huge ranch with multiple houses, a private airstrip and private planes...

    Does THAT explain what this is really all about?

    Cui Bono

    It has NOTHING to do with religion
    It has NOTHING to do with rights

    It has EVERYTHING to do with money and power

  • Every Democrat needs to vote! These home grown teahadist have all lost their minds and we all MUST vote America back because we are better than them. Vote Blue ~ and I love my children.

Recent Posts

Trump Takes Fifth Amendment Throughout Deposition With New York Attorney General

Trump might have additional motivation to take the Fifth. He lies with such impunity that…

60 mins ago

MAGA World Believes Someone Important Flipped on Trump

Trump World is right to be paranoid about a flip. And when people are paranoid…

3 hours ago

Trevor Noah Absolutely Shreds GOP Hypocrites Defending Trump After FBI Raid

The Daily Show's Trevor Noah called the hypocrisy of Republicans who threw America under the…

12 hours ago

The DOJ Section Investigating Trump Document Theft Handles Espionage And Sabotage

The section of the DOJ that is investigating Trump's theft of classified documents handles national…

16 hours ago

FBI Seizes Rep. Scott Perry’s Cell Phone As The Heat Gets Turned Up On Alleged 1/6 Criminals

Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) said that the FBI seized his cell phone after agents had…

18 hours ago

1/6 Committee Members Are Investigating Trump Docs To Find Evidence Of Private Pardons

1/6 Committee members are investigating and looking for potential documents related to Trump and private…

18 hours ago