Obama Pushes Back Against Comcast and Verizon By Urging Strong FCC Action On Net Neutrality

obama net neutrality statement

In a strong statement, President Obama pushed back against the corporate takeover of the Internet by urging the FCC to implement the strongest rules to protect net neutrality.


The president said,

An open Internet is essential to the American economy, and increasingly to our very way of life. By lowering the cost of launching a new idea, igniting new political movements, and bringing communities closer together, it has been one of the most significant democratizing influences the world has ever known.

“Net neutrality” has been built into the fabric of the Internet since its creation — but it is also a principle that we cannot take for granted. We cannot allow Internet service providers (ISPs) to restrict the best access or to pick winners and losers in the online marketplace for services and ideas. That is why today, I am asking the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to answer the call of almost 4 million public comments, and implement the strongest possible rules to protect net neutrality.

When I was a candidate for this office, I made clear my commitment to a free and open Internet, and my commitment remains as strong as ever. Four years ago, the FCC tried to implement rules that would protect net neutrality with little to no impact on the telecommunications companies that make important investments in our economy. After the rules were challenged, the court reviewing the rules agreed with the FCC that net neutrality was essential for preserving an environment that encourages new investment in the network, new online services and content, and everything else that makes up the Internet as we now know it. Unfortunately, the court ultimately struck down the rules — not because it disagreed with the need to protect net neutrality, but because it believed the FCC had taken the wrong legal approach.

The FCC is an independent agency, and ultimately this decision is theirs alone. I believe the FCC should create a new set of rules protecting net neutrality and ensuring that neither the cable company nor the phone company will be able to act as a gatekeeper, restricting what you can do or see online. The rules I am asking for are simple, common-sense steps that reflect the Internet you and I use every day, and that some ISPs already observe. These bright-line rules include:

No blocking. If a consumer requests access to a website or service, and the content is legal, your ISP should not be permitted to block it. That way, every player — not just those commercially affiliated with an ISP — gets a fair shot at your business.

No throttling. Nor should ISPs be able to intentionally slow down some content or speed up others — through a process often called “throttling” — based on the type of service or your ISP’s preferences.

Increased transparency. The connection between consumers and ISPs — the so-called “last mile” — is not the only place some sites might get special treatment. So, I am also asking the FCC to make full use of the transparency authorities the court recently upheld, and if necessary to apply net neutrality rules to points of interconnection between the ISP and the rest of the Internet.

No paid prioritization. Simply put: No service should be stuck in a “slow lane” because it does not pay a fee. That kind of gatekeeping would undermine the level playing field essential to the Internet’s growth. So, as I have before, I am asking for an explicit ban on paid prioritization and any other restriction that has a similar effect.

If carefully designed, these rules should not create any undue burden for ISPs, and can have clear, monitored exceptions for reasonable network management and for specialized services such as dedicated, mission-critical networks serving a hospital. But combined, these rules mean everything for preserving the Internet’s openness.

So the time has come for the FCC to recognize that broadband service is of the same importance and must carry the same obligations as so many of the other vital services do. To do that, I believe the FCC should reclassify consumer broadband service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act — while at the same time forbearing from rate regulation and other provisions less relevant to broadband services. This is a basic acknowledgment of the services ISPs provide to American homes and businesses, and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure the network works for everyone — not just one or two companies.

The Internet has been one of the greatest gifts our economy — and our society — has ever known. The FCC was chartered to promote competition, innovation, and investment in our networks. In service of that mission, there is no higher calling than protecting an open, accessible, and free Internet. I thank the Commissioners for having served this cause with distinction and integrity, and I respectfully ask them to adopt the policies I have outlined here, to preserve this technology’s promise for today, and future generations to come.

The three corporations who have spent the most money trying to kill net neutrality are Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T. These companies want to destroy the very thing that makes the Internet so special. Without an open and free Internet, you probably would not be reading this website right now.

Republicans oppose net neutrality. They view regulations that promote an open Internet as government interference in the free market. As the president said, net neutrality allows open competition.

PoliticusUSA is a perfect example of why net neutrality is vital. This website began with no money. It was something that I started by myself with no cash. We had no venture capitalists giving us funding to start up. We had no backers or donors. It was just me. I couldn’t have bought access to the fast lane of the Internet. This website still has no donors or backers. We don’t take money from anyone. PoliticusUSA grew through years of hard work. Since the Internet was open to all, people were able to read our writing and the website has grown to what it is today.

We aren’t the kind of website that can afford to pay to be in the fast lane. Net neutrality is personal for us. President Obama was correct. An open and free Internet is the key to an informed democratic society. An open Internet is also vital to economic innovation.

The corporations already control the media. Tell them to keep their hands off of your Internet.

6 Replies to “Obama Pushes Back Against Comcast and Verizon By Urging Strong FCC Action On Net Neutrality”

  1. Of course Faux News will run the Headline of “Dictator Obama takes away freedom of speech in Liberal Nazi mandate” And we all know that Fox is were the cowardly weak minded on the right get their thoughts.

  2. I think this last election was an eloquent tribute to corporatized presstitution, a social disease that cannot be allowed to spread to the Internet.

  3. I imagine all the ISPs who oppose net neutrality (anti-corporate regulation of the internet) happen to have non competition clauses included within their contracts with local governments.

    Regulations against free market competition seems to be perfectly fine with the Republicans if it protects the big guys.

  4. Republicans oppose #NetNeutrality . They want to give special rights to big corporations who can afford to pay more by raising your prices. Thank you President Obama for taking a good stand on this. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.